. THE REVIEW AND INTRODUCTION OF ECTS SYSTEM Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, Skopje, R. Macedonia Suzana Loskovska THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization Sciences, University of Belgrade
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade The European Credit Transfer System The European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) is a student-centered system based on the student workload required to achieve the objectives of a programme.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade ECTS Credits The most commonly used basis for measuring student workload in European higher education. Describe student workload in terms of time employed to complete a course or a course unit. The calculation of credits in terms of workload is a difficult issue.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Credits in Terms of Workload Credit is a measure of workload of typical student based on the time necessary to complete a given teaching/learning unit. What is the typical student? The number of hours of student work required to achieve a given set of learning outcomes depends on student ability, teaching and learning methods, teaching and learning resources, curriculum design.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Calculation of Workload Different approaches are used to calculate the student workload. Common items used to calculate workload are the total number of contact hours for the course unit number of hours per week x number of weeks; number of hours per week x number of weeks; preparation before and finalising of notes after the attendance of the lecture / seminar; the amount of independent work required to finish the course successfully.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Calculation of Workload Independent work can contain the following items: the collection and selection of relevant material; reading and study of the material; preparation of an oral or written examination; writing of a paper or dissertation; independent work in a lab; preparation for contact teaching sessions (revising course material, preliminary exercises, other intellectual training); doing tasks/exercises given during contact teaching time; doing assignments; other spontaneous work The calculation of workload in terms of credits is not an automatic process.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Workload for Blended Courses Teaching methods Information transmission (lectures, demonstrations) Activity based teaching (guided exercises, active demonstrations, seminars) Assignment based teaching (research project, home essay...) Literature based learning Virtual teaching Via a computer network in electronic learning environments Via a computer network in electronic learning environments Teacher/tutor is present via electronic instrument; students working with computer, searching for material, reading and writing (electronic) materials Teacher/tutor is present via electronic instrument; students working with computer, searching for material, reading and writing (electronic) materials No face-to-face contact No face-to-face contact
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Workload for Blended Courses Time required in virtual teaching time for completing learning assignments time for communication with tutors and other course participants time for reading course literature of other study material time for material search time required to learn how to operate the software, learning environments and other special tools, time required for possible contact teaching modules connected with the course examples Time provided for electronic communication is estimated according to messages produced by a student words/hour Every new software application at least 8 hours is needed for learning how to use it Technical errors.. How much time?
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Methods for Credit Allocation in Curricula Experts identify three different methods of credits allocation within curricula The top-down method The bottom-up method Credit allocation by reference to learning outcomes.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade The Top-down Method the easiest method to allocate credits a programme is divided into course units or modules, to which are allocated a limited/reasonable number of credits in more or less standard multiples Advantages it might prevent too much fragmentation and avoids too many examinations. it makes the transfer of credits easier. Dissadvantages decreases the teaching freedom, when the amount of contact hours within the module is limited Problems How to assess credits for modules which are essentially different in character? How to cope with particular modules which, although involving the same amount of work for students, count for a different credit weighting when taken within different degree programmes? How to deal with programme building unless one makes sure that all modules fit together in a coherent fashion?
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Credit allocation for MSc in elearning The courses included in the curriculum were determined so the top-down method is the easiest method and most suitable for credit allocation. To achieve (arithmetical) coherence of credits for different courses the credits for all modules are multiples of a given basic size. The basic size of a course is chosen to be 5 credits and all the courses are awarded credits that are multiples of 5.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade The Bottom-up Method Credits are allocated to individual units or modules by calculating student workload by counting the “hours of work”. Attention is concentrated on how many actual hours it takes an average student to accomplish the work for a specific module, in an individual module or all the modules for an entire semester’s or academic year’s work. The highly professional statistical surveys are carried out all over Europe. The average student estimates that he/she requires /- 200 hours to complete one academic year’s work. 1 ECTS credit is equivalent to something between 25 and 30 hours of work.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Possible problems Course title: ECTS credits: 5 Total number of classes per semesterOther classes Lectures: 30Practices: 30Other modes of teaching:Research work: Teaching methods On-line interaction by using the online course page and on-site lectures. Lectures: presentations and discussions with multimedia support; case studies. Labs: practical use of eLearning tools, teaching assistants provide any sort of required assistance. Total number of classes per semesterOther classes Lectures: 30Practices: 30Other modes of teaching:Research work: Teaching methods Lectures: lectures enhanced with multimedia support; case studies. Labs: students work on their projects on their own; teaching assistants provide any sort of required assistance
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Possible problems Предмет ПВДОНЕСПБ TИ91 Настава и учење у електронском образовању 2205 TИе92Алати и технологије за електронско учење 2115 TИе93 Инструкциони дизајн и развој електронских курсева 2115 ЕЛ967TИ946Инфраструктура за електронско учење 2115 TИ945 Образовање одраслих и цело животно учење 2115 TИ955 Истраживачке методе у образовању на даљину 2115 TИ956 Системи за управљање електронским учењем 2115 TИ957 Управљање пројектима електронског учења 2115 TИ965 Корисничка подршка у електронском учењу 2115 TИ966Мултимедија у електронском учењу 2115 TИ967Оцењивање у електронском учењу 2115
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Credit Allocation According to Learning Outcomes The best way, to calculate the number of student hours for successfully completing a new module, is to identify and enumerate the learning outcomes and competences. Advantages The use of learning outcomes in describing programmes and individual modules helps to establish programme equivalence. Learning outcomes indicate equivalence in terms of both the volume and the level of those contents. This method enables the curriculum developer to look at exactly how much student effort is necessary to achieve the specified outcomes. In theory, this method of credit allocation is excellent and it is consistently used by those who design open and distance learning modules.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Problems The theory and the vocabulary of learning outcomes is still imprecise. Academics are often to be found in the process of developing a basic vocabulary for the whole area of learning outcomes. Much work is still in progress on reaching commonly accepted definitions of levels of learning. Levels are not necessarily related directly to years of study. The learning outcomes in individual cases may be very different from that which the teacher may primarily have had in mind. Credit Allocation According to Learning Outcomes
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Which of the Three Methods is the Best? Because all three methods have problems and limitations, the best way is to use all three methods as far as possible, then each one can act as a check on the others. It is to be recommended that those charged with credit allocation within universities attempt first to use the simplest approach, and then pass on to the others as a check on that method if and when it has worked reasonably well.
THE 2nd TEMPUS JEP WORKSHOP June, 16-17, 2008, Faculty of Organization sciences, University of Belgrade Thank you for your attention!