CarboNA: a Joint North American Carbon Program Country leads/coordinators: Nancy Cavallaro (USDA) Catherine Ste. Marie (Canadian Forest Service) Julia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Advertisements

GHG Verification & the Carbon Cycle 28 September 2010 JH Butler, NOAA CAS Management Group Meeting Page 1 Global Monitoring, Carbon Cycle Science, and.
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
CMIP5: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
Land-use effects on spatial and temporal patterns of carbon storage and flux in PNW forests David Wallin Department of Environmental Sciences Huxley College.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy North American Carbon Balance – Results from the Regional Synthesis Project of the North America Carbon.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
NACP Breakout Session: North American Terrestrial Carbon Monitoring and Decision Support Capabilities (combined from CMS and CarboNA proposals) Organized.
Presentation to the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry February 18, 2003 Nigel Roulet Professor of Geography Associate Member of the.
The North American Carbon Program: An Overview for AmeriFlux investigators Kenneth Davis The Pennsylvania State University Co-chair, NACP Science Steering.
FOREST SERVICE GHG ISSUES AND INFORMATION NEEDS Elizabeth Reinhardt, FS Climate Change Office.
The Ocean’s Role in Climate Change. Responding to the Kyoto Protocol Climate Change Action Fund (CCAF) Initiatives Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Reduce.
Global Forest Carbon Monitoring: Opportunities to Apply the NACP Multi- tier Approach to UNFCCC Reporting and REDD Requirements Richard Birdsey, Yude Pan,
Recent developments in the UNFCCC process in relation to global observations 4 th GTOS Steering Committee Paris, 1-2 December 2009 Rocio Lichte Programme.
Basic Climate Change Science, Human Response and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Prepared for the National Workshop.
Canada Climate Change Development Fund (CCCDF) Projects in support of national communications Satender Singh Department of Foreign Affairs and International.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
U. S. Support for National Communications Susan Wickwire U.S. Environmental Protection Agency June 9, 2003.
The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Director, Climate Change Science Program.
Intergovernmental Network on Atmospheric Pollution Objectives of the Intergovernmental Network on Atmospheric Pollution: –Promote the exchange of research.
External Communications Working Group Kevin Bowman, Peter Griffith, Kevin Gurney, Elizabeth Nelson, Ariane Verdy Interns: Maya Hutchins, Adam Norris 2013:
Module 1.1 UNFCCC context and requirements and introduction to IPCC guidelines REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank.
US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.
South Eastern Latin America LA26: Impact of GC on coastal areas of the Rio de la Plata: Sea level rise and meteorological effects LA27: Building capacity.
Field Measurement Networks D. Hollinger, E. LaPoint, R. Birdsey, L. Heath U.S. North American Carbon Program (NACP) Investigators Meeting, January 22-24,
Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities Dr Frank McGovern.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
The role of the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study in the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Ken Davis The Pennsylvania State University The 13 th ChEAS.
VuRSAL Scoping Study. Background NASA’s 2008 ROSES Solicitation (NNH08ZDA001N-TE) called for proposals to carry out “Scoping studies to identify the scientific.
Why Establish an Ecosystem-Atmosphere Flux Measurement Network in India? Dennis Baldocchi ESPM/Ecosystem Science Div. University of California, Berkeley.
Carboeurope Update of synthesis of continental carbon fluxes Dourdan carboocean 2008 meeting.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Continental Coastal Interactions: Integration of models across terrestrial, inland water, and coastal ocean ecosystems for diagnosis, attribution, and.
Science Mission Directorate Overview of NASA Research in Carbon Data Fusion and Data Assimilation Carbon Fusion Workshop, May, 2006 Bill Emanuel Program.
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
Forestry Projects: Measurement and Monitoring Werner A. Kurz Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Victoria, BC, Canada Biological Sequestration.
A Grand Plan for FIA’s role in a FS National Carbon Accounting System Linda S. Heath USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, FIA Forest Carbon Accounting.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
Expert meeting on “Environment, Climate Change and Security in the Artic” 28 February 2013 EEA activities on climate change impacts and adaptation in Europe.
Investigating the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems (ICCTE) Scott Ollinger * -PI, Jana Albrecktova †, Bobby Braswell *, Rita Freuder *, Mary Martin.
Identify topics for collaboration and define task team What is the specific nature of the topic or research task? What is carbon cycle question(s) or issue(s)
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
North American Carbon Sources and Sinks: Magnitude, Attribution and Uncertainty Anthony King Daniel Hayes Deborah Huntzinger Tristram West Wilfred Post.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
International workshop on Asian Greenhouse Gases Budgets Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India September 2011 Pep Canadell*, Prabir Patra.
Science Advisory Board Public Session 1 1 Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Associate Director for Science Integration Climate Change Science Program Office CCSP Update.
How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.
UNCLASS1 Dr. Gene Whitney Assistant Director for Environment Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President WISP Meeting - July.
Flux Measurements and Systematic Terrestrial Measurements 1.discuss gaps and opportunities What are gaps? 2. brainstorm ideas about collaborative projects.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
Arctic Research Office May, 2002 Update on SEARCH from the Agency Perspective.
U.S. Climate Change Science Program & Climate Change Technology Program Updates NOAA Science Advisory Board Meeting July 14, 2004 James R. Mahoney, Ph.D.
Scientific Plan Introduction –History of LBA Background –Definition of Amazon –7 Themes with achievements Motivation for Phase II –Unresolved questions.
A comparison of recent model- and inventory- based estimates of the continental-scale carbon balance of North America A. David McGuire USGS / University.
CMS and Decision Support: Economic and Policy Decision Support Analysis in the Context of North American Carbon Cycle Research Conveners: Allison Thomson,
Building resilience for adaptation to climate change in the fisheries and aquaculture sector: A global perspective and FAO roadmap Cassandra De Young Fisheries.
Interagency Ocean Observation Committee The Integrated Coastal & Ocean Observing System Act of 2009  Interagency Ocean Observing Committee  Lead Federal.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
Surprises in the anthropogenic carbon budget Why OCB is so important! Jorge Sarmiento Princeton University Co-lead author of the US Carbon Cycle Science.
Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes and Exchanges in the Gulf of Mexico May 6-8, 2008 St. Petersburg,
IASC Mission IASC is a non-governmental organization whose aim is to encourage and facilitate cooperation in all aspects of Arctic research, in all countries.
Claudia Borchert, City of Santa Fe Claudia Borchert, City of Santa Fe 2012 New Mexico Water Dialogue Thursday, January 12, 2012 Meeting Water Challenges.
North American Carbon Program
Preparing for the Production of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) for Biomass from Future Spaceborne Remote Sensing Missions: Is There A Role for CEOS-Carbon?
South Africa’s Approach to implementing REDD+
QUANTIFYING TROPICAL WETLAND BIOMASS AND CARBON STOCKS
Developing an Integrated
South Eastern Latin America
Presentation transcript:

CarboNA: a Joint North American Carbon Program Country leads/coordinators: Nancy Cavallaro (USDA) Catherine Ste. Marie (Canadian Forest Service) Julia Martinez (SEMARNAT)

CarboNA: a Joint North American Carbon Program Science Steering Committee Co-Chairs: Hank Margolis (Laval University) Ben deJong (ECOSUR) Scott Denning (Colorado State University)

Statement of Common Interest The Government Coordination Working Group approved a Statement of Common Interest and Agreement to Work Together – sets forth the justification, purpose, and preliminary structure of the program – Establishes the GCWG, Science Steering Committee – Calls for information exchange/shared results, joint workshops, scientific integration, common measurement protocols where appropriate, international projects/initiatives to be considered for cooperative funding.

North American Carbon Program (CarboNA) Science Plan Over-riding science questions: What is the current carbon budget of North American land, water, and adjacent oceans, and what is the uncertainty of the estimates? What natural processes control the variability of carbon stocks and fluxes at the continental and sub continental scales? What societal processes determine carbon emissions and sinks at these scales? What are the past and projected trends in the North American carbon budget, and what factors are expected to be important in the future? When will sinks saturate? Will they become sources? What are possible surprises? What will be the response of terrestrial ecosystems and coastal oceans to climate change and rising atmospheric CO 2 ? Which stocks and flows of carbon are most vulnerable? What is the role of economic development, energy technology, trade, and policy actions in driving changes in fossil fuel emissions? What are the impacts of different greenhouse gas policies on future carbon stocks and fluxes? What data are needed? How can we improve carbon observation systems?

North American Carbon Program (CarboNA) Science Plan Special emphasis for international collaboration in North America: Monitor and predict responses of ecosystem carbon cycles to natural variability in climate and disturbance regimes, to increasing CO 2 and to climate change along an ecological gradient from the Arctic to the Tropics; Estimate continental budgets for atmospheric greenhouse gases using data from land-based, airborne, marine, and space borne platforms including the integration of inventory-based carbon stock estimates for the three member countries; Establish a working group to identify research needs leading to improved understanding and quantification of carbon cycle processes and budgets in the Gulf of Mexico Basin; Improve understanding of the current state and likely future changes in carbon cycling in continental coastal ocean environments; of impacts on fisheries and coastal economies; of exchange between coastal oceans and deep ocean basins; and of air-sea gas exchange;

North American Carbon Program (CarboNA) Science Plan Special emphasis for international collaboration in North America: Government–level agreements on data sharing and harmonization, standardization of data collection and management, and criteria for using data, This should include development of trilateral databases with spatial data from tropics to Arctic following international protocols to the extent practicable; Develop an approach for a long-term, consistent, and integrated observation and reporting system for greenhouse gas mitigation across North America; Identify impacts of possible tri-lateral mitigation strategies and opportunities for reducing emissions, increasing greenhouse gas sequestration, sustainable use of biofuels; and how the 3 countries can work together to implement them. (Also how policies in one country might affect the others; Coordinate efforts to develop and deploy decision-support tools to explore the socio-demographic, socio-economic, and socio-political causes of variability in CO 2 emissions, as a way to mitigate increases, at the national, state and local level. This could help assess the effectiveness of actions undertaken by stakeholders aimed at mitigating CO 2 emissions or adapting to climate change.

CarboNA projects: criteria and process Given its mandate and the many and varied sources of funding, CarboNA requires flexible criteria and broad guidelines for designating participating projects and investigators. A CarboNA project must be of scientific interest to the three countries. It must be relevant to CarboNA Over-riding continental-scale science questions* and is expected to develop results and products that CarboNA needs to achieve its Goals*. A CarboNA project must include collaboration of scientists from at least two of the three North American countries. A CarboNA project must clearly address one of CarboNA’s Special emphasis areas for international collaboration in North America*. CarboNA Projects are generally but not necessarily relevant to continental scale analyses, continental gradients or cross-border gradients and regional studies. A CarboNA project must be endorsed by a minimum of one government agency, or by one member of the CarbonNA Government Coordination Working Group from at least two of the nations participating in CarboNA.

Example CarboNA projects CarboNA-04: Assessing the impacts of fire and insect disturbance on the terrestrial C budgets of forested areas in Canada, Alaska, and the Western US. CarboNA-05: Collaboration with Mexico on Forest Carbon Budget CarboNA-07: Canadian Carbon Program- Flux towers, atmospheric GHG conc., top- down / bottom-up modeling, integration of process and inventory models CarboNA-08: Ameriflux network CarboNA-09: Estimating the Amount, Spatial Distribution, and Statistical Uncertainty of Aboveground Carbon Stocks of the North American Boreal Forest Using the ICESAT- GLAS Spaceborne Lidar CarboNA-10: Governement Related Initiatives Program CSA-AAFC: Adapting cropping systems to climate variations: deriving above-ground crop biomass from hyperspectral reflectance and radar CarboNA-12: National Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification System – carbon budget for agricultural land in Canada CarboNA-17: Forest land dynamics and management opportunities for North America CarboNA-18: RESUCCCITIES Initiative to Attain Resilient and Sustainable Relationships among Carbon, Climate and Cities CarboNA-19: Field protocols for terrestrial carbon accounting, and data submission protocols manual (GTOS); based on the west coast design, developed for AmeriFlux and NACP, consistent with 1ha FIA inventory plots.

Some examples of relevant collaborations

CarbonTracker “Carbon Weather” January (net CO 2 emission) July (net CO 2 uptake) Long-term Observations CarbonTracker™

Sulfur Hexafluoride (ppt) Carbon Dioxide (ppm) An emerging high- altitude observatory in Mexico yields information on broad- scale fluxes of GHGs Sierra Negra Orizaba 18,700 ft.

Recent Atmospheric Monitoring Site in Saskatchewan Cooperative arrangement between NOAA and EC Now has continuous measurements from tower (not shown here) Used in CarbonTracker (Alert, Canada, coop since 1985)

FLUXNET-AmeriFlux-CCP Networks

Slide 15 Fluxnet-Canada: Canadian Carbon Program (CCP):

CarboNA-06: Application of the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3) to Mexico (slides from Werner Kurz, Canadian Forest Service) Collaborative project between ConaFor, EcoSur, other Mexican research centers and Canadian Forest Service Support for reporting of GHG emissions and removals, and analysis of REDD baseline and alternative scenarios. Currently testing of model at several pilot sites in wide range of ecological conditions in Mexico Preparation of input data for national-scale application of the model

Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3) An operational-scale model of stand and landscape-level forest C dynamics. Allows forest managers to assess carbon implications of forest management: increase sinks, reduce sources Compliant with IPCC reporting guidelines Freely available at: carbon.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca Kurz et al. 2009, Ecol. Modelling

CBM-CFS3 Application in Mexico Developed spatial stratification for compilation of national data. Conducted 2 workshops: project planning and user training. Spanish-language interface for CBM-CFS3 under development. Foreststands > 60, Spatial Units 7 Ecoregions & 32 States + Classifiers

CBM-CFS3 Application in Mexico Contacts: Dr. Ben de Jong, Ecosur Marcela Olguin, Ecosur Dr. Werner Kurz, Canadian Forest Service

CarboNA-09: Estimating the Amount, Spatial Distribution, & Statistical Uncertainty of Aboveground C Stocks of the N.A. Boreal Forest Using ICESAT-GLAS Spaceborne Lidar (slides from Hank Margolis, Laval University, Quebec) Idea was the ICESat satellite carried a lidar to measure polar ice sheet elevation could also be sensitive to forest biomass. Pilot study where Quebec scientists worked closely with scientists at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to use an airborne lidar to sample both provincial forest inventory plots and the ICESat ground tracks. This allowed them to scale the >100,000 ICESat laser pulses acquired in Quebec to estimate aboveground forest biomass for the province. The successful pilot study has allowed US and Canadian scientists to expand the approach to the entire boreal forest of North America. And hopefully to soon work with Mexican collaborators to apply the approach to the entire forest area of North America.

97 GLAS Orbits in Quebec – Autumn ,044 pulses

CarboNA-09: Estimating the Amount, Spatial Distribution, & Statistical Uncertainty of Aboveground C Stocks of the N.A. Boreal Forest Using ICESAT-GLAS Spaceborne Lidar Idea was the ICESat satellite carried a lidar to measure polar ice sheet elevation could also be sensitive to forest biomass. Pilot study where Quebec scientists worked closely with scientists at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to use an airborne lidar to sample both provincial forest inventory plots and the ICESat ground tracks. This allowed them to scale the >100,000 ICESat laser pulses acquired in Quebec to estimate aboveground forest biomass for the province. The successful pilot study has allowed US and Canadian scientists to expand the approach to the entire boreal forest of North America. And hopefully to soon work with Mexican collaborators to apply the approach to the entire forest area of North America.

CarboNA-09: Estimating the Amount, Spatial Distribution, & Statistical Uncertainty of Aboveground C Stocks of the N.A. Boreal Forest Using ICESAT-GLAS Spaceborne Lidar Idea was the ICESat satellite carried a lidar to measure polar ice sheet elevation could also be sensitive to forest biomass. Pilot study where Quebec scientists worked closely with scientists at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to use an airborne lidar to sample both provincial forest inventory plots and the ICESat ground tracks. This allowed them to scale the >100,000 ICESat laser pulses acquired in Quebec to estimate aboveground forest biomass for the province. The successful pilot study has allowed US and Canadian scientists to expand the approach to the entire boreal forest of North America. And hopefully to soon work with Mexican collaborators to apply the approach to the entire forest area of North America.

ICESat-1 Coverage 11 million pulses in boreal

CarboNA-09: Estimating the Amount, Spatial Distribution, & Statistical Uncertainty of Aboveground C Stocks of the N.A. Boreal Forest Using ICESAT-GLAS Spaceborne Lidar Idea was the ICESat satellite carried a lidar to measure polar ice sheet elevation could also be sensitive to forest biomass. Pilot study where Quebec scientists worked closely with scientists at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to use an airborne lidar to sample both provincial forest inventory plots and the ICESat ground tracks. This allowed them to scale the >100,000 ICESat laser pulses acquired in Quebec to estimate aboveground forest biomass for the province. The successful pilot study has allowed US and Canadian scientists to expand the approach to the entire boreal forest of North America. And hopefully to soon work with Mexican collaborators to apply the approach to the entire forest area of North America.

A call for collaborators, proposals A list of currently proposed projects and profiles can be found on the CarboNA website: bin/carbona/investigations/inv_profiles.pl bin/carbona/investigations/inv_profiles.pl Some are looking for collaborators—Yukon river, Health and Agriculture, Crop Biomass, Ocean Acidification, RESUCCCITIES We welcome additional projects NACP projects may be co-listed with CarboNA if they meet the criteria

Slide 29 NACP Interim syntheses underway- Most include Canadian scientists, some also include Mexican scientists – Regional/continental comparison-CA, MX – Site-based model-data comparison-CA – Midcontinent intensive regional syntheses-? – Non-CO 2 greenhouse gas synthesis-CA – Disturbance effects on carbon fluxes-CA, MX – Coastal ocean carbon cycle synthesis-CA, MX – MsTMIP Synthesis (multi-scale synthesis and intercomparison project)-?

Some observations U.S. looking for international collaboration on human interactions and cities Need for more ocean/coastal coordination--take advantage of increased interest/funding in the Gulf of Mexico on the part of MX due to the oil spill Take advantage of new initiative in MX (CONACYT) for and observations network-coordinate with NEON? Horizontal movement of carbon-riverine fluxes, estuarine processes, wetlands, interfaces between ecosystem types Take advantage of U.S. initiative in soil carbon protocols, measurement and modeling Some programs and observations systems are in jeopardy-- Can more prominent international interest influence national funding for systems and studies in danger of losing funding?