The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting further and higher education e-Learning and Pedagogy overview Helen Beetham Programme Consultant.
Advertisements

Supporting further and higher education Future Activities Sarah Knight Helen Beetham.
Supporting further and higher education A template for describing instances of (e)learning.
Our vision for a pedagogic planning tool Practical assistance for lecturers designing blended learning activities Both literature-based and adaptable in.
Subject Based Information Gateways in The UK Coordinated Activities in The UK Within the UK Higher Education community, the JISC (Joint Information Systems.
Supporting further and higher education Learning design for a flexible learning environment Sarah Knight and Ros Smith Pedagogy Strand of the JISC e-Learning.
Selecting Methods for Assessing Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change and the Role of the Compendium Presented to: UNFCCC Compendium on Impacts,
Exploring Organ Donation Through HEALTH EDUCATION UNITS.
Supporting further and higher education Supporting Digital Preservation and Asset Management in Institutions eSPIDA event University of Glasgow 11 February.
Montse Moharra; Antoni Parada on behalf of WP8 of the EUnetHTA project Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research EUnetHTA HANDBOOK ON.
A learning design toolkit for fostering effective e-learning Professor Gráinne Conole, University of Southampton NVU –Konferansen.
Protocol, the virtual project room. This brief tour will help you visualise Protocol and how best to take advantage of its benefits. Protocol helps you.
The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to.
Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,
Phoebe A wiki-based pedagogic planner to promote innovative practice in Design for Learning Liz Masterman Oxford University Computing Services with Marion.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
4. 2Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process Objectives  Explain the elements of project management and the responsibilities of a.
DoW text: Task and WP leaders will prepare syntheses reports of the project progress, its results and its implications. These synthesis reports will be.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
Adapted from C. Casey Project Introduction.ppt Computing Degree Projects An introduction to choosing and initiating computing related projects.
1 Beyond the Library: i-Skills for University Administration © Netskills, Quality Internet Training, Newcastle University Partly.
School Adjustment Plans. What is a School Adjustment Plan? What is the purpose of the Adjustment Plan? Who is the Audience? Comparing the Adjustment Plan.
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Viewpoints for Student Partnerships Carry out a baseline study to research current position. Establish the case for student partnerships and align with.
Part 1: Design for Learning: an online workshop by the EDIT4L project JISC Online, June DPT part 2part 2 LAMS part 3part 3.
Geoff Payne ARROW Project Manager 1 April Genesis Monash University information management perspective Desire to integrate initiatives such as electronic.
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Professor Norah Jones Dr. Esyin Chew Social Software for Learning – The Institutional Policy of the University of Glamorgan ICHL 2012, China
UK Wide Core Skills & Training Framework Findings of 2 nd Stage Consultation and Implications for Development of the Framework.
Learning Leeds 7 th October 2013 Meeting.
Joint Information Systems Committee 14/10/2015 | | Slide 1 Effective Assessment in a Digital Age Sarah Knight e-Learning Programme, JISC Ros Smith, GPI.
1 Reference Framework for Sustainable Cities (RFSC) Some useful functionalities for Finnish cities.
Using the Retention Data Center as a DeVry Student Success Coach Presented by Annette Herring and Beth Richter Noel-Levitz.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Key themes covered Search engines Locating/ assessing suitable resources Information Skills – knowing where to look Free web-based RDN,NLN, Ferl JISC or.
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Outline Information Systems Architecture Information System Architecture components Information Engineering Phases.
Shelter Cluster Coordinating humanitarian shelter Update from the Global Shelter Cluster Shelter Centre meeting Geneva, 25 May 2012.
Practical Investment Assurance Framework PIAF Copyright © 2009 Group Joy Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved. Recommended for C- Level Executives.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Chisholm Online Information Literacy The COIL project.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Developing networked learner support in UK higher education Perspectives from the NetLinkS project Phil Levy, UK-Nordic Conference 1997.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
Evaluating the quality of vital statistics UN Expert Group Meeting, June 2011 Dr AJ Lanyon Australian Bureau of Statistics 30 June 2011.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
External Audit as a Catalyst for Institutional Development – A South African Perspective EAIR Conference: August 2009 Presenter: Martin Oosthuizen.
COMPETENCY MAPPING ASSESSMENT & DEVELOPMENT BY : SUBHASHIS CHATTERJEE Sr. MGR (PERSONNEL)
© 2013 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. The Value Review.
Interprofessional Learning Clinical Placement Toolkit Module: Competencies What competencies could we offer and how? “Building and sustaining training.
SAS Curriculum Mapping Trainer (SAS CMT) October 2011.
NIH Change Management Program Change Management Program Overview March 8,
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Quality and Effectiveness Framework for post-16 learning Edwyn Williams Head of Performance Improvement South-West & Mid Wales Area Team.
LRC Network Planning for Records Management improvement Kathryn Dan, GM University Records and Policy.
Stages of Research and Development
Redesigning a Series of Online Nursing Courses
IT Governance is …… ‘an integral part of enterprise governance and consists of the leadership and organizational structures and processes that ensure that.
ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
Home Site Map FAQ Certif. Glossary Contact Help Search
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Project Charter START IT! By Catherine B. Calio, PMP
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Bridging the ITSM Information Gap
Presentation transcript:

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 1 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Dr. Grainne Conole

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 2 Institute for Learning and Research Technology An integrated approach to evaluating learning technologies Grainne Conole, Ed Crewe - University of Bristol Martin Oliver - University College London Jen Harvey - Dublin Institute of Technology

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 3 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Toolkits as an approach to evaluating and using learning materials Grainne Conole, Ed Crewe - University of Bristol Martin Oliver - University College London Jen Harvey - Dublin Institute of Technology

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 4 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Background Evaluation Assistant is –an online toolkit to help practitioners carry out evaluations –a six-month project funded by the UK JISC Committee for Awareness, Liaison and Training (JCALT) –a collaboration between Bristol University, University College London the Dublin Institute of Technology

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 5 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Toolkits - a definition Toolkits lie between –Frameworks provide theoretical overview or point of reference less restrictive than toolkits, also less supportive –Wizard easy to use software ‘black boxes’ software tools which can make decisions draws on pre-defined templates easier to use than a toolkit, but more restrictive

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 6 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Underlying assumptions Designed to  be easy-to-use for practitioners and produce demonstrable benefit  provide guidance, but not be prescriptive  be adaptable and easy to customise to the local context  establish a comprehensive resource of relevant material

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 7 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Outline Provides a structured resource that –that can be used to plan, scope and co-ordinate an effective evaluation –provides progressively more detailed information on particular topics and links to appropriate resources –allows the user can follow up relevant issues –reduces the time taken to plan an evaluation –can be used iteratively over time

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 8 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Toolkit architecture The toolkit consists of three components –Evaluation Planner helps define and scope the evaluation –Evaluation Advisor guides the user through the process –Evaluation Presenter provides support for presenting the results

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 9 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Evaluation planner Consists of seven stages –About planner –What are you evaluating? –Reasons –Context –Who is it for –Devising the question –Summary

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 10 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Who’s the evaluation for? This stakeholder analysis: –defines the stakeholders for the evaluation ie anyone who may have a stake in the evaluation –looks at the different types of stakeholders and their associated concerns and issues –maps the stakeholders to the evaluation process

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 11 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Formulating the question(s) Aligned to stakeholders analysis Question(s) refined to: –explore stakeholder concerns –provide comparison –yield measurement –challenge or expose stakeholder’s perspective

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 12 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Evaluation advisor Consists of four stages –About advisor –Data capture methods –Data analysis –Summary

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 13 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Filtering of choices At each stage of advisor –users are asked a series of questions –these help formulate the evaluation –this is linked to a filtering process –leading to a defined choice of data capture methods and data analysis

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 14 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Evaluation presenter Consists of four stages –About presenter –Closing the loop –Presentation tools

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 15 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Presenting the findings The final step –closes the loop by relating findings back to the stakeholders Options for presenting findings include:  Data sets or spreadsheet of costings  Executive summary of activity  Narrative account of the evaluation  Oral presentation or poster of findings  Research reports

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 16 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Further information Web site: Project team –University of Bristol Grainne Conole, Ed Crewe, Martin Belcher –University College London Martin Oliver –Dublin Institute of Technology Jen Harvey

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a centre of excellence in the development and use of Information and Communication Technology to support learning and research 17 Institute for Learning and Research Technology Relevant references Conole, G. & Oliver, M. (1998), A pedagogical framework for embedding C and IT into the curriculum. ALT-J, 6 (2), 4-16 Oliver, M. & Conole, G. (1998), Evaluating Communication and Information Technologies: a toolkit for practitioners. Active Learning, 8, 3-8 Conole, G., Oliver, M. & Harvey, J. (2000), ‘Scoping study’, a report for the ‘Evaluation Toolkit for practitioners JISC JCALT project, University of Bristol Oliver, M. & Conole, G., (2000), Assessing and enhancing quality using toolkits. Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 8, 1, Conole, G., Oliver, M. & Harvey, J. (2000), ‘Toolkits for practitioners’, ALT-C 2000, Manchester Conole, G., Oliver, M. & Harvey, J. (2000), ‘Toolkits as an approach to evaluating and using learning materials’, ASCILITE 2000, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales Conole, G., Oliver, M. & Harvey, J. (2000), ‘An integrated approach to evaluating learning technologies’, IWALT 2000, Palmerston North, New Zealand