Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 1 Assessment of the contribution from wood burning to the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium Willy Maenhaut 1,2, Reinhilde.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STN Carbon Field Blank Analysis, Derived Organic Carbon Analysis and IMPROVE blank corrected artifact analysis Bret Schichtel.
Advertisements

PM 2.5 Carbon Measurements in EPA Region 10 Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Chemical Composition of Organic Carbon Fractions Barbara Zielinska.
Recent Studies of Urban Air Pollution over the Greater Beijing Area Meigen ZHANG (State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop PM 2.5 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) Carbon Conversion Joann Rice.
Diurnal Variability of Aerosols Observed by Ground-based Networks Qian Tan (USRA), Mian Chin (GSFC), Jack Summers (EPA), Tom Eck (GSFC), Hongbin Yu (UMD),
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Assessing PM 2.5 Background Levels and Local Add-On Prepared by Bryan Lambeth, PE Field Operations Support Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
FIRE AND BIOFUEL CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANNUAL MEAN AEROSOL MASS CONCENTRATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES ROKJIN J. PARK, DANIEL J. JACOB, JENNIFER A. LOGAN AGU FALL.
1 Recent PM 2.5 Trends in Georgia André J. Butler Mercer University EVE 290L 14 April, 2008.
Source apportionment of Swiss carbonaceous aerosols using radiocarbon analyses of different fractions References: S. Szidat et al., 2007: Dominant impact.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF UK ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham and National Centre for Atmospheric Science.
Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands – A year-long radiocarbon study Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands.
Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon in Atlanta Area Chao Wu.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Recent Finnish PM studies / 2 examples. Characterizing temporal and spatial patterns of urban PM10 using six years of Finnish monitoring data Pia Anttila.
Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham.
Arifa Lodhi and Badar Ghauri Pakistan Space And Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPPARCO), P. O. Box 8402, University Road, Karachi-75270, Pakistan.
J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 1 College of Resources and Information Tech., China University.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Size-segregated analysis of PM10 at a tandem urban – rural site combination J. K. Gietl 1*, T. Tritscher 1,2, and O. Klemm 1 1 University of Münster, Institute.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Speciation of water-soluble organic carbon compounds in boundary layer aerosols during the LBA/CLAIRE/SMOCC-2002 campaign Magda Claeys 1, Vlada Pashynska.
Impact of a renewable biomass energy power plant in urban landscape with complex terrain in Central Italy: modelling assessment and suggestions for monitoring.
Comparison of gravimetric PM data from the Harvard Impactors and Gent Stacked Unit PM 10 Samplers in Prague 2004 M. CIVIŠ 1, J. HOVORKA 1 and J. SCHWARZ.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
25/05/20071 About comparability of measured and modeled metrics Jean-Philippe Putaud Fabrizia Cavalli DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Low-Wind/High Particulate Matter Episodes in the Calexico/Mexicali Region 1 The University of Utah 2 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 3 San Diego.
Observations The collection of slope values were plotted against time and box plots show the distribution for each of the six daily trips of the vessel.
P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Evaluating temporal and spatial O 3 and PM 2.5 patterns simulated during an annual CMAQ application over the continental U.S. Evaluating temporal and spatial.
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
F. Lucarelli 1, S. Becagli 2, G. Calzolai 1, M. Chiari 1, T. Martellini 2, S. Nava 1, L. Paperetti 1, R. Udisti 2 and E. Yubero 3 1. INFN and Dept. of.
The Use of Natural Abundance of 13 CO 2 to Determine Soil Respiration Components in an Agro-Ecosystem a School of Environmental Sciences, University of.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Organo-Sulfur and Receptor Modeling Status/Challenges Christopher Palmer Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Long-term measurements of surface ozone at remote and rural sites in China Xiaobin Xu 1, Weili Lin 1,2 1 Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Key.
CHARACTERIZING IMPACTS OF WILD AND PRESCRIBED FIRES ON AMBIENT FINE PARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS CSU Atmospheric Science Department National Park Service/CIRA.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Preliminary Analysis by: Fawn Hornsby 1, Charles Rogers 2, & Sarah Thornton 3 1,3 North Carolina State University 2 University of Texas at El Paso Client:
Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by linear unmixing of aerosol mass spectra V. A. Lanz 1, M. R. Alfarra 2, U. Baltensperger.
Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Photo image area measures.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
1 Černikovský, Krejčí, Volná (ETC/ACM): Air pollution by ozone in Europe during the summer 2012 & comparison with previous years 17th EIONET Workshop on.
RUG sampling activities at Fazenda Nossa Senhora Willy Maenhaut Ghent University (RUG) Institute for Nuclear Sciences Department of Analytical Chemistry.
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
Willy Maenhaut1, Wan Wang1, Xuguang Chi1, Nico Raes1, Jan Cafmeyer1,
Organics Analyses and Results
Sources of the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium, and re-evaluation of the contribution from wood burning Willy Maenhaut1,2, Reinhilde Vermeylen2, Magda.
Flanders 4-sites study Sources of the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium, and re-evaluation of the contribution from wood burning Willy Maenhaut1,
Aerosol chemistry studies at the SMEARIII station in Kumpula
Assessment of the primary and secondary contributions from wood burning to the PM10 OC for a rural site in Belgium by making use of molecular markers and.
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
11th ICCPA, Berkeley, CA, USA
EAC 2017, Zürich, Switzerland
Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri (EMEP/CCC)
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
About comparability of measured and modeled metrics
New Approaches to Air Measurements in AOSR
EC/OC – monitoring within EMEP
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 1 Assessment of the contribution from wood burning to the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium Willy Maenhaut 1,2, Reinhilde Vermeylen 2, Magda Claeys 2, Jordy Vercauteren 3, Christina Matheeussen 3 and Edward Roekens 3 1 Ghent University (UGent), Department of Analytical Chemistry, Krijgslaan 281, S12, 9000 Gent, Belgium 2 University of Antwerp (UA), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium 3 Flemish Environment Agency (VMM), Kronenburgstraat 45, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 2 Introduction In Flanders (Belgium) we are struggling with too many exceedances of the 50 µg/m 3 daily PM10 mass limit  in the EU : only 35 exceedances per year allowed at any given location  thus, of interest to examine the cause of possible exceedances Wood burning may provide a substantial contribution to the PM10 aerosol mass, as appeared from studies in several European countries (e.g., Switzerland, Austria) Over a decade ago, Simoneit et al., AE [1999] introduced levoglucosan as an indicator for wood burning  levoglucosan (C 6 H 10 O 5 ) arises from the pyrolysis of cellulose, the main building material of wood, at temperatures higher than 300 o C  levoglucosan is accompanied by other minor stereoisomeric monosaccharide anhydrides in atmospheric aerosols, with mannosan and galactosan being the most important ones Flemish Environment Agengy (VMM) wanted to find out what the contribution from wood burning to PM10 was over a full year for 7 sites in Flanders  thereby using levoglucosan as wood burning indicator

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 3 From 7 February 2010 to 6 February 2011 PM10 aerosol samples simultaneously taken every 4th day at 7 monitoring sites in Flanders, Belgium  on 47-mm diam. Pallflex quartz fibre filters Two of the sites (i.e., Gent and Borgerhout) are urban background sites; Mechelen is a suburban background site, and the other 4 sites are rural background sites, whereby Hamme and Lier were expected to be particularly impacted by biomass burning Sampling

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 4 Borgerhout : at 30 m from a busy road (Plantin en Moretuslei) Most polluted of the 2 urban background sites

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 5 Gent : in the Baudelo park in the North-East of the city Least polluted of the 2 urban background sites

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 6 Hamme : in a rural area with individual houses In the neigbourhood of the site are several inhabitants who use wood as fuel

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 7 Houtem : rural background site In the middle of an agricultural area in the polders

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 8 Meteorology Of the 92 sampling days: 60 days with rain

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 9 Meteorology (cont.) Wind direction mostly from South-West and North-North-East

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 10 Analyses PM10 mass determined by weighing of the filters at 20 o C and 50% relative humidity [done by VMM] Organic, elemental, and total carbon [OC, EC, and TC (= OC + EC)] measured with a dual photo-detector (2PD) thermal-optical instrument from Sunset Lab  using NIOSH temperature protocol  transmission (TOT) and reflectance (TOR) simultaneously measured  TOT data retained for further evaluation Levoglucosan, mannosan, and galactosan measured by gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS) after trimethylsilylation, using method described in Pashynska et al., J. Mass Spectrom. [2002], but  extraction with methanol  use made of a different recovery standard (RS)  and slightly modified GC temperature program employed

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 11 Schematic diagram of the Sunset Laboratory TOT instrument (V = valve)

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 12 ECOC1PC OC = OC1 + PC (with PC: pyrolytic carbon) : area below the blue line prior to the OC/EC split point (vertical brown line) EC : area below the blue line after the OC/EC split point

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 13 Full brown line : laser transmission (T) signal  vertical full brown line : OC/EC split point for T Dashed purple line : laser reflectance (R) signal  vertical dashed purple line : OC/EC split point for R

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 14

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 15 Total ion current (TIC) chromatogram [relative abundance (R.A.) versus time] obtained for the sample that was collected on 23 February 2010 in Hamme. The numbered peaks are for the following compounds: 1: galactosan: 60.6 ng/cm 2 ; 2: mXP: 510 ng/cm 2 (added); 3: mannosan: 145 ng/cm 2 ; 4: levoglucosan: 826 ng/cm 2.

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 16 Comparison of TOT and TOR results TOR provided systematically larger EC data than TOT  thus, TOR provided systematically lower OC data than TOT

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 17 Some tendency for higher ratios at rural sites than at urban sites  exception: Houtem Some tendency for higher ratios in winter than in the other seasons

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 18 TOR/TOT ratio for OC versus TC loading on filter

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 19 Time series for the PM10 mass at the 7 sites Fairly good correlation between the data of the 7 sites At Gent: 3 samples in a row in July with elevated levels  these samples taken during the “Ghent City Festival”

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 20 Retie (RT) Lier (LR) Mechelen (ML) Borgerhout (BO) Hamme (HA) Gent (GE) Houtem (HO)

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 21 Correlation coefficients for the PM10 mass data of the 7 sites 3 "Ghent City Festival" samples excluded

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 22 Time series for EC at the 7 sites EC levels highest at Borgerhout, lowest at Houtem Clearly less correlation between the data from the different sites than was the case for the PM10 mass

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 23 Correlation coefficients for EC data of the 7 sites

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 24 Median EC/TC ratios

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 25 Time series for OC at the 7 sites Fairly good correlation between the data of the 7 sites At Gent: 3 samples in a row in July with elevated levels  these samples taken during the “Ghent City Festival”

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 26 Correlation coefficients for OC data of the 7 sites 3 "Ghent City Festival" samples excluded

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 27 Gent sample of 13 July 2010

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 28 Gent sample of 21 July 2010

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 29 Gent sample of 29 July 2010

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 30 Time series for OC at the 7 sites Fairly good correlation between the data of the 7 sites At Gent: 3 samples in a row in July with elevated levels  these samples taken during the “Ghent City Festival”

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 31 Median TC/PM10_mass ratios

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 32 Time series for levoglucosan at the 7 sites High levels in winter & fall; low levels in spring & summer Time series for Hamme quite peculiar

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 33 Correlation coefficients for levoglucosan data of the 7 sites The levoglucosan data for 5 of the 7 sites (i.e., Retie, Lier, Mechelen, Borgerhout, and Gent) are very highly correlated with each other (all r>0.9, except 0.86 between Retie and Gent)  indicating that the impact from wood burning at these 5 sites was a regional phenomenon

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 34

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 35

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 36 Data for mannosan and galactosan A each site : mannosan and galactosan very highly correlated with each other and with levoglucosan  all r > 0.95 (except at Hamme : 0.93 between levoglucosan and mannosan) Levoglucosan/mannosan (L/M) ratio depends on the type of biomass and wood burnt  Miocene lignite54Fabbri et al., AE [2009]  Peat8.6Kourtchev et al., STE [2011]  Bituminous coal3.1Kourtchev et al., STE [2011]  US woods, fireplacesFine et al., EES [2004] − hardwoods13-24 − softwoods  Austrian wood stovesSchmidl et al., AE [2008] − hardwoods14-15 − softwoods

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 37 Data for mannosan and galactosan The annual average L/M ratios for our 7 sampling sites ranged from 6.2 to 7.1 and there was little variation with season  suggests that softwood burning was clearly more important than hardwood burning in Flanders in Schmidl et al., AE [2008] provided the following equation for estimating the %spruce burned from the L/M ratio : %spruce = (14.8 – L/M_ratio) /  this equation used to estimate the %spruce burned at our 7 sites

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 38 Typically between 70 and 80% from spruce burning  little variation from site to site  little variation with season

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 39 Contribution from wood burning to the OC and the PM10 mass To assess the percentage contribution from wood burning to the OC, we relied on the concentrations of 9.3% levoglucosan and 52% OC in wood smoke as given by Schmidl et al., AE [2008]  meaning that the levoglucosan level is multiplied by a factor of 5.59 (i.e., 52/9.3) to obtain the OC concentration from wood smoke Similarly, we used the conversion factor of 10.7, suggested by Schmidl et al., AE [2008], to convert our levoglucosan concentrations to PM10 mass levels due to wood smoke

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 40 Time series for %OC from wood burning at the 7 sites High values in winter & fall; low levels in spring & summer Time series for Hamme quite peculiar

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 41 In winter (blue) for 6 of the 7 sites : around 40% of OC, on average, from wood burning At Hamme in winter : 60% of OC, on average, from wood burning

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 42 Annual medians of the % OC due to wood burning at the 7 sites

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 43 Time series for %PM from wood burning at the 7 sites High values in winter & fall; low levels in spring & summer Time series for Hamme quite peculiar

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 44 In winter (blue) for 6 of the 7 sites : around 10% of PM10 mass, on average, from wood burning At Hamme in winter : 22% of PM10 mass, on average, from wood burning

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 45 Annual medians of the % PM due to wood burning at the 7 sites

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 46 Annual medians of the % EC in PM10 at the 7 sites

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 47 Wood burning is an important contributor to the OC and PM10 mass in Flanders, especially in winter  on average, 40 % of OC in winter from wood burning (60% at Hamme)  on average, 10% of PM10 mass in winter from wood burning (22% at Hamme) Since most of the exceedances of the 50 µg/m 3 daily PM10 mass limit occur in winter, reducing the wood burning emissions would help in complying with the EU limit of maximum 35 exceedances per year at any given location Wood burning smoke is a regional phenomenon in Flanders  in Hamme: nearby sources very important This study published in Sci. Total Environ.  Maenhaut et al., STE 437 (2012) Summary and conclusions

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 48

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 49

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 50 Mechelen : at about 1 km from the inner ring of the city Suburban background site

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 51 Lier : rural site; within a radius of 1 km were two horticulture farms that used wood as fuel, but it appeared in the course of the project that one of the two farms had already stopped its activities at the start of the project

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 52 Retie : rural background site In a meadow, next to a wooded park (Prinsenpark)

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 53 Gent sample of 17 July 2010

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 54 Gent sample of 25 July 2010

Wood burning in PM10, Flanders 55 Gent sample of 2 August 2010