Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strengthening statistical capacity in support of progress towards the Internationally Agreed Development Goals in countries of South Asia United Nations.
Advertisements

Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 2: Managing contract/Managing project… Question 1 : What do you think are the expectations and concerns of the EC task.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS PLANNING PROCESS
Life-cycle model ccWGs 22 May 2014 Bart Boswinkel ccNSO Senior Policy Advisor.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
SUB-REGIONAL WORKSHOP FOR GEF FOCAL POINTS IN WESTERN AND CENTRAL AFRICA, DAKAR, May 2007 GEF NATIONAL COORDINATION: BURKINA FASO’S EXPERIENCE.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Hong Kong Project management theory Project Management What do you know about management theory?
How do I manage my work as well as possible? Know who is responsible for what Three key parties: 1.The student (you) 2.Your supervisor 3.Your unit/UCC.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Committee Planning and Budgeting Tool: Outlining the Roles and Responsibilities of Selected Committee Support Personnel A Presentation to Committee 8 July2014.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 5 to 6 November 2012 New Delhi, India Roles and Responsibilities of Council Members and Focal Points.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
UNAIDS Response to the Second Independent Evaluation.
Governance & Leadership Structure Influence Build Connect.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Virginia Athletic Trainers’ Association State Leadership Matrix Jay Sedory MEd, ATC, EMT-T; Certified Athletic Trainer United States Marine Corps, Quantico,
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Global Task Team: Improving AIDS Coordination Among Multilateral Institutions and International Donors Briefing for Theme Group on HIV/AIDS 1 November.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
GAC-GNSO Consultation Group On GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP London Progress Report 22/06/2014.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO UNDERSTANDING THE ORGANIZATION OF CODEX Module 2.5 How do Codex Committees function?
December_2009 Partnership building. December_2009 Partnership building within the partnering process COREGROUPCOREGROUP FORMAL LAUNCH $ $ $ $ $ cost centre.
Text #ICANN51 GAC / GNSO Joint Meeting 12 October 2014.
TNCM Oversight Committee and GF Flow of Funds Presentation to DPG-Health May 6, 2015.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
WMO WIGOS Project Office and Project Oversight Board ICG-WIGOS-3; Geneva, February WMO; WIGOS-PO.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Setting up your project for success Afternoon session.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
RESEARCH PROGRAMS GETTING OFF ON THE RIGHT FOOT AND STAYING THERE Sue Sillick Montana Department of Transportation July 28, 2010 Methods to Ensure the.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.3 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.3 Considerations for selecting.
National and Regional Preparations for MEA Meetings Session Three Felix Dodds.
June 24, 2016 UNAIDS Partnerships- Strategies, structures and social relationships Sally Smith Partnership Adviser.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Implementation of RCA Projects
Principles of Good Governance
IATI – Planned evaluation of IATI
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
Return to First Principles
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
IATI – Planned evaluation of IATI
Roles and Responsibilities of Council Members and Focal Points
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Roles and Responsibilities
Position descriptions
Validation procedure Nat. Secretariat and MSG
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships

S.I. EVALUATION and OVERSIGHT Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships UNOPS UNAIDS Secretariat Evaluation Team CO Liaison Official Cosponsoring Organizations Committee of CO S.I.E S.I.E. Report UNAIDS Programme Coordinating Board (PCB) Oversight Committee (OC) OC Secretariat EA&AA Chair

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS Willingness of stakeholders to participate. Shared understanding on scope, depth of evaluation, and priorities to be addressed. Availability of data and information from UNAIDS Secretariat, Cosponsors and other stakeholders. Findings are practical and useful for future planning. Evaluation process is perceived as independent, transparent, and impartial. Delays in timelines and milestones can be managed Finances are available as planned. Selection of country studies and informants are representative.

to review and finalize terms of reference for selection of the Evaluation Team; to participate with UNOPS in the review, selection, and contracting of the Evaluation Team, subject to the endorsement of the PCB; to provide guidance and directions to the Evaluation Team. A specific plan will be made for this upon approval of the Inception Report; to monitor and adjust, as required, timelines and budget (where necessary consulting the PCB), and other critical success factors; to ensure that the guiding principles of independence, transparency, and involvement of stakeholders are respected through communication and consultative measures; to inform the PCB through the OC Chair on progress of the Evaluation and on any matters requiring PCB approval, endorsement or action; to provide feedback on the Evaluation process for the PCB and comments on the Final Evaluation Report; to manage communication on the Evaluation process between the Evaluation Team and its interlocators; to mediate should conflicts or questions arise regarding outcomes and results between the Evaluation Team and interlocators; other actions as required for credibility of the Evaluation process and product. Oversight Committee Roles and Responsibilities

Chair of OC: Roles and Responsibilities In addition to overall responsibilities as a Member of the OC, the Chair will: Chair OC meetings. Serve as the contact point for the OC with the PCB, Evaluation Team, Secretariat, and Cosponsors. Set agendas, oversee preparation of briefing materials and reports for the meetings. Prepare Update information notes on the Evaluation for general distribution to stakeholders. Report to the PCB Chair on outcomes of the meetings, issues arising, actions to be taken and other matters as required. Provide progress reports to the PCB on the Evaluation. Oversee preparation of the OC report on the Evaluation to the PCB. Other duties as required or requested by the OC.

UNAIDS Secretariat OC Expectations on Roles and Responsibilities To prepare formalities for Evaluation Team visits in selected countries with UN representatives and governments, as required, and with UCC. To provide ongoing, timely critical review, validation and verification on initial findings, debriefings and reports of the Evaluation Team, To ensure participation at global and field levels in stakeholder consultations. To provide consolidated comments on the draft Inception and Evaluation Reports, and participate in any consultations. Any other activities to support the OC and to ensure meaningful contribution to the Evaluation process and products.

UNAIDS Secretariat Contact Official OC Expectations on ROLES and RESPONSIBILITIES To serve as the conduit for information exchange between the OC and the Secretariat. To coordinate responses from the Secretariat for the Evaluation Team. To suggest and provide relevant documentation to be reviewed by the Evaluation Team. To suggest appropriate Secretariat informants, arrange meetings, briefing sessions, or appointments for the Evaluation team in coordination with the OC Secretariat. Any other activities to support the OC and to ensure meaningful contribution to the Evaluation process and products.

Cosponsor Liaison Official Roles and Responsibilities To ensure optimal access to the experience and knowledge of the Cosponsors, while respecting the Evaluation principle of independence from the components being evaluated, the Cosponsor Liaison Official would: serve as the conduit for information exchange between the OC and the Cosponsors. provide technical advice to the OC to ensure institutional knowledge and experience of Cosponsors is taken into account. inform Cosponsors of any significant events and required contributions. suggest and provide relevant documentation to the Evaluation Team and OC as required. be available where possible for meetings and teleconferences of the OC at the invitation of the OC Chair. perform other activities to assist the OC in the process of their work.