The Urban Dimension of Romania’s Cohesion Policy REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2007-2013 Gabriel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 EU assistance to South-eastern Europe new Member States and Candidate Countries DG REGIO.
Advertisements

Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
Cyprus Project Management Society
Role and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department of Rural Development LEADER+ TYPE MEASURE IN POLAND International Conference: „Future of European.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE SEC. GEN. OF INVESTMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGING AUTHORITY CIP Interreg Interregioanal Cooperation in INTERREG III Programmes.
URBACT II Promoting Integrated & Sustainable Urban Development.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
National Framework for Sustainable urban development 2014 – 2020 January We invest in.
Investment and integrated strategies supporting towns Raivis BREMSMITS Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of.
Preparation of Bulgaria for future use of EU Structural Instruments Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance.
1 MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SOCIAL SOLIDARITY AND FAMILY ESF HEAD OF MISSION MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR SECTORAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT.
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Florin Banateanu October 2011 EU funds for private sector in Romania – opportunities and practical features.
Regional Policy Priorities of Latvia until 2020
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
Regional Policy ESI Funds' Policy in European Trade Unions Confederation Brussels – 13 March 2014 Diego Villalba de Miguel – DG Regional and.
The Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic (MRD) Urban dimension in Czech Operational Programmes Josef Postránecký Department.
European Social Fund Cohesion Policy EU cohesion policy & social economy Dominique Bé, European Commission Worker ownership: the synthesis between.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 10 Regions and the E.U. public policy process.
CASE STUDY: TIMIŞOARA, ROMANIA Monitoring the Urban Dimension in EU Cohesion Policy.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Urban Regeneration in the EU: An Overview Dr. Haroon SAAD Director of QeC-ERAN Monitoring the Urban Dimension in Cohesion Policy:Spanish and Portuguese.
Regional Policy as a Tool of Regional Development Support Chapter IV. Pavol Schwarcz Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.
Dr Elisabeth Helander Director Community Initiatives and Innovative Actions DG Regional Policy European Commission.
Fondi strutturali - Regionalizzazione Le differenti fasi di applicazione dei fondi strutturali e La conseguente regionalizzazione del territorio dell’Unione.
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Experiences, Framework and New Operational.
“Common Strategy for Sustainable Territorial Development of the cross-border area Romania-Bulgaria” 26 th of September 2013 Craiova, Romania.
Regional & Urban Policy Investments for growth & jobs Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities 6 th Report on economic, social.
Brainstorming meeting House of Catalonia, Bruxelles 26 March 2014 Territorial Vision and Pathways 2050.
EU FUNDING INSTRUMENTS – GENERAL REVIEW. EU's funding structure and the associated instruments and programmes  Pre-Accession Assistance:
MINISTRY OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION General Directorate for Regional Development Regional Policy and Pogramming Directorate REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME.
Conference with European multipliers of information 21 st of September 2010, Calarasi “Common borders. Common solutions” Common solutions” 21/09/2010.
« Performing Efficient Models of Administration Capacity and Regional Reform in the European Union» European Parliament 15 October 2008 Bruxelles Romanian.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
Political Issues and Social Policy in the E.U. Professor John Wilton Lecture 10 Regions and the E.U. policy process.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
For a better place to live! OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONS IN GROWTH” Investing.
Welcomeurope © RUSE Project Krakow, 2005 November 29 “The European Structural Funds” RUSE Project coordinated by Energie-Cités Seminar hosted by Polish.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005 Towards a new partnership for growth, jobs and cohesion.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
European Union Funds European Union Funds for growth and development Andžs Ūbelis Deputy State Secretary Ministry of Finance EU Structural Funds.
EU Urban Policy: An overview Dr. Haroon Saad Director QeC-ERAN.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Developing coherence mechanisms (ERDF/EARDF) in Poland Andrzej Hałasiewicz, PhD Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Foundation of Assistance Programmes.
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 11 Regions and the E.U. public policy process.
Territorial and urban dimension 1Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague.
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
Regional Policy Integrated Territorial Approaches Madrid, 22 February 2013.
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
Fourth progress report on cohesion June 2006
UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT POSTGRADUATE PROGRAM IN EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Evaluation of the.
Regional Development Planning
6th Report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, July 2014
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
Presentation transcript:

The Urban Dimension of Romania’s Cohesion Policy REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2007-2013 Gabriel FRIPTU Head of the Managing Authority for Regional Operational Programme Ministry of Regional Development and Housing 1

Romania’ NUTS II Regions

Development of Romania in terms of GDP Romania’s GDP = 38.4% of the EU-27 average Nr. crt. Region GDP in 2006 EUR/inhab. GDP/inhab. in 2006 (in PPS, EU27=100) ROMANIA 4,500 38.4 1 NORD EST 2,900 24.7 2 SUD EST 3,800 32.5 3 SUD 32.1 4 SUD VEST 3,600 30.4 5 VEST 5,300 44.7 6 NORD VEST 4,200 35.9 7 CENTRU 38.3 8 BUCUREŞTI-ILFOV 9,900 83.8

Indicative financial allocation from Structural Instruments for 2007-2013 Structural and Cohesion Funds : 19.7 billion Euro OPs Convergence: 19.2 billion Euro, out of which: ROP: 3.7 billion Euro (19.5%) OPs European Territorial Cooperation: 0,5 billion Euro + National co-financing (state budget, local budget, private contribution): 5.5 billion Euro Instruments for Agriculture and Rural Development: 13.3 billion Euro

Operational Programmes under Convergence Objective National Coordinator – Ministry of Finance MANAGING AUTHORITY FUND Increasing Economic Competitiveness Ministry of Economy ERDF Transport Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure ERDF + CF Environment Ministry of Environment Regional Development Ministry of Regional Development and Housing Human Resources Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Protection ESF Administrative Capacity Ministry of Administration and Interior Technical Assistance Ministry of Finance

Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 - Financial allocation - Total allocation : 4.4 billion Euro, out of each: 3.7 billion Euro – ERDF 0.7 billion Euro – National Contribution (state budget, local budget, private contribution)

Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 - Strategic Objective - Supporting the economic, social, territorially balanced and sustainable development of the Romanian Regions, according to their specific needs and resources, focusing on urban growth poles, improving the business environment and basic infrastructure, in order to make the Romanian Regions, especially the ones lagging behind, more attractive places to live, visit, invest in and work.

Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 - Specific Objectives - To increase the economic and social role of urban areas, adopting a polycentric approach, in order to stimulate a more balanced development of regions; To increase accessibility within regions and in particular the accessibility of urban areas and their connection to surrounding areas; To increase the quality of social infrastructure of regions; To increase the competitiveness of regions as business locations; To increase the contribution of tourism to the development of regions.

ROP’ strategic approach for achieving a balanced territorial development A differentiated financial allocation by Regions, according to their level of development; Key importance given to the urban dimension in achieving a polycentric and a more balanced development of the country; Concentration of investments in urban growth poles in order to stimulate the development of Romanian Regions and maximize the impact of intervention; The need to increase the accessibility of cities, their connection to surrounding areas and improve the links between rural and urban areas.

Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 - Priority Axes - Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles; Improvement of regional and local transport infrastructure Improvement of social infrastructure; Strengthening the regional and local business environment ; Sustainable development and promotion of tourism; Technical assistance.

Urban development of Romania No. Region Population - Total - 2006 Urban Population Urban Population (%) ROMÂNIA 21,584,365 11,913,938 55.2 1 NORD EST 3,732,583 1,629,250 43.6 2 SUD EST 2,837.834 1,573,520 55.4 3 SUD 3,312,342 1,379.073 41.6 4 SUD VEST 2,293,895 1,092,922 47.6 5 VEST 1,927,229 1,223,730 63.5 6 NORD VEST 2,730,132 1,449,635 53.1 7 CENTRU 2,530,818 1,513,670 59.8 8 BUCUREŞTI-ILFOV 2,219,532 2,052,138 92.5

Urban development characteristics - Weaknesses (I) - Low level of urbanization level, compared with European Union Member States (55.2%); At regional level, urbanization is historically correlated with overall economic development. With the exception of Bucharest-Ilfov (92.5%) the most urbanized regions are among the most prosperous ones: West Region (63.5%) and Center Region (59,8%); In the East part of the country (North-East Region) as well as in the South (South and South-West Regions) the rural population working in agriculture activities is prevailing; The existing of a large number of small and medium sized towns (about 90% in the total number of towns and cities) with limited urban functions and poor infrastructure; Important migration flows of urban population towards rural areas and outside country;

Urban development characteristics - Weaknesses (II) - Decreasing urban population ( 1990-2006) in all development regions; Poor quality of public infrastructure (including road, health, social and education infrastructure), obsolete urban public utilities and failure to maintain historical and cultural assets; Socio-economic decline of many regional urban centers and the diminishing of their role in the surrounding areas and Regions’ development; Large cities increasingly experiencing congestion; Disparities within towns and cities with deprived areas and neighbourhoods, having low level of quality of life; The urban system is dominated by a large urban pole – Bucharest the Capital city and a regional network of secondary poles (large cities).

Urban development characteristics - Potential - Cities concentrates economic activities and population, having potential to act as engines for economic development of the Regions; Relatively well balanced distribution of large cities; Every development region has at least one city with more than 200.000 inhabitants, which can stimulate and induce development in the surrounding areas; Some urban areas in the west part of the country are becoming labour market poles;

“Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” - Objective & key area of intervention - Allocated funds: 1.4 bill. Euro (30% in ROP financial allocation) Objective: To increase the quality of life and to create new jobs in cities, by rehabilitating the urban infrastructure, improving services, including social services, as well as by developing business support structures and entrepreneurship.  Key area of intervention: Integrated Urban Development Plans implemented through projects addressing the following issues : Rehabilitation of the urban infrastructure and improvement of urban services, including urban transport; Development of sustainable business environment; Rehabilitation of social infrastructure, including social housing and improvement of social services.

“Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” - Urban growth poles - Three types of urban growth poles identified: Growth poles - 7 large urban centers and their hinterland, designated by Government Decision: Iasi, Constanţa, Ploieşti, Craiova, Timişoara, Cluj-Napoca and Braşov; Urban development poles – 13 cities, designated by Government Decision: Suceava, Bacău, Brăila, Galaţi, Piteşti, Râmnicu Vâlcea, Arad, Deva, Satu Mare, Baia Mare, Oradea, Sibiu and Târgu Mureş; Urban centers - towns over 10.000 inhabitants, other than growth poles and urban development poles.

“Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” Growth poles - implementation arrangements (I) Seven coordinators, one for each growth pole; Association for Intercommunity Development (AID) created; for each growth pole; it comprises the city identified as urban core of growth poles and territorial administrative units in their hinterlands (towns, communes). County Councils may also be members of this Association; Establishes the geographical area of the growth pole; Ensure the setting up of the technical team(s) of experts at the level of each growth pole, having the task to elaborate, monitore and implement the Integrated Urban Development Plan; Set up the decision-making mechanisms for each growth pole; Agree the Integrated Development Plans, including an action plan containing a list of projects set up by AIDs;

“Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” Growth poles - implementation arrangements (II) Projects are financed from all operational programmes of NSRF, National Programme for Rural Development, as well as from national programmes and other sources: EIB, EBRD, etc; Priority given by other Managing Authorities for SOPs to projects promoted by growth poles; Regional Operational Programme allocates up to 50% (about 630 mil. Euro) from the financial allocation of ROP Priority Axis 1.

“Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” Urban development poles - implementation arrangements The projects are implemented within the administrative borders of cities designated as urban development poles; Integrated Development Plans, including an action plan with a list of projects are set up by municipalities; they should contain at least two types of projects out of the three eligible categories of activities: urban infrastructure, business structures and social infrastructure; The projects are financed from the funds allocated to ROP Priority Axis 1 (up to 20% - about 253 mil. Euro), as well as from national programmes, private sources etc.

“Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” Urban centers - implementation arrangements Urban centers are small and medium sized towns with over 10,000 inhabitants; Integrated Urban Development Plans, including an action plan with a list of projects are set up by municipalities; they should contain at least two types of projects out of the three eligible categories of activities: urban infrastructure, business structures and social infrastructure; Integrated urban development plans are implemented in “urban actions zones” with at list 10.000 inhabitants, geographically delineated within urban centers; The projects are financed from the funds allocated to ROP Priority Axis 1 (up to 30% - about 503 mil. Euro), as well as from other sources.

Local public authorities Associations for Intercommunity Development “Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” - Beneficiaries - Local public authorities Associations for Intercommunity Development Partnerships between local public authorities

“Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” - Implementation system - A. Growth poles Submission of the Integrated Urban Development Plans (IUDP) to the ROP MA for endorsement; Submission of the projects included in IUDP’s action plan to the IBs of MA for ROP – in the case of projects financed under ROP and to the MA for SOPs – in the case of projects financed under other operational programmes for evaluation. B. Urban development poles and urban centers Submission of the integrated development plans together with the projects included in IUDP’s action plan to the IBs of MA for ROP for evaluation.

“Support to sustainable development of urban growth poles” - Calls for proposal - Calls for proposal launched in November-Decembre 2008: Growth poles – open calls with rolling submission Urban development poles – open calls with rolling submission Urban centers – deadline submission (31st of March 2009)

Governing aspects of the ROP’ urban dimension (I) The Cities and Municipalities Associations were involved in the elaboration of ROP and identification of urban issues as being one of the most important priorities for Romania, in line with Community Strategic Guidelines for Cohesion 2007-2013 (attending to the fora organized both at national and regional level); The Cities and Municipalities Associations are members of ROP Monitoring Committee as observers; The Cities and Municipalities Associations contributed to the identification of growth poles and urban development poles; The use of the integrated approach and Integrated Urban Development Plans as strategic planning tools;

Governing aspects of the ROP’ urban dimension (II) The participation of citizens to the elaboration of Integrated Urban Development Plans – a condition for the approval and financing of the projects within integrated urban development plans; The use of Technical Assistance (pre-accession funds) to support the local authorities of growth poles to elaborate Integrated Urban Development Plans during the period June-November 2008; Methodological Guidelines for the elaboration of Integrated Urban Development Plans carried out by ROP Managing Authority; Regular meetings with representatives of the local authorities of growth poles and urban development poles, to support them in the process of Integrated Urban Development Plans’ elaboration and implementation.

THANK YOU! www.inforegio.ro www.mdrl.ro