Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) in Yolo County Phil Hogan, District Conservationist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 221 W. Court,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nutrient Management: Planning and Trends
Advertisements

Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
California’s Land Resource Protection Division at Department of Conservation.
Farmland Preservation Haywood County Becoming an Enhanced Voluntary Agriculture District.
Farmland Classification in Montana July 2008 Neal Svendsen Resource Soil Scientist USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Missoula, Montana.
WILLIAMSON ACT AND AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTS WILLIAMSON ACT AND AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTS Fresno County Board of Supervisors February 26, 2008.
Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
SISR : STORIE INDEX Soil Ratings. Storie Index Rating System The Storie Index Rating system ranks soil characteristics according to their suitability.
Managing the Agricultural/Urban Interface 2011 CALAFCO Annual Conference Thursday, September 1, :45 AM – 12:15 PM 1 Jon Edney, Moderator Commissioner,
Presentation for the Policy Advisory Committee California Transportation Plan 2040 April 15, 2014 Agricultural Land Stewardship Planning.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE John Day Center for Environmental Farming Systems, NC State University.
Increased Ethanol Production Impacts on Minnesota Wetlands Dr. David Kelley University of St. Thomas 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference.
Kings County as part of the San Joaquin Valley Blueprint County Planning & LAFCO engaging the COG’s Blueprint efforts to map out the County’s future. Greg.
Land Subdivision and Zoning Unit: Owning Property Lesson: Land Subdivision and Zoning.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION u THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IDENTIFIES PROPERTY IN SUCH TERMS THAT IT CANNOT BE CONFUSED WITH ANY OTHER PROPERTY. u A LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS.
Rachel Elkins, County Director and Pomology Farm Advisor, UCCE Lake County and Kelly Cox, Administrative Officer, County of Lake UCCE and County Government:
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Peter Brundage, Executive Officer; Donald J. Lockhart, Assistant Executive Officer; Diane Thorpe, Commission.
Water School June 20, 2013 Loretta M. Bates, Ph.D. University of California Cooperative Extension San Diego County.
1 SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE: SANTA CLARA LAFCO’s EXPERIENCE August 31, 2007 CALAFCO CONFERENCE Sacramento.
Planning Issues and Agriculture Lecture 4 Agriculture Land and the State Mapping Project.
Agricultural Land Rating Systems... for the Non-Soil Scientist Earl Yamamoto, State Department of Agriculture February 5, 2000 Advance slide 
Ethanol: Impacts on Soil and Water Quality Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension Water Quality Program (573)
USDA-NRCS COST SHARE PROGRAM BILL HUGHES STATE RESOURCE CONSERVATIONIST.
Agriculture, Water and the California Economy Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference San Diego Friday August 24, 2012 Daniel A. Sumner, University.
Luke Gibbs. Job Description  Agricultural engineers use their knowledge to solve the problems of farmers and the agricultural industry. They work to.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Behzod Abdullobekov Tajik Agrarian University August 16, 2012, Hungary.
New Jersey Local Work Group Pilot Project Camden County, Gloucester County, Freehold and Morris County Soil Conservation Districts.
THE CALIFORNIA WATER CRISIS RISK TO THE CALIFORNIA FOOD SYSTEM CDFA BOARD MEETING Cornelius “Corny” Gallagher Chairman California Banking Association.
A+ for Energy ® Energy Educator Training Conferences Sponsored by BP, Presented in Partnership with The NEED Project and NREL Texas Energy Story.
Meet The U.S. Forest Service “Caring for the Land and Serving People”
Jennifer Abbey NRCS District Conservationist Plant City Field Office.
LAND EVALUATION SITE ASSESSMENT (LESA) GIS APPLICATION REDESIGN Brad M. Shirey, GISP The Pennsylvania State University Master of GIS Program – Capstone.
Soil Productivity and Conservation THE GMIS. Importance of Soil As the key resource in crop production It supports the physical, chemical, and biological.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Locally Led Conservation Colorado State Conservation Board.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
LESA: Land Evaluation and Site Assessment An Effective Way to Plan Champaign County Soil and Water Conservation District.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Anatomy of Iowa Floods: Preparing for the Future “How urban and rural Iowans work together to reduce flood impacts.” James Martin, Division of Soil Conservation.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Final Environmental Impact Report Amendment of SMUD’s Sphere of Influence and SMUD Yolo Annexation.
Yolo LAFCO Agricultural Conservation Policy Yolo County Local Agency Formation Commission Commissioners  Public Member Olin Woods, Chair   County Member.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Tom Krapf Assistant State Conservationist NRCS - Wisconsin The Regional Conservation Partnership Program.
Careers in the Environmental Science Industry Objective 5.01: Remember careers in the environmental science industry.
Soil Resources 14.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
1 LAFCo 201 The Statutory and Legal Framework 2010 Annual CALAFCO Meeting Hilton Hotel, Palm Springs Scott Browne.
LandJudging in Oklahoma
NEWPORT POINTE COUNTY FILES: GP# , RZ# , SD# , AND DP# BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HEARING June 4, 2013.
Assessing Development Pressure on Agriculture Land 2009 Ohio GIS Conference September 16-18, 2009 Crowne Plaza North Hotel Columbus, Ohio 2009 Ohio GIS.
Yolo LAFCO Agricultural Conservation Policy Yolo County Local Agency Formation Commission Commissioners  Public Member Olin Woods, Chairman   City Members.
1 Preserving Swainson’s Hawk Habitat LAFCO October 5, 2005.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County In Franklin-Simpson County 85% of the land area is devoted.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Mission Statement “One Voice” unites Fresno County communities and regional interests in a voluntary and collaborative effort to seek federal and state.
Ventura County Population of over 800,000 Voter imposed growth boundaries for the County and 8 of the 10 cities Gross agricultural production value of.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN & RZ-OTH
WELCOME to the FIRE DISTRICT WORKSHOP San Joaquin LAFCo July 16, 2009.
Introduction to Land Evaluation Basic Soil Science AFNR-BAS-6: Describe soil formation and management and assess its relevance to plant/animal production.
Jackson County Farmland Protection Program A County/Local/State Partnership.
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service NRCS Programs Applicable to Brownfields Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Different types of farming
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Essential Standard 5.00: Understand the environmental science industry (water, soils, wildlife and forestry).
Environmental Science ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CAREER AREAS.
PROTECTING THE UPPER OCONEE RIVER WATERSHED WITH CONSERVATION EASEMENTS & ACEP-ALE Krisztian Varsa Athens Land Trust September 30, 2016.
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Dane County Farmland Preservation Plan Planning Areas
Final Environmental Impact Report
Environmental Science
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission
Presentation transcript:

Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) in Yolo County Phil Hogan, District Conservationist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 221 W. Court, Suite 1 Woodland, CA

YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LOCATION – Lower part of Sacramento Valley – Land Area: 661,760 acres, or 1,034 square miles – Just northwest of Sacramento from I-5 or I-80 Yolo County LESA di daerah Yolo, California

YOLO COUNTY AGRICULTURE – 1,060 Farms – Average Size: 519 Acres – $333 million market value – Processing tomatoes biggest cash crop, then wine grapes – Ranks ~20th in California – 6% total county employment – Prime Farmland = 48% of the County ag land – Leader in direct marketing – Organic sector growing LESA di daerah Yolo, California

YOLO COUNTY MAJOR LAND USES LESA di daerah Yolo, California

REGIONAL GROWTH TRENDS – Yolo County is between rapidly growing Sacramento and Bay Areas – Until recently, major growth has bypassed Yolo County – Growth is rapidly increasing now: ample supply of relatively inexpensive developable land relatively inexpensive housing good supply of water for industrial use relatively low utility rates perceived high quality of life I-80, I-5, I-505 and SP Railroad all induce growth LESA di daerah Yolo, California

YOLO COUNTY POPULATION TREND – 2002 Population: 172,500 – 2020 Projected Population: 262,400 – This represents a 52% increase LESA di daerah Yolo, California

FARMLAND PROTECTION MEASURES IN YOLO COUNTY – Williamson Act and Farmland Security Zones: YES – California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): YES – General Plan Amendments: YES – Habitat Conservation Plan: YES – Right-to-Farm Ordinances: YES – Sphere of Influence: YES – Yolo Land Trust (Easements): YES – Local Land Evaluation and Site Assessment System (LESA): YES Farmland Protection Measures LESA di daerah Yolo, California

BACKGROUND ON YOLO COUNTY LESA – LESA not widely used in California – Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) policies – NRCS approached LAFCO to show how LESA can help – LAFCO directed that LESA subcommittee be formed – Several meetings and field tested – Finalized by LAFCO board in 2000 – State LESA model developed by Department of Conservation – Contact Dr. Charles Tyson (916) LESA di daerah Yolo, California

LESA in Yolo County, California YOLO COUNTY LESA SUBCOMMITTEE – Yolo County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) – Yolo County Resource Conservation District – Yolo County Community Development Agency – SWCS University of California, Davis Student Club – California Department of Conservation (Chuck Tyson) – City of Davis – Yolo County Board of Supervisors – Cooperative Extension Service – Yolo Land Trust – Planning Consultants – Realtors, Farmers, Yolo County Farm Bureau, USDA NRCS LESA FACTORING

INTRODUCTION TO YOLO COUNTY LESA – Lesa is a tool to identify the most important agricultural lands – Maximum score is 100 – Land Evaluation Factors: 50 points – Site Assessment Factors: 50 points – Land Evaluation uses USDA LCC, UC Storie Index, and an irrigation component – Site Assessment is based on parcel size, urban conflict, zoning + LE Factors 50 pts. SA Factors 50 pts. + = 100 pts total LESA score LESA di daerah Yolo, California

FACTOR WEIGHTING – Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Weight LE and SA are weighted 50% each off the total LESA score Maximum LE score is 50 Maximum SA score is 50 Maximum LESA score is 100 – Individual Factor Weight LE Land Capability Class (LCC): 20% LE Storie Index Rating (SIR): 20% LE Water: 10% SA Size: 20% SA Urban Separation: 15% SA Zoning: 15% LESA di daerah Yolo, California

University of California, Davis Relative Degree suitability of a soil for intensive agriculture Soil characteristics only In itself, cannot be considered an index for land valuation Storie Index

Four factors considered: – Profile Characteristics Suitability of a soil profile for plant root growth – Surface Layer Texture Affects ease of tillage and water holding capacity – Slope Affects water runoff – Other Conditions: high water table, salts, etc. Storie Index

Each factor is rated separately in terms of percentage of the ideal, or 100% Storie Index of a soil is obtained by multiplying the four factors – Profile rating 100% X Texture rating 100% X Slope rating 100% X Other condition (saline-alkali soil) 20% = Storie Index = 20 Storie Index

Soils placed in grades according to agricultural suitability: – Grade 1:80 to 100 Index Rating – Grade 2:60 to 80 Index Rating – Grade 3:40 to 60 Index Rating – Grade 4:20 to 40 Index Rating – Grade 5:10 to 20 Index Rating – Grade 6:Less than 10 Index Rating

Storie Index Grade 1: few or no limitations for use for crops Grade 2: Suitable for most crops, minor limitations Grade 3: Suitable for few crops or special crops that require special management Grade 4: Severely limited for crops; careful management Grade 5: Not suitable for cultivated crops, used for pasture and range Grade 6: Not suited to farming.

Storie Index

Storie Index: AD-1006 Name of Land Evaluation System Used Storie Index

LESA di daerah Yolo, California PROBLEMS, PERCEPTIONS, LIMITATIONS OF LESA – Various levels of political will to protect farmland – Lack of consensus on prime farmland criteria – Range and forest land uses – NRCS Field Offices lack training

PROBLEMS, PERCEPTIONS, LIMITATIONS OF LESA – Irrigated lands – LESA will not protect farmland by itself – Consistency of results – LESA is not LISA – Manipulation of LESA to meet political needs – Landowner fears of numbers attached to t heir land – First thing: agree on the objective of local LESA system! LESA di daerah Yolo, California

LE WATER SCORE LESA di daerah Yolo, California

LESSONS AND ADVICE – Local initiative – Receptive local government – LESA Committee Diversity – Patience! – Quality – Set deadlines – Technical credibility – Supervisor’s support LESA di daerah Yolo, California