Qualitative study on acceptability of screening Research team: Alison Heawood (PI, Bristol), Clare Emmett (Qualitative Researcher, Bristol), Niamh Redmond.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A pilot study to identify why women choose different services for the provision of routine cervical screening S Milligan, ME Cupples, P Milsom. The Queen’s.
Advertisements

Definitions Patient Experience Patient experience at NUH results from a range of activities that all impact upon patient care, access, safety and outcomes.
PHASE 1 Facilitating discussion on treatment preferences and advance care planning in cancer patients using the vignette technique Funding: Department.
Needs assessment of cancer survivors O Santin, L Murray, A Gavin and M Donnelly Cancer health services research and survivorship studies programme Centre.
Department of Vermont Health Access Vermont Blueprint for Health: Using APCD to Evaluate Health Care Reform Pat Jones, MS Blueprint Assistant Director.
Shared decision making and Australian general practitioner training Dr Ronald McCoy, Education Strategy Senior Advisor, Royal Australian College of General.
Working With Children and Young People
Recruitment to Trials. Background Recruitment of participants is a VERY important issue. The general consensus is that most trials under recuit.
Hysterosalpingogram- the patients perspective Maggie Williams Clinical Lead Nurse Radiology Gateshead Health NHSF Trust.
Dementia in Residential Care: Education Intervention Trial Project Team: Chris Beer (Principle Investigator) Kelly Banz (Study Coordinator) Nada Eltaiba.
IHT presentation 08/05/01 PRESENTING AND INTERPRETING HEALTH RISKS AND BENEFITS: THE ROLE OF THE INTERNET Flis Henwood, Sally Wyatt and Angie Hart.
SW 644: Issues in Developmental Disabilities Health Promotion for People with Developmental Disabilities Lecture Presenter: William Schwab, M.D.
In the name of Allah. Development and psychometric Testing of a new Instrument to Measure Affecting Factors on Women’s Behaviors to Breast Cancer Prevention:
Evaluation of the Older Adults Specialist Intervention Service Christina Richards Clinical Services Manager and Head of Therapies.
NHS Improvement National Conference Cancer Survivorship – Living with and Beyond Cancer “ACHIEVING EQUITABLE and CONTEMPORARY SERVICES for all Cancer SURVIVORS”
Program Evaluation: Entre Familia. Entre Familia: Program Description  Gender- and culture-specific residential treatment program (6 to 12 months duration,
Project Purpose The purpose of the project is to develop a preliminary “patient care map” for head and neck cancer patients for eventual use at the Vancouver.
Osteoporosis Research Center The Burden of Osteoporosis Estimates are that by the year 2020, one in two Americans will have or be at high risk for osteoporosis.
Designing a culturally appropriate self-management intervention for primary breast cancer patients from different ethnic groups using ‘Experience Based.
Using hotlines to improve women’s access to information in legally restricted settings Bangkok, March 9-11, 2012 Challenges for documenting hotlines’s.
Frequency and type of adverse events associated with treating women with trauma in community substance abuse treatment programs T. KIlleen 1, C. Brown.
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
To CESR and beyond by Dr Chris Ubawuchi MRCPsych
Results Recruitment 507 out of 4417 patients were eligible to take part in the study 131 of them (25.5%) participated in the study Demographics Male-female.
Chief Investigator: Dr Lee Shepstone School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice Collaborating universities:- Birmingham Bristol Manchester Sheffield.
Self-reported cognitive and emotional effects and lifestyle changes shortly after preventive cardiovascular consultations in general practice Dea Kehler.
Qualitative Research and Decision-Making
The SCOOP Study Lee Shepstone. A Brief History of SCOOP Local Modelling Outline application to the arc(£ ) Invitation to submit.
The Impact of Health Coaching
Introduction Method Implications Educational training programs regarding self-injury have potential to improve professionals’ attitudes towards and comfort.
Psychosocial consequences of false- positive screening results - breast cancer as an example John Brodersen MD, GP, PhD The Department of General Practice.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
CERVICAL SCREENING AMNESTIES DO THEY CUT IT? Ms Christine Reid Health Improvement Senior Dr Jennifer Darnborough Consultant in Public Health Medicine.
Unit A Vocabulary Words. 1. Sensory Neurons Neurons that carry signals from receptors and transmit information about the environment to processing centers.
The Green Dreams Project CIC Dr James Fleming MBChB MSc FRCGP Supported by:
5 Ways to Health and Wellbeing Alison Paul Health Promotion Specialist.
Barriers to seeking diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer in a selected Philippine population Victoria M. Medina.
Formic software training for the SCOOP study Mikey Desai, Training Consultant, Formic Ltd Liz Lenaghan, SCOOP Study Manager, UEA.
Focusing the question Janet Harris Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group ESQUIRE Qualitative Systematic Review Workshop University of Sheffield 6.
In The Name of God BREAST IMAGING N. Ahmadinejad Medical Imaging Center TUMS.
The author accepts full responsibility for this talk What works well with Keep Well? Initial providers’ perspectives on anticipatory care. Faculty of Public.
BETTER CANCER CARE A Discussion Elizabeth Porterfield Head, NHS National Planning Team SGHD.
Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, Toby.
Older People’s Services The Single Assessment Process.
Quality of Life (QOL) & Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Lori Minasian, MD Chief, Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, DCP, NCI, NIH,
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Prostate Cancer Symposium An Educational Initiative For Patients, Spouses, Advocates and Healthcare Professionals Importance of Clinical trials Virgil.
1 6 th National Children & Young People Survivorship Workshop A GP perspective Una Macleod Professor of Primary Care Medicine Primary care cancer lead,
MONITORING AND EVALUATION Teresa Lipson Strategic Commissioning Manager Older People, East Sussex CC.
Brief Intervention. Brief Intervention has a number of different definitions but usually encompasses: –assessment –provision of education, support and.
Pharmacy White Paper Building on Strengths Delivering the Future Overview.
Determinants of Bahraini Women’s Empowerment Entisar Mohamed Ali Shaikh Mansoor Alsetri PhD in Politics RUW Conference on Women and Society April.
The communication of benign biopsy results in breast cancer screening
LATEST RESEARCH JUNE 2015 Formed in 2009 the Aston Research Centre for
The Clinical Trial Volunteer’s Bill of Rights
LEADER – Interim results Liz Eyre Rod Hughes Peter Reynolds
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Kristin McDaniel Ross, M.S., Saint Louis University Contact: Abstract
Health Education England Workforce Strategy - Key Points
Physical Health Facilitator
WHY GENETIC COUNSELING IS IMPORTANT
Osteoporosis Definition
Preliminary analysis of a new measure of quality of patient decision making about research participation Peter Knapp, Jonathan Graffy, Peter Bower, Jo.
Participants’ Rights Participants of clinical trials have rights, and they are protected under law when participating in clinical trials. The informed.
Health Education England Workforce Strategy - Key Points
The Importance of Asking ALL Women About Safety in Their Relationships
Volume 391, Issue 10122, Pages (February 2018)
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Cervical Cancer and Screening Dr Ghufran Jassim MBBS,MD, MSc, PhD 8/30/2017.
Gregory Levin, FDA/CDER/OTS/OB/DBIII
Presentation transcript:

Qualitative study on acceptability of screening Research team: Alison Heawood (PI, Bristol), Clare Emmett (Qualitative Researcher, Bristol), Niamh Redmond (Trial Coordinator, Bristol), Tim Peters (Bristol), Liz Lenaghan (UEA) & Lee Shepstone (UEA)

Qualitative methods are increasingly used within trials to evaluate aspects less accessible to quantitative methods Questions are often raised about the costs as well as benefits of screening, for example the psychological impact on patients Quantitative studies have produced diverse findings regarding whether screening for osteoporosis contributes to anxiety in women Some qualitative studies have examined the psychological impact of screening on patients in other clinical areas (e.g. breast cancer, cervical cancer) But there has been little qualitative evaluation of the impact of osteoporosis screening on both women and GPs Background

Sample Women: Purposeful sample of approx. 30 women participating in SCOOP from two study centres: Bristol and Norwich Will include women in both the high and low risk groups, from different general practices and socio- economic backgrounds GPs: Purposeful sample of approx. 20 GPs from practices participating in SCOOP from the same study centres Will include GPs from a variety of practices (e.g. in terms of deprivation), with a range of proportions of women identified as at high risk

Experiences and views of the risk assessment process Experiences of the DXA scan (for those who received a scan) Understanding of osteoporosis Perceptions of their risk of future fracture Feelings about being identified as low risk Interviews with low risk women

Experiences and views of the risk assessment process Experiences of the DXA scan Understanding of osteoporosis Reactions to knowing that they are potentially at risk of a future fracture Reasons for taking-up or not taking-up the opportunity to discuss the results with their GP Experiences of consulting the GP to discuss the result and future treatment options (where this option has been taken up) Thoughts and feelings about using preventative medication Interviews with high risk women

Acceptability of the screening process Reactions to receiving the screening result (a woman’s risk category) and how they interpret this Experiences of discussing the screening results with women (both high risk women who take up this option as part of the trial, and low risk women who independently seek a discussion with their GP as a result of participating in the trial) Decision-making about potential preventative treatment options for high risk women Interviews with GPs