Use of Bayesian Methods for Markov Modelling in Cost Effectiveness Analysis: An application to taxane use in advanced breast cancer Nicola Cooper, Keith.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health Economics for Prescribers
Advertisements

Introduction to Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) methods
METHODOLOGY FOR META- ANALYSIS OF TIME TO EVENT TYPE OUTCOMES TO INFORM ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS Nicola Cooper, Alex Sutton, Keith Abrams Department of Health.
USE OF EVIDENCE IN DECISION MODELS: An appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK Nicola Cooper Centre for Biostatistics & Genetic Epidemiology,
USE OF EVIDENCE IN DECISION MODELS: An appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK Nicola Cooper Centre for Biostatistics & Genetic Epidemiology,
Estimating the cost-effectiveness of an intervention in a clinical trial when partial cost information is available: A Bayesian approach Nicola Cooper.
Evidence synthesis of competing interventions when there is inconsistency in how effectiveness outcomes are measured across studies Nicola Cooper Centre.
Dealing with Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
Bayesian Health Technology Assessment: An Industry Statistician's Perspective John Stevens AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood Bayesian Statistics Focus Team Leader.
Markov Models: Overview Gerald F. Kominski, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Health Services.
The Incorporation of Meta-Analysis Results into Evidence-Based Decision Modelling Nicola Cooper, Alex Sutton, Keith Abrams, Paul Lambert, David Jones Department.
Bayesian Estimation in MARK
1 Parametric Sensitivity Analysis For Cancer Survival Models Using Large- Sample Normal Approximations To The Bayesian Posterior Distribution Gordon B.
Gibbs Sampling Qianji Zheng Oct. 5th, 2010.
Decision and cost-effectiveness analysis: Understanding sensitivity analysis Advanced Training in Clinical Research Lecture 5 UCSF Department of Epidemiology.
The uptake of value of information methods Solutions found and challenges to come Alan Brennan Director of Operational Research ScHARR.
What role should probabilistic sensitivity analysis play in SMC decision making? Andrew Briggs, DPhil University of Oxford.
Approaches to Data Acquisition The LCA depends upon data acquisition Qualitative vs. Quantitative –While some quantitative analysis is appropriate, inappropriate.
Modelling Partially & Completely Missing Preference-Based Outcome Measures (PBOMs) Keith Abrams Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester,
ANALYSIS OF REPEATED MEASURES COST DATA WITH ZERO OBSERVATIONS: An Application To The Costs Associated With Inflammatory Polyarthritis Nicola J Cooper,
1 Cost-effectiveness analysis using Markov modeling Rahul Ganguly Ph.D. November 25 th, 2006 BITS, Pilani.
Introduction to decision modelling Andrew Sutton.
Bayesian statistics – MCMC techniques
Gaussian Processes to Speed up Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Matthieu Lê Journal Club 11/04/141 Neal, Radford M (2011). " MCMC Using Hamiltonian Dynamics. "
Stochastic approximate inference Kay H. Brodersen Computational Neuroeconomics Group Department of Economics University of Zurich Machine Learning and.
1 CE 530 Molecular Simulation Lecture 8 Markov Processes David A. Kofke Department of Chemical Engineering SUNY Buffalo
. PGM: Tirgul 8 Markov Chains. Stochastic Sampling  In previous class, we examined methods that use independent samples to estimate P(X = x |e ) Problem:
USE OF LAPLACE APPROXIMATIONS TO SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY
Value of Information Some introductory remarks by Tony O’Hagan.
A Two Level Monte Carlo Approach To Calculating
1 Transforming the efficiency of Partial EVSI computation Alan Brennan Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS) Samer Kharroubi Centre for Bayesian.
CS 561, Session 29 1 Belief networks Conditional independence Syntax and semantics Exact inference Approximate inference.
Non-parametric Bayesian value of information analysis Aim: To inform the efficient allocation of research resources Objectives: To use all the available.
Using ranking and DCE data to value health states on the QALY scale using conventional and Bayesian methods Theresa Cain.
Value of Information for Complex Economic Models Jeremy Oakley Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield. Paper available from.
Generalised Evidence Synthesis Keith Abrams, Cosetta Minelli, Nicola Cooper & Alex Sutton Medical Statistics Group Department of Health Sciences, University.
Bayesian Analysis for Extreme Events Pao-Shin Chu and Xin Zhao Department of Meteorology School of Ocean & Earth Science & Technology University of Hawaii-
Case 1: Optimum inspection and maintenance rates (wind turbine is available during inspection) Case 2: Optimum inspection and maintenance rates (wind turbine.
1 CE 530 Molecular Simulation Lecture 7 David A. Kofke Department of Chemical Engineering SUNY Buffalo
Modeling Menstrual Cycle Length in Pre- and Peri-Menopausal Women Michael Elliott Xiaobi Huang Sioban Harlow University of Michigan School of Public Health.
Material Model Parameter Identification via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Christian Knipprath 1 Alexandros A. Skordos – ACCIS,
University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2012 Stephen T. Parente, Ph.D. Carlson.
WSEAS AIKED, Cambridge, Feature Importance in Bayesian Assessment of Newborn Brain Maturity from EEG Livia Jakaite, Vitaly Schetinin and Carsten.
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 17: Economic Evaluation using Decision.
Analysis and Visualization Approaches to Assess UDU Capability Presented at MBSW May 2015 Jeff Hofer, Adam Rauk 1.
Introduction to MCMC and BUGS. Computational problems More parameters -> even more parameter combinations Exact computation and grid approximation become.
A Beginner’s Guide to Bayesian Modelling Peter England, PhD EMB GIRO 2002.
Markov Random Fields Probabilistic Models for Images
Improved Cross Entropy Method For Estimation Presented by: Alex & Yanna.
Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Longitudinal Frequency Data Joseph Jordan Advisor: John C. Kern II Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Duquesne.
Bayesian Approach For Clinical Trials Mark Chang, Ph.D. Executive Director Biostatistics and Data management AMAG Pharmaceuticals Inc.
MCMC reconstruction of the 2 HE cascade events Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison.
Advanced uncertainty evaluation of climate models and their future climate projections H Järvinen, P Räisänen, M Laine, J Tamminen, P Ollinaho Finnish.
Markov Chain Monte Carlo for LDA C. Andrieu, N. D. Freitas, and A. Doucet, An Introduction to MCMC for Machine Learning, R. M. Neal, Probabilistic.
Lecture #9: Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo, part 3
Materials for Lecture 19 Readings Chapter 14
1 Chapter 8: Model Inference and Averaging Presented by Hui Fang.
Introduction to Sampling Methods Qi Zhao Oct.27,2004.
The Unscented Particle Filter 2000/09/29 이 시은. Introduction Filtering –estimate the states(parameters or hidden variable) as a set of observations becomes.
Bayesian Modelling Harry R. Erwin, PhD School of Computing and Technology University of Sunderland.
Economics of Complementary and Integrative Medicine: Where Do We Go From Here? Patricia M. Herman, ND, PhD, RAND Corporation IM4US Boston August 8, 2014.
SIR method continued. SIR: sample-importance resampling Find maximum likelihood (best likelihood × prior), Y Randomly sample pairs of r and N 1973 For.
Efficiency Measurement William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Hierarchical Models. Conceptual: What are we talking about? – What makes a statistical model hierarchical? – How does that fit into population analysis?
Generalization Performance of Exchange Monte Carlo Method for Normal Mixture Models Kenji Nagata, Sumio Watanabe Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Secondary logo Secondary logo
Bayesian inference Presented by Amir Hadadi
Multidimensional Integration Part I
Presentation transcript:

Use of Bayesian Methods for Markov Modelling in Cost Effectiveness Analysis: An application to taxane use in advanced breast cancer Nicola Cooper, Keith Abrams, Alex Sutton, David Turner, Paul Lambert Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Leicester, UK

OBJECTIVE To demonstrate how CE decision analysis may be implemented from a Bayesian perspective, using MCMC simulation methods. Illustrative example: CE analysis of taxane use for the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer compared to conventional treatment

OUTLINE Decision-Analytical Model Transition Probabilities Model Evaluation Methods Model Results Summary & Conclusions

MODEL 4 Stage stochastic Markov Model 4 Health states Response Stable Progressive Death Cycle length = 3 weeks (35 cycles) Maximum of 7 treatment sessions

MODEL cont. Stages 1 & 2 (cycles 1 to 3) Stage 3 (cycles 4 to 7) Stage 4 (cycles 8 to 35) Treatment cycles Post - Treatment cycles

1) Pooled estimates TRANSITION PROBABILITIES 3) Transformation of distribution to transition probability 2) Distribution 4) Application to model (i) time variables: (ii) prob. variables:

Stochastic Markov Models: –Classical Model - Monte Carlo (MC) simulation model (EXCEL) –Bayesian Model - Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation model (WinBUGS) MODEL EVALUATION

Docetaxel Doxorubicin RESULTS Stable Progressive Respond Death

CE PLANE (MC)

CE PLANE (MCMC)

RESULTS

INB CURVES

NET BENEFIT (cont.)

NET BENEFIT (cont.)

CONCLUSIONS Advantages of the Bayesian approach compared to equivalent Classical approach (i)Incorporation of greater parameter uncertainty (ii)Ability to make direct probability statements & thus direct answers to the question of interest (iii)Incorporation of expert opinion either directly or regarding the relative credibility of different data sources

ACCEPTABILITY CURVE

FURTHER WORK Sensitivity analysis –One / multi-way analysis –Choice of prior distributions –MCMC convergence Simple versus Complex Markov model –Time dependent variables –Two-way pathways (e.g. stable to response to stable)