1 SMUD’s Small Business Summer Solutions Pilot: Behavioral response of small commercial customers to DR programs (with PCTs) Karen Herter, Ph.D. Associate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Case Study of Demand Response: Con Edison Business Program by Eileen Egan-Annechino Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Advertisements

SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Automated Demand Response June 9, 2009 Connectivity Week, Santa Clara.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
January 20, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter Sanjoy Chatterjee – Principal, Chatterjee.
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
AEP Texas Energy Efficiency / Demand Response Programs Russell G. Bego, EE/DR Coordinator AEP Texas September 24, 2014.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
SMUD’s SmartPricing Options Marketing Strategy Jennifer Potter July 31, 2014 Powering forward. Together.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
February 23, 2006Karen Herter, LBL/CEC/UCB-ERG 1 /29 Temperature Effects on Residential Electric Price Response Karen Herter February 23, 2006.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
1 SmartMeter™ Delivering Customer Benefits Jana Corey Director, Policy Planning Integrated Demand-side Management Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Colorado Rural Electric Association Energy Innovations Summit Demand Response: Are Customers Ready to Change Their Ways? Confidential October 27, 2014.
+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.
Partnering with Our Customers in Demand Side Management Mark Wallenrod Director DSM Program Operations Southern California Edison Southern California Energy.
Overview of OpenADR May 4, 2011 Integrating Demand Response, Efficiency, Renewables and Smart Grid Sila Kiliccote Deputy, Demand Response Research Center.
1 OpenADR Taskforce Chair – Albert Chiu Co-chair – Ed Koch Technical Editors – Bruce Bartell, Gerald Gray.
Reshaping Utility/ Consumer Relationships MEC October 5, 2010 Pinehurst, NC Penni McLean-Conner.
Smart Grid Research Consortium November 9, DM Goals/Objectives User adoption & consumer engagement Prove consumer behavioral change Prove consumer.
2011 Residential HAN Pilots Evaluation Results © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
Load Management SMUD & Demand Response Jim Parks CEC Load Management Standards Scoping Workshop March 3, 2008.
Demand Response and the California Information Display Pilot 2005 AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, South Carolina July 11, 2005 Mark S. Martinez,
California Energy Commission - Public Interest Energy Research Program Demand Response Research Center Research Overview Load Management Informational.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Load & Bill Impacts, Role of Technology & Operational Consideration Dr. Stephen.
Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.
Dominion VA Power Credit Risk Management October 20, 2010 Pam Kemper Utility Payment Conference.
ERCOT ELTF – Overview and Brief Proposal Dr. Eric Woychik – Strategy Integration LLC representing Comverge, Inc. 8 November 2006.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
Smart Meters & Customer Benefits
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1 Demand Response Research Center Research Opportunity Notice February 2, 2007 Mary Ann Piette Research Director, DRRC Rick.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
PG&E Automated Demand Response Program: IDSM Lessons Learned
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish October 6, 2015.
© 2004 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Demand Response Programs Backup Material.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR DSWG Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 17, 2015.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
1 Proposed Policies to Increase the level of Demand Response Energy Action Plan Update April 24 th, 2006, Sacramento, CA Mike Messenger, CEC.
Overview Review results Statewide Pricing Pilot Review results Anaheim Rebate Pilot Compare performance of models used to estimate demand response peak.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 1, 2015.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
You’re Getting Warmer... Smart Thermostat Pilot Update Presenters: Dan Rubado-ETO, Evaluation Project Manager Dennis Rominger-PSE, Market Manager Customer.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
Pay-As-You-Go Final Report February Agenda Safety Moment PAYG Refresher Pilot Goals & Overview Voice of the Customer Front Office Impacts Back Office.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
2015 SDG&E PTR/SCTD Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Workshop George Jiang May 11 th, 2016 Customer Category Mean Active Participants Mean Reference.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation of Southern California Edison’s Peak Time Rebate Program Josh Schellenberg DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop.
Pay-As-You-Go Final 2012 Report. Agenda PAYG Refresher Pilot Goals & Overview Voice of the Customer Front Office Impacts Back Office Impacts Financial.
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
SMECO Demand Response filing
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Highlights from SMUD's SmartPricing Options Pilot
Presentation transcript:

1 SMUD’s Small Business Summer Solutions Pilot: Behavioral response of small commercial customers to DR programs (with PCTs) Karen Herter, Ph.D. Associate Director Heschong Mahone Group November 19, 2008

2 Project Overview Acknowledgements Demand Response Research Center (DRRC) Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) Schedule September 2007Market Report October 2007Focus Groups Spring 2008Recruitment & installation June-Sept 2008Field study December 2008Final Report

3 Research Overview Target: SMUD Small businesses <20 kW Goal: Quantify perception, behavior & load impact differences between… 2 DR program types –A. Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) –B. Temperature Offset of 2 or 4 degrees 3 small business customer types –Offices –Retail –Restaurants

4 A. Critical Peak Pricing Option Discounted TOU rate + 12 CPP events Overall: Revenue Neutral for the summer PCTs offered for free, but not required PCTs can pre-cool and/or float during events (or not) Settings can be changed by customer at any time Bills showed change in bill relative to standard rate

5 Critical Peak Pricing Rate

6 B. Temperature Offset Option Payment ≈ CPP savings for similar AC actions $5 per month for 2-degree AC offset $10 per month for 4-degree AC offset PCTs required Can pre-cool Overrides not allowed (but technically feasible) No $$ incentive to reduce lighting, etc.

7 Participant Breakdown

8 Event Procedure Notifying participants Day before event Via , text message and/or thermostat display Notifying thermostats Morning of event Event parameters to thermostat (via RDS) to schedule automated control strategy Internet FM Tower RDS Signal

9 Twelve Event Days

10 Satisfaction by Program Choice Did the Summer Solutions program meet your expectations? 20%80%

11 Satisfaction by Business Type Did the Summer Solutions program meet your expectations? 20%80%

12 Cooling offsets by Program Choice

13 Cooling offsets by Business Type

14 CPP Bills Only four participants paid more on the CPP rate Avg. % Savings = 5% Max % Savings = 10% Max % Increase = 14%

15 Data Yet to be Analyzed Hourly load data

16 For more information Contact Karen Herter at: (916) x32 -OR- Read the PIER report due December 2008