WITH NITROGEN LIMITS BASED ON A TMDL MARYLAND NPDES AND GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS * Groundwater permit designed to add no non-point nitrogen load.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.

Advertisements

LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.

TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.

Nutrient Issues at the Blue Plains WWTP February 2004.

Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.

Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,

Strategic Process Engineering Liquid Treatment Processes at the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant Tier 1 Workshop Blue Plains Users October.

Exploring Trading to Reduce Impacts of Acid Mine Drainage: Cheat River, West Virginia Evan Hansen: Downstream Strategies, LLC Paul Ziemkiewicz, Jerry Fletcher,

ENTITY and DATE HERE Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium TMDL and Reasonable Assurance Overview.

A Collaborative Approach to Meeting Water Quality Goals : Tampa Bay, Florida Holly Greening, Tampa Bay Estuary Program Michael Connors, City of St. Petersburg.

Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.

Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.

Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.

Lee County Government Division of Natural Resources TMDL/BMAP Update TMDL/BMAP Update November 30, 2010 Roland Ottolini, Director Lee County Division of.

Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.

Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.

Nutrient Criteria for New Hampshire’s Estuaries Background Information Phil Trowbridge NH DES / NHEP September 30, 2005.

Anthony Whiley Environmental Engineer WA Department of Ecology ( ) Spokane River Phosphorus Ratios Preliminary.

Lessons from Chesapeake Bay Restoration Efforts Understanding the role of nutrient reduction activities in improving water quality.

Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator

Nutrient Trading and the Chesapeake Bay Paul K. Marchetti PENNVEST February 18, 2008.

Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.

1. DWS NPDES Permit Enrollment   Who is required to enroll Water Purveyors that are Community Drinking Water Systems (CDWS) with 1000 connections or.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,

Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia Tech

1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.

WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.

Department of the Environment Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program Phase I- Trading between point sources and trading involving connecting on-site septic.

Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,

Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.

What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,

Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.

Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.

Great Bay Municipal Coalition New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association June 13, 2013 Dean Peschel Peschel Consulting

Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.

Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.

Status and Effect of Impervious Area Estimates in the TMDL Presented to the Potomac Watershed Roundtable by Michael S. Rolband P.E., P.W.S., P.W.D., LEED.

Prepared for: Prepared by: Nutrient TMDLs and Their Effect on Dredging Operations in the Chesapeake Bay 24 October 2012 William J Rue- EA Engineering,

John Kennedy VA DEQ - Ches. Bay Program Mgr Tributary Strategies: Point Source Nutrient Controls Potomac Watershed.

Wastewater Treatment Plant # 2 Engineering Services Council Workshop July 8, 2014.

Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.

Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.

VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.

Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.

Strategic Process Engineering Liquid Treatment Processes at the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant Introductory Workshop for Blue Plains Users.

Water Resources Technical Committee Chesapeake Bay Program Overview & Updates July 10, 2008 Tanya T. Spano.

Potomac Toxics Monitoring Status and Issues ICPRB March 8, 2004.

Manure Overload in Maryland Investigation of Poultry Industry Records Shows Phosphorus Pollutions Regulations Are Needed to Save the Chesapeake Bay Read.

Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.

STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.

Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.

Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.

Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.

Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.

The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.

New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP

It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)

Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategies, TMDLs, and MS4 Permits

Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development

Nutrients and the Chesapeake Bay

Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater

Nutrient Trading for NPDES Permittees

Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters

Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters

Nutrient Trading for NPDES Permittees

Estimated Available Nutrient Credits

Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs

Presentation transcript:

WITH NITROGEN LIMITS BASED ON A TMDL MARYLAND NPDES AND GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS * Groundwater permit designed to add no non-point nitrogen load to the watershed. FacilityPermit No.TMDL Princess Anne WWTP96-DP-0486Manokin River Eastern Correctional Institute WWTP99-DP-3027Manokin River Centreville WWTP97-DP-0116Corsica River Hurlock WWTP99-DP-0645Marshyhope Creek College of Southern MD WWTP00-DP-1107Port Tobacco River La Plata WWTP00-DP-0518Port Tobacco River Swan Harbour Dell WWTP00-DP-0654Swan Creek Thunderbird Apartments WWTP98-DP-0431Port Tobacco River Fruitland WWTP99-DP-1223Lower Wicomico River Riddle Farm*01-DP-2710St. Martin River Pennington Commons*03-DP-3421St. Martin River Perdue - Showell95-DP-0051St. Martin River JCR Enterprises, Inc.99-DP-0024Transquaking River Ocean Pines97-DP-0708St. Martin River

TREATMENT PLANTS WITH A NITROGEN GOAL FOR CONCENTRATION OR LOAD IN THEIR PERMIT

TREATMENT PLANTS WITH A NITROGEN GOAL FOR CONCENTRATION OR LOAD IN THEIR PERMIT (CONT’D)

* Groundwater permit designed to add no non-point nitrogen load to the watershed. MARYLAND NPDES AND GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS WITH NITROGEN LIMITS BASED ON A TMDL

(1)When this permit is renewed, the new limitations may not be equal to the above limitations. (2)There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam other than trace amounts. (3)When the nutrient loading allocation for the Swan Point WWTP is issued under the Chesapeake Bay 2000 Agreement and/or a Tributary Strategy finalized under the Agreement, this permit may be reopened and new nutrients provisions added as appropriate. The permit may also be reopened to be reissued in accordance with the requirements of MDE’s Watershed Permitting Plan under which all discharge permits in a watershed are issued in the same year. (4) Upon completion of the upgrade, the permittee shall make a best effort to achieve a nitrogen concentration performance goal of 3 mg/l. The permittee shall also make a best effort to achieve a load of 7,309 lbs/year for total nitrogen. To establish performance with respect to this goal, the permittee will report to MDE monthly, the cumulative total nitrogen load. The nitrogen concentration performance goal will also be reported on as a monthly average. Total nitrogen is the sum of ammonia-N, organic-N, and (nitrite + nitrate)-N based on samples collected on the same day.