University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch 2013-14 Critical Design Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Preliminary Design Review “Analysis of Atmospheric Cosmic Radiation Distribution as a Function of Altitude” Steven Schroeder-Program Manager Damon Emerson-Rocket.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT ADVANCE.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
November 7, 2014.
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Final Readiness Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Plantation High SL team 1
University of Iowa USLI
Presentation transcript:

University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

Table of Contents ●Vehicle Design ●Subscale Results ●Recovery System Design ●Hazard Camera ●Liquid Sloshing ●Aerodynamic Analysis ●Schedule ●Budget ●Questions

Vehicle Design Overview

Vehicle Name: HYDRA (HYdrodynamics, hazard Detection, Research for Aerodynamics) Carbon Fiber Airframe – High stiffness to weight ratio Total Length: 154in Diameter: 3.9” Wet Mass: 32.1 lb Static Stability Margin: 6.4 Target Altitude: 6,000 ft

Final Motor Selection Final Motor Selection: Cessaroni L1720-WT – Max/Avg.Thrust: 473/398 lbf – T/W Ratio: 12.4 – Rail size: 12 ft 1515 rail – Rail Exit Velocity: 93.1 ft/s

Stability Margin Static Stability Margin: ~6-8

Mass Statement ComponentMass (lbs) Nosecone2.750 Hazard Camera Payload0.124 GPS and Radio Transmitter0.222 Aerodynamic Analysis Payload Total3.960 Upper Body Tube1.920 Drogue Parachute Liquid Sloshing Payload and Electronics5.000 Avionics Bay and Electronics2.050 Lower Body Tube1.360 Main Parachute1.200 Complete Motor Assembly and Fin Can Motor Casing3.496 Propellant3.869 Total32.063

Mass Statement Current Wet Mass: 32.1 lb Potential mass growth: ~2.5 lb Expected Weight: 33 lb Mass Margin: +/- 2.5lb –This will keep the team near their target altitude of 6000ft.

Subscale Results

Total Length: 99.5 in Diameter: 54 mm Wet Mass: 9 lb Static Stability Margin: 6.4 Motor: Cesaroni K-360 Projected Altitude: 9216 ft

Subscale Results Static Stability Margin: ~6-10

Subscale Results

Recovery System

Parachute Design Elliptical cupped –Simple design 8 ft. diameter main parachute –Descent Rate: 18 ft/s 3 ft. diameter drogue parachute –Descent Rate: 50 ft/s Example of elliptical cupped parachute

Manufacturing Pattern cut from 1.9 ounce rip stop nylon Sewed with rolled hem seam and Dual Duty XP Heavy Nylon Thread Reinforced with 1” tubular nylon which continue to become shroud lines.

Chute Testing Chutes will be dropped off tall building with a small mass attached to determine drag coefficient. Strength test of seams will be done using a strength tester.

Parachute Placement/Deployment Main will deploy between first section and electronics bay Drogue will deploy between middle section and motor section –Trigged by two black powder charges each deployment First section Electronics Bay Middle section Motor section

Kinetic Energy (ft-lbf) Flight EventsMotor SectionMiddle SectionFirst Section Motor BurnoutN/A 261,683 Main Deployment Landing

Recovery attachments Two 25ft sections of 1” tubular Kevlar shock cord and one 1ft –One for each chute and one for payload integration Chutes attached by high strength (2,500 lbf) swivel and 3/8” quick link to shock cord Shock cord attached to bulkhead assemblies using quick links. Bulkheads are made of ¼” birch aircraft plywood.

Avionics Using Raven Featherweight altimeters 1 st event (drogue deployment) at apogee 2 nd event (main deployment) at 1,000 ft. AGL Redundant altimeter is also a Raven Wiring for Raven3 Featherweight

Vehicle Drift (0 mph)

Vehicle Drift (5 mph)

Vehicle Drift (10 mph)

Vehicle Drift (15 mph)

Vehicle Drift (20 mph)

Hazard Camera Payload

Hazard Camera (HazCam) Payload Overview Scans ground looking for Hazards Image is taken and sent to Raspberry Pi Raspberry Pi analyzes image and looks for Hazard When hazard is found, it is transmitted to ground station All footage is saved onboard for post-launch analysis Drawing of Nosecone-HazCam Assembly

HazCam Payload - Block Diagram HazCam connects to Comm System via USB to Arduino Board Uses cost effective and easy-to-use Raspberry Pi hardware

HazCam Payload - Design Used to process image Handles transmission to Xbee transmitter Built by makers of Raspberry Pi, comes with fully built library Capable of HD video

HazCam/GPS-Comm System Integration Placed within nosecone Mounted on Fiberglass Sled Secured in place with 8-32 all- thread Hazard Camera is at top of nosecone Clear acrylic lid on top of nosecone

HazCam Algorithm - Current State

HazCam Algorithm - Future Work Increase Speed Translate to C Reduce False Positives

Liquid Sloshing Payload

Liquid Sloshing Overview Tests a new method for mitigating liquid sloshing in fuel tank in microgravity Fuel contained in flexible bag in pressurized container Acceleration data and camera videos recorded by Raspberry Pi on SD card Data processed post-flight

Experiment Design and Analysis Control tank: water free to move about tank Experimental tank: water confined to flexible bag in pressurized tank Tanks isolated by electronics bay Acceleration data measured Data verified by video data Two launches: full scale and competition for greater sample size and less error

Liquid Sloshing Design Overall Dimensions: 17” long, 3.9” diameter Placed in middle body tube of rocket just above drogue parachute Bulkheads bolted into rocket body hold payload in place Two tanks: control and experiment, separated by electronics bay Accelerometer mounted to outside of experimental tanks LEDs light up coupler tubes for camera

Electronics Overview Data from camera and accelerometer processed by Raspberry Pi microcomputer Data stored on SD card for post-flight analysis Raspberry Pi powered by 5V USB charger, camera and accelerometer powered through Pi LEDs powered by 2x 9V batteries in electronics bay

Liquid Sloshing Integration Payload built utilizing coupler tubes and bulkheads that are similar to avionics bay Payload is bolted into rocket body tube through ½” bulkheads

Testing Plan Pressure test acrylic tank to ensure 4:1 pressurization safety factor Drop test to ensure payload survival in case of parachute failure Accelerometer test to confirm it can withstand 13g liftoff accelerations Systems integration testing to ensure proper component interfacing and wiring logic

Aerodynamic Analysis Payload

Aerodynamic Analysis Overview Payload to satisfy requirement – Aerodynamic analysis of protuberances during flight Goals: To determine drag of different shaped protuberances through pressure measurement To correlate and verify experimental data with CFD results

Aerodynamic Analysis Design Three mock “SRBs” are attached to the rear of the rocket Each SRB has a different geometry Pressure distribution over each SRB is measured

Scientific Overview

Electronics Isolation of systems Managed data flow Hardware filters of analog signals Pressure Velocity MultiplexerMicrocontrollerSD Card

Aerodynamic Analysis Integration Mounted to rocket utilizing a rail system Each SRB is an independent apparatus Easy to assemble and dissasemble

Aerodynamic Analysis Testing Structural testing Static pressure testing –Data recording –Circuit design –Sensor communication Dynamic pressure testing –Filtering –Noise levels –Leaks in pressure measurement system

Requirements Verification

Structures and Aerodynamics #RequirementSatisfying Design Feature Verified by: Status SA.1The airframe of the vehicle must be able to survive under all expected loads experienced during flight. Body Tubes and Couplers Analysis, Test Verified SA.1.1The airframe must survive a max longitudinal load of 400 lbf Body Tubes and Couplers Analysis, Test Verified SA.2The airframe must be able to integrate with all on board payloads, electronics, and recovery systems. Avionics Bay, Body Tubes InspectionVerified SA.3The airframe must integrate with the motor retention system. Motor Tube, Motor Retainer InspectionVerified

Propulsion and Guidance #RequirementSatisfying Design Feature Verified by: Status PG.1The motor must stay within the vehicle at all times during flight Motor RetainerAnalysis, test Verified PG.2The motor must supply enough thrust for the vehicle to obtain the target altitude of 6,000 feet MotorAnalysis, test Verified

Avionics and Recovery #RequirementSatisfying Design Feature Verified by: Status AR.1The recovery avionics must have a completely independent backup system Raven Featherweight Altimeters InspectionVerified AR.2The recovery avionics must fit within the allotted space in the avionics bay Avionics BayInspectionVerified AR.3The recovery system shall fit within the available tube space. Recovery System, Body Tubes Inspection Pending AR.4The recovery system shall be able to be deployed while the rocket is in its flight configuration Recovery SystemTestPending

Ground Ops # RequirementSatisfying Design Feature Verified by: Status GO.1 The wireless transmitters must be able to downlink all necessary data from the rocket in real time while in flight configuration. Transmitter, ground computer TestVerified GO.2 The range of the transmitter shall be more than two miles when installed in its flight configuration TransmitterTestVerified GO.3 The ground station must be able to store all downlinked data in real time. Ground computerTest Verified

Project Plan

Schedule

Budget CategoryCost Vehicle & Payloads$ Outreach$ Testing$ Travel$ Misc.$ TOTAL$

Educational Outreach Status Completed 1 Event – Reached over 90 middle-school students 2 more activities scheduled this month 1 scheduled in April On target to reach goal of working with 200 students

Questions?