Non-hydrostatic IFS at ECMWF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerics of physical parametrizations
Advertisements

Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
Governing Equations IV
Impact of EOS MLS ozone data on medium-extended range ensemble forecasts Jacob C. H. Cheung 1, Joanna D. Haigh 1, David R. Jackson 2 1 Imperial College.
Status and performance of HIRLAM 4D-Var Nils Gustafsson.
Verification of NCEP SFM seasonal climate prediction during Jae-Kyung E. Schemm Climate Prediction Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA.
Introduction to parametrization Introduction to Parametrization of Sub-grid Processes Anton Beljaars room 114) What is parametrization?
Recitation Geostrophic Balance Thermal Wind Effect of Friction.
ICONAM ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic Atmospheric Model -
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
Stratosphere–Troposphere Exchange: Isabel RamosÁlvaro.
Exploring strategies for coupled 4D-Var data assimilation using an idealised atmosphere-ocean model Polly Smith, Alison Fowler & Amos Lawless School of.
Exeter 1-3 December 2010 Monthly Forecasting with Ensembles Frédéric Vitart European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts.
General Circulation of the Atmosphere Lisa Goddard 19 September 2006.
Zängl ICON The Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic model: Formulation of the dynamical core and physics-dynamics coupling Günther Zängl and the ICON.
19 December ConclusionsResultsMethodologyBackground Chip HelmsSensitivity of CM1 to Initial θ' Magnitude and Radius Examining the Sensitivity of.
Teleconnections and the MJO: intraseasonal and interannual variability Steven Feldstein June 25, 2012 University of Hawaii.
3 October th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana1 Some developments at ECMWF during 2005 Mariano Hortal ECMWF.
Northern Hemisphere Atmospheric Transient Eddy Fluxes and their Co-variability with the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio-Oyashio Extensions Young-Oh Kwon and Terrence.
ECMWF Potsdam 2010 Slide 1 Non-hydrostatic model formulations for ultra-high resolution medium-range forecasting: compressible or anelastic ? EULAG workshop,
Influences of the 11-year solar cycle on the tropical atmosphere and oceans Stergios Misios and Hauke Schmidt Max Planck Institute for Meteorology TOSCA.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Improved ensemble-mean forecast skills of ENSO events by a zero-mean stochastic model-error model of an intermediate coupled model Jiang Zhu and Fei Zheng.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Atmosphere at rest experiments with the latest COSMO version.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High resolution COSMO runs for dispersion applications.
ECMWF Potsdam 2010 Slide 1 Non-hydrostatic modeling on the sphere with ultra-high resolution PDE’s on the sphere, Potsdam 2010 Nils Wedi, Mats Hamrud and.
Extra-tropical climate and the modelling of the stratosphere in coupled atmosphere ocean models. E Manzini Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia.
RC LACE 25th EWGLAM Meeting 6-9 October 2003, Lisbon1.
METR March Review Hydrostatic balance Ideal gas law p = ρ R d T v, ρ = p / R d T v Take layer average virtual temperature, R and g as constants.
Dispersion conditions in complex terrain - a case study of the January 2010 air pollution episode in Norway Viel Ødegaard Norwegian Meteorological.
A baroclinic instability test case for dynamical cores of GCMs Christiane Jablonowski (University of Michigan / GFDL) David L. Williamson (NCAR) AMWG Meeting,
The status and development of the ECMWF forecast model M. Hortal, M. Miller, C. Temperton, A. Untch, N. Wedi ECMWF.
Lennart Bengtsson ESSC, Uni. Reading THORPEX Conference December 2004 Predictability and predictive skill of weather systems and atmospheric flow patterns.
Core Theme 5: Technological Advancements for Improved near- realtime data transmission and Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Data Assimilation WP 5.2 Development.
Workshop on Tropical Biases, 28 May 2003 CCSM CAM2 Tropical Simulation James J. Hack National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado USA Collaborators:
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
Local forcing and intra-seasonal modulation of the South America summer monsoon: Soil moisture, SST and topography Alice Grimm Dept. of Physics - Federal.
Markus Gross PDC14 Setting the scene. ftp://ftp.cicese.mx/pub/divOC/ocefisica/PDC14.
SASCOF 2010 Météo-France GCM forecasts JP. Céron – Météo-France
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Numerics of Parametrization ECMWF training course May 2006 by Nils Wedi  ECMWF.
Multidecadal simulations of the Indian monsoon in SPEEDY- AGCM and in a coupled model Annalisa Bracco, Fred Kucharski and Franco Molteni The Abdus Salam.
Global variable-resolution semi-Lagrangian model SL-AV: current status and further developments Mikhail Tolstykh Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian.
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
The application of ensemble Kalman filter in adaptive observation and information content estimation studies Junjie Liu and Eugenia Kalnay July 13th, 2007.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
Some preliminary FIM results DCMIP workshop July/August 2012 Boulder, CO.
Matthew J. Hoffman CEAFM/Burgers Symposium May 8, 2009 Johns Hopkins University Courtesy NOAA/AVHRR Courtesy NASA Earth Observatory.
Class #11 Monday, February 2 Class #11: Monday, February 2 Chapter 6 Forces and winds 1.
OSEs with HIRLAM and HARMONIE for EUCOS Nils Gustafsson, SMHI Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, IMO John de Vries, KNMI Roger Randriamampianina, met.no.
Atmospheric Dynamics Suzanne Gray (University of Reading) With thanks to Alan Gadian and Geraint Vaughan. Basic dynamical concepts.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Wednesday 09/10/2014 Quiz! (Short?) Weather Discussion Continue Review Material Geostrophic Wind Continuity Vorticity.
IC2_I Scenarios of future changes in the occurrence of extreme storm surges Nilima Natoo A. Paul, M. Schulz (University of Bremen) M.
Recent Developments at ECMWF
Predictability and forecast evaluation of ensemble simulations of long-lived Hurricane Nadine (2012)
Reporter: Prudence Chien
El Niño / Southern Oscillation
Oliver Elison Timm ATM 306 Fall 2016
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
A New Tropopause Definition for Use in Chemistry-Transport Models
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology
Bo Christiansen Downward propagation from the stratosphere:
Impact of the vertical resolution on Climate Simulation using CESM
seasonal prediction for Myanmar
A coupled ensemble data assimilation system for seasonal prediction
Sub-seasonal prediction at ECMWF
ECMWF activities: Seasonal and sub-seasonal time scales
Project Atmosphere American Meteorological Society
Climate sensitivity of the CCM3 to horizontal resolution and interannual variability of simulated tropical cyclones J. Tsutsui, K. Nishizawa,H. Kitabata,
Observational Data Source Impacts In The NCEP GDAS
Presentation transcript:

Non-hydrostatic IFS at ECMWF Mariano Hortal, Deborah Salmond, Agathe Untch, and Nils Wedi

Topics NH-IFS stability physics-dynamics coupling NH-IFS climate and forecast performance Tracer transport: physics-dynamics coupling idealized flow experiments

NH-IFS Problem with horizontal diffusion, which lead to noise and model failure in the stratosphere.

Problem with horizontal diffusion Inconsistency in setup of horizontal diffusion in NH at ECMWF: diffusion applied on horizontal divergence and the two new non-hydrostatic variables was different. This did not show up as a problem in CY30R1, however in CY31R1 it results in noise in the horizontal divergence: When the same diffusion is applied on the NH variables as on horizontal divergence this noise does not develop.

Model failure when coupled to the physics Using large time-steps we encountered problems with “bull’s eyes” in the temperature field near the surface in areas with steep orographic gradients which lead to model failure.

2. Problem with temperature over steep orography NH run at T159L60, ∆t=1h, NSITER=1 Temperature at level 59 after 27h

NH with NSITER=2, ∆t=1h Hydrostatic run, ∆t=1h (with physics)

NH with NSITER=1, ∆t=1h Hydrostat. with no phys, ∆t=1h (no physics)

Hydrostat. with no phys, ∆t=1h NH with NSITER=1, ∆t=1h Hydrostat. with no phys, ∆t=1h LVERAVE_HLUV=FALSE (no physics)

2. Problem with temperature over steep orography NH run at T159L91, NSITER=1, NEPHYS=3, Temperature at level 90 after 168h ∆t=0.5h ∆t=1h

Summary: near surface sensitivities in the vicinity of steep orography Decrease the time-step Switching off the averaging of surface winds Change the number of iterations Sensitivity to pointwise large surface wind accelerations (implicit convection scheme formulation) LVERAVE_HLUV=F NSITER=2 works best!

Physics – Dynamics coupling Development of 2 options to call physics: Call physics only in the last corrector step of the ICI scheme (adiabatic predictor steps) (NEPHYS=3), NH(3) Call physics in the predictor step and use these physical tendencies in each subsequent corrector step (NEPHYS=2), NH(2)

NH-IFS with physics Does the model climate of the NH version of IFS differ from the climate of the hydrostatic version for a Tl159L91 resolution ? 3 member ensemble 1 year daily SST forcing

zonal-mean zonal wind NH(3) – H(NH) H(NH) – H(IFS) NH(2)-H(NH) H(IFS)-ERA40

zonal-mean zonal temperature NH(3) – H(NH) H(NH) – H(IFS) NH(2)-H(NH) H(IFS)-ERA40

NH H(NH) diff

Anomaly correlation and rms error: 12 cases, Tl159L91 NH H(NH) H 500hPa Z, Northern Hemisphere 500hPa Z, Southern Hemisphere 500hPa T, Tropics Anomaly correlation and rms error: 12 cases, Tl159L91 CPU time factor: H=1; H(NH)=1.5; NH=2; H(NH) and NH used NSITER=2

Physics – Dynamics coupling 2 separate calls to vertical diffusion scheme, before and after calls to cloud and convection to test possibility for a better near surface balance in the last corrector step of nonhydrostatic model hydrostatic test

Physics – Dynamics coupling 1 call to vdfmain 2 calls to vdfmain

Physics-Dynamics coupling Vertical diffusion Anton Beljaars Physics-Dynamics coupling Vertical diffusion Negative tracer concentrations noticed despite a quasi-monotone advection scheme

Physics-Dynamics coupling Vertical diffusion (Kalnay and Kanamitsu, 1988) Single-layer problem

Physics-Dynamics coupling Vertical diffusion Two-layer problem depends on  !!!

(D+P)t (D+P)t+t  = 1.5 Dt+t  = 1 Anton Beljaars

Idealized flow past a mountain on the sphere Initial zonal flow, isothermal atmosphere, no physics Hydrostatic mountain NL/U >>1 Non-hydrostatic mountain NL/U ~ 1 Froude number Nh/U ~1

Hydrostatic model Tl799L91, NL/U ~ 900 Hydrostatic regime Non-hydrostatic model Horizontal divergence D

Tl159L91, NL/U ~ 2.5 Near non-hydrostatic regime Horizontal divergence D hydrostatic model non-hydrostatic model

dt=3600s, sitra=100K dt=1800s, sitra=50K p-p_hyd noise dt=1800s, sitra=10K Blows up! dt=1800s, sitra=100K

dt=1800s, sitra=100K dt=1800s, sitra=150K dt=1800s, sitra=200K dt=1800s, sitra=350K Blows up!

Next steps Further investigate the physics-dynamics interaction with NH-IFS Test NH-IFS in higher resolution Idealized tests in the NH regime on the sphere Improve the scores …

dt=3600s, p-p_hyd dt=3600s, horiz. divergence dt=1800s, p-p_hyd dt=1800s, horiz. divergence