KE6316 MD-11F SHA ACCIDENT 신 지 수신 지 수. General Information Date : 1999. 4. 15 Place : SHA Injury to Person : –8 (3 crews, 5 civilians) killed –4 seriously.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN C F I T
Advertisements

Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
Robert L. Swaim National Resource Specialist Aircraft Systems Engineering National Resource Specialist Aircraft Systems Engineering.
ONUR AIR OPERATIONS MANUAL PART-A PART-B PART-C PART-D.
1 LASER LIGHT ENCOUNTERS Several Florida West pilots have reported that the cockpit of their aircraft was illuminated by a laser light in the vicinity.
Pre-Solo Training Module
Short Field Takeoff & Landing
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
Accident Summary Cargo smoke warning during approach to PHL Smoke filled cockpit after landing Crew evacuated via slide at left forward (L1) door Major.
LOSING CONTROL of a Perfectly Good Airplane Janeen Kochan.
Gimli Glider Incident Investigation By Lee Xuan Hong.
Tailwinds Flying Club Fall Safety Session Know your airplane Piper Arrow III PA28R- 201T.
Aircraft Accident Investigation AST 425. Accident investigation Who is involved in an aircraft flight prior to an accident: Pilots Passengers ATC/FSS.
CAKE session no. 11 What is a major accident?. Feedbacks from last CAKE session Other activities we can arrange –Team buildings –Onshore seminars –Activities.
Steep Turns.
S-271 Helicopter Crewmember Slide 7D-1 Unit 7D Operational Safety - Lesson D: Parking Tender and Miscellaneous Roles and Responsibilities.
FAASTeam Welcome Today’s Presentation Instructor Professionalism Multi vs. Single Engine Flight instruction Similarities and Differences.
Maria Szonert Binienda, Esq. Public Hearing in the European Parliament Brussels, March 28, 2012 Smolensk Pattern Threatens International Aviation CRASH.
Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
Aviation Safety “ Can the Universities make a difference?” Ralph A’Harrah Strategy & Analysis Manager, Aviation Safety Office of Aerospace Technology December.
NTSB Part 830 AST 425. NTSB PART 830 Applies to the notification and reporting of: Incidents Accidents Certain other occurrences involving:
B757 Review Questions.
EATS Prague Engine Failure Training Pl. 1 Engine Failure Training Francis Fagegaltier Engine Failure Training Francis Fagegaltier.
SWA MEMORY ITEMS.
Pinch Hitters The Right Stuff for the Right Seat Flight Controls and Flight Instruments William J. Doyle, Jr., CFII, AGI, IGI, ASC
AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS WHY DO WE DO THIS? WHO SAYS SO?
A FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS GUIDE FOR SOLOING A STUDENT PILOT.
Prevention of Volcanic Ash Encounters in the Proximity Area Between Active Volcanoes and Heavy Air Traffic Routes Prevention of Volcanic Ash Encounters.
1 Runway Incursion Causal Analysis Section 3. 2 PILOTS and VEHICLE OPERATORS must taxi and maneuver their aircraft/vehicles on taxiways and runways in.
Downloaded from Teaching Stalls: Awareness / Recoveries.
Office of Aviation Safety US Airways Flight 1549 Ditching on the Hudson River January 15, 2009 Katherine Wilson, Ph.D. Human Performance Capt. David Helson.
Office of Aviation Safety Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701 Jefferson City, Missouri Lorenda Ward Investigator-in-Charge.
Office of Aviation Safety Canadair Challenger November 28, 2004 Montrose, Colorado.
TWA 800 Accident Overview Michael Collins Fuel Tank Safety Program Manager Transport Standards Staff, ANM-112 November 5, 2001.
National Transportation Safety Board Airplane Performance Daniel R. Bower, Ph.D. Airplane Performance Specialist Daniel R. Bower, Ph.D. Airplane Performance.
SHOW ME A PILOT THAT CAN’T PERFORM A GIVEN TASK, & I’LL SHOW YOU A PILOT THAT DOESN’T:
North Florida Flight Standards District Office
Presented to: By: Dennis H. Whitley Date: March 1, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration SOUTHERN REGION FAASTeam/Area 1 Approach and Landing Accidents.
EMBRAER – Safety Review Board Three Flags Test Point Execution Scale Proposal for Flight Test Risk Assessments.
Office of Aviation Safety Opening Remarks Joseph Sedor.
AIR & SPACE TRAVEL CONTINENTAL US FLIGHT OPERATIONS PROVIDE GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES PROVIDE FLIGHT PLANNING SUPPORT Request Flight Plan Request User.
Ex. 7 - Climbing Ex. 7 - Climbing.
Objectives Students will be able to:
Wing Safety Briefing April, April 08 NM Wing Safety Briefing CAP Sentinel Notes Aging Gracefully in CAP “Glass” Cockpit CAPSAFE Mishap Summary.
Lecture 7: Why Aircraft Needs to be Pressurized
“ A location on an aerodrome movement area with a history or potential risk of collision or runway incursion, and where heightened attention by pilots/drivers.
Dynamics of Pilot Training
By: Maya Valerio & Lauren Mariani. US Airways flight 1549 departed from La Guardia Airport. Complications occurred shortly after takeoff when both engines.
In-flight Fire and Crash
READY OR NOT THE FLIGHT REVIEW.
Applying Human Factors Principles Chapter 10 Section B Aeronautical Decision Making.
Part 117 Flight and Duty Limitations and Rest Requirements: Flightcrew Members.
Spinning. What are we trying to achieve: raise awareness of the seriousness of both Stalling and Spinning to investigate the effect of different modes.
Office of Aviation Safety Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701 Jefferson City, Missouri Operational Factors Captain David Tew.
AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION MOOC THE INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS ACCIDENT REPORTS.
Seminar On BLACK BOX Submitted To: Submitted By:
Flight Test Introduction 2016 Introduction to Flight Test Engineering Dan Hrehov Flight Test Engineer.
Comet aircraft Fatigue failure Group 6. Background  de Havilland –Jet powered aircraft –Comet became first commercial jet airliner  First prototype.
SOPs. Pinnacle Airlines Flt th Oct 2004 Objectives By the end of this session you will be able to:  Identify the factors that led to the loss.
© AIRBUS all rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. An Active Safety Net for Runway Overruns Presented by Logan JONES Airbus Flight Operations.
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
Aircraft instrument’s
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
Design Refining a design.
Kabul RNAV Visual & RNP-AR Process & Benefits
Human Factors Training
Situational Awareness
Grab their Attention with Active Learning!
Baghdad A300 Incident Discussion
Air Traffic Control the Netherlands
Presentation transcript:

KE6316 MD-11F SHA ACCIDENT 신 지 수신 지 수

General Information Date : Place : SHA Injury to Person : –8 (3 crews, 5 civilians) killed –4 seriously injured –36 minor injured Damage to Airplane : Hull Loss A/C Type: MD-11F Year Built: 1992 Flight Time: 28,347 hrs Flight Cycle: 4,463 Engine: PW4460 x 3

Conclusion of Accident Investigation CAAC/KCAB/NTSB joint investigation concluded the probable cause of the accident for: –Flight Crew’s failure of altitude awareness –Confusion between Meter & Feet unit in ATC instructed Altitude –Insufficient Pre-departure preparation

Findings No Indication of : (No finding actually) –In-flight Fire –In-flight breakage of airplane –System Failure –Failure in Cargo loading –Bomb or DG Explosion in flight –Engine Failure F/O’s wrong spoken word Lateral deviation of Instrument departure Dive to the ground from 4500 feet in 16 second Crew expressed difficulty in control

CAAC’s conclusion basically based upon: Wrong spoken word of altitude unit Stabilizer Trim moved toward AND Simulator (FSB in Long Beach) evaluation No Departure Briefing Not enough operational experience in SHA

Lack of Factual Evidences FDR loss Difficulty in defining position of flight control related items Difficulty in Corroboration No indication of system failure –No warning or alerts of system failure in CVR –No indication on the wreckage

Factual Evidence vs Situational Evidence Both requires : –Correlation –Corroboration –Correction –Ask 100 times “Why?” Stronger supporting facts needed for analysis by situation evidence Both must be feasible : “Make sense!”

Other View KAL analyzed different point of view: –Cockpit Noise Analysis including Engine Noise level –Flight Path Analysis –Focused on other clues

Other Important Clues Difficulty in Pitch Control Unidentified Noises Abrupt Nose up before Dive Contamination in Elevator control valve

Similar Incident or Accident worldwide FeDex crash land in Newark JAL pitch oscillation CAL abrupt pitch oscillation

Can human make that kind of control? Dive to crash from 4500ft in 16 second with max 20 degrees nose up to max 50 degrees nose down –Physical limitation of human –Engine Noise(Throttle movement) –Pilots’ call out –Continuous Trimming down(beginning time)

Investigation should be further reviewed CVR analysis A/C Stability & Pitch Control Negative-G load stall Engineering Simulation EMI(Electro-magnetic Interference) Flight Path analysis Reason of Lateral deviation

Administrational Litigation In Progress Cargo Operation continues currently. 감사합니다.