Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 1 NML Cryomodule Quad Doublet Lattice Solutions  Question  Are quadrupoles required as part of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
Advertisements

USR-WS (Beijing) Oct. 30 – Nov. 1, 2012 K. Soutome (JASRI / SPring-8) on behalf of SPring-8 Upgrade Working Group Injection Scheme for the SPring-8 Upgrade.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
Design and Performance Expectation of ALPHA accelerator S.Y. Lee, IU 2/26/ Introduction 2. Possible CIS re-build and parameters 3. Issues in the.
Beam current4 A Beam pulse length1.5 ms Power input/structure 35 MW Ohmic losses (beam on)1.6 MW RF power to load (beam on) 0.4 MW RF-to-beam efficiency.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
~ gun3.9 GHz cavity Bunch compressor 3 ILC cryomodules 45 deg. spectro injector main linac user area disp. area transport line Overview of.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
1 Plan and Opportunities for Migration and Integration of the Photoinjector into New Muon Lab Mike Church AAC Review - 12/5/06.
Cavity status; recent KEK activities : Hayano (1)STF CM-1 cavities are; MHI MV/m for CM-1 ILC cryomodule (3-rd VT) MHI MV/m for.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
Cornell ERL-FFAG Lattice Using Dejan’s doublet arc cell September 2014Stephen Brooks, FFAG’141.
Preliminary Design of Electron Beam line F. Velotti, C. Bracco, B. Goddard and M. Meddahi.
Beam Optics of the TTF2 Nina Golubeva DESY. Beam optics from the BC2 up to the undulators General introduction to linear optics: – constraints for different.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Rings with 400 and 800 MHz RF Ring Cooler Meeting Oxford, Ms. March 11-12, 2004.
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
LTR for ILC e- (eLTR) RF section solenoid section.
CW Linac: Optics with Quads or Doublets. N. Perunov and N.Solyak Nov.6, 2009.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Some Aspects on Compton Scheme Positron Source Study Wanming Liu ANL Tsunehiko OMORI KEK.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Physics design on the main linac
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Electron Source Configuration
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Physics Design on Injector I
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Update on Alternative Design of jleic ion injector Complex B
XFEL Beam Dynamics Activity at CANDLE
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
CEPC injector beam dynamics
JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 1 NML Cryomodule Quad Doublet Lattice Solutions  Question  Are quadrupoles required as part of the cryomodule package?  Assumptions  29E-6 normalized emittance (blowup by CSR in chicane)  Injector kinetic energy = 46 MeV  6 cryomodules: 1 st = TTF no quads; 2 nd = TTF with quad doublet; 3 rd – 6 th = ILC with quad doublet  TTF-like quad doublets: 20 T/m, L=0.15 m  Physical aperture = ±17.5mm  Applied condition  Require minimum aperture of ±8 beam sigmas through cryomodules

Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 2 Allowed Initial Lattice Parameters: 31 MV/m, no quads For initial lattice parameters outside this region, the beam size violates the aperture requirement somewhere within the 6 cryomodules.

Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 3 Quad Doublet Solution: 31 MV/m CM2 quads: 6.8 T/m CM3 quads: 3.1 T/m CM4 quads: 4.3 T/m CM5 quads: 5.9 T/m CM6 quads: 7.6 T/m

Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 4 Allowed Initial Lattice Parameters: 16 MV/m, no quads For initial lattice parameters outside this region, the beam size violates the aperture requirement somewhere within the 6 cryomodules.

Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 5 Quad Doublet Solution: 16 MV/m CM2 quads: 1.3 T/m CM3 quads: 1.2 T/m CM4 quads: 1.8 T/m CM5 quads: 2.4 T/m CM6 quads: 3.2 T/m

Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 6 Summary Quadrupole doublets are required in most of the cryomodules to compensate RF focusing Quadrupole focusing strength of 20 T/m x.15 m is adequate; half that is probably adequate Initial lattice functions at entrance of 1 st cryomodule is a constraint on injector design