Dr. Sean Allen Patricia Correa Nicky Rucker Our Community Our Kids Terri St.Arnauld Department of Family and Protective Services Contract Performance Presenters.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Educational Stability for Children Placed in Resource Homes.

Advertisements

Title IV-E Guardianship Assistance Program (GAP) Liliana Hernandez, Childrens Bureau Child Welfare Program Specialist September 2010.

JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.

A Focus on Team Meetings 1. 2 Think about the individual. Remember that each student has individual needs, based upon the impact of his/her disability.

Normalcy – Letting Kids be Kids Objectives Understand the Law Recognize and Remove Barriers Deal with Frequent Issues Special Considerations

Single Source Continuum Contractor.  Partnership with DFPS  Provider Network  Intake and Assessment (CAFAS and JIFF)  Wraparound and Behavioral Health.

Which of the following is not a duty of the local liaison? a)Identifying homeless children and youth b)Coordinating with community agencies c)Assisting.

Foster Care Redesign: Region 3b

117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.

Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.

Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.

Introduction to the Child & Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment (CANS) Our Community. Our Kids. Dr. Gary Buff, Ed.D. President and COO.

Team Decision Making and Self- Evaluation: Getting the Most Out of Your Database Anne K. Abramson & William C. Dawson Center for Social Services Research.

Self Evaluation and Reporting using TDM CA Anne Abramson Center for Social Services Research UC Berkeley Jana Rickerson Technical Assistant (TDM) Annie.

Team Decision Making (TDM) Database Anne Abramson Bill Dawson Center for Social Services Research UC Berkeley

Supporting Foster Care Students. Improving Outcomes for Foster care Students Nationally, less than half of youth in foster care complete a regular high.

Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.

FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.

PCCYFS 2012 Annual Spring Conference Aging Out of Care: Challenges and Opportunities to Support Older Youth Presented By: Emily C. Keller, Esq. Juvenile.

VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,

FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.

-9- RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE SCHOOLS. School Resources for Children with Special Health Care Needs Evaluation Special Education – I.E.P. 504 Special Accommodations.

Adams County Educational Stability Grant Project Update March 2014.

Welcome! We will begin our webinar at the top of the hour Please have your grant data collection and reporting forms available in this order o Grantee.

1 EDUCATION: Court Reports: What to include related to the Child’s Education.

Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.

Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.

Joseph J. McDowall © 2014 ACWA 2014: Children in a Changing World, Sydney, August 18 – 20, 2014 Contact between, and Placement of Siblings in Out-of-Home.

Court Reports Made Easy!. A Few Basics CASA reports must be submitted to your ACM TWO WEEKS prior to the scheduled hearing Avoid redundancy Maintain objectivity.

I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the rights of neglected and abused children. I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the.

Individualized Service Plan Who attends the ISP?

Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.

New England November 2012 Children in the Courtroom Sounds Good, BUT..... Margaret A. Burt, Esq.

Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.

 What is the Children’s Hearings system?  What does it do?  What are the key stages of the process?

WORKING TOGETHER FOR KIDS MENTAL HEALTH. IMPLEMENTATION Working Together for Kids Mental Health is being implemented in four communities during 2010/11:

Kenny A vs State Principles Georgia’s Child Welfare System must actively promote the opportunity for children to grow up with in a family. Family contacts.

Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.

The Food Stamp Employment and Training (FSET) Program The Entered Employment Rate Measure State Fiscal Year 2005/2006 The Agency for Workforce Innovation.

Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.

CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.

PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.

Welcome! We will begin our webinar at the top of the hour Please complete the polling question on the screen Please have your grant data collection and.

Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.

Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.

ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)

1 Participation Rate Basics. 2 The Agreement FEDERAL Federal government provides a TANF block grant to states = $562,340,120 Florida is also one of 17.

11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.

Road to Discovery: Transition to Adult Living, Learning and Working 1 Funded by the Iowa Department of Education Developed by PACER Center®

JOHN BURTON FOUNDATION THP-Plus Letter of Intent Online Webinar – September 9, 2008 at 10:00 am Presented by Michele Byrnes and Amy Lemley, John Burton.

Lilliput Family Finding & Relative Support Efforts Karen Alvord, CEO, Beverly Johnson, CPO,

Georgia DFCS Outcome- Based Permanency Initiative A Proposal to Introduce Performance- Based Contracting and Partner for CFSR Success.

Introduction to Observation Observing Children: A Tool for Assessment

Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.

Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services

Every Child Every Month

Making Adoption a Positive Option

Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018

Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign

Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation

4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health

SB-11 Implementation All residential contracts will be updated to comply with SB-11 effective September 1st, A grace period will exist where DFPS.

Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018

Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes: A System Redesign

Permanency Planning Modified Manual

Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign

The Preventing Sex Trafficking & Strengthening Families Act

CBC Implementation Updates

Presentation transcript:

Dr. Sean Allen Patricia Correa Nicky Rucker Our Community Our Kids Terri St.Arnauld Department of Family and Protective Services Contract Performance Presenters PMET Tuesday, 11/4/14 10:30 AM - 11:30 AM Performance Management Evaluation Tool Reporting PMET numbers in the context of Foster Care Redesign Ask questions at any time during the presentation

DFPS LegacySystem SSCCSystem Children placed by … OC-OK Report PMET data in … PMET systemEvolv Submission deadline Dec days after end of quarter Dec days after end of quarter

Count them up until the date of their transfer LegacySystem SSCCSystem What happens when a child transfers to the SSCC? Count them after the date of their transfer This means the child will be counted in both systems during the reporting period he or she transfers (unless he or she transfers on the first or last day of the reporting period).

Education Portfolios LegacySystem SSCCSystem The PMET questions are different for the two systems. Family Contact Sibling Contact Regular Job State ID Family Contact Sibling Contact Court Participation

Children maintain connections with family (numerator) (denominator) Question 1 Question 2 Outcome: How many of the children/youth reported in question #1 had at least one Personal Contact with the identified Family member each month or portion of a month they were in the care of the Contractor during the quarter being reported? How many unduplicated children/youth under age 18 and in the care of the Contractor during the quarter being reported had at least one Family member, as defined in the contract but excluding parents and siblings, identified by DFPS as appropriate for contact?

(numerator) (denominator) Question 3 Question 4 Outcome: How many of the children/youth reported in question #3 had the minimum number and type of Personal Contacts, as defined in the contract, with each sibling, for each month or portion of a month they were in the care of the Contractor during the Quarter being reported? How many unduplicated children/youth under age 18 and in the care of the Contractor during the quarter being reported had one or more siblings in foster care? Do not include in count if all siblings were placed together. Children maintain connections with siblings

(numerator) (denominator) IMPACT data Question 5 Outcome: Number of children aged 16 or older in care, year to date. Youth have a regular job How many unduplicated youth in the care of the Contractor at any time during the fiscal year (i.e., September 1 - August 31) and were age 16 or older on the last day of the period being reported had a Regular Job, as defined in the contract, at any time during the fiscal year? The number reported should be cumulative for the fiscal year.

(numerator) (denominator) IMPACT data Question 6 Outcome: Number of children aged 16 or older in care, year to date. Youth have a state ID How many unduplicated youth who were in the care of the Contractor at any time during the fiscal year (i.e., September 1 - August 31) and were age 16 or older on the last day of the period being reported had been issued a driver's license and/or state identification card by the end of the period being reported? The number reported should be cumulative for the fiscal year.

(numerator) (denominator) IMPACT data Question 7 Outcome: Number of children in the SSCC’s care who experienced a placement change. Children participate in placement decisions How many of the placement changes within the SSCC during the quarter being reported were preceded by at least one discussion with the child/youth to obtain the child/youth’s opinion regarding their placement options, to the extent of the their ability? OC-OK will track this outcome; will not appear on PMET form in Evolv.

(numerator) (denominator) Question 8 Question 9 Outcome: Children/youth participate in court How many of the hearings in question #8 were attended by the child/youth? How many court hearings were held during the quarter being reported for children/youth in the care of the Contractor who were age 10 or older at the time of the hearing?