CALIFORNIA’S HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Society of American Military Engineers S.A.M.E. May 26, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Advertisements

CHSRA 2012 BUSINESS PLAN Tom Umberg Chair, California High Speed Rail Authority.
California High-Speed Train Project Los Angeles Union Station Alternatives Analysis January 7, 2010 Board Presentation.
CHSRA SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM Society of American Military Engineers (SAME) Thursday, November 8, 2012.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N California Energy Commission Electric Vehicle Activities Pat Perez California Energy Commission Joint.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
LIGHT RAIL PERMITTING ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEETING Dec. 17, 2014|3:00PM -5:00PM | ROOM 1E-113.
Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL NORTHEAST UPDATE AASHTO – FEBRUARY 29,
Overview CMAA May 29, What is Metro Regional Rail >Manage more than 165 miles of R/W in L.A. County >Develop capital improvement projects and.
Overview ACEC July 16, What is Metro Regional Rail >Manage more than 165 miles of R/W in L.A. County >Develop capital improvement projects and.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
1 Trade Corridor Improvement Fund March 5, 2008 Southern California Consensus Group.
Passenger Rail – Plan & Opportunities Engineer Contractor Conference Middleton, WI January 21, 2010.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
A TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA’S FUTURE Dan Richard, Chair California Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015 Sacramento, CA.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
October  AB 32 (2006)  Target: Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions at 1990 levels by 2020 and maintain reductions  Authorized the Cap and Trade Program.
M IAMI F ORT L AUDERDALE W EST P ALM B EACH O RLANDO Addresses Florida’s demand for express, intercity rail travel. Is designed to serve tourists, business.
SCORT Annual Meeting Jacksonville, Florida September 20, 2010 Passenger Rail in Florida.
December 3,  Summarize how the bond act affects  The attributes of the high-speed rail system  The timing and sequence of construction.
California High Speed Rail Project Leadership Mountain View May 21, 2010.
Michelle Boehm Southern California Regional Director CMAA Southern California Chapter May 13, 2015 A TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA’S FUTURE.
Jason Hade, Regional Planner Kern COG Workshop – November 21, 2002 High-Speed Rail for the Kern Region Kern Council of Governments.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Anaheim – Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS California High-Speed Rail Authority HIGH-SPEED TRAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Orange County Business Council- Infrastructure.
Caltrain Modernization CMAA September 18, Caltrain Today.
Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center Project Update.
1 CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL Silicon Valley Leadership Group February 5, 2014 eBay, San Jose P R E S E N T E D B Y Ben Tripousis Northern California Regional.
Corridor Electrification Environmental Process SVLG Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
1 Economic Recovery: Water Quality Infrastructure February 2009 State Water Resources Control Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program.
Project Transformation and Acceleration for Clean Energy Innovators The Grant Farm develops and executes campaigns for businesses working to commercialize.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March 15, 2011.
December 12-13, 2007 Item 4.4 Tab 31 California State Rail Plan to
San Francisco Mayor’s 2030 Transportation Task Force Current & Near Term Transportation Plans April 30, 2013.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
California Energy Commission Personal and Commercial Vehicle Choice High-Speed Rail Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts Rosenfeld.
1 PLEASE NOTE: This information was presented during previous Economic Recovery Workshops. Since then, the information has been updated. Please refer to.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Public-Private Partnership Program 2015 Update 2015 American Council of Engineering Companies ACEC – Los Angeles Chapter Luncheon, July 8, 2015.
California High-Speed Train Project California High-Speed Rail Metro Bus Operations Subcommittee January 2010.
1 Round One Public Outreach Workshops Fall 2005 DRAFT Bay Area Regional Rail Plan August 2007 Workshops.
Early Implementation of Coalition Initiatives ARK-LA-TEX Rail Summit May 9, Transportation Department North Central Texas.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
New Starts/Small Starts and BRT: An Update APTA Bus Conference Seattle, WA May 5, 2009.
4733 Bethesda Ave, Suite 600 Bethesda, MD (P) Developing Criteria for Project Programming.
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
11 Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds Funding Guidelines for Agencies that Administer California Climate Investments September
1 Sunrise Powerlink Project Update Orange County Business Council March 10, 2009.
Impact of the California High Speed Rail System Lee Ann Eager, Chief Operating Officer Economic Development Corporation serving Fresno County.
CHSRA SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM Society of American Military Engineers (SAME) Thursday, November 8, 2012.
1 PLEASE NOTE: This information was presented during the February 18, 2009 webcast of the Economic Recovery Workshop. Since then, the information has been.
Federal Funding Strategies Update Internal Working Document Update on Federal Funding California High-Speed Rail Authority In Partnership with: Kadesh.
Commuter Rail Studies Summary of MAG High Capacity Transit Study June 2003 Commuter Rail Summary.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
California Transportation Planning Conference Rail Modernization to Improve Mobility for California Moderator: Melissa Elefante DuMond, AICP Director of.
Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Program “In the ground ready”
Connecting and Transforming California
California High-Speed Rail
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
AN INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA’S FUTURE
Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA’S HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Society of American Military Engineers S.A.M.E. May 26, 2011

THE BASICS California’s Planned HST System Speeds: designed for 250 mph; operates up to 220 mph on dedicated high-speed track; mph in shared track areas 520-mile system (Phase 1 from San Francisco to LA/Anaheim) Up to 800 miles (when Phase 2 extensions to San Diego and Sacramento are realized) 100% clean electric power Safely grade-separated Route assigned in 2005

PHASE 1 SECTIONS San Francisco-San Jose San Jose-Merced Merced-Fresno Fresno-Bakersfield Bakersfield-Palmdale Palmdale-Los Angeles Los Angeles-Anaheim Divided into these sections for the purpose of managing the environmental review

PHASE 2 SECTIONS + ALTAMONT Los Angeles-San Diego (via Inland Empire) Merced-Sacramento Altamont Corridor Rail Project Divided into these sections for the purpose of managing the environmental review

WHERE WE ARE NOW Transitioning from Planning to Implementation Undergoing NEPA/CEQA review in all project sections Central Valley sections (Merced-Fresno, Fresno-Bakersfield) are completing scoping and the analysis of alternative alignments and will publish Draft EIR documents by mid On track to secure environmental clearance by early All seven Phase 1 sections continue to do environmental analyses. Receiving public input on all alignments. Building toward construction RFEI followed by RFQ by mid-2011 with RFPs in early Begin awarding construction contracts in the second half of 2012 Authority staffing up for current/future needs.

FUNDING NEEDS Anticipated contributions to construction cost California funding:$9 billion Federal funding:40-45% Local funding:<10% Private capital:~25%

CURRENT FUNDING SUMMARY Current total: $6.33 billion The strength of California's rail programs has led to awards totaling 40% of all available federal funding. FUNDING SOURCE FEDERAL AWARD STATE MATCH TOTAL ARRA Jan $2.25 billion$1.85 billion $3.7 billion HSIPR FY Oct $715 million$306 million $1.02 billion ARRA Dec $616 million $1.234 billion FL Re-allocation May 2011 $300 million$75 million $375 million

INITIAL CONSTRUCTION Starting in the Central Valley Only section where California’s HST system will travel 220-mph maximum operating speed for long periods of time (enabling the two-hour, 40-minute requirement for trip time between LA and San Francisco) Initial track in the Central Valley will serve as testing and proving ground for new high- speed train technology in the United States Less expensive land and less complex engineering in the Valley Near-term job creation benefits (conservative estimate of 100,000 jobs – direct and indirect – over life of the first $5.5 billion in construction) The foundation for true high-speed rail

INITIAL CONSTRUCTION Scope of Initial Contracts Early opportunities Right-of-way engineering/appraisals Utility relocations (e.g. major, critical) Hazmat removal/remediation Clearing and grubbing Site demolition Final design and engineering Surveying Construction management Construction inspection

INITIAL CONSTRUCTION Scope of Initial Contracts Based on typical * alignment Approximately 120 miles, from about six miles north of Fresno to Bakersfield city limits 75 to 100 * miles of “at-grade” double track 15 to 40 * miles of aerial structure Two to five * miles of retained earth structure 30 to 70 * grade separations, including local street improvements Two possible basic HST stations Does not include core systems (rolling stock, electrification, signaling) Does not include heavy maintenance facility *Note: The final details are subject to the selection of the final preferred alternative route within the selected section and the conclusion of the ROD/NOD for the relevant sections, consistent with all necessary federal, state and other approvals.

INITIAL CONSTRUCTION Stations Basic stations Four-track stations Locations Fresno Kings/Tulare regional (potential) Roughly $200 million each Station elements Platforms Canopies Public concourse Ticketing/waiting Areas Station management/ security Station support areas (e.g. MEP, Comms)

INITIAL CONSTRUCTION Timeline  Draft environmental documents for public review/input: spring/summer 2011  Final environmental documents: end of 2011  Right-of-way acquisition: beginning of 2012  Begin construction: late 2012  Complete construction funded with ARRA dollars: September 2017

FUTURE EXPANSION Getting to Passenger Service From Initial Construction Section [ICS] To Initial Operable Section [IOS] To Completion of Phase 1 To Phase 2 ICS IOS PH1 PH2

FIRST PASSENGER TRAINS Building Outward North/South Must expand initial construction into an “Initial Operating Section”  Will require additional track built north and south of the Central Valley Top EIR priority  Fresno-Bakersfield  Merced-Fresno Next priority  San Jose-Merced  Bakersfield-Palmdale  Palmdale-Los Angeles Initial Operating Section plans to be reviewed by Legislature 6.4 M current population 4.2 M current population 19 M current population

CONSTRUCTION SUSTAINABILITY GOALS Protecting our Environment  CHSRA is a member of EPA’s Collaborative for Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Construction (CSTIC)  Maximize use of recycled/low-energy materials  Implement construction waste management plan  Maximize waste segregation to minimize landfill impacts  Build energy-efficient facilities (e.g., LEED-certified stations)  Maximize energy efficiency/GHG emissions reduction measures

SMALL BUSINESS Small Businesses are the Backbone of California’s Economy Goals  25 percent participation by certified small businesses (SBE)  3 percent Disabled Veterans Business Enterprise (DVBE)  Extensive outreach to all SBEs, including minority- and women-owned businesses Expectations  Prime contractors to network with small businesses  International consortia to localize with California businesses  Procurement format selected to foster small business participation

 Complete Final EIR/EIS documents + 30 percent design for Central Valley ARRA sections  Prepare state appropriations request and financing plan for use of Proposition 1A funds for initial operating section to be submitted to the Department of Finance and Legislature  Advocate for additional federal funding (ongoing HSR funding for the nation as well as funding opportunities for other sections of our system)  Issue RFQs for first contracts of the $5.5 billion of construction This calendar year, the Authority will: NEXT STEPS FOR 2011

NEXT STEPS FOR PROCUREMENT RFQ  Request for Qualifications in mid-2011 RFP  Request for Proposals (formal procurement) in late 2011/early 2012 Award first contracts  Late 2012 Additional funding  Federal advocacy  Securing private investment

STAYING UP TO SPEED Contact information California High-Speed Rail Authority 770 L St., Suite 800 Sacramento, CA