Linh Nguyen, TPB, NCDOT February 11, 2011 1 Madison County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP ) Madison County Board of Commissioners Meeting Marshall,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011 P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition.
Advertisements

January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
ESTABLISH A NORTH-SOUTH PARKWAY The LNTC and the towns should plan for a parallel north-south parkway that will expand the commuter rail impact area to.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
US 52 Corridor Study Public Meeting November 15, 2010.
Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ROUTE 29.
City of Ashland Transportation System Plan Update September 6 th, 2012.
May 14, st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project.
US 1 CORRIDOR STUDY AND PROJECT PRIORITIZATION PROCESS Augusta, GA November 29, 2012 Jeff Carroll CDM Smith Georgia Association of MPOs Annual Conference.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
Public Location/Design Hearings November 17, 2010 Laughlin, Nevada November 18, 2010 Bullhead City, Arizona.
State Highway 6 Corridor Access Plan. SH 6 Project Description Project Initiated and funded by –City of Houston –Missouri City –City of Sugar Land –Harris.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Presentation to RTC July 17, 2015 Project Purpose Extend RAPID to UNR Improve pedestrian safety & access Create.
Schools Jobs Revenues Services Recreation Environment Transportation Transportation Connectivity Housing Public Safety Pontiac’s.
Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency Kamm’s Corners Development Corporation.
A Handbook That Outlines When traffic impact studies should be required What analyses should be included How the study should be reviewed and used Who.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
SR 997 / KROME AVENUE Florida Department of Transportation April 27th, 2006 South Miami-Dade Watershed Study Advisory Committee.
Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Department of Transportation Consideration of Potential City of Pasadena Position Related to SR710 Extension Alternatives Being Considered By Metro City.
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
9 TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) Ali Bonakdar.
ALACHUA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES FOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WORK PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2011/12 – 2015/16 Presentation to Board of County.
Oregon Transportation Commission October 14, 2015 OR 99 Rogue Valley Corridor Plan.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Urban Street Standards Progress Report Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE 2040 LRTP Update – Needs Plan Development October 6, 2015 City of Lynn Haven.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
Route 12B Safety Improvement Project New York State Department of Transportation Mark Silo, P.E. Thomas J. Madison, Jr. Regional DirectorCommissioner.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING GIS TYLER MEYER, AICP 2015 AMPO Conference Clark County, NV October 2015.
COUNTY ROAD 517 Improvements from State Highway 172 to Howe Drive DECEMBER 16, 2015 At Tribal Multipurpose Facility.
156 th Street Design in Bennington Public Open House Meeting October 28, 2009 City of Bennington, NE.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
ALACHUA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES FOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WORK PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2013/14 – 2017/18 Presentation to Board of County.
ALACHUA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES FOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WORK PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2015 – 2019 Presentation to Board of County.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
Martin J. Walsh Mayor Michael Dennehy Commissioner Public Hearing January 20, 2015.
Complete Streets Training Module 4a – Understanding Context.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Waterdown Road Corridor Class Environmental Assessment (Phase 3 & 4) Community Services Committee May 9, 2012.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
Thoroughfare Plan Update
32 Transportation Midway City 2016 General Plan
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway
Fordham at Columbia as a Grade-Separated Intersection
Meeting of the Hillsborough MPO Board December 5, 2017
Lenoir County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Maps and Recommendations John A. (Andy) Bailey April 16, 2018.
SANDY SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Lenoir County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Maps and Recommendations John A. (Andy) Bailey April 9, 2018.
MPO Board Presentation
Fordham at Columbia as a Grade-Separated Intersection
Parks Highway Reconstruction: Lucas Road to Big Lake Road
STATE ROAD 61/369 CRAWFORDVILLE HIGHWAY
Presentation transcript:

Linh Nguyen, TPB, NCDOT February 11, Madison County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP ) Madison County Board of Commissioners Meeting Marshall, NC

February 11, 2011 Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP): What is it? Long range multi-modal transportation plan for a town/city, group of towns/cities, or a county Concept for broad range of improvements over year planning period, NOT financially constrained Vision Plan, No funding attached Developed cooperatively: NCDOT & local stakeholders Incorporates Land Use plans, community & statewide goals Elements Include: – Highway – Public Transportation & Rail – Bicycle – Pedestrian

February 11, 2011 CTP: What is it? (cont’d) Current & future conditions – Lanes, Right-of-Way (ROW), volume, capacity – Level Of Service (LOS), congestion, safety Deficiencies & recommended improvements – For all modes Final product – CTP = maps showing recommended improvements – Technical report

February 11, 2011 A Comprehensive Transportation Plan Does NOT... ; Make a promise to build roads. ; Determine a pinpoint location of new roads. of new roads. ; Make a promise to build roads. ; Determine a pinpoint location of new roads. of new roads. The Road goes HERE!! We will build this road for you!

February 11, 2011 CTP: Why is it Needed? Analysis and recommendations are a basis for project prioritization by the Rural Planning Organization (RPO) Projects must be in a mutually adopted CTP to be eligible for inclusion in NC Transportation Improvement Program (NCTIP) Use CTP recommendations to protect right of ways Coordinated Subdivision and Land Use Controls

February 11, 2011 Construction, Maintenance, Operations Building & Maintaining the Road Project Design Design & ROW Project Planning Minimizing the Impacts Program Development Funding the Projects Long-Range Planning Determining the Need Project Development Process We are here in the process

February 11, 2011 CTP: Who is involved? NCDOT RPO Local stakeholders – County – Towns – Business interests: Retail, Office, Industrial – Other modes: Bus, Rail, Bicycle, Pedestrian – Environmental interests

February 11, 2011 CTP: What are the steps? Requires land development plan Form a CTP Steering Committee Goals & Objective Survey – Public Involvement Vision statement Network: roads to study Data collection/Future projections Analysis – Base Year (2009) and Future Year (2035) Presentation to Steering Committee and Officials Test Alternatives Preliminary Recommendations Public Involvement (Nov Marshall, Mars Hill, Hot Spring) Final Recommendations/Adoption/Endorsement

December 3, 2010 CTP Steering Committee Composed of representative from: – Madison County – Marshall – Mars Hill – Hot Springs – NCDOT Division & District Office from Division 13 – NCDOT TPB – Land-of-Sky RPO Staff

December 3, 2010 Role of CTP Steering Committee Coordinate with county/town councils, planning boards Develops vision statement Agrees on roads to be studied Assists with public involvement and survey Reviews plan as it is developed (consistency with vision) Assists with adoption & endorsement – Municipalities, County Board of Commissioners, RPO, NCDOT

February 11, 2011 Question ???? Recommendation: Highway Rail & Transit Bicycle Pedestrian

February 11, 2011 Highways Recommendations 1. US 19 Widening – from I-26 to Yancey County line (NCTIP project # R-2518A – under construction) Existing Recommended Lanes: 2-lane rural Lane: 4-lane divided Boulevard 2009 ADT: 7,800 to 9,700 Capacity: 60,700 vpd 2035 ADT: 16,700 to 21,800Speed: 55 mph Speed: 55 mph Capacity: 15,800 vpd Purpose: Add capacity to alleviate future traffic congestion

December 3, 2010

February 11, 2011 Highways Recommendations (cont.) 2. NC 213 Bypass – from existing NC 213 (Carl Eller Rd) just west of I-26 Interchange to existing NC 213 (Cascade Rd) in the vicinity of Gabriels Creek Rd NC 213 (without Bypass)Recommend NC 213 Bypass Lanes: 2-3 lane Lanes: 2-lane 2009 ADT: 9200 to vpd2009 ADT: NA 2035 ADT: to vdp2035 ADT: 12,000 vpd Speed: 25 – 35 mph Speed: 45 mph Capacity: vpdCapacity: 15,800 vpd Purpose: 1. Provide alternate route for through trip travel in Mars Hill area. 2. Alleviate future travel congestion on existing NC Enhance Safety by minimize future vehicle/pedestrian conflict in the Mars Hill downtown, especially through the Mars Hill College area

December 3, 2010

February 11, 2011 Highways Recommendations (cont.) 2. US 25/US 70 Widening (Marshall) from NC 251 to North Main Street (US 25/US70 Bus) Existing Recommended Lane: 2-3 lane Lane: 4-lane divided Boulevard 2009 ADT: 8, vpdSpeed: mph 2035 ADT: vpdCapacity: 60,700 vpd Speed: mph Capacity: vpd Purpose: Add capacity to alleviate future traffic congestion

December 3, 2010

February 11, 2011 Highways Recommendations 3. Little Pine Rd/NC 63 Connector (including improving existing Little Pine Rd) from US 25/US 70 in Marshall to NC 63 near Spring Creek Community (NCTIP Project # FS-0513A) Existing Propose Connector Lane: 2-lane (18-20 ft pavement) Lane: 2-lane (24ft pave) 2009 ADT: vdp 2035 ADT: vpd 2035 ADT: vpd Speed: 35 mph Speed: 35 mph Capacity: vdp Capacity: 7,400 vpd Purpose: To provide alternate route between NC 63/209 and US 25/US 70 To provide safer travel environment and better connectivity

December 3, 2010

February 11, 2011 Highways Recommendations 4. Widen Bruce Road from North Main Street to Riddle Rd Existing Recommended Lane: 2-lane (16 ft pavement) Lane: 2-lane (24ft pave) 2009 ADT: 800 vdp Speed: mph 2035 ADT: 1500 vpd Speed: 25 mph Capacity: 7,200 vpd Purpose: To provide safer travel environment for school buses from Mars Hill Elementary School

February 11, 2011 Highways Recommendations 5. Add left-turn lane on Main Street at NC 213 in downtown Mars Hill Purpose: To improve capacity on Main Street and to improve travel efficiency at Main/NC 213 intersection

December 3, 2010

February 11, 2011 Boulevard Facility US 70 East of Goldsboro Cary Parkway Moderate mobility, moderate access 30 to 55 mph Minimum 2 lanes with a median Connections: At-grade intersections for most major and minor cross streets Driveways allowed – primarily right- in/right-out; encourage consolidation and/or sharing of access Examples: US 1 in Raleigh, NC 55 (Holly Springs Bypass), US 70 between Clayton and Smithfield

February 11, 2011 High mobility, low access 45 to 60 mph Minimum 4 lanes with a median Connections: Interchanges (major cross streets) and at-grade intersections (minor cross streets) Driveways are limited in location and number; right-in/right-out only Traffic signals not allowed Examples: US 117 north of I-40, US 74 just east of I-277 in Charlotte Expressway Facility US 221 (Marion Bypass) US 220 in Rockingham County

February 11, 2011 Freeway Facility US 74 Near Waynesville US 264 East of I-95 High mobility, low access 55 mph or greater Minimum 4 lanes with a median Connections provided only at interchanges; all cross streets are grade-separated Driveways not allowed Traffic signals not allowed Examples: I-40, I-26, US 64 between Rocky Mount & Williamston, US 1 between Raleigh and Sanford

February 11, 2011 Major/Minor Thoroughfares US 441 South of Dillsboro US 13 North of Ahoskie Balanced mobility and access 25 to 55 mph Minimum 2 lanes, no median; includes facilities with a continuous left turn lane Connections: At-grade intersections Driveways allowed with full movements; consolidate or share connections if possible NC and US routes are always Major Examples: NC 86 north of Hillsborough, US 64 in Siler City, US 70 through Kinston, NC 168 in Currituck County

February 11, 2011

Transit & Rail Recommendations 1. Express bus service from Downtown Asheville to Mars Hill (recommended in the French Broad River MPO CTP and LRTP) 2. Park and Ride lot off of Calvin Edney Rd north of NC 213/I26 Interchange 3. Park and Ride lot off of NC 251 between US 25/US 70 and US 25/US 70 Bus

December 3, 2010

February 11, 2011 Bicycle Recommendations 1. Multi-Use Path – along NC 251 from Buncombe County line to US 25/US Share the Road signs on NC 213 between Mars Hill and Marshall (NCDOT will need to perform analysis of road before installing)

December 3, 2010

February 11, 2011 Pedestrian Recommendations 1. Multi-Use Path – along NC 251 from Buncombe County line to US 25/US Upgrade a number of older sidewalks in downtown areas to ADA Compliance 3. Fill in gaps in downtown sidewalk networks 4. Add pedestrian path connecting NC 213 to Mountain View St in Mars Hill

December 3, 2010

February 11, 2011 CTP Adoption Maps 1. Adoption Sheet 2. Highway Map 3. Highway Map Inset 4. Rail and Transit Map 5. Rail and Transit Map Inset 6. Bicycle Map 7. Pedestrian Map 8. Pedestrian Map Inset

December 3, 2010

December 20, 2010

February 11, 2011

Proposed Inclusion of Marshall Bike & Pedestrian Plan in CTP documentation Include a referral of the Marshall Comprehensive Plan in the Bike & Pedestrian Chapter of the CTP documentation (ie, Town of Marshall has adopted a Comprehensive Land Use Plan in It is recommended that the Town uses this Plan as a basis to implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (Figure 3- 1)** in the area. In addition, the Town will work with the Bicycle & Pedestrian Unit of NCDOT on a more detail Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the area. The Madison County CTP will be amended to include this plan once the it is completed.) ** Marshall’s Bike & Ped Plan is included as Figure 3-1

February 11, 2011 CTP Completion Schedule: 1. Adoption by Towns in Madison County Mars Hill – Adopted December 6, 2010 Marshall – Adopted January 19th, 2011 Hot Spring – February 7, Endorsement by Land-Of-Sky RPO – February Adoption by NCDOT Board of Transportation – March Completion of Technical Documentation – End of March CTP Study Close Out – End of April 2011

February 11, 2011 NCDOT Contacts Transportation Planning Branch (CTP): – Linh Nguyen, PE, (919) , ext. 67 Highway Design Branch – R-2518A US-19 Widening – Thad Duncan, (919) District Engineer: – Jeff Moore, PE, (828) Board of Transportation Member: – Wanda Proffitt Land-Of-Sky Rural Planning Organization: – Natalie Murdock, (828)