What is the evidence of benefits of PSA screening for prostate cancer? Outpatient Medicine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PSA: Fact or Fiction The debate as it stands
Advertisements

PSA and PROSTATE CANCER
The Great PSA Testing Controversy Does PSA Testing Do More Harm Than Good? Associate Professor Anthony Lowe.
HEALTHY PEOPLE. Aims  Interpret evidence about a screening programme and decide whether it is worthwhile – for individuals or groups  Demonstrate an.
†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department.
PSA Testing William J Catalona MD Northwestern University.
RESULTS TITLE; Prospective randomized controlled trial of the role of PSA and PCA3 testing in a sequential manner in an opportunistic screening protocol.
Prostate Cancer Screening: Con
What is the role of free PSA? Total PSA Range 2.5 to 4.0 ng/ml Age Range (Years) %Free PSA=60 (yrs)All Ages
Putting Prevention into Practice Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care Groupe d’étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs Screening for.
Otis W. Brawley, M.D. Chief Medical and Scientific Officer Executive Vice President American Cancer Society Professor of Hematology, Medical Oncology,
A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO PSA SCREENING Kendall Itoku, MD St. Louis Urological Surgeons.
Early Detection of breast cancer Anthony B. Miller, MD, FRCP Associate Director, Research, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
Geriatric Health Maintenance: Cancer Screening Linda DeCherrie, MD Geriatric Fellow Mount Sinai Hospital.
EVIDENCE AND DEBATE SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER.
Prostates & Pissing in the Wind. The Laytons Bob December 25, 1925 – May 9, 2002 Jack July 18, 1950 – August 22, 2011.
World Burden of Cancer Epi 242 Cancer Epidemiology Binh Goldstein, Ph.D. October 7, 2009.
Prostate Cancer Screening 2012 Paul L. Crispen, MD Department of Surgery University of Kentucky.
Prostate Cancer Screening Assistant Professor Charles Chabert Men’s health Seminar Ballina April 2011 prostates.com.au.
M Ravanbod Medical oncologist Bushehr – 11/91 A 50 y/o white man comes for check up and wants to discuss about prostate cancer. Negative family history.
Lecture Fourteen Biomedical Engineering for Global Health.
Prostate cancer: To screen or not to screen – To treat or not to treat Dr Oliver Klein – Medical Oncologist.
Study Design / Data: Case-Control, Descriptives Basic Medical Statistics Course: Module C October 2010 Wilma Heemsbergen
HSB examples from Finland Nea Malila Mass Screening Registry, Cancer Society of Finland and University of Tampere, Tampere School of Public Health.
Richard M. Hoffman, MD, MPH DOIM Thursday School October 30, 2014.
Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Massachusetts, Bureau of Health Statistics, Research and Evaluation Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
Prostate Screening in 2009: New Findings and New Questions Durado Brooks, MD, MPH Director, Prostate and Colorectal Cancer.
Finding N.E.M.O. Marvin R. Balaan, MD, FCCP System Division Director, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh.
Prostate Cancer James B. Benton,M.D.. Prostate Cancer Significant of the clinical problem Early detection/screening Prevention/Management.
EPIB-591 Screening Jean-François Boivin 29 September
Prostate Cancer Screening. Google Search “Prostate Cancer” “Google Health” prostate cancer (OK) “Should All Men Be Screened for Prostate Cancer?” ABC.
Lecture 17 (Oct 28,2004)1 Lecture 17: Prevention of bias in RCTs Statistical/analytic issues in RCTs –Measures of effect –Precision/hypothesis testing.
A/Prof Brian Cox Cancer Epidemiologist Dunedin. Research Associate Professor Brian Cox Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit Department of Preventive and.
PSA Testing 101 Stanley H. Weiss, MD Professor, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School Director & PI, Essex County Cancer Coalition May 15, 2010.
J. Jacques Carter, MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Medicine Department of Medicine Harvard Medical School Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, Massachusetts.
Prostate Cancer Screening in 2013: Reports of its Death Are Greatly Exaggerated Norm D. Smith, M.D. Associate Professor Co-Director Urologic Oncology University.
Based on ACS data, nearly 217,730 men will be diagnosed with CaP in Over 32,050 men will die of this disease in Over 2 million men are alive.
Prostate Cancer: A Case for Active Surveillance Philip Kantoff MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School.
Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism N Engl J Med Apr ;348(15) : PREVENT (Warfarin) Trial.
“The African American Prostate Cancer Crisis in Numbers”
A Glimpse of the Science Behind the American Cancer Society Access to Care Campaign Impact of Being Uninsured or Underinsured on Individuals with Cancer.
The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Fifth Annual African-American Prostate Cancer Disparity Summit September 24, 2009 Christine.
PCa Screening New Areas of Research Francesco Montorsi Milan.
Prevention with Finasteride Ian M. Thompson, MD October, 2009.
BME 301 Lecture Thirteen. Review of Lecture 12 The burden of cancer Contrasts between developed/developing world How does cancer develop? Cell transformation.
 Volunteer bias  Lead time bias  Length bias  Stage migration bias  Pseudodisease.
Prostate Cancer Screening Risk Management Ben Inch.
Il PSA nello screening del carcinoma della prostata PRO Franco Gaboardi Urologia Ospedale San Raffaele Turro Milano.
Per-Anders Abrahamsson, Department of Urology Malmö University Hospital Sweden EAU, Berlin, March 24, 2007 What´s New in Prostate Cancer?
AUA G UIDELINES : E ARLY D ETECTION OF P ROSTATE C ANCER Urology Journal Club 5/28/13.
Senior Statistician Per-Henrik Zahl, MA MD PhD
Colorectal Cancer Screening Implementation of a public health programme An Expert Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening Cancer Society of Finland, Finnish.
From EBM to SDM: Michel Labrecque MD PhD Michel Cauchon MD Department of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval Teaching how to apply evidence.
Prostatectomy operations in England South West Public Health Observatory Trends in the use of radical prostatectomy in England Sean McPhail.
Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer Anna Bill-Axelson, M.D., Lars Holmberg, M.D., Ph.D., Mirja Ruutu, M.D., Ph.D., Michael.
Preventative Care and Monitoring for Prostate Disease Joshua Broghammer, MD FACS Assistant Professor, Dept of Urology University of Kansas Medical Center.
PSA screening Cost Conscious Project Kristopher Huston January 2016.
Breast Cancer Screening 1. 2 Methods 3 Mammography.
Date of download: 6/29/2016 From: Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer Due to Mammography Screening: Results From the Norwegian Screening Program Ann.
Date of download: 7/6/2016 From: Comparative Effectiveness of Alternative Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies: Model Estimates.
New Study Offers Support for Prostate Testing
Definition of Cancer Screening
2017 USPSTF Draft Recommendations for Prostate Cancer Screening
Dr. John Jordan Dr. Stephen Pautler
CONVERSATIONS ON PROSTATE CANCER
Willie Underwood, III, MD, MS,MPH
Prostate Cancer Screening- Update
Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) - what’s new
Does PSA Testing Influence the Natural History of Prostate Cancer?
Presentation transcript:

What is the evidence of benefits of PSA screening for prostate cancer? Outpatient Medicine

Objective Review the evidence concerning the effect of PSA screening on prostate cancer mortality (Question 1 of the USPTF report on prostate cancer screening)

RCTs (and quasi-RCTs) of PSA screening 1988 Quebec Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Norkopping, Sweden study ERSPC PLCO

Observational studies Canada Tyrol, Austria Olmsted County, Minnesota

1988 Quebec Perspective Randomied Controlled Trial n = 46K men age Randomized to an “invite for screening” group and a control group. Treatment group received PSA (ULN = 3.0) and DRE. If either abnormal patients received TRUS and sextent Bx

1988 Quebec Results at 7 year follow up: Compliance in treatment arm: 23% Compliance in control arm: 93%

1988 Quebec 11 year follow up: no difference according to intention (invitation) to screen. Among all screened individuals: 19 prostate cancer deaths / 100k Among non-screened: 53.4 deaths / 100k

11 year follow up of Quebec study

1988 Quebec Comments: –No comparison between the groups (invited vs. not invited) –No comparison between screened and unscreened groups –Inappropriate analysis of screened vs. unscreened rather than intention to screen

Norrkoping Sweden study n = 9026 men in Norrkoping, Sweden Patients in the screened group (SG, n = 1494) were given DREs in 1987 and 1990, as well as DRE + PSA in 1993 and 1996.

Norrkoping Results In SG 5.7% of patients were diagnosed with cancer, about ½ on the initial DRE in % of these cancers were localized at time of diagnosis. In the control group (CG), 3.8% were diagnosed with cancer, 27% of which were organ confined. NO DIFFERENCE IN SURVIVAL at 15 year follow up. Since PSA was not used until the 6 th year of the study, this is not a 15 year follow up for PSA screening

Norrkoping Comments –No reported data comparing baseline characteristics of screened vs control –No reported data on crossover, compliance, etc.

European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Powered to detect a 25% reduction in prostate cancer mortality through screening. In 2006 data was assessed and the trial was continued

PLCO Trial N = 76,705 (38,350 screened) Screened group given annual PSA and DRE Compliance 89% 1.4% of men in the initial screening are were diagnosed, the majority with localized Mortality results pending. Patients enrolled from 1993 through 2001.

Population analyses In several Western countries including the US and Canada (34.1 to 28.3 deaths per 100k), prostate cancer mortality has decreased substantially since the early 1990s, when PSA screening was introduced. No one knows why this is –PSA screening –New therapies (anti-androgen therapy) –“attribution bias”

References Lin K, Lipsitz R, Miller T, Janakiraman S. Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149: Labrie F, Candas B, et al. Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 1999;38: Labrie F, Candas B, et al. Screening decreases prostate cancer mortality: 11-year follow-up of the 1988 Quebec prospectve randomized controlled trial. Prostate 2004;59: Shroder. Screening for prostate cancer (PC) – an update on recent findings of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC). Urologic Oncology: Seminar and Original investigations 2008;26: Andriole GL et al. Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. Journal of the national cancer institute 2005;97: Matteo LD, Matteo RD. Does testing for prostate-specific antigen contribute to declining prostate cancer mortality? Eur J Health Econom 2005;6: Oberaigner W et al. Reduction of prostate cancer mortality in Tyrol, Austria, after introduction of prostate-specific antigen testing. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164: Bergstralh EJ et al. Population-based case-control study of PSA and DRE screening on prostate cancer mortality. Urology 2007;70: Hoffman RM. Screening for prostate cancer. UpToDate Accessed at on 12/6/2008.