Ex ante-evaluation of Bulgaria-the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA CBC Programme 2014-2020 Joint Working Group, Sofia 21/08/2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Evaluation arrangements in Lithuania Neringa Jarmalavičiūtė, Evaluation Division, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
Ex Ante Evaluation of Latvian Cohesion Policy Operational Programme 2014–2020 Presentation at the Monitoring Committee 16 May 2013.
1 Jela Tvrdonova,  Strategic approach to rural development  Common approach to evaluation: legal background and CMEF  Monitoring and evaluation.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
BG MK IPA Cross-border Programme (CCI Number 2007CB16IPO007) This project is funded by the European Union This project is implemented by Project Planning.
INTERACT ENPI is a project funded by the European Union Summary of the Workshops
Ad hoc expert group meeting on draft templates and guidance for the Partnership Agreement and operational programmes under cohesion policy
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Technical Assistance Strategy Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Operational Programme Technical Meeting&Joint Approval Committee, Bucharest,
EU funds for South East Europe: IPA II Cross-border Cooperation Programme BULGARIA-SERBIA Sofia, 2015.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
EMFF Operational Programme EMFF programme: 6 main elements 1. Ex-ante conditionalities 2. Ex-ante evaluation 3. SWOT analysis & needs analysis.
Ex-ante evaluation for RDPs 4 th International Evaluation Conference Budapest, 26th September 2013 Zélie Peppiette, DG AGRI Rural Development.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
Evaluation of sector programmes and budget support operations in the context of EU development cooperation 1 st M&E Network Forum 07 to 08 November 2011.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
# 1 22-Oct-15 Management and Economics Interim Evaluation of Cross-Border Programmes between Candidate/Potential Candidate Countries (Intra-Western Balkan.
111 Synthesis of Questionnaires. Thematic concentration  Most of the new member states support the suggested principle while maintaining the element.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
IPA Funds Monitoring and Evaluation December Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Roma projects and policies, Brussels, 30/11/2010 Evaluating the European Social Fund support to Roma inclusion: processes,
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Indicators – intervention logic, differences ( vs programming period, ESF vs. ERDF) Piotr Wolski Marshall’s Office Zachodniopomorskie.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
W. Schiessl, AGRI E.II.4 Programme management and institutions involved in monitoring and evaluation.
Interreg Programmes Preliminary Conclusions May 2016.
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Operative Programmes Anita Gulam Ana Kovačević Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Republic of.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
Karelia ENPI CBC September the 6th 2011 St. Petersburg Document EG Chairs and ITAs 12/4.4/Info 1.
A project funded by the European UnionImplemented by a consortium led by Get ready for the call! Next steps for building partnerships and developing a.
Herman Smith United Nations Statistics Division
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
Project Cycle Management
Paul Casey Head of Research Monitoring and Evaluation
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
EU Funding in Western Balkan Countries
Outline What is governance and what does it comprise?
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
The Atlantic Forum Process and outcomes European Commission – DG MARE
EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
ESF evaluation partnership
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

Ex ante-evaluation of Bulgaria-the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA CBC Programme Joint Working Group, Sofia 21/08/2014

Ex-ante evaluation’s main phases and deliverables 2 Contract signature and kick- off meeting Inception Report Indicators Report Final Report 1° Draft Draft Final Report May 2014 Beginning of June 2014 End of June 2014 End of July 2014 May 2014

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)’s main phases and deliverables 3 Contract signature and kick- off meeting Inception Report Scoping Report Consultat ions on Scoping Report Environm ental Report May 2014 Beginning of June 2014 June 2014 July 2014 May 2014

Ex-ante evaluation as an iterative process 4 Managing Authority Programming team Joint Working Group Relevant stakeholders Ex-ante Evaluator Tight cooperation with programming authorities Timely feedbacks to fit cognitive needs Judgments and recommendations

Lessons learnt from programming:  Strategy is backed by a sound and well-grounded socio-economic analysis  Clear demarcation between spheres of interventions and between Priority axes to be ensured  A border region tourism strategy which outlines destinations and services for tourism development  Soft measures and investments are well balanced  Horizontal principles duly considered programming and will be developed during OP’s life-cycle  More tailored and accountable indicators, including methods for baseline and target values, also broken down in categories where possible Designing the Bulgaria-the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA CBC Programme Involvement of stakeholders:  Develop strategies and propose actions adhering to cross-border needs and demands  Strengthening a sense of collective ownership of Community Policies  Participatory pathway enabling a wide participation of cross-border stakeholders (Main steps: on-line surveys, Regional Consultative Forum, on-line consultations on Draft OP (versions 1.0 and 2.0)  Stakeholders informed about outcomes and tackling methods  On-line instruments and periodic events during Programme implementation

Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Programme strategy 1/2 6

Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Programme strategy 2/2 7

Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Horizontal principles 8 Programming phase  Horizontal principles duly taken into consideration in preparatory works and  Participatory pathway  Dialogue with the Ex ante Evaluator Programme implementation  Horizontal principles will be taken into account in the quality assessment for project selection  Monitor horizontal principles at programme and project level  Breakdown indicators (where possible)

Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Financial allocation 9 Financial weighting took into account lessons learned and needs assessment Financial allocation seems to be coherent, balanced and appropriate Financial breakdown per Priority is consistent with identified challenges and needs

Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Indicators, monitoring and evaluation 1/2 Baseline and target value  Programme specific result indicators’ baseline values established where possible on past experience and budget, others to be established through ad hoc surveys  Output indicators’ target values have been established paying attention to envisaged activities, past experience and budget allocation  Need for further clarification on methods for calculating targets  Definition of Strategic Projects (and related requirements, scope and budget) essential for fine tuning the targets Indicators  The choice of foreseeing one Result Indicator (RI) for each expected result is sharable, though they must prove not to be overambitious  The S.M.A.R.T. analysis proved result and output indicators’ suitability to monitor and verify Programme’s achievements. Nonetheless, some rooms 10

Collection of data and evaluation  The arrangements for the management and control system are explained in detail and are well structured, with a delimitation between institutional and procedural parts  More detailed/clearer criteria still need to be identified for selecting Strategic Projects Administrative capacity  The functions and responsibilities of the bodies in charge of the management system are in line with the regulatory framework and well described  The indicative list of members of the JMC identify which are the institutions and organizations which will take part in the work of this body, though it must be completed  These adjustments should lead to the simplification of the JMC  The Programme may involve advisory bodies in the work of the JMC Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Indicators, monitoring and evaluation 2/211

Ex-ante Evaluation’s main recommendations on Draft Final OP (version 3.2 – August 2014)12 Procedural improvement Clarify synergies between SOs related to competitiveness during the implementation Describe functions of JTS so as to enable its simplification Programme strategy Indicators, monitoring and evaluation Administrative capacity Lessons learnt from Using project forms to monitor implementation & cross cutting issues

Methodology  Iterative process with programming team and cooperation with Ex-ante Evaluator  Literary review of EC guidance documents and reports on the application of the SEA Directive as well as national specific legislation, manuals and guidelines developed by Bulgaria and Turkey  Analysis on Draft OP Objectives  Assessing possible impacts on the environment of the Bulgaria-Turkey IPA CBC Programme (Directive 2001/42/EC and national legislation), taking into account cross- border nature of proposed intervention  Providing a qualitative description on the positive and possible negative effects on the environment at SO level  Drawing recommendations to prevent and reduce and as fully as possible any significant adverse effects during the implementation the Programme Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)13 Main steps  Scoping Report  Consultations on Scoping Report (June 2014)  Draft Environmental Report  Consultations of the Draft of the Environmental Report (underway)  SEA (to be annexed to OP)

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Vincenzo Angrisani Virgilio Buscemi Francesca Solca Federico Benvenuti

LATTANZIO GROUP Head Office Via Nazionale, 89A – Roma (Italia) Tel – fax