Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Leslie Ambrose June 28,2001 SUPERNOVA/ACCELERATION PROBE (SNAP) Data Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Satellite Communication
Advertisements

Adaptive Ground Antenna Arrays for Low Earth Orbiting Satellites.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Decision making process, Communications and Planning.
Automated File Transfer and Storage Management Concepts for Space Gary Meyers - GSFC Ed Criscuolo - CSC Keith Hogie - CSC Ron Parise - CSC Revised 6/14/2004.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Communication and Ground Station 12 October 2008.
Final Version Bob G. Beaman May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Electrical Power System (EPS)
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Direct Readout Laboratory NPP/JPSS HRD/LRD Status Patrick Coronado NASA Goddard Space Flight Center directreadout.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/ipopp.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R 1 The Trade Between CCSDS and HDLC Framing on Global Precipitation Measurement David Everett and Jonathan.
Marco Concha Charles Petruzzo June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Flight Dynamics.
VSOP-2 Ground Link Station - Tracking Station Requirements - National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Y. Kono.
5 - 1 June 4, 2002 Earth Observing-1 GSFC Systems Engineering Seminar: EO-1 Results Section 5 Spacecraft Technologies.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Reliability & System Safety Dick Bolt David Bogart June 28, 2001.
Bob G. Beaman June 28, 2001 Electrical Power System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)
Indian Ocean METOC Imager (IOMI) Operational Concept Demonstrates Military Operational Utility and Enables Improved Global Weather Prediction Data to Naval.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
Student Satellite Project Tracking, Telemetry & Command UASat Progress Review Tracking, Telemetry and Command (TTC) January 26, 1999 Dana Irvin, Team Leader.
5 Section 11.0 Communications Subsystem Space Technology
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting C&DH Flight Software April 14, 2005.
1 How to design or select an antenna? Communications Crosslink scientific/housekeeping data (emitter & receiver sat) G/S link scientific data (emitter.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Mission/Science Operations Irene Bibyk Tim Rykowski Bob Schweiss June 28, 2001.
Spacecraft and Ground Segments Status March 21, 2014 Dan Ossing STEREO Mission Operations Manager (240)
Section Number - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Communication Systems Jason A. Soloff NASA/GSFC Code 567 August 16-17, 2005.
NGU Proposed revision of recommendation CCSDS (401-B-20) on TC bit rate NGU WG Fall CCSDS Meeting - London UK - Oct 25, 2010.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG April 2008 Meudon, France.
APSDEU-6, 1-3 June 2005, KMA HQ 1 Introduction to Future COMS Met. Operational Center KWON O-Ung Korea Meteorological Administration.
TRIO-CINEMA Meeting at KHU 1 October 19-23, 2009 CINEMA Operations Manfred Bester.
Final Version Dick Bolt Code 302 May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Success.
MAXIM Data Systems Command & Data Handling Space - Ground Link Ground System 19 August 1999.
AAE 450 – Senior Design J. Darcey Kuhn ERV Team – Communications January 23, 2001.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG March 27-28, 2007.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
Final Version Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Bob Summers May Data Systems Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
The CCSDS Cislunar Communications Architecture Keith Scott The MITRE Corporation CCSDS Meeting January 2007.
Telemetry Constraints during Early Operations The STEREO telemetry rate is restricted during the phasing orbits due to S/C RF interference with each other,
Competition Sensitive Gabe Karpati June 28, 2001 SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) System Overview.
Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.
Basic Satellite Communication (3) Components of Communications Satellite Dr. Joseph N. Pelton.
John Martin April 5, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Introduction.
First Flight: Successful Use of a High Rate LDPC Code With High Data Rate in a Restricted Band H. Garon, V. Sank, W. Fong NASA/GSFC Spring Technical Meeting,
CINEMA PDR, UCB/SSL 1 August 22, 2008 CINEMA Communications & Ground Systems Manfred Bester.
From you host … Dr. H. Introduction Communications design requires us to think about the following issues: Communications design requires us to think.
Requirements to WSO Ground Segment Lavochkin Association & ROSCOSMOS 30/06/2006.
LuNet Integrated Network Architecture for Sustained Human and Robotic Exploration Gary Noreen Telecommunications Architect Communications Architecture.
V3 SLAC DOE Program Review Gunther Haller SLAC June 13, 07 (650) SNAP Electronics.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
Low - Rate Information Transmission (LRIT) Downlink and Reception Satellite Direct Readout Conference for the Americas Frank Eng, Computer Sciences Corp.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
Next Generation Space VLBI Project: VSOP-2 Inoue, M. 1, Nagai, H. 1, Asada, K. 2, Saito, H. 2, Tsuboi, M. 2, and the Next Generation Space VLBI Working.
Section 19.1 Mission Operations Steve Odendahl Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC ST5 PDR June.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Mission Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
From you host … Dr. H. Introduction In the present project, communications design forces us to think about the overall arrangement of the system and its.
Ground Control AERSP 401A. Ground System’s Basic Elements Mission Elements –Control the space segment or handle mission data, and includes: Ground Stations.
S-band Telemetry Description DMC 211 October 2015.
Terry Smith June 28, 2001 Command and Data Handling System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 FSW & Operations Winter Summary Seyoung Yoon KHU EE Team.
Sketch for a telecoms system
ESA's Ground Station Network Prospects for operations of the Lagrange missions S. Kraft OPS-L , K.-J. Schulz OPS-GS 08/03/2017.
H. Garon, V. Sank, W. Fong NASA/GSFC
Maximizing Data Volume for Direct to Ground Satellite Systems
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
SLAC DOE Program Review
LRO Mission Operations Concept
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
The STEREO Space Weather Broadcast
Presentation transcript:

Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Leslie Ambrose June 28,2001 SUPERNOVA/ACCELERATION PROBE (SNAP) Data Systems

Page 2 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Topics  Overview  Driving Requirements and Assumptions  Selected Configuration and Rationale  Coverage  Signal Margin Summary  Component Power/Mass/Cost Summary  Risk Assessment  Issues and Concerns  Backup

Data Systems Page 3 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Overview  Ka-Band 55 Mbps continuously (except during eclipse) through a HGA to a ground network consisting of either:  Berkeley, CA; Lyon, France; Tokyo, Japan  Single gaps of 18 hours will occur each orbital period of 14 days  18 hour gaps are acceptable at once per orbit  S-Band T&C through omni antennas  S-Band ranging using DSN during early maneuvers, infrequently during the mission  Ground terminal sized for maximum range of 69 Re  On-board recorder sized for recording spectrograph data and housekeeping for 24 hours

Data Systems Page 4 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center  Launch: Dec 2008  Mission Life: 2 year required, 5 year goal  Nominal Orbit: Prometheus 57Re x 40 deg  Stellar pointing  Instrument Data Collection Rates:  45.2 Mbps  Housekeeping rate = 16 Kbps  CCSDS compatible 15%)  Data storage: 24 hrs/72 Gbits (see C&DH for details) Data Systems Driving Requirements & Assumptions

Data Systems Page 5 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center  Data Latency: None  Infrequent commanding  Telemetry BER =10 -6  Rate 1/2 Convolutional/Reed-Solomon encoding  Inclination is primary driver  CCSDS compatible  Redundancy  Link margins : 3 dB  S/C is jitter sensitive Data Systems Driving Requirements & Assumptions

Data Systems Page 6 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Selected Configuration & Rationale  Ka-Band  3 gimbaled 0.7m antennas  antenna movements between observation periods (every seconds)  Beamwidth of 1 deg is large enough to provide adequate coverage without movement during observation periods (will stay close enough to main beam so as not to degrade the link)  located 120 deg apart  switchable by on-board command  20 watt TWT(2)- heritage is TDRS H  Ka-Band modulators(2)-modification to existing L3 X Band transmitter  Data rate = 55 Mbps continuous (includes science, Hskpg, CCSDS & R/S encoding)  S-Band  Omni antennas  Transponders(2)  Command rate = 2 Kbps  Telemetry rate = 1 Kbps

Data Systems Page 7 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Selected Configuration & Rationale  Normal operations:  Continuous Ka-band transmission  Both S-band receivers always on  S-band transmitter on as needed  Ground terminals  Ground terminals are sized for maximum range of 69 Re  Ka-band autotrack will be required  Berkeley 11m (modified for Ka-Band)  All other sites 10m  Ka-band receive  S Band receive/transmit  Radomes highly recommended & included in cost

Data Systems Page 8 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Selected Configuration & Rationale  Operational scenario 1(Berkeley,France,Japan)  Inclinations < 40 deg  Continuous transmission  Worst case maximum gap = 18 hours (average outage =12 hours)  per orbital period of 14 days(nominal period)  Operational workaround understood to be acceptable with spectrograph data(approx 816 Kbps) recorded on board & played back during visible periods

Data Systems Page 9 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems S/C Antenna Considerations  S-Band  Need 2 antennas to enable reliable command & recovery in case of loss of control & launch phase support  Best location is perpendicular to pointing axis(Z)  Ka- Band  Need 3 antennas in order to keep the antennas close to the spacecraft so that the dampening of the movement is quicker  Best location is perpendicular to the pointing axis

Data Systems Page 10 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Selected Configuration & Rationale SNAP MOC Berkeley Science & Hskpg Command 2 kbps S-Band Cmd 55 Mbps K-Band science 1 kbps S-Band hskpg SNAP 11M K/S Japan/France 55 Mbps K-Band science 1 kbps S-Band hskpg 2 kbps S-Band Cmd 10M K/S

Data Systems Page 11 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Selected Configuration and Rationale C&DH S-Band XPNDR OMNI 1 OMNI 2 CMD/TLM Data Storage: 9 Gbytes HGA Science Instruments HGA S-Band XPNDR Hybrid K-Band Modulator(2) Diplexer HGA K-Band Amplifier(2) Switch OBC

Data Systems Page 12 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center SNAP Coverage Gaps (3 stations)

Data Systems Page 13 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center SNAP Signal Margins (Max Range = 69 Re)

Data Systems Page 14 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Component Power/Mass/Cost Summary

Data Systems Page 15 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Risk Assessment  Construction, Maintenance and operation of 10M Ka/S-band stations: Low to Medium Risk  K-band Modulator: Modified design of current X-band transmitter: Low to Medium Risk

Data Systems Page 16 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems Issues and Concerns  During 5 year period the apogee/perigee/inclination will vary  Apogee up to 69 Re  Perigee down to 7 Re  Inclination down to 0 deg & up to 65 deg Shape of the orbit  If the inclination increases coverage gap times will increase (gaps greater than 18 hours will occur when the inclination increases above 40 deg.)  Location of apogee and perigee (dependent on possible inclinations)

Data Systems Page 17 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Data Systems SNAP Back-Up Charts

Data Systems Page 18 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center SNAP Ka-Band 10 M Downlink (55 Mbps)

Data Systems Page 19 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center SNAP S-Band 10M Uplink (2 kbps)

Data Systems Page 20 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center SNAP S-Band Downlink (2 Kbps)

Data Systems Page 21 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center SNAP S-Band Downlink (1 kbps)

Data Systems Page 22 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center SNAP S-band Ranging Up-link

Data Systems Page 23 SNAP June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center SNAP S-band Ranging Downlink