CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Small/ASAM Schools and PI Categorical Program Director’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Cathy George Academic Accountability.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations & Implications for California’s Accountability System Robert Linquanti Cathy George Project Director & Sr.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Understandin g the API & the AYP APLUS+ Annual Conference October 2010 Del Mar, California Diane Grotjohn
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September 1, 2009 Webinar Fred Balcom, Director, District.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Developing a Framework for Ensuring the Validity of State Accountability Systems Council of Chief State School Officers AERA San Diego April 15, 2004.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the California English Language Development Test.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
AERA March 25, 2008 Delaware’s Growth Model and Results from Year One.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Accountability Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services August 15, 2014.
American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Bilingual Coordinators Network.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Driving Through the California Dashboard
January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit
ABCs/AYP Background Briefing
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
North Carolina’s NCLB Pilot Growth Model
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Small/ASAM Schools and PI Categorical Program Director’s Meeting September 16, 2008 Jan Volkoff, Consultant Policy and Evaluation Division California Department of Education

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2 State and Federal Accountability Reports and requirements differ for state and federal accountability. This is especially true for small schools and schools in the Alternative Schools Accountability Model (ASAM).

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 3 API Reports Small schools with valid scores receive an API with an asterisk to denote the greater statistical uncertainty of an API based on a small number of scores. Very small schools with fewer than 11 valid scores do not receive an API report. (APIs for these schools are calculated for AYP but are not shown on the reports.) ASAM schools receive an API report but do not have API growth targets or ranks.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 4 AYP Reports All schools receive an AYP report, including small schools and ASAM schools. Schools with as few as one enrolled or one valid score receive an AYP report. All schools that receive Title I, Part A, funds receive a PI status. A school with an invalid Growth API does not meet the API indicator for AYP, and the school would not make AYP.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 5 Accountability Development Efforts have been made over the years to ensure fairness in API and AYP reporting and requirements, particularly for small schools and ASAM schools. California’s Accountability Workbook must be approved by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). Requests for Accountability Workbook revisions are not always approved.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 6 API and AYP Implementation API established – ASAM implemented. Small schools receive APIs with asterisks –Schools and districts receive AYP and PI reports under NCLB. Districts and ASAM schools receive APIs for NCLB – API 85% tested rule becomes applicable only for schools with 100 or more students enrolled in each content area – CA requests high mobility schools be allowed to use LEA results for AYP (denied by ED).

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 7 AYP Alternate Criteria for Small Schools Despite the denial of some proposed amendments, the ED has approved other requests for alternate criteria for schools with small numbers.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 8 Small Schools - Participation Rate The participation rate does not apply if the school has fewer than 50 enrolled on the first day of testing. A school with 50 enrolled must test at least 47 students. A school with between 51 to 99 students enrolled must test at least 95% (rounded up).

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 9 Example 1 Participation Rate –Enrolled = 49 –Tested = 24 –Participation Rate = 41% –Met Criteria = Yes –Alternative Method = EN EN = Enrollment less than 50

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 10 Small Schools – Percent Proficient (AMOs) A school with fewer than 100 valid scores has adjusted AMOs to account for the small number of test scores. These schools must meet the adjusted AMOs, which were calculated using a confidence interval methodology. For the adjusted AMOs, refer to pages 29 to 31 in the 2008 AYP Report Information Guide on the AYP Web page at

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 11 Example 2 Percent Proficient –Valid Scores = 9 –Number At or Above Proficient = 0 –Percent At or Above Proficient = 0 –Met Criteria = Yes –Alternative Method = CI CI = Passed Using Confidence Intervals

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 12 Confidence Interval Adjusted AMO Table See next page

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 13 Small Schools – API Indicator Very small schools with fewer than 11 valid scores have adjusted API criteria for AYP reporting to account for the very small number of test scores.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 14 Confidence Interval Adjusted API Table Number of Valid Scores Minimum API for

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 15 Example 3 API Additional Indicator –Valid Scores = 10 –2008 Growth API = 478 –2007 Base API = 477 –API Growth = 1 –Met Criteria = Yes –Alternative Method = CI CI = Passed Using Confidence Intervals

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 16 Small Schools – Graduation Rate ED has insisted that all high schools must have a graduation rate, even those without a graduating class. ED approved the use of proxy graduation rates for schools without complete graduation data. ED approved assigning the LEA or countywide rate for ASAM high schools with the primary mission of returning the students to a comprehensive high school.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 17 Example 4 Graduation Rate –Rate for 2007 = 96.7 –Rate for 2008 = –Change = 3.3 –Average 2-Year Change = N/A –Met Criteria = Yes –Alternative Method = PX PX = Proxy Graduation Rate

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 18 Example 5 Graduation Rate –Rate for 2007 = 83.0 –Rate for 2008 = 85.2 –Change = 2.2 –Average 2-Year Change = -3.9 –Met Criteria = Yes –Alternative Method = DA DA = District Average

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 19 PI Identification The criteria for PI identification is the same for all schools. A Title I school is identified for PI when, for each of two consecutive years, the school: –Does not make AYP in the same content area (schoolwide or subgroups), OR –Does not make AYP on the same indicator (schoolwide)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction More Information API and AYP calculations – Robert Bernstein, Manager Academic Accountability Unit Policy and Evaluation Division (916)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction More Information PI Status Determinations – Paula Bellacera, Manager Evaluation, Research, and Analysis Unit Policy and Evaluation Division (916)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction More Information PI Plans and Planning – Julie Baltazar, Manager District and School Program Coordination Accountability and Improvement Division (916)