Run 13 Offline Analysis Complete run list (785) – 4 TB data+log+root Backup in hpss – Fill_#####.tar.gz (includes good run list)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lumi Analysis for HAPPEx III / PREX Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 5/18/2007.
Advertisements

June 9, Tetsuro Sekiguchi, KEK BNL-E949 Collaboration The E949 experiment The analysis The results Conclusions BNL, FNAL, UNM, Stony Brook Univ.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Report on E-165 Steve Schnetzer MCC Meeting June 28.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Recent Results on Diffraction and Exclusive Production from CDF Christina Mesropian The Rockefeller University.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
Diffractive Results from Workshop on low x physics, Antwerp 2002 Brian Cox   E Diffractive W and Z Observation of double diffractive dijets Run 1 highlights.
Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Jefferson Lab Experimental search for A’ for APEX collaboration 1.
The polarized hydrogen jet target measurements at RHIC Andrei Poblaguev Brookhaven National Laboratory The RHIC/AGS Polarimetry Group: I. Alekseev, E.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
DIS 2006 TSUKUBA April 21, 2006 Alessandro Bravar Spin Dependence in Polarized Elastic Scattering in the CNI Region A. Bravar, I. Alekseev, G. Bunce, S.
1. introduction 2. goal of luminosity monitor 3. Structure of BESII Luminosity detector 4. Calculation of the luminosity 5. MC of luminosity detector 6.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Summer Students Lectures June 17, 2010.
S PIN A SYMMETRIES ON THE N UCLEON E XPERIMENT ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Experiment Nuclear Physics Group Meeting Hampton University May 11, 2009.
X-Ray Reflection Data Analysis Update Information can be extracted from XRR data: - Film thickness - Roughness.
Jorge Barreto Low_x Prague1 Status of Diffractive Physics at DØ Run II Jorge Barreto Instituto de Física - UFRJ Rio de Janeiro – RJ - Brazil Outline.
STUDY OF CHARMONIUM STATES IN ANTIPROTON-PROTON ANNIHILATIONS: RESULTS FROM FERMILAB E-835 Giulio Stancari Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the.
Run 8 Polarization measurements from STAR BBC Andrew Gordon September 12, 2008.
Yury Gurchin June 2011 MEASUREMENT OF THE CROSS-SECTION IN DP-ELASTIC SCATTERING AT THE ENERGIES OF 500 AND 880 MEV AT NUCLOTRON.
1 Calice UK Meeting 27/03/07David Ward Plans; timescales for having analysis results for LCWS Status of current MC/data reconstruction Reconstruction status;
What can we learn from η production in proton-proton collisions? Joe Seele MIT and University of Colorado.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
K.O. Eyser --- Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region -1- Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the.
Polarization Measurement of 100GeV Proton Beams at RHIC with CNI pC Polarimeter Itaru Nakagawa (RIKEN/RBRC) On behalf of CNI Polarimeter Group I.G.Alekseev.
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
Development of a Gamma-Ray Beam Profile Monitor for the High-Intensity Gamma-Ray Source Thomas Regier, Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University.
» Absolute Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC« Oleg Eyser for the RHIC Polarimetry Group International Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Search for neutrino bursts from Gravitational stellar.
Neutron detection in LHe ( HMI run 2004) R.Golub, E. Korobkina, J. Zou M. Hayden, G. Archibold J. Boissevain, W.S.Wilburn C. Gould.
Elastic Scattering and Diffraction at DØ Tamsin Edwards for the DØ collaboration 14 th - 18 th April, 2004 XII International Workshop on Deep Inelastic.
» RHIC Polarimetry « Oleg Eyser for the RHIC Polarimetry Group 2014 RHIC Retreat, August 14.
Proton Polarimetry at RHIC K. Oleg Eyser for the CNI polarimeter group Newport News, VA, October 25, 2013.
 -bin Number Tower Calibration (ch/GeV) Desired E T matched gain s  =1.0  =2.0 from electrons slopesMIPs EEMC Towers Calibration Run 3 p+p Used 4 methods.
Missing Et Before and After Shutdown Yuri Gershtein.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
Run6 CNI Analysis: Concluding Remarks and Summary of Systematic Uncertainties A.Bazilevsky For RHIC CNI group RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting November.
40 Minutes Left.
RHIC CNI Polarimeter status RHIC CNI Group February 26, 2008.
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
Diffraction at DØ Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington E   Run IRun II Low-x Workshop June 6, 2003 Nafplion, Greece.
Run Time, Mott-Schwinger, Systematics, Run plan David Bowman NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting 10/15/2010.
Minutes Left:
Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region September 30, 2006 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting RIKEN, Wako, Japan.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
Backup slides Z 0 Z 0 production Once  s > 2M Z ~ GeV ÞPair production of Z 0 Z 0 via t-channel electron exchange. e+e+ e-e- e Z0Z0 Z0Z0 Other.
RHIC pC Polarimeters in Run9: Performance and Issues A.Bazilevsky for the RHIC CNI Group Polarimetry Worshop BNL, July 31, 2009.
Neutron production and iodide transmutation studies using intensive beam of Dubna Phasotron Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics Institute of CAS Řež, Czech republic.
Analysis of    production ► Data taking ► Reaction identification ► Results for double polarization observable F ► Summary Based on data taken in the.
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
G0 Beam Polarization T. Horn, D. Gaskell Jefferson Lab
Monte Carlo study of the DVCS process on nuclear target
ورود اطلاعات بصورت غيربرخط
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Current status Minjung Kim.
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
Forward TOF Anton A. Izotov, PNPI.
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
Update on Ecal simulation
X-Ray Reflection Data Analysis Update
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Run 13 Offline Analysis Complete run list (785) – 4 TB data+log+root Backup in hpss – Fill_#####.tar.gz (includes good run list) Offline analysis on eic0007 – Include monitoring plots – Asymmetry calculation for elastic p+p (-t) T 0 determination Background studies Standalone calibration (Luis) – libJetCalibration.so 1 good runs605 limited15 calibration8 empty target37 beam development18 jet studies11 RF problems4 bad36 disk full13

Online Plots 2

Kinematics 3 sum over all jet centerdownstream

New T 0 determination 4 Use elastic p+p signal in good energy range Determine mean T 0 in slices of energy Remove parts of the distribution when rms is too large Calculate mean T 0 over good energy range need to refine

Single Beam Studies E kin,min (MeV)ɛ target ± ± ± ± ± E kin,min (MeV)ɛ target ± ± ± ± ± left right

Abort Gaps E kin,min (MeV)ɛ target ± ± ± ± ± E kin,min (MeV)ɛ target ± ± ± ± ± ɛ target ± ± ± ± ± ɛ target ± ± ± ± ±

Fill (1) partɛ target ɛ beam ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Partɛ target ɛ beam ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±

9 Fill 17586

Background Fractions 10 Fill 17586, 15 hours Revolution counter: 10 7 ≈ 21 minutes Each point here is ≈ 10 minutes Will need accurate T 0 calibration

11 Fill /2

12 Fill /2

Background Fractions 13 Fill 17600, first 7 runs

Background Fractions 14 Fill 17600, second 7 runs

Detector Geometry 15 5 MeV signal regionbackground region 1 MeV Calculate Δz with d and ϑ cm

16 Fill 17586

17

18

19

20

21

22