MHSA FULL SERVICE PARTNERSHIP OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT INITIAL EVALUATION Performance Outcomes & Quality Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DDRS Health Homes Initiative: Meeting the Triple Aim through Care Coordination. Shane Spotts Director, Indiana Division of Rehabilitation Services May.
Advertisements

LeadManager™- Internet Marketing Lead Management Solution May, 2009.
Management Information Systems 2007 Understanding a Systems Approach to Sound Fiscal Management.
GALVESTON COUNTY, TX P-CARD TRAINING GALVESTON COUNTY.
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
NCTOPPS and Western Highlands Network North Carolina- Treatment Outcomes and Program Performance System February 2007.
ADDICTIONS AND MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Adult New Investment Quarterly Reports Wendy Chavez, MPA April 23, 2014 Developed By: Wendy Chavez, MPA Adult New.
Data Management and Analysis 1 Consumer Behavior Studies Plan Development and Assistance (Technical Advisory Group) SGIG/SGDP Build and Impact Metrics.
Health Insurance Oversight System (HIOS)
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
1 Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and FinancingColorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing The Case Manager’s Guide to Critical Incident.
How To Batch Register Your Students
What Did We Say We Were Going to Do? 1. Overview of Measurement and Change Paradigms 2. Audience Review and Discussion of Full Service Partnership Strategies.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation PARTICIPANT LEVEL INSTRUMENT (PLI)
ADDICTIONS AND MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Supported Employment Reporting and Data Sharing Wendy Chavez, MPA September 16, 2014 Developed By: Wendy Chavez,
Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.
Field Capable Clinical Services (FCCS) Outcomes
PRESENTATION TO THE MHSA PLANNING STAKEHOLDER STEERING COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 24, 2014 MHSA THREE-YEAR PROGRAM AND EXPENDITURE PLAN –
NAMS Account Activation Training. 2 What is NAMS? The NASA Account Management System is NASA’s centralized process for requesting and maintaining accounts.
HSRC February 10,  The target population for individual outcomes data collection is based on four age groupings as specified in the Community.
California Outcomes Measurement System – Treatment
Human Resources Administration Department of Social Services 1 Eligibility Data and Image Transfer System EDITS November 6, 2008.
Company: Account Requests FMCSA Portal Prioritization Phase I Release, December 2010 v1.4.
Lead Management Tool Partner User Guide March 15, 2013
California Statewide Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Projects Overview May 20, 2010.
How Can NRCS Clients Use the Conservation Client Gateway
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Using the HRSA EHB to Report 2009 Uniform Data System (UDS) Data “New Start” Grantee Technical Assistance Call December 15, 2009.
1 eWiSACWIS and Levels of Care Jónelle Brom, OHC Specialist Jenny Weber, eWiSACWIS
Incident Management PCCYFS June 27, 2007 Incident Management for the Office of Children, Youth and Families.
Welcome to the ER/CalWORKs Webinar! You should have a panel on the right of your screen that shows other attendees and has a box at the bottom to write.
August, 2013 This training was funded by the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC). Audio will begin shortly.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Behavioral Health DATA BOOK A quarterly reference to community mental health and substance abuse services Fiscal Year 2010 Quarter 2 March 30, 2010.
Presented by: Tracy Reynolds, Business Development Manager & Matt Scicchitano, Account Manager Presented by: Tracy Reynolds, Business Development Manager.
JENNIFER CLANCY, CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH FSP ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING FEBRUARY 14 TH, 2011.
REQUEST TEASE ACCESS INDICATOR 7 Steps to Request Access to Indicator 7 through TEASE (Texas Education Agency Secure Environment) Data Collection TEA.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
MHSA OMA Forms Overview Rev. 3/02/10. Child / Youth Ages 0-15 Child / Youth Ages 0-15 Transition Age Youth Ages Transition Age Youth Ages
1 April 21 – 23, 2004 Baltimore, Maryland John Arnaldi, Ph.D. Coordinator of Education USF Research Compliance Barry Bercu, M.D. Chair, USF Biomedical.
1 MHSA FULL SERVICE PARTNERSHIP OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT California Department of Mental Health Performance Outcomes & Quality Improvement
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
A Volunteer Supervisor’s Guide to Volunteer Connection a modern, online volunteer management solution.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda May 19, 2011 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update.
Independent Living Services and Outcomes Reporting Christine Lenske Beth Rudy.
MHSA OMA Forms Overview Rev. 6/12/2014. Objectives – FSP Forms Learn about the history of MHSA and Outcomes Learn about the 3 types of forms and how they.
Proposed Preliminary Statewide Full Service Partnership Classification System BASED ON STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK THIS REPORT IS THE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OVERSIGHT.
Data Coordinators Conference – 2014 Laura Marroquin CASEWORKER/JCMS Specialist Everything New Data Coordinators Should Know.
Georgia DFCS Performance-Based Contracting Online Reporting Requirements Overview Presenters: Catrecia Stokes, DHS, DFCS, OPUOM Dawn Reed, Care Solutions,
February 18, 2015 This webinar was funded by the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC).
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
National 4-H Common Measures Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA Jill Walahoski, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Provider Information Request (PIR) Staff Data Collection.
IIS Project and Contact Management Systems (CMS): An Efficient Comprehensive Management Approach to IIS Recruitment, Training and EHR Integration IIS Community.
Case Management Updates.  During the of week April 11, 2011, the ETO system experienced technical difficulties.  As of April 13, 2011, the errors have.
How Can NRCS Clients Use the Conservation Client Gateway
Behavioral Health DATA BOOK A quarterly reference to community mental health and substance abuse services Fiscal Year 2012  Quarter 2  April.
MHSA OMA Forms Overview
Mental Health Data Alliance, LLC (MHData) January 4th, 2018
Mental Health Data Alliance, LLC (MHData) June 7th , 2018
CSDR Submit-Review Website Submitter Guide
Arizona House Calls CareLink
MHSA OMA Forms Overview
Welcome Effective May 13, 2019 the following services will require an authorization through the KEPRO Atrezzo Portal: Code Modifier Description T1017 HF.
FSP DCR Training for Administrative Users
FSP DCR Training for Users
Presentation transcript:

MHSA FULL SERVICE PARTNERSHIP OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT INITIAL EVALUATION Performance Outcomes & Quality Improvement

Training Overview Background Context of the Initial Evaluation of Full Service Partners Full Service Partnership (FSP) Target Population Outcomes Assessment FSP Forms & Methodology FSP Data Submission to DMH Option 1: On-Line Data Entry Option 2: XML Data Submission Getting Data Back ITWS MHSA Certification & Authorization DMH Staff Contact Information

Context of the Initial Evaluation of Full Service Partners

Client and Services Tracking Individual Client Outcomes Tracking Monitoring / Quality Assurance / Oversight (multi- stakeholder process) Monitoring / Quality Assurance / Oversight (multi- stakeholder process) Staff / Provider Evaluation / Satisfaction with regard to mental health system Client / Family Satisfaction / Evaluation of Services and Supports PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT Mental Health Promotion, Mental Illness Prevention & Awareness Community Reaction / Evaluation / Satisfaction with regard to mental health system Large-Scale Community Indicators Mental Health System Structure / Capacity in Community PUBLIC / COMMUNITY- IMPACT LEVEL (Evaluation of Global Impacts and Community-Focused Strategies) MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM ACCOUNTABILITY LEVEL (Evaluation of Community Integrated Services and Supports – Program/System-Based Measurement) INDIVIDUAL CLIENT LEVEL (Evaluation of Community Integrated Services and Supports – Individual Client Tracking) Levels are not intended to be hierarchical. Each level is important for a comprehensive approach to performance measurement.

Target Population for the Initial Evaluation of Full Service Partners

Data Collection Target Population Full Service Partners within four age groupings, as described in the “Mental Health Services Act Community Services and Supports, Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan Requirements, Fiscal Years , , ”

MHSA Full Service Partnership Forms & Methodology

Child / Youth Ages 0-15 Child / Youth Ages 0-15 Transition Age Youth Ages Transition Age Youth Ages Adults Ages Adults Ages Older Adults Ages 60+ Older Adults Ages 60+ Separate forms developed for the age groupings specified in the MHSA Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan Requirements document

MHSA FULL SERVICE PARTNERSHIP FORMS The forms will gather: History/Baseline data: Partnership Assessment Form (PAF) – Completed ONCE, when partnership is established Follow-Up data: Key Event Tracking Form (KET) – Completed when change occurs in key areas Quarterly Assessment (3M) – Completed every 3 months

PARTNERSHIP ASSESSMENT FORM Completed ONCE, when a partnership is established. History and baseline data for the following areas:  Residential (includes hospitalization & incarceration)  Education  Employment  Sources of Financial Support  Legal Issues / Designations  Emergency Intervention  Health Status  Substance Abuse  ADL / IADL - Older Adults Only

KEY EVENT TRACKING FORM Completed every time there is a change in the following key areas:  Administrative Information  Residential (includes hospitalization and incarceration)  Education  Employment  Legal Issues / Designations  Emergency Intervention

Completed every 3 months to assess changes in: Education Sources of Financial Support Legal Issues / Designations Health Status Substance Abuse ADL / IADL – Older Adults Only QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT FORM

Partnership Assessment Form (PAF) Key Event Tracking (KET) Quarterly Assessment (3M) Administrative Information Residential (includes hospitalization & incarceration) Education Employment Sources of Financial Support Legal Issues / Designations Emergency Intervention Health Status Substance Abuse ADL / IADL - Older Adults Only Review: FORM DOMAINS

# Months in Services , etc. QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT 6 Partnership Assessment Form (PAF): Completed ONCE - when a partnership is established Quarterly Assessment Form (3M): Completed every 3 months KET due: Residential Move KET due: ER Visit KET due: Begins Work Key Event Tracking (KET): Completed each time a change takes place * * Timeline: Form Administration * KET due: Residential Move *

Recap: FORMS AVAILABLE FOR 4 AGE GROUPS: Child/Youth (ages 0-15) Transition Age Youth (ages 16-25) Adults (ages 26-59) Older Adults (ages 60+) 3 TYPES OF FORMS: Partnership Assessment Form - completed ONCE, when the partnership is established Key Event Tracking Form - completed EACH TIME THERE IS A CHANGE in a key event Quarterly Assessment Form - completed EVERY THREE MONTHS, starting from the date the partnership was established

Options for Submitting FSP Data to DMH

Getting Data to DMH Option 1: DMH On-Line Data Collection & Reporting (DCR) System County submits data directly to DMH using a DMH designed on-line, key-entry system. DMH maintains the data system and makes all updates. Option 2: Local System Data Reporting County collects data using their own technology. County submits data via XML (Extensible Markup Language). County is responsible for maintaining their own data system and making all updates.

DMH On-Line Data Collection & Reporting (DCR) System

Option 1: DMH DCR Phase 1: Available January 1, 2006 Allows data submission and batched data return Provides basic HTML interface with some error checking and validation functionality Phase 2: Available Summer 2006 Allows editing of submitted data Allows query and reporting capability Performs County Client Number verification against CSI data Provides real time data download capability Performs stringent data validations during data entry Provides user friendly interface Allows XML schema based integration Provides “tickler” mechanism to track when reviews/assessments are due

bmissa ******* Authorized user FIRST logs into system to access forms using a user-specific ID and password.

Select Systems > Mental Health Services Act (MHSA)

Select Functions > DCR eForms

Select a form for data entry.

A Partnership is being established. CLICK on the link for the Partnership Assessment Form

John Doe 5468 A497C

Medications Self-Help SUBMIT data entered on-line County Region

Click “OK”

If you want to enter a different form, CLICK on drop-down arrow To continue entering data for the same form type, CLICK here

Local System Data Reporting: XML Data Submission

Counties are responsible for ensuring that the most recent version of the DMH XML Schema Definition (XSD) is used to submit data Current versions of the XSD can be downloaded by authorized users from the DMH ITWS at DMH will work with counties on data submission timeframe. Ideally, data collected locally will be submitted to DMH on a nightly basis. XML Data Submission

Getting Data Back

GETTING DATA BACK Data available to authorized users via ITWS Data in XML format easily imported into Excel

DMH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY WEB SERVICES (ITWS) AUTHORIZATION

ITWS AUTHORIZATION The DMH ITWS will serve as the front-end security for both the DCR System and XML data reporting. DCR users (option 1) need ITWS authorization to access the DCR application Counties submitting data via XML (option2 ) need ITWS authorization to access the latest versions of the DMH XSD files and XML documents Each county has designated ITWS MHSA ‘Approvers’ that are appointed by the County Director ITWS MHSA ‘Approvers’ will be given MHSA IT Security Training on how to set up user roles, group assignments, etc. The ITWS MHSA ‘Approvers’ will be responsible for determining which county staff will have access to the ITWS

MHSA FSP Training Counties must receive Full Service Partnership Outcomes Assessment training in order to become “certified” to collect Full Service Partnership data and use the DCR System. Counties should contact DMH POQI Unit to schedule the training.

Contacting DMH Performance Outcomes and Quality Improvement Staff

DMH Performance Outcomes Contacts POQI Support: Candace Cross-Drew, Research Program Specialist Phone: (916) Traci Fujita, Research Program Specialist Phone: (916) Brenda Golladay, Research Program Specialist Phone: (916) Marti Johnson, Research Program Specialist Phone: (916) Kari Yoshizuka, Research Program Specialist Phone: (916) Alice Chen, Research Analyst Phone: (916) Minerva Reyes, Research Analyst Phone: (916) Stephanie Oprendek, Ph.D., Chief Phone: (916)