Page 1 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva 30.10. - 01.11.2002 Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Status of Safety Analyses for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SNS Spallation Neutrino Source 1 SNS layout GeV proton linear accelerator Accumulator ring Main target Stripping foil.
Advertisements

Spallation Neutron SourceOak Ridge December 5-9, 2005 Impact of BL 13 NPDγ Experiment H 2 Target on SNS Safety Basis: I. Introduction II. USID III. Hazard.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen 5. Mai 2015PSI,5. Mai 2015PSI, Paul Scherrer Institut Polonium Evaporation Studies from Liquid Metal Spallation.
DEVELOPMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL SOURCE TERMS FOR NON-REACTOR ACCIDENTS Dale M. Petroff and Wendy C. Swygert Washington Safety Management Solutions.
Yoro TALL Santiago de Compostela (Spain) June 7 – 10, Second IP EUROTRANS Internal Training Course on Nuclear Data for Transmutation: status, needs.
Safety distances: comparison of the metodologies for their determination – M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi ICHS San Francisco, USA - September SAFETY.
Safety at ESS. Thomas Hansson Nuclear Safety Engineer at ESS, since November 2011 Experience from Swedish Nuclear Power Plants since 1991 (Mainly Fuel.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Two Tube Failure Event for the Helium Cooled Blanket Lee Cadwallader and Brad Merrill INEEL Fusion.
May 22nd & 23rd 2007 Stockholm EUROTRANS: WP 1.5 Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
Fusion Power Plant Licensing and Waste Management by Antonio Natalizio for Presentation at the 9 th Course on Technology of Fusion Reactors at Erice (Monastero.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – Safety approach Madrid, November Sophie EHSTER.
Overview of radioactivity vs. chemical toxicity issues for Overview of radioactivity vs. chemical toxicity issues for potential target materials presented.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Stockholm, May Sophie.
ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 U. Wisconsin, Madison Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
Safety assessment for Safety assessment for potential target materials: radioactivity vs. chemical toxicity presented by: Susana Reyes ARIES Group Meeting.
Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing (ME592) Date: March 10, 2000 Slide:1 Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing Class 3: Hazard.
Oxidation of Graphite Walls: Preliminary Results from SOMBRERO Safety Analysis S. Reyes, J. F. Latkowski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Laser IFE.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Safety Procedures in the Chemical Industry Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December 2013.
EURISOL DS Target Meeting, CERN, CHY.KADIMarch 10-11, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET 1st year planning Y. Kadi (AB/ATB) European Organization.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1 Agenda Kick Off Meeting of the contract EFDA-ENEA 05/ Task TW5-SEA 4.2 “Update Failure Mode and Effect.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
Completion of Water-Cooled Backup Study Eric Pitcher TAC-10 November 5, 2014.
128 May 2013 CENF Near Far Integration For the Safety Folder + Environmental impact Study Simple process: Identify Safety issues >> description >> risk.
San Diego Workshop, 11 September 2003 Results of the European Power Plant Conceptual Study Presented by Ian Cook on behalf of David Maisonnier (Project.
LIEBE project Safety aspects of the Pb/Bi loop target LIEBE meeting report – WP5A. Marchix19/09/2013 Thanks to : AP. Bernardes/EN/STI, J.Blaha/DGS-RP,
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
The Status of ESS Accelerator Shielding and Accident Scenarios Lali Tchelidze May 26, 2014.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Solid Targets for Neutron Spallation Sources Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented to: AHIPA Workshop October 20, 2009.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Management System Part II: Inventory of Radiation Sources – Regulatory Authority Information System (RAIS)
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
 B&H authorities, in 1998, established Radioactive Waste Storage Facility in order to accommodate for a relatively long term period the disused sealed.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
HTS Tl-based coatings for FCC beam screens - Radiation Protection Aspects - Markus WIDORSKI, DGS-RP Information on ActiWiz: Courtesy of Chris Theis, DGS-RP.
NToF - Radiation Protection M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, E. Lebbos, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
Oxygen Potential in High Burnup LWR Fuel using Themochimica in MOOSE/BISON Theodore M. Besmann.
WP2 progress on safety E. Baussan EUROnu CB Meeting Monday 10th & Tuesday 11th June 2011 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Low Power and Shutdown PSA IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.
Characterization of the nTOF Radioactive Waste M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop R. Casey Activation Issues for NSLS-II March 28, 2007.
Helium Purification Håkan Carlsson WP Manager Fluid Systems Per Nilsson, Leif Emås 1 April 2015.
Status and Plans for the Target Safety System Linda R. Coney Group Leader – Target Safety and Controls April 1-2, 2015.
ESS Target Station Hazards Analysis and Safety Classification Process Linda R. Coney European Spallation Source (ESS) HPTW
LIEBE Target Design Review. Schedule This comment is no longer valid as the schedule has been postponed and the beam permit will be requested for Q
Peter Thirolf, WP5/Subtask B EURISOL-DS Town-Meeting, Caen, Status of Radioactivity Control, Status of Radioactivity Control, Safety and Risk.
EURISOL DS Task meeting Orsay, 07 Janvier Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
Safety & Radioprotection 8 Jul. 2005, Liverpool, UK WP 5: Safety & Radioprotection Participants:role 1. GANIL, France - sub-task D 2.
Complementarity of deterministic and probabilistic approaches
Sandia National Laboratories
Quantitative Risk Assessment
Radioactive material within the body
ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCE OF POTENTIAL MAJOR ACCIDENTS
M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi. Università di Pisa
ESS Per Nilsson CFD Specialist
Status of AA3, AA1 and AA2 (In order of maturity)
F. Schartmann, S. Thierfeldt Brenk Systemplanung GmbH, Aachen
Preliminary Hazard Analysis of Bunker
RSFs & categorisation 20 May, 2019.
ESS Target Station Radiation Safety Accident Analyses
Radiation Safety Analysis and radiation safety functions classification Different approaches for Public and Workers ESHAC meeting 11 April
Radiation Safety External hazards & antagonistic threats
Mikael Olsson Control Engineer
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Status of Safety Analyses for the ESS Target R.Moormann, R.Bongartz, W.Kühnlein, J.Marx, H.Schaal, K.Verfondern (FZJ) P.Berkvens (ESRF), P.Wright (RAL)

Page 2 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Artist‘s view of the ESS Facility

Page 3 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Main parameters

Page 4 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Scheme of ESS target and of mercury circuit (15 t Hg, max. operation temperature: 250°C, max. temperature increase by decay heat: 35 °C) yellow =target block, red = mercury Proton beam

Page 5 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ -The target is the only component in Spallation Sources, which requires detailed accident analyses: accidents, harming the public, are imaginable only for the target due to its substantial radiotoxic and chemical toxic inventory. Other components (accelerators etc.) need safety considerations for normal operation/- abnormal events only. The preliminary safety analysis report (PSAR including updates) for the SNS target is under review with respect to its applicability for ESS

Page 6 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Short description of PSAR Procedure of PSAR (preliminary safety analysis report) : -screening of possible events -rough estimation of consequences and frequencies (limited credit on safety measures = ‘unmitigated’ estimations) -identification of relevant accidents by ‘risk binning’; (risk = dose * frequency) -cut off criteria: low frequencies (< 1.e-6/a) and low consequences (< 1 mSv)

Page 7 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ -more detailed estimation of source term and consequences for relevant accidents (‘unmitigated’ estimations) -in case of transgression of dose limits: repetition of source term/consequence/- frequency estimations assuming additional ‘mitigating’ safety measures -stepwise increase of accuracy, until dose limits are met (advantage: reduction of effort, identification of really important safety measures)

Page 8 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Relevant accidents identified: Fire within the target building Hydrogen/moderator explosion with and without subsequent fire Loss of confinement (Leak in the target circuit) –[Loss of mercury flow] –[Loss of heat sink] [Target hull heat-up by misadjusted proton beam] Earthquake followed by explosion with and without following fire Crane drop accident

Page 9 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Safety work at ESS Main results of PSAR/SNS review are: - PSAR/SNS is a valuable basis for ESS safety work - Additional accident to be considered in case of a Be-reflector: Be-reflector fire - European conditions require a more detailed safety analysis than performed within PSAR/SNS for the following reasons:

Page 10 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ larger ESS radioactive inventory smaller distance ESS – receptor conservative consequence model for ESS required, not a realistic one as for SNS consideration of ingestion pathway for ESS accidents required (contrast to SNS) lower dba dose limits in EU: effective dose/dba: 50 mSv in D 250 mSv for SNS

Page 11 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Safety relevant nuclides in mercury target:

Page 12 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Note: Long lived actinides are not found in spallation sources Comparison of activities in LWR and ESS

Page 13 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Conclusion on comparison of inventories: Determination of spallation yield for long-lived nuclides (Hg-194, Gd-148) is of particular relevance: ESS will perform evaluation of Hg irradiation experiments of ORNL, performed at SINQ Even for individual short lived nuclides the spallation yield is fairly uncertain (which is compensated by the large number of nuclides). Accordingly, short term Hg irradiation experiments are advisable

Page 14 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Comparison of radiotoxicity and chemical toxicity of mercury Comparison is problematic, because only incorporation effects are comparable Comparison for toxicity by inhalation between the total inactive Hg-inventory and the inventory of one individual nuclide (Hg-197) reveals, that the chemical toxicity is about a factor of higher than the radiotoxicity of Hg-197

Page 15 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Nevertheless, due to strong ground shine (Hg-194) and due to the large number of other radiotoxic nuclides, we expect, that radiotoxicity dominates the overall toxicity. Chemical toxicity may however not be neglected.

Page 16 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Loss of confinement accidents 1.Probabilistic and system studies Relevant ESS dba A = anticipated within ESS lifetime U = unlikely

Page 17 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ 2. Deterministic examinations Hg/H-3 thermochemistry has to be examined JSNS work indicated, that mercury iodides (lower volatility than I 2 ) may be formed: - PSAR/SNS assumes a pronounced iodine release in loss of confinement accidents, because the chemical status of iodine is considered as elemental (high volatile). Resulting emissions are too high for ESS conditions. - Thermochemical calculations (using ORNL-code SOLGASMIX-PV) at ESS quantified the chemical composition. Validation will be performed.

Page 18 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Equilibrium composition of an Hg/I and of an Hg/I/Fe system Results of SOLGASMIX-PV

Page 19 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ Additional target and moderator safety work Other accident classes in examination for ESS (probabilistic, system, source term and dose studies) are: External events (earthquake, fire, airplane crash..) Internal explosions

Page 20 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ CFD (CFX-Code): calculations on distribution of moderator within target cell/- building in accidents (burnable gas mixtures etc.): Leak in H 2 -pipe with spontaneous evaporation 1.5 kg of H 2 released in 30 s Air ingress with 0.15 kg/s at 288 K CFD-calculations on particle (Hg-droplets) transport in case of accidents Examinations on moderator explosions

Page 21 SAFERIB I - CERN/Geneva Status of safety analyses for the ESS target Rainer Moormann, PES-FZJ General ESS safety work Decommissioning, final waste disposal Activity transport with ground water flow Consequence estimations for accidents using COSYMA model (planned) Selected design work for safety systems Shielding philosophy and design