Securing Academic Rigor for Secondary Students RELEVANCE, RIGOR & EUREKA! NAGC, November 2007 Dr. Cecelia Boswell ©Dr. Cecelia Boswell, ACES, Austin Creek.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What do you know about the Rigor/Relevance framework?
Advertisements

Rigor/Relevance: Integrated Instruction & Student Engagement Liholiho Group Data Coaches & STEM RTs.
The 3 R’s IGOR ELEVENCE ELATIONSHIPS.
The Rigor and Relevance Framework: A lesson
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
The 21st Century Context for
School Board Workshop January 11, 2006 Rigorous and Relevant Questions/Assignments? Alison Adler and Rosemarie Backhus The Department of Safe Schools Secondary.
In Your Walkthroughs… Do You See Rigorous and Relevant Questions/Assignments? High School Learning Team Meeting October 26, 2005.
Rigor/Relevance/Relationships Working in Quadrant D.
Explore Asia at the Zoo Planning a unit of work around bamboo. Jennifer Brown-Omichi Project Officer National Asian Languages and Studies in Schools Program.
Department of Mathematics and Science
How to engage students through Rigor, Relevance & Relationships
SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
RIGOR AND RELEVANCE.
Creating Rigor and Relevance in Garden City Public Schools Refining Instruction and Assessment.
Rigor, Relevance, Relationships, & Results
1 Implementing the standards cannot simply mean informing teachers about what the designers of the standards intended or providing them with videos of.
Integrating Academic and Vocational Education. What is Academic Integration? Blending CTE skills and competencies with academic standards to bring relevance.
Principles of Assessment
1 1*. 2 After studying and practicing with the Rigor & Relevance Framework tools, teachers will be able to write lesson plans and develop learning experiences.
Where the Rubber Hits the Road – Next Generation Assessments Susan Gendron, Senior Fellow International Center for Leadership in Education October 3, 2011.
Common Core State Standards. What are Standards? They ensure that students are ready to be successful in school and in the workforce. They set the tone.
RIGOR, RELEVANCE, RELATIONSHIPS, & RESULTS Presented By: Kim Powell and Kim Dye November 10 th, 2012.
Scaffolding for Academic Language Use by Students Colleen Moore Senior Field Trainer University of Texas at Austin.
Teaching for Rigor and Relevance Why, What, How? Dr. Kelly Gillespie SWPRSC.
ALP and ICAP Say What?.
Career and Technology Education (CTE) in Maryland.
1. Read a description of a science experiment and list the necessary materials to perform the experiment. 2. Locate and read a current article on stem.
Central concepts:  Assessment can measure habits of mind or habits of recall.  Tests have their limits.  It is important to know the purpose the test.
The Revised CSOs Lou Maynus, WVDE. 21 st Century Learning Mission To grow the seeds of greatness in every child, teaching them to achieve to their fullest.
Rigor in the Classroom DECEMBER 11, Standards: 3. INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES: The teacher promotes student learning by using research-based instructional.
Project-Based Learning Training What is the problem with current education methods?
TEA Science Workshop #3 October 1, 2012 Kim Lott Utah State University.
Lesson Planning Collin College EDUC  Identify interests, TEKS  Brainstorm (What do you wonder or What would you like to know about) using a web.
“In years to come, your students may forget what you taught them
To Examine Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment.
At Oconomowoc High School.  Aims/Goals  Curriculum  Benefits  Cost  Preparation  Scheduling.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Engaging Students through Rigorous and Relevant Instruction.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
Implementing the Common Core State Standards The Role of the School Counselor.
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
International Center for Leadership in Education Common Core Rigor and Relevance.
Performance Task Overview Introduction This training module answers the following questions: –What is a performance task? –What is a Classroom Activity?
Nurturing Active, Deep, and Engaging Learning for Students of Color Tony Lamair Burks II, Ed.D. Superintendent-in-Residence National Center for Urban School.
Project Based Learning Summer Literacy Insititute.
Title Slide In the Murky Middle “In the Murky Middle: Assessing Critical Thinking and Integrative Learning Across the General Education/Major Divide” Dr.
Teaching for Rigor and Relevance Why, What, How? Dr. Kelly Gillespie SWPRSC.
Building in the Three R’s An Introduction to Rigor, Relevance, and Relationship Edited from a PLS presentation for Lenoir County Public Schools Presented.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Project Based Learning at Island View School Originally presented at the School District 8 Principals’ Meeting, January 19, 2011 by John Sheehan, Erin.
Classroom Management: Teaching for Rigor and Relevance.
Building a System-Wide Focus On Student Achievement Joe Shannon September 30, 2011.
 Acceleration  Complexity  Depth  Creativity.
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Rigor/Relevance For All Students Common CORE January, 2013
Computational Reasoning in High School Science and Math
Children’s Literature Across Curriculum
Grading AND Assessment IN THE MYP AT GWA
Performance Task Overview
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A for Mathematics
SEMS STEAM 2016.
Rigor and Relevance: A Must for 21st Century Learners
Rigor/Relevance Framework
September 1, 2013 Word Generation 1 P# 5-6
Planning a cross- curricular topic
Killeen ISD Mission and Vision Statement
Presentation transcript:

Securing Academic Rigor for Secondary Students RELEVANCE, RIGOR & EUREKA! NAGC, November 2007 Dr. Cecelia Boswell ©Dr. Cecelia Boswell, ACES, Austin Creek Education Systems

The Relationships, The Realities Texas Performance Standards Project Relevance Advanced Placement Rigor Independent Study EUREKA! ©2007, ACES

Relevance, Rigor, & Eureka! When curriculum is designed and organized according to a structure that integrates all levels of knowledge, learning occurs.

Relevance, Rigor, & Eureka! When curriculum is structured on students’ interests, relevance occurs.

Relevance, Rigor, & Eureka! When curriculum is structured to include analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, rigor occurs.

Relevance, Rigor, & Eureka! When knowledge within the curriculum is structured and realized, EUREKA! occurs.

The Relationships RELEVANCE RIGOR EUREKA! ©2007, ACES

Rigor & Relevance Dr. Willard Daggett ©2007, ACES QUADRANT C Assimilation QUADRANT D Adaptation QUADRANT A Acquisition QUADRANT B Application

Rigor & Relevance Dr. Willard Daggett ©2007, ACES QUADRANT C 1 Content Analysis Synthesis Evaluation QUADRANT D Interdisciplinary Analysis Synthesis Evaluation QUADRANT A 1 Content Knowledge Comprehension Application QUADRANT A More than 1 Content Knowledge Comprehension Application

QUADRANT A Acquisition Students gather and store bits of knowledge and information. Students are primarily expected to remember or understand this knowledge. Knowledge, Comprehension, Application

QUDARANT A EXAMPLES: Memorize names of planets in solar system. Illustrate parts of a cell. ©2007, ACES

QUADRANT B Application Knowledge, Comprehension, Application Apply knowledge across disciplines Apply knowledge to real-world predictable and unpredictable situations

QUADRANT B EXAMPLES: Create a class book about the animal and plant life in local rivers. Develop an acid test and sample rainwater for acidity. ©2007, ACES

QUADRANT C Assimilation Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluation Knowledge in one discipline Apply knowledge in one discipline Advanced Placement

QUADRANT C EXAMPLE: Write and illustrate biographies of inventors. Research an endangered species. ©2007, ACES

QUADRANT D Adaptation Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluation Students have the competence to think in complex ways and to apply their knowledge and skills. Even when confronted with perplexing unknowns, students are able to use extensive knowledge and skill to create solutions and take action that further develops their skills and knowledge.

QUADRANT D: Adaptation Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluation Apply knowledge across disciplines Apply knowledge to real-world predictable and unpredictable situations

QUADRANT D EXAMPLE: Design a candy dispenser that works without gravity. Design a zoo. ©2007, ACES

RELEVANCE Quadrant D Daggett’s Rigor/Relevance Not necessarily ©2007, ACES

RIGOR Quadrant C and D Daggett’s Rigor/Relevance Maybe ©2007, ACES

EUREKA! Daggett’s Rigor/Relevance Quadrant D Evaluation Rubrics Authentic Audience: No ©2007, ACES

Texas Performance Standards Project (TPSP) Independent Study ©2007, ACES

TPSP: SAMPLE TASKS SECONDARY Mathematics Figure It Out! is a mathematics unit that allows students to explore the uses of statistics in everyday life. Though a mathematics unit, Figure It Out! teaches students skills in the other subject areas of English language arts, science, and social studies. ©2007, ACES

SAMPLE TASKS Phase I. Learning Experiences This unit gives students an opportunity to develop survey research skills. Students identify an issue to investigate using survey research. ©2007, ACES

SAMPLE TASKS They identify the issue, design a survey tool for collecting the data, analyze the data, and draw conclusions in an article that is written for an actual publication (school newspaper, community newspaper (letter to the editor), teen magazine, online journal). ©2007, ACES

SAMPLE TASKS Phase II. Final Product Write an article that summarizes the results of the survey. Use graphs, tables, and other graphic organizers to illustrate your results and conclusions. Submit the results to a publication. ©2007, ACES

SAMPLE TASKS Develop a brief, formal presentation, with notes, to share the results of your survey with the class. Audio tape or videotape the presentation. ©2007, ACES

RELEVANCE Quadrant D Texas Performance Standards Project Independent Study SAMPLE TASKS ©2007, ACES

RIGOR Quadrants C and D Texas Performance Standards Project SAMPLE TASKS Independent Study ©2007, ACES

EUREKA! Quadrant D Texas Performance Standards Project With use of Scoring Dimensions and Rubric ©2007, ACES

EUREKA! DAGGETT Evaluation Rubrics TPSP Scoring Dimensions and Rubric Curriculum Circle Relevance, Rigor, and EUREKA! ©2007, ACES

Relevance, Rigor, & EUREKA! Circular Curriculum ??? ©2007, ACES

SECTOR 1 Themes, Issues, Problems Themes, Issues, Problems

SECTOR 1 Concept and Generalization Concept and Generalization

SECTOR 1 THINKING SECTOR Thinking about Scenario, Concept, and Product. THINKING SECTOR Thinking about Scenario, Concept, and Product.

SECTOR 1 HEROES Scenario Theme Generalization HEROES Scenario Theme Generalization

SECTOR 2 Factual Knowledge

SECTOR 2 TEKS, Standards, Scope & Sequence

SECTOR 3 Expanded Factual Knowledge

Sector 3 This step is called Expanded Factual Knowledge. The term refers to knowledge and application expanded in students’ complex analysis and synthesis of the content.

Sector 3 Activities are designed to teach students how to critically and creatively solve problems; in this case, how to determine their course of action in order to create the the product.

Sector 3 Pre ASSESSMENT In what ways can students be formally and informally assessed BEFORE activities for this sector?

SECTOR 3 Creating and Working Sector

SECTOR 3 Pre Assessment, Best Practices

SECTOR 3 Best Practices: Activities, e.g., Depth & Complexity, CPS, etc.

SECTOR 3 Best Practices: Development of product

SECTOR 4 Evaluation and Presentation Sector Includes Authentic Audience Evaluation and Presentation Sector Includes Authentic Audience

SECTOR 4 Embedded Factual Knowledge Validation or Invalidation: Embedded Factual Knowledge in the product

SECTOR 4 Rubric and “practice run” to validate or invalidate their work.

Circular Curriculum SECTOR 4 SECTOR 1 EMBEDDED FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE THEME, ISSUES, Rubric PROBLEMS Validation/Invalidation SECTOR 3 SECTOR 2 EXPANDED FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE Best PracticesTEKS, CPSStandards, Depth & ComplexityScope & Sequence Product DevelopmentResearch Skills

Circular Curriculum: HEROES SECTOR 4 SECTOR 1 EMBEDDED FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE Relationships Rubricmay be natural, Presentationforced, or chosen Validation/Invalidation HEROES Scenario SECTOR 3 SECTOR 2 EXPANDED FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE Pre-Assessment TEKS, Depth & Complexity Scope & Sequence, Standards, Research Skills Independent Study

ACES Circular Curriculum Relationship between Advanced Placement and Circular Curriculum ©2007, ACES

SECTOR 1 AP Exam Individual Teachers’ curricula Hooks???? AP Exam Individual Teachers’ curricula Hooks????

SECTOR 2 Factual Knowledge State Standards, Scope & Sequence, AP Objectives

SECTOR 3:Expanded Factual Knowledge Pre Assessment? Up to the teacher Best Practice? AP designed for all students Independent Study? Left to individual teachers

SECTOR 4 AP Exam Authentic Audience??? AP Exam Authentic Audience???

ACES Circular Curriculum Relationship between TPSP and Circular Curriculum Sample Tasks ©2007, ACES

SECTOR 1 No T I P, but can apply Concept & Generalization Product Relevance No T I P, but can apply Concept & Generalization Product Relevance

SECTOR 2 Factual Knowledge State Standards, Scope & Sequence

SECTOR 3:Expanded Factual Knowledge Pre Assessment? NoBest Practice? Yes Independent Study? Maybe

SECTOR 4 Scoring Dimensions, Scoring Criteria, and Scoring Scale Authentic Audience Scoring Dimensions, Scoring Criteria, and Scoring Scale Authentic Audience

Circular Curriculum Relationship between Gifted Education and ACES Circular Curriculum ©2007, ACES

SECTOR 1 T I P Product Relevance T I P Product Relevance

SECTOR 2 Factual Knowledge State Standards, Scope & Sequence

SECTOR 3:Expanded Factual Knowledge Pre Assessment? Yes Best Practice? Yes Independent Study? Yes

SECTOR 4 Rubric for Evaluation Authentic Learning and Presentation for EUREKA! Rubric for Evaluation Authentic Learning and Presentation for EUREKA!

Don’t’ forget SO WHAT??? ©2007, ACES

AND SO, … ACES Curricular Curriculum Relationship to Relevance, Rigor, & EUREKA! ??? ©2007, ACES

AND SO, … ACES Curricular Curriculum Is easily adaptable to any curriculum ©2007, ACES

AND SO, … ACES Curricular Curriculum Posits a form that helps visualize and realize relevant, authentic learning, rigorous study for students, and EUREKA! moments for real learning. ©2007, ACES

AND SO, … ACES Curricular Curriculum Ensures Relevance, Rigor, & EUREKA! ©2007, ACES

Austin Creek Education Systems ACES Curricular Curriculum Relevance, Rigor, & EUREKA! ©2007, ACES

REFERENCES Texas Performance Standards Project (TPSP) Texas Education Agency Daggett’s Rigor and Relevance International Center for Leadership in Education ACES Circular Curriculum ACES ©2007, ACES

ACES Circular Curriculum Available June 2007 Includes o Chapters on background and rationale o References o Sample curriculum K-12 ©2007, ACES

ACES Circular Curriculum Available June 2007 Contact ACES at ©2007, ACES