STEEP Data Management Ease, Reliability, Power. STEEP Data Management Goal: Make it simple to implement RTI correctly –Select Students who Need Intervention.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Responsiveness to Instruction North Carolina Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model Session 1/4.
Advertisements

Data Collection Benchmark (CBM Family) Progress Monitoring Interventions Tiers Training/Materials Problem Solving Model Allocation of Resources.
 EC Professional Development Day February 18, 2013.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Building Level Benchmark Data This represents the percent of students who demonstrated the following proficiency levels on benchmark assessments. AP-Advanced.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Margaret D. Anderson SUNY Cortland, April, Federal legislation provides the guidelines that schools must follow when identifying children for special.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
Using the PMER &PMBR Overview of Progress Monitoring and the assessments available 1
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
What help does each student need?. Assess to find out specifically where a child is having problems.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
Thinking Smart About Assessment Ben Clarke, Ph.D. Rachell Katz, Ph.D. August 25, 2004 Oregon Reading First Mentor Coach Training © 2004 by the Oregon Reading.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
The Role of Assessment in Response to Intervention Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Richland School District 2013 EOY Gains Analysis Data reflects implementation by 7/16/13 export.
CEDS 2005 ANNUAL CONFERENCE Educational Assessment: Looking Forward, Reaching Further November 17, 2005 When Assessment Isn’t Enough: Understanding Student.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS The District Data Team Meeting Blending Behavioral and Academic Multi-tiered Systems of Support Oregon.
Speech Interventions. Universal Screenings Articulation –All Pre-K and K students will be screened by the Speech Therapists –Students in grades 1-4 may.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
“Working hand in hand to improve
Developing the Plan. Tier III Developing the Intervention Plan Developing the Intervention Plan.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Data based Decision Making Valerie O’Connor Aimsweb Bootcamp Aug Westlake City Schools
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Response to Instruction & Problem Solving Teams Summer 2010.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charlie Eccleston, MTSS Trainer.
EBIS Effective Behavior & Instructional Supports Tina Rodriguez June 23, 2013.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance Kira Florence Jonathan Potter University of Oregon.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Offered by The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading First Assessment “Catch Them Before They Fall”
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
1 Discovery RtI Solution Overview for New York State RTI Why RTI? * Included in IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Act * Integral part of Reading.
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
Progress Monitoring Presented By: Bart Lyman. Aimsweb Progress Monitoring Guide-Pearson 2012 RTI Implementer Series: Module 2: Progress Monitoring Training.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data-Based Leadership
Welcome to Eagleview RTI Reading & Math.
Data Usage Response to Intervention
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System: RTI Assessment Julie Alonzo, Ph.D. & Gerald Tindal, Ph.D. July 2011.
Presented by: Dr. Sue Abel
Presentation transcript:

STEEP Data Management Ease, Reliability, Power

STEEP Data Management Goal: Make it simple to implement RTI correctly –Select Students who Need Intervention –Select an appropriate intervention Using a validated standard protocol –Monitor Progress System monitors data on rate of learning Zero in quickly on students who don’t respond to intervention

Use any Screening Method System will easily manage any method of screening including –DIBELS –STEEP –TPRI (Texas Primary Reading Inventory) –Any other method. Use any standard –Completely customizable such that districts can evaluate student scores relative to any standard View students with respect to DIBELS, state, school or district standards or benchmarks (Unique to STEEP).

Manage Early literacy Benchmark data from DIBELS CBM benchmark data for any type of assessment using any benchmark Middle and high school benchmark data Tier 2 and Tier 3 intervention data Progress monitoring data for IEP goals in special education.

New to Data Management? What can you do with a data management system? –Basic users (about 90% of all users) Enter benchmark and progress monitoring scores Review reports for benchmark and progress monitoring –Advanced users Examine student level and rate of performance aggregated by school, teacher, NCLB subgroups, etc. “Drill down” into the data STEEP is simple for basic users with the power needed for advanced users.

Using the Data System Steps –Enter students –Enter screening scores –Select students for intervention –Monitor intervention use and student outcomes –Evaluate success Working with the System is Easy

Screen Students then Enter Scores

Review Class Performance

Quickly know –Which students need intervention (those in red) –Which students are low because of motivation –Whether there are Tier 1 issues

System manages any Data. Here CBM reading scores are viewed using TEKS standards (Texas)

DIBELS Initial Sound Fluency Determine Quickly who is in “Red” on DIBELS Then let system recommend an intervention.

Teachers Receive Written Reports to Guide Intervention Planning Sample Report Segment: –“LANASHA KOHN appears to have a WON'T DO Problem. This means that academic performance increased markedly when an incentive was offered. Typically this means that the child can perform this skill but does not always perform in line with their ability. “

Intervention Selection Select students needing intervention: –After screening, the data system will automatically select and list those students who need intervention. Select Intervention. (Unique to STEEP) –The system will then automatically select the type of reading intervention a student needs –Using STEEP standard protocol. –Can be used with DIBELS and others systems

Which Students Need Help? User or System Can Select Students Needing Intervention

System will list Students Needing Assistance User Can Then Select Students to Proceed with Intervention Planning and Setup

Systems Determines Specific Intervention Needed System Coaches users to: –Gather additional assessment information if needed –System evaluates screening data and any additional assessment data and specifies intervention to match student need. Unique to STEEP

During Intervention Progress Monitoring Data is Entered and Continuously Monitored by Data System Intervention Fidelity is Monitored –Intervention Data is Continuously Monitored by professionals and entered into system –iSTEEP has partnered with third party intervention companies and will soon make available automatic real time monitoring of intervention usage for specific web based interventions.

Automatic Setup of Progress Monitoring Progress goals can be set based upon research based standards, local standards or any other standard. Aimline is automatically drawn. NO COMPUTATIONS FOR USER.

Easy to Read Progress Monitoring Graphs

Plain English Summary of Student Progress also Available

Students Can “Help” Enter Their Score to Improve Motivation This graph is animated and child friendly

Advanced Users Power Users will Appreciate the Ability to –Aggregate data on any variable Principals can look across their school Superintends can perform comparisons across schools District Norming is Easy

Progress by Teacher Which teachers in a school show the most progress. Which teachers need support. What strategies are working for the teacher on the right?

Drill down—for low performing classes, which specific students are not making progress? This Graph Shows the average increase in WRC per week. (The emerging metric for RTI)

Assessment by Race This graph suggests possible Tier 1 Problems for Hispanic Students

Aggregation by All NCLB Subgroups for Level and Slope Use for Goal Setting Rate of Student ProgressLevel of Student Performance

Average Progress in Grade 2 The mean (in Red) and other statistics useful for norming by grade within schools or across multiple schools.

Superintendents View Across 8 Schools Rate of Growth for 8 Schools Score Levels at start of year for 8 Schools

Screen Prescribe Intervention Monitor Progress STEEP: Validated and Proven Practices

See the Results

Contact: iSTEEP, LLC Miyo Chun, PhD Joe Witt, PhD