Automated File Transfer and Storage Management Concepts for Space Gary Meyers - GSFC Ed Criscuolo - CSC Keith Hogie - CSC Ron Parise - CSC Revised 6/14/2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Streaming Video over the Internet
Advertisements

SCTP v/s TCP – A Comparison of Transport Protocols for Web Traffic CS740 Project Presentation by N. Gupta, S. Kumar, R. Rajamani.
29.1 Chapter 29 Multimedia Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Csc333 Data communication & Networking Credit: 2.
Seminar WS 03/04 „Satellite-Based Internet“: Transport Protocols and Applications for Internet Use in Space Alexander Pasztor Julius-Maximilians-Universität.
Chapter 6 outline r 6.1 Multimedia Networking Applications r 6.2 Streaming stored audio and video m RTSP r 6.3 Real-time, Interactive Multimedia: Internet.
Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Leslie Ambrose June 28,2001 SUPERNOVA/ACCELERATION PROBE (SNAP) Data Systems.
Introduction Future wireless systems will be characterized by their heterogeneity - availability of multiple access systems in the same physical space.
Analysis of Using Broadcast and Proxy for Streaming Layered Encoded Videos Wilson, Wing-Fai Poon and Kwok-Tung Lo.
A simulation-based comparative evaluation of transport protocols for SIP Authors: M.Lulling*, J.Vaughan Department of Computer science, University college.
CS 268: Wireless Transport Protocols Kevin Lai Feb 13, 2002.
An Overlay Multicast Infrastructure for Live/Stored Video Streaming Visual Communication Laboratory Department of Computer Science National Tsing Hua University.
Anthony Trinh and Rich Zieminski Department of Computer Science, Columbia University { akt2105, rez2107
Copyright 2003 CCNA 1 Chapter 7 TCP/IP Protocol Suite and IP Addressing By Your Name.
Network Simulation Internet Technologies and Applications.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R 1 The Trade Between CCSDS and HDLC Framing on Global Precipitation Measurement David Everett and Jonathan.
CIS679: RTP and RTCP r Review of Last Lecture r Streaming from Web Server r RTP and RTCP.
Providing Controlled Quality Assurance in Video Streaming across the Internet Yingfei Dong, Zhi-Li Zhang and Rohit Rakesh Computer Networking and Multimedia.
CSCI-235 Micro-Computer in Science The Network. © Prentice-Hall, Inc Communications  Communication is the process of sending and receiving messages 
Open Source DTN for ISS Payloads Concept Proposal, 05-Jun Open-source DTN communication software for ISS Payloads Kevin K. Gifford BioServe Space.
Experiences in Design and Implementation of a High Performance Transport Protocol Yunhong Gu, Xinwei Hong, and Robert L. Grossman National Center for Data.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 7: Transport Layer Introduction to Networking.
1 CCSDS File Delivery Protocol for Flight Applications Art Ferrer NASA/GSFC, Code 582 Fourth Space Internet Workshop June 2004 Hanover, MD.
TCP Throughput Collapse in Cluster-based Storage Systems
Effects of Advertised Receive Buffer Size and Timer Granularity on TCP Performance in a LEO Satellite Network.
Module 10: Monitoring ISA Server Overview Monitoring Overview Configuring Alerts Configuring Session Monitoring Configuring Logging Configuring.
Final Year Project Presentation by Daire O’Neill 4EE.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting C&DH Flight Software April 14, 2005.
June 2004 SIW-4 - IP in Space Implementation Guide 1 Handbook for Using IP Protocols for Space Missions James Rash - NASA/GSFC Keith Hogie, Ed Criscuolo,
Kamal Singh, Árpád Huszák, David Ros, César Viho and Jeney Gábor
GridNM Network Monitoring Architecture (and a bit about my phd) Yee-Ting Li, 1 st Year UCL, 17 th June 2002.
Page No. 1 Kelvin Nichols Payload Operations and Integration Center EO50 Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) Implementation on the International Space Station.
CING-YU CHU INFOCOM Outline  Introduction  Measurement  Measurement Results  Modeling Skype Behaviors  Analysis on TCP-friendly.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Mission/Science Operations Irene Bibyk Tim Rykowski Bob Schweiss June 28, 2001.
Chapter 6 outline r 6.1 Multimedia Networking Applications r 6.2 Streaming stored audio and video m RTSP r 6.3 Real-time Multimedia: Internet Phone Case.
ONE Concept. ONE Work area & lab setup ONE Goals Provide single network interface regardless of physical link Provide reliable, isochronous message transport.
1 Networking Chapter Distributed Capabilities Communications architectures –Software that supports a group of networked computers Network operating.
Data Communications and Computer Networks Chapter 2 CS 3830 Lecture 8 Omar Meqdadi Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of.
DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Model Mission: Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Goal “To study the microphysics of three.
DTN Network Management Scenarios and General Requirements Will Ivancic
Chapter 28. Network Management Chapter 29. Multimedia
1 Space-Based IP Testing Using COTS Equipment Will Ivancic - NASA GRC Terry Bell - Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications Dan Shell - Cisco System.
CSTS File Transfer Service CS File Transfer Specification – Initial Discussions IOAG Service Catalogue #1 Scope Candidate Applications File Content.
TCP-Cognizant Adaptive Forward Error Correction in Wireless Networks
Forward Error Correction vs. Active Retransmit Requests in Wireless Networks Robbert Haarman.
Internet multimedia: simplest approach audio, video not streamed: r no, “pipelining,” long delays until playout! r audio or video stored in file r files.
A Bandwidth Estimation Method for IP Version 6 Networks Marshall Crocker Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Mississippi State University.
Measuring the Capacity of a Web Server USENIX Sympo. on Internet Tech. and Sys. ‘ Koo-Min Ahn.
CSCI-235 Micro-Computer Applications The Network.
Space Data Link Secure Protocol Simulator Bruno Saba DCT/TV/IN 15/04/2010.
Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)
First Flight: Successful Use of a High Rate LDPC Code With High Data Rate in a Restricted Band H. Garon, V. Sank, W. Fong NASA/GSFC Spring Technical Meeting,
1 IEX8175 RF Electronics Avo Ots telekommunikatsiooni õppetool, TTÜ raadio- ja sidetehnika inst.
Wireless Cache Invalidation Schemes with Link Adaptation and Downlink Traffic Presented by Ying Jin.
Dynamic Access for a Space Communications Network with IP Functionality Hui Zeng and Michael Hadjitheodosiou Center for Satellite & Hybrid Communication.
Storage System Optimization. Introduction Storage Types-DAS/NAS/SAN The purposes of different RAID types. How to calculate the storage size for video.
February 14, 2013 POIWG Technical Overview CR / HM-3430 Ku Forward Capability.
1 Network Communications A Brief Introduction. 2 Network Communications.
Page No. 1 Overview Kelvin Nichols Payload Operations and Integration Center EO50 SSCN Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN)
ISS Institutional DTN Overview for CCSDS
SCTP v/s TCP – A Comparison of Transport Protocols for Web Traffic
CSE679: Multimedia and Networking
Providing Secure Storage on the Internet
File Transfer Issues with TCP Acceleration with FileCatalyst
Beyond FTP & hard drives: Accelerating LAN file transfers
Space Communications Emulation Facility (SCEF): Improving NASA Missions though Emulation Rich Slywczak, Brenda Ellis, Allen Holtz, Fran Lawas-Grodek,
Satellite Communication 101 (or maybe 1.01)
Chapter 15. Satellite Services and the Internet
Presentation transcript:

Automated File Transfer and Storage Management Concepts for Space Gary Meyers - GSFC Ed Criscuolo - CSC Keith Hogie - CSC Ron Parise - CSC Revised 6/14/2004

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 2 Overview Introduction Concepts Testbed Characteristics & Parameters Target Mission Testbed Architecture & Operation Planned simulations Results Conclusion & Future Efforts

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 3 Introduction The purpose of this project was to validate and demonstrate the use of an IP-based, NAK-oriented, reliable file delivery protocol to meet a space mission's data delivery and storage management requirements for onboard stored data. To this end, we built a Data Delivery Simulation Testbed and simulated a real, upcoming mission.

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 4 Concepts Instruments generate onboard data as streams of UDP packets. Replace onboard "Tape Recorder" paradigm with a file system using random-access files for stored data collection. Use IP-based standard "off-the-shelf" file delivery protocols for error-free transfer of stored data. Use file-level acknowledgements to automate the management of onboard storage space. Trade retransmissions and/or application-level FEC for BER.

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 5 Testbed Characteristics Simulated instrument & housekeeping data generation Automated onboard data storage management Adjustable Space/Ground link characteristics Ground system receipt of all collected data The simulation testbed must be highly parameterized in order to accommodate changing requirements and investigate "What if" scenarios.

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 6 Testbed Parameters Orbital Period Contact Time Separate Data Rates for Instruments and S/C Houskeeping Collection Time Per Data File Onboard storage cache size Downlink Data Rate Uplink Data Rate Link Delay Link Bit Error Rate

Revised 6/14/ Space Internet Workshop 7 MMS (Magnetospheric MultiScale) chosen Orbit Characteristics –4-spacecraft constellation –Tetrahedral configuration –Highly elliptical orbit –4 mission phases, with orbital periods from 1 to 10 days Link Characteristics –Downlink rate =2 Mbits/sec –Uplink Rate = 2 Kbits/sec –Prop. Delay = 25 mS mS –One contact (per S/C) per orbit, close to perigee Data Rates (per S/C) –Aggregate Rate: 25 Kbits/sec continuously –4 Instruments: 10, 5, 5, 3 Kbits/sec –S/C Housekeeping:2 Kbits/sec Target Mission

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 8 Testbed Architecture Inst 1 10 kbps Inst 2 5 kbps Inst 3 5 kbps Inst 4 3 kbps Spacecraft C&DH UDP Capture UDP Capture UDP Capture UDP Capture MDP Server Router Channel Simulator Router Ground System MDP Client Houskeeping 2 kbps UDP Capture Hot Directory Outbox Simulated Space Link: Delay and 2.0 Mbps Orbit Simulator Pause / Resume Data Archive Data Collection Inbox

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 9 Testbed Operation UDPCapture continuously transforms data streams of UDP packets into discrete data files onboard. Data files are moved to MDP's hot directory when completed. Orbit simulator enables MDP server during contact passes. When enabled, MDP Server automatically sends any new files that have appeared in the hot directory, and manages onboard data storage space. Channel simulator hardware introduces propagation delay and bit errors. MDP Client reliably receives data files, automatically requesting retransmission of any bad packets. Files are moved to archive when complete.

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 10 Planned Simulations Downlink Data Rate: 2 Mbps Uplink Data Rate: 2Kbps Link Prop. Delay: 25mS (Phase I & II), 215mS (Phase IV) BER: 0, 1E-8, 1E-7, 1E-6, 1E-5 Orbital Periods: 24 hrs (Phase I), 4 days (Phase II), 10 days (Phase IV) Inst/Hk Data Rates: 10, 5, 5, 3, 2 Kbps (25 Kbps total) Collection Time Per Data File (each instrument) : 3 hrs

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 11 Calculated Transfer Times Based on previous MDP performance measurements * (using 1 Mbyte files) Phase IPhase IIPhase IV 0 BER23 min82 min221 min 1E-823 min82 min221 min 1E-726 min91 min246 min 1E-643 min152 min409 min 1E-560 min217 min508 min * Refer to "Characterization data for MDP, 2001"

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 12 Projected Phase I Storage Utilization

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 13 Results To date, the Phase I simulations have been run. Initial real-time run at 0 BER for 4 days –Transfer times matched analytically derived values. –Storage utilization matched analytically derived values to within 1% Similar results for BERs of 1E-8 & 1E-7 At BER of 1E-6 –Transfer times were slightly better than predicted –Storage utilization matched predicted within 1% 30 day run at BER of 1E-5 –Transfer times were 30% better than predicted (43 min vs 60 min) –Storage utilization matched predicted within 1%

6/9/ Space Internet Workshop 14 Conclusion & Future Efforts Conclusion –An IP-based, NAK-oriented, reliable file delivery protocol can meet MMS mission's Phase I data delivery and storage management requirements for onboard stored data. Future Efforts –Vary MDP block size from 1024 to 1500 and characterize the effect on goodput –Add pro-active application-level FEC to reduce retransmissions at BER of 1E-5 and characterize the effect on bandwidth utilization