Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, 2012 1 Isiah Leggett Montgomery County Executive Arthur Holmes, Jr. Director Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIGER PROGRAM LESSONS LEARNED Great PA/NJ Regional Trail Projects Presentation to the Circuit Coalition May 15, 2014 Chris Stanford, P.E., PTOE, PMP Michael.
Advertisements

Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011 P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition.
What is the S-48 Corridor? Study Area What’s Happened So Far? Previous Tasks  Project InitiationJune 2005  Existing ConditionsOct  Planning.
Maryland Transportation Builders and Materials Association November 20, 2013.
Maryland Avenue and Arkwright Street Nick Fischer, EIT Ramsey County Jerry Auge, PE Project Manager Ramsey.
Maryland Avenue and Arkwright Street Jerry Auge, PE Project Manager Ramsey County April 2, 2013.
Maryland Avenue and Arkwright Street Jerry Auge, PE Project Manager Ramsey County June 25, 2013.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Alachua County BoCC Meeting November 8, Project Background and Location Study Purpose Study Activities Bridge Alternatives Evaluation Schedule.
U.S. 33 Northern Connector Alternative
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
Jan. 16, 208 CoW1 - Light Rail Transit Improving mobility Easing congestion Strengthening our communities Central Corridor Committee of the Whole January.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River ODOT Project DEF December 2, 2014 Stakeholder’s Meeting.
Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River ODOT Project DEF April 1, 2015 Stakeholder’s Meeting.
January 30, 2014 Luke Lortie, EIT Jerry Auge, PE
Public Location/Design Hearings November 17, 2010 Laughlin, Nevada November 18, 2010 Bullhead City, Arizona.
Maryland Avenue and Arkwright Street Jerry Auge, PE Project Manager Ramsey County
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
U.S. 31 at CR 400 South Roundabout Information Meeting December 18, 2013 Clifty Creek Elementary Columbus, Indiana.
I-65 Added Travel Lanes Project in Tippecanoe County
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Agency Scoping.
S.R. 144 Intersection Improvement and Road Reconstruction Project Tuesday, October 11, :30pm Presentation Neil A. Armstrong Elementary School 1000.
Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River ODOT Project DEF May 14, 2015 Public Meeting.
Public Involvement Meeting June 11,  Introduce the project  Provide history and current status of the project  Explain the benefits of the project.
NE 203 rd Street & NE 215 th Street Intersection Improvements between US 1 & West Dixie Highway Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Upcoming Project Development.
US 1 COLLEGE PARK – SEGMENT 1 FROM COLLEGE AVE/REGENTS DRIVE TO MD 193 (UNIVERSITY BLVD) Presentation to College Park City Council August 5,
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Page 1 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Cyrville Road Bridge Replacement at Highway 417 (Ottawa Queensway) Detail Design Study Group Work Project
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Alternatives Presentation.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
ROUNDABOUTS Improving Safety and Efficiency The Ohio Department of Transportation District Clark Ave. Ashland, OH Julie Cichello, P.E. District.
Rte 11, Canton Village PIN Village Board Meeting October 29 th, 2007 Project Information.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Town of Cobourg Division Street Improvements Public Information Centre October 1, 2015 Image Courtesy of Google 2015.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
S.R. 930 and Green Street Intersection Improvement Project Tuesday, May 22, :00 p.m. Presentation Park Hill Learning Center Auditorium New Haven,
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
Route 55: Lauer Rd –TSP & Access Management. Agenda  Welcome and Introductions  Workshop Purpose  Project Introduction & Background  Citizen Advisory.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
MD 97 (Georgia Avenue) at Randolph Road Purpose Improve vehicular, bicyclists and pedestrian safety Improve Levels of Service Increase capacity Improve.
U.S. 33 Road Reconstruction Goshen High School Auditorium 6 p.m. Wednesday, August 20, 2014.
April 18, 2013 Luke Lortie, EIT Jerry Auge, PE
Route 12B Safety Improvement Project New York State Department of Transportation Mark Silo, P.E. Thomas J. Madison, Jr. Regional DirectorCommissioner.
U.S. 20 Intersection Improvement Project at Waverly Road Porter Town Hall Thursday, August 13, 2015.
Project Briefing for BROOKS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY and SANTA ROSA SOUND ALTERNATE CROSSING STUDY April 2015 SPEAKER: BOB.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6:00pm Monday, October 1, 2012 South Grove Intermediate School Beech Grove, Indiana.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
BROOKS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY February 18, 2016 Project Briefing for Presenters: April Williams, P.E. (FDOT Project Manager) Steve Schnell, AICP (HDR.
Introductions U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Metro Parks Mayor’s Office Metro Council District Representatives HDR, Inc.
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study F ROM M ANDY L ANE TO T HOMAS D RIVE I NTERSECTION B AY C.
Visit Our Website at: Click to edit Master title style.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
The Central Avenue Connector Trail
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway
Bill Good Chief Operations Officer
I-66 Outside the Beltway Design Public Hearing Meetings November 13, 14 & Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of.
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Central Corridor - Light Rail Transit Metropolitan Council
S.R. 261 Intersection Improvement at Fruitwood Lane in Newburgh
U.S. 20 at State Road 2 New Interchange
White Flint North Entrance Feasibility Study
Proposed I-710 Early Action Project City of Huntington Park Slauson Avenue Capacity Enhancement Improvements I-710 TAC Meeting August 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, Isiah Leggett Montgomery County Executive Arthur Holmes, Jr. Director Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Engineering 100 Edison Park Drive 4th Floor Gaithersburg, MD Phone: Fax: Bruce Johnston, P.E. Division Chief Holger Serrano, P.E. Engineering Services Specialist Sogand Seirafi, P.E. Planning & Design Chief Tom Reise Property Acquisition Chief Girum Awoke, Ph.D., P.E. Construction Chief «« PUBLIC MEETING »» N Tuesday, April 10, :00PM – 9:00PM Sligo Middle School 1401 Dennis Avenue Silver Spring, MD Dennis Ave PROJECT SITE Georgia Ave Capital Beltway Forest Glen Rd Sligo Middle School M metro

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« PURPOSE OF PUBLIC MEETING »» Introduce project team Outline project purpose and need Share background data Present alternatives and draft concepts Explain project procedure and schedule Listen to community’s concerns and gather feedback

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, 2012 «« PURPOSE OF PROJECT »» To provide a grade separated pedestrian passageway across Georgia Avenue at Forest Glen Road for improved safety To provide direct access to Forest Glen Metro Station and improved ADA accessibility to the mezzanine of the Metro Station 3

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« NEED FOR PROJECT »» There is a need for improved pedestrian safety at the intersection and improved access to the Metro Station  Highly congested intersection  Frequent conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles  90% of pedestrians crossing Georgia Ave are to/from the Metro Station  No existing direct ADA access to the mezzanine of the Metro Station

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS »»

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« EXISTING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONDITION »» Highly congested intersection 80,000 vehicles/day Long signal cycle – 150 seconds Potential pedestrian delay ≈ 140 seconds Long delay encourages jaywalking

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« EXISTING PEDESTRIAN OPERATIONS »» Counts performed Tuesday, April 26, 2011 Significant crossings of all 4 legs of the intersection > 800 crossings of Georgia Avenue 90% of pedestrian activity is to/from Metro

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, 2012 «« ALIGNMENT OPTIONS »» 8

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, % of pedestrian traffic is related to Metro Preferred Alternatives should provide direct access to Metro «« PRELIMINARY EVALUATION »»

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« TUNNEL ALTERNATIVE 1 »» SOUTHEAST QUADRANT TO METRO STATION

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« TUNNEL ALTERNATIVES »»

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« TUNNEL ALTERNATIVE 2 »» NORTHEAST QUADRANT TO METRO STATION

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« BRIDGE ALTERNATIVE 1 »» SOUTHEAST QUADRANT TO METRO STATION

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« BRIDGE ALTERNATIVE 1 »» SOUTHEAST QUADRANT TO METRO STATION

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, Recommendation: (Note: A recommendation for a preferred alternative will be made after consultation with the project team, solicitation of public comment, and review by county officials.) «« ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON »» Tunnel Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Tunnel Alternative 2 (NE Quadrant to Metro) Bridge Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Length (Ft)  303  324  270 Width (Ft)  23 (18 Ft Clear)  12 (10 Ft Clear) Estimated Pedestrian Usage (Crossing MD 97/ Day)  759  461  683 Average Travel Time Savings (Sec/Pedestrian)  119  103  57 Construction Duration  39 months  15 months Maintenance of Traffic  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (3 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave.  Single overnight complete closure of Georgia Ave Properties Impacted  1 Property, 2200 Square Feet  1 Property, 4100 Square Feet  1 Property, 1500 Square Feet Utility Impacts  High - Underground, overhead, and traffic signal  Moderate - Overhead and traffic signal Construction Cost  $11.5M  $12.1M  $5.8M Tunnel Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Tunnel Alternative 2 (NE Quadrant to Metro) Bridge Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Length (Ft)  303  324  270 Width (Ft)  23 (18 Ft Clear)  12 (10 Ft Clear) Estimated Pedestrian Usage (Crossing MD 97/ Day)  759  461  683 Average Travel Time Savings (Sec/Pedestrian)  119  103  57 Construction Duration  39 months  15 months Maintenance of Traffic  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (3 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave.  Single overnight complete closure of Georgia Ave Properties Impacted  1 Property, 2200 Square Feet  1 Property, 4100 Square Feet  1 Property, 1500 Square Feet Utility Impacts  High - Underground, overhead, and traffic signal  Moderate - Overhead and traffic signal Construction Cost  $11.5M  $12.1M  $5.8M Tunnel Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Tunnel Alternative 2 (NE Quadrant to Metro) Bridge Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Length (Ft)  303  324  270 Width (Ft)  23 (18 Ft Clear)  12 (10 Ft Clear) Estimated Pedestrian Usage (Crossing MD 97/ Day)  759  461  683 Average Travel Time Savings (Sec/Pedestrian)  119  103  57 Construction Duration  39 months  15 months Maintenance of Traffic  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (3 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave.  Single overnight complete closure of Georgia Ave Properties Impacted  1 Property, 2200 Square Feet  1 Property, 4100 Square Feet  1 Property, 1500 Square Feet Utility Impacts  High - Underground, overhead, and traffic signal  Moderate - Overhead and traffic signal Construction Cost  $11.5M  $12.1M  $5.8M Tunnel Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Tunnel Alternative 2 (NE Quadrant to Metro) Bridge Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Length (Ft)  303  324  270 Width (Ft)  23 (18 Ft Clear)  12 (10 Ft Clear) Estimated Pedestrian Usage (Crossing MD 97/ Day)  759  461  683 Average Travel Time Savings (Sec/Pedestrian)  119  103  57 Construction Duration  39 months  15 months Maintenance of Traffic  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (3 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave.  Single overnight complete closure of Georgia Ave Properties Impacted  1 Property, 2200 Square Feet  1 Property, 4100 Square Feet  1 Property, 1500 Square Feet Utility Impacts  High - Underground, overhead, and traffic signal  Moderate - Overhead and traffic signal Construction Cost  $11.5M  $12.1M  $5.8M Tunnel Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Tunnel Alternative 2 (NE Quadrant to Metro) Bridge Alternative 1 (SE Quadrant to Metro) Length (Ft)  303  324  270 Width (Ft)  23 (18 Ft Clear)  12 (10 Ft Clear) Estimated Pedestrian Usage (Crossing MD 97/ Day)  759  461  683 Average Travel Time Savings (Sec/Pedestrian)  119  103  57 Construction Duration  39 months  15 months Maintenance of Traffic  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (18 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave and Forest Glen Rd  Partial Night Time Work (3 months)  Overnight Lane Closures to 2-3 Lanes on Georgia Ave.  Single overnight complete closure of Georgia Ave Properties Impacted  1 Property, 2200 Square Feet  1 Property, 4100 Square Feet  1 Property, 1500 Square Feet Utility Impacts  High - Underground, overhead, and traffic signal  Moderate - Overhead and traffic signal Construction Cost  $11.5M  $12.1M  $5.8M

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, 2012 Collect data; develop alternatives and draft concepts; and evaluate impacts and constructability Obtain public input Select recommended Preferred Alternative and refine concept. Obtain approval from the Director of DOT & County elected officials on Preferred Alternative and concept I. FEASIBILITY STUDY (Funded) Complete in Summer «« PROJECT PROCEDURE & SCHEDULE »» Obtain Federal Funds 1 ½ Years II. FINAL DESIGN (Funded) 3 ¼ Years (Tunnel) 1 ¼ Years (Bridge) III. CONSTRUCTION (Not Funded) WE ARE HERE

Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, «« OBtain Public INPUT »» Project Manager: Greg Hwang Mailing Address:Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Engineering 100 Edison Park Drive, 4th Floor Gaithersburg, Maryland Phone: Fax: Division of Transportation Engineering Home Page: Public Meeting on April 10, 2012 Comment Period thru April 24, 2012  By postage paid comment card  By mail or to Project Manager