AN OVERVIEW OF TRENDS IN CMT AND CAPT DATA CALI PARTNER AND SUPPORTED DISTRICTS HEATHER LEVITT DOUCETTE EDUCATION CONSULTANT BUREAU OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Turning Point Grades Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.

Advertisements

CT Dept. of Labor Web site: Veterans Workforce Web site: Connecticut Dept. of Labor Veterans.

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.

Overview of The Legislation’s Purpose and Requirements CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION School Governance Councils.

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Pershing Pershing Annual Meeting Title I AYP/School Improvement.

1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.

Meghan Martins Michael Wasta Kathleen Wedge April 2, 2009.

Louisiana School Turnaround Specialist Program

Department of Public Instruction Kirsten Baesler, State Superintendent 600 East Boulevard Ave., Department 201 Bismarck, ND Beth Larson-Steckler.

CAPT Remarkable Results Percent of Math Students Reaching Goal or Higher 1Bristol Central Hs64.9 2Bristol Eastern Hs52.3 3Norwich Free Academy51.9.

Executive Summary  Did not meet API/AYP goals in language arts for the school or significant subgroups.  Did not meet API/AYP goals in math for the school.

Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.

Grape Creek Report Card Grape Creek Intermediate School Robin Graham Erica Crawford Dee Ann Shelton Carol Anderson.

The goal of the Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative (CALI) is to provide a model of state support to districts and schools to.

Connecticut State Department of Education Bureau of Accountability and Improvement District Improvement Plan Monitoring Spreadsheet Instructions for Effective.

ConneCT Demo and Update State of Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS) April 12, 2013.

1 The Connecticut Enterprise Zone Program 2005 Annual Report Department of Economic & Community Development Office of Business & Industry Development Holly.

A SSESSING THE V ULNERABILITY OF THE T ELECOMMUNICATIONS N ETWORK TO I MPACTS FROM C LIMATE C HANGE : F OCUS ON N EW E NGLAND T REVELYN P OTTER D R. P.

Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.

The goal of CALI is to provide a model of state support to districts and schools to support the process of continuous school and district.

Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.

Perinatal & Infant Oral Health Quality Improvement (PIOHQI) Pilot Grant Women’s Health Committee Meeting May 12, 2014.

Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement

The federal “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) law requires that all children be proficient in reading and math by the school year. It places pressure.

Innovative Collaborative Efforts To Reduce Urban Violence: Shooting Task Forces and Cold Case Squads DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE Kevin T. Kane Chief State’s.

DATA PRESENTATION February 5, 2008 ARE WE IMPROVING? WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?

CALI Professional Development (paid) Balanced Scorecard Periodic District Data Reviews Leadership & Learning Center Consultant Support Accountability,

Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.

Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!

School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.

Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.

Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.

1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.

Meeting the Needs of English Language Learners: Using Assessment Results and Data to Inform Decisions Michael Sabados, PhD, CSDE consultant Bureau of Data,

Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.

1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.

December 15, 2014 ESEA Flexibility Analysis. The flex analysis was designed to examine the characteristics of schools identified by each SEA’s differentiated.

2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011.

Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.

MPR Associates 1 ATTENDING — TO — ATTENDANCE Shared Attendance Database Connecticut Consortium on School Attendance  An association of local school and.

Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.

Race to the Top Application State Board of Education Meeting January 6, 2010 January 6, 2010.

Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.

Differentiated Accountability Title I Conference Daytona, Florida April 29, 2009.

Orlando Rodriguez, M.A. Manager/Connecticut State Data Center (CtSDC) Center for Population Research (CPR) College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (CLAS) University.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.

PVAAS School Consultation Guide Fall 2010 Session C: 9-12 High School – All Data Tools PVAAS Statewide Core Team

1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.

Early Intervention Project 20 th Anniversary November 5, 2004.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.

“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.

2014 UPDATE Report 97% Pass Rate 5620 Total Student Registrations 5125 Students Finished 4980 Students Passed.

December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.

STAKEHOLDERS MEETING Topic: Clean Energy Communities Program Improvements, Changes & New Points System.

Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.

Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis.

State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results

2012 Accountability Determinations

Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010

Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities

Meriden-Middletown-Wallingford Tri-Town Collaborative

2012 Rotary Foundation Dinner

Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305

Data Overview West Forsyth High School Forsyth County Schools, Georgia

State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results

Presentation transcript:

AN OVERVIEW OF TRENDS IN CMT AND CAPT DATA CALI PARTNER AND SUPPORTED DISTRICTS HEATHER LEVITT DOUCETTE EDUCATION CONSULTANT BUREAU OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

SELECTION OF PARTNER DISTRICTS PARTNER DISTRICTS Selected in 2007, again in 2008, and again in in 2007 An additional 3 in 2008 An additional 3 in 2010 In Year 3 or greater of In Need of Improvement Status Did not make AYP at the whole district level in math, reading or both in the year selected

SELECTION OF SUPPORTED DISTRICTS SUPPORTED DISTRICTS Selected in 2007 In Year 3 or greater of In Need of Improvement Status Did not make AYP at in math, reading or both for sub-group performance only Some Supported Districts later met the criteria for Partner Districts No new Supported Districts identified since 2007

SUPPORTS FOR PARTNER DISTRICTS Instructional and financial diagnostic assessments of the districts and schools Technical Assistance team assigned to facilitate the revision and monitor implementation of the District Improvement Plan (DIP) Required to establish an accountability system based on the CALI model Free access to training and onsite technical assistance in the CALI modules Demonstration Schools

SUPPORTS FOR SUPPORTED DISTRICTS Facilitated district self-assessment using the DSAC tool Free access to training and onsite technical assistance in the CALI modules Demonstration Schools

CURRENT PARTNER AND SUPPORTED DISTRICTS Partner Districts Selected in 2007 Partner Districts Selected in 2008 Partner Districts Selected in 2010 Supported Districts BridgeportAnsoniaHamden*Bristol East HartfordDanburyWest Haven*Manchester HartfordStamfordWindsor*Naugatuck MeridenCTHSS Middletown New Britain New London New Haven Norwalk Norwich Waterbury Windham * Former Supported Districts

Partner Districts: Ansonia, Bridgeport, Danbury, East Hartford, Hartford, Meriden, Middletown, New Britain, New Haven, New London, Norwalk, Norwich, Stamford, Waterbury, Windham DEMOGRAPHIC COMPOSITION OF 15 PARTNER DISTRICTS AS COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE STATE: ( SCHOOL YEAR) AA/NA 4%

Distribution of Special Education, Free/Reduced Lunch Eligible and ELL students in 15 Partner Districts as Compared to the Rest of the State ( School Year)

WHAT DOES THIS DATA LOOK LIKE FOR THE DISTRICTS WE ARE WORKING IN?

Percent of Students Performing at/above Proficiency on CMT Reading: 3rd Grade 2007 Matched Cohort District2007 (Grade 3)2008 (Grade 4)2009 (Grade 5)2010 (Grade 6) Manchester STATE Bristol Danbury Middletown Hamden Stamford Norwalk Norwich Ansonia Naugatuck West Haven Meriden Windsor New Haven East Hartford New London Waterbury Bridgeport Hartford Windham New Britain

Percent of Students Performing at/above Proficiency on CMT Math: 3rd Grade 2007 Matched Cohort District2007 (Grade 3)2008 (Grade 4)2009 (Grade 5)2010 (Grade 6) Ansonia Danbury State Manchester Middletown Bristol86 88 Hamden Windsor Naugatuck Stamford West Haven Norwalk Meriden East Hartford Bridgeport Norwich New Haven Hartford Waterbury New London New Britain Windham

Percent of Students Performing at/above Proficiency on CMT Reading: 4th Grade 2007 Matched Cohort District2007 (Grade 4)2008 (Grade 5)2009 (Grade 6)2010 (Grade 7) Bristol Manchester State Danbury Naugatuck Middletown Windsor West Haven Stamford Norwalk Hamden Norwich Ansonia Meriden New London Waterbury Bridgeport East Hartford New Haven Hartford Windham New Britain

Percent of Students Performing at/above Proficiency on CMT Math: 4th Grade 2007 Matched Cohort District2007 (Grade 4)2008 (Grade 5)2009 (Grade 6)2010 (Grade 7) Bristol Windsor Danbury State Ansonia Hamden Norwalk Naugatuck Stamford Manchester Middletown West Haven Meriden Norwich New Haven Waterbury Bridgeport East Hartford Hartford New London New Britain Windham

Percent of Students Performing at/above Proficiency on CMT Reading: 5th Grade 2007 Matched Cohort District2007 (Grade 5)2008 (Grade 6)2009 (Grade 7)2010 (Grade 8) Bristol Naugatuck Manchester State Hamden7685 Danbury Stamford Windsor Middletown West Haven Ansonia Norwalk Norwich Meriden New Haven East Hartford New London Waterbury Hartford Bridgeport New Britain Windham354549

Percent of Students Performing at/above Proficiency on CMT Math: 5th Grade 2007 Matched Cohort District2007 (Grade 5)2008 (Grade 6)2009 (Grade 7)2010 (Grade 8) Bristol Naugatuck Windsor State Hamden Middletown Ansonia Danbury Stamford Manchester Norwalk Meriden Norwich West Haven New Haven East Hartford Bridgeport Waterbury Hartford New Britain Windham New London606257

Percent of Students Performing At/Above Proficient: CAPT Reading District Bristol Naugatuck State CTHSS Windsor Stamford Norwalk Ansonia Manchester West Haven Hamden Middletown Meriden Danbury Hartford East Hartford Waterbury New Britain New Haven Windham New London Bridgeport Norwich* **** *Norwich has only one alternative High School; the N size for CAPT participants is too small to report the data publicly.

Percent of Students Performing At/Above Proficient: CAPT Math District Bristol Naugatuck CTHSS State Windsor Norwalk Manchester Hamden Stamford Middletown Danbury Ansonia West Haven Meriden East Hartford Hartford New London New Haven New Britain Windham Waterbury Bridgeport Norwich***** *Norwich has only one alternative High School; the N size for CAPT participants is too small to report the data publicly.

WHAT ABOUT THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP?

Percent of Students At/Above Proficient on Math CMT by Race: 3rd Grade 2007 Matched Cohort

Percent of Students At/Above Proficient on Reading CMT by Race: 3rd Grade 2007 Matched Cohort

Percent of Students At/Above Proficient on Reading CMT by Free/Reduced Lunch Eligibility: 3rd Grade 2007 Matched Cohort

Percent of Students At/Above Proficient on Math CMT by Free/Reduced Lunch Eligibility: 3rd Grade 2007 Matched Cohort

IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOLS, DISTRICTS AND THE STATE Cohort information is different than status Some districts and schools need to start looking at Goal Closing the achievement gap requires accelerating the learning of sub-groups Vertical Scale Analysis The assessment and accountability system will be changing Schools and districts need to mine their own data

HEATHER LEVITT DOUCETTE BUREAU OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARMENT OF EDUCATION