SEARCH PLAN VARIABLES CG Addendum Section H.5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SITREP.
Advertisements

CDOs – the flightdeck perspective Captain Spencer Norton AOA Environment Conference 28 th April 2014.
Authored by Rich Simerson 26-Sep-94 Revised 01-Apr-2010 Modified by Lt Colonel Fred Blundell TX-129 Fort Worth Senior Squadron For Local Training Rev 5.0.
RESPONSE TO FLARE SIGHTINGS
20051 Surface Rescue Swimmer School Survivor Marker/Locator Devices LT 4.6.
Perimeter and Area.
1 Emergency Services Search Coverage Mission Pilot CAPR Attachment 10 Paragraph d Richard Shulak Wasatch Sqdn. RMR-UT-008 February 2000.
Mission Aircrew Course Chapter 9: Search Planning and Coverage (Feb 2005)
Emergency Services Search Patterns
CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC NAVIGATION AND CHARTWORK CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC February 2012.
Search Patterns Search Patterns -- Rev: Nov 05 Boat Forces Center Coxswain “C” School.
Search Patterns BMCS WOLFSON HEH! I’M OVER HERE !!!
POC, POD, POS Minnesota Wing Air Branch Director Course.
Potomac Management Group, Inc.1 Objective POD Estimation The Development of a Standard Method For Gathering and Using Detection Data R. Quincy Robe & Jack.
Coast Guard Search & Rescue Metrics and Definitions Slides 2-6 Courtesy of: R.J. Koester, D.C. Cooper, J.R. Frost, R.Q. Robe Presented by Dave Larson.
Observer Scanner Training by 1 st Lt. Alan Fenter.
Eights-on Pylons Not to be confused with Eights around pylons Eights across a road Eights along a road.
Principles of Navigation and Guidance AEE 500 – Fall 2009 L. C. Smith College of Engineering Syracuse University Instructor: Harish Palanthandalam-Madapusi.
Property of Lear Siegler. NAVIGATIONAL COMPUTER SLIDE RULE.
PERFORM MULTIAIRCRAFT OPERATIONS TASK 2010 CONDITIONS: In an H-60 helicopter. STANDARDS: Appropriate common standards plus the following additions/modifications:
Interoperability of Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems Lixia Song James K. Kuchar Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
WEATHER CHARTS. WEATHER CHARTS T L O Enabling Learning Objective (ELO) A Action: The student will interpret the information contained in a surface.
AIR NAVIGATION Part 2 Distance Speed & Time.
Scanner Course #6 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2025, P-2026, O-2004 Search Coverage Disaster Assessment.
Area: Parallelograms, Triangles, and Trapezoids Written By Mrs. Ballard Tweaked By KLS.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Coast Guard Research & Development Center Multi-Sensor Performance Prediction (MSPP) Tool-Set Kim Babcock U.S. Coast Guard R&D Center U.S. Coast Guard.
En Route Performance CPL Performance.
Electronic Navigation Chapter 23. Many Toys Speed up and make easier many tasks Tools are better with knowledge Common: –VHF –Depth Sounder –RADAR –LORAN.
Observer Scanner Training Electronic Searches Section 3 by 1st Lt. Alan Fenter.
Radio Detection And Ranging (RADAR). Exercises Describe the basic principles of RADAR. What are the bands of frequencies for ATC Radars? What are the.
P-2025, P-2026 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2025, P-2026 Search Terms Disaster Assessment.
. Tracking Uncertainty in Search and Rescue Planning Art Allen U.S. Coast Guard Office of Search and Rescue
Search Patterns W S CG Addendum (Chap 3, Appendix H Section H.7 )
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
International Search And Rescue Training MOB SOUTH OF THE ISLAND ANHOLT 20 th of August 2013.
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon
HWT X-1 POTOTYPE IN OPERATION Unmanned System - Scalable 6 Years of Development Rigorous Testing Patented WingSail & Controls Autonomous Vehicle Control.
knots WIND DESIRED TRACK HEADING HEADING VS TRACK.
Weather Predicting Weather forecasting is a prediction of what the weather will be like in an hour, tomorrow, or next week. Weather forecasting involves.
Aircrew Tasks O-2022 DEMONSTRATE SCANNING PATTERNS AND LOCATE TARGETS (S) O-2102 DEMONSTRATE PLANNING AND FLYING A ROUTE SEARCH (P) O-2103 DEMONSTRATE.
Observer Scanner Training
CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC COORDINATION OF MULTIPLE SURFACE UNITS CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC February 2012.
DETECTION OF SURVIVORS USING THERMO & NIGHT VISION SYSTEM (UNDER DEVELOPMENT) Zbigniew Burciu, Teresa Abramowicz-Gerigk, Piotr Michna, Leszek Smolarek,
Lecture 9 Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) Radio Aids & Navigational System.
The Analytic Blunder Risk Model (ABRM) A computer model for predicting collision risk Kenneth Geisinger Operations Research Analyst Federal Aviation Administration.
AIR NAVIGATION Part 4 Magic Numbers.
Search Effort. The Balancing Act Limited Resources Limited Resources Planning Time in Search Area – how much time does it take to complete a search assignment?
Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)
Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)
P-2027 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Task P-2027 Visual Search Patterns and Procedures.
Introduction The uses of a DME DME Equipment How DME work? Advantages of DME Disadvantages of DME.
Survival and Rescue By AST3 Michael Dibble. Questions After Ditching What do I do once I’ve made it out of the plane? How are they going to see me? What.
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS).
UNIT 2 – MODULE 7: Microwave & LIDAR Sensing. MICROWAVES & RADIO WAVES In this section, it is important to understand that radio waves and microwaves.
presented by: Reham Mahmoud AbD El-fattah ali
Civil Air Patrol – California Wing Visual Search Patterns and Procedures Mission Scanner Course Chapter 10 Version 1.2 (1 March 2014)
Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage
Civil Air Patrol – California Wing Search Planning and Coverage Mission Scanner Course Chapter 9 Version 1.2 (1 March 2014)
Flight Operations Chapter 26 En Route Navigation.
By Bret, Kayla, Antonia, Arin
This lesson will explain the duties of an SRU as well as provide some recommendations to help prepare for the mission and carry out the Search Action Plan.
Aircrew Tasks O-2022 DEMONSTRATE SCANNING PATTERNS AND LOCATE TARGETS (S) O-2102 DEMONSTRATE PLANNING AND FLYING A ROUTE SEARCH (P) O-2103 DEMONSTRATE.
Expanding Square Search Pattern
777 Neptune Flight Planning.
RYA Instructor Conference 2019
Aircrew Tasks O-2022 DEMONSTRATE SCANNING PATTERNS AND LOCATE TARGETS (S) O-2102 DEMONSTRATE PLANNING AND FLYING A ROUTE SEARCH (P) O-2103 DEMONSTRATE.
Search Planning and Coverage (Chapter 9)
RYA Instructor Conference South Africa 2019
Presentation transcript:

SEARCH PLAN VARIABLES CG Addendum Section H.5

Instructor Notes

Objectives Demonstrate the relationship between Track Spacing (S); Corrected Sweep Width (W); Coverage Factor (C) State the factors needed to obtain a corrected visual sweep width Locate the visual sweep width estimate for night detection aids Compute Coverage Factor (C)

The Goal of Search Planning “To cover as much of the search area as possible with a reasonable probability of detection with the ultimate aim to maximize the probability of success.” Section H.5 Search Plan Variables The goal of search planning is to cover as much of the search area as possible with a reasonable POD with the ultimate aim to maximize POS. Area coverage is a function of area size, corrected sweep width, and the number, speed, and endurance of SRUs used. POD and Coverage are measures of the thoroughness of a search.

TRACK SPACING (S) SWEEP WIDTH (W) COVERAGE FACTOR (C) Search Plan Variables TRACK SPACING (S) SWEEP WIDTH (W) COVERAGE FACTOR (C) Read each, and comment briefly.

The distance between two adjacent Track Spacing (S) The distance between two adjacent parallel search legs Simultaneous Sweeps Successive Sweeps s s H.5.4.1 Track spacing (S) is the distance between two adjacent parallel search legs. It directly influences coverage (C). POD can be increased by decreasing track spacing (which increases coverage), but decreased track spacing means that either less area can be covered, that more time is needed to cover the same area with the same number of SRUs, or that more SRUs are needed to cover the same area in the same amount of time. The ideal “compromise” between area covered and POD is the one that produces the maximum POS.

Sweep Width (W) Search objects missed within Sweep Width Search objects detected outside Sweep Width Figure H-22 Sweep Width Search objects missed within Sweep Width SWEEP WIDTH LATERAL RANGE IN SWEEP WIDTHS NOTE: Number of search objects missed in area “A” is equal to number of search objects sighted in area “B” POD H.5.5 Sweep Width H.5.5.1 Sweep width (W) is the width of a swath centered on the SRU’s track where the probability of detecting the search object if it is outside of that swath is equal to the probability of missing the search object if it is inside that swath. It is a measure of detection capability based on search object and sensor characteristics, weather, and other factors. Sweep width is less, often much less, than twice the maximum detection range, which is the farthest range at which the object can be detected

Sweep Width (W) A measure of detection capability Based on scientific study Some must be corrected for weather, fatigue, velocity It is a measure of detection capability based on search object and sensor characteristics, weather, and other factors.

Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Sweep width corrected (W) = sweep width uncorrected (Wu) x weather correction (fw) x fatigue correction (ff) x speed correction (fv-aircraft only) Corrected sweep width (W) is a measure of detection capability and will vary with search object type, SRU/sensor type, and environmental conditions. For search patterns that use straight, equally spaced parallel tracks, coverage is computed as the ratio of the corrected sweep width to the track spacing (C = W/S). The more difficult an object is to detect, the closer together the search legs must be to achieve a given coverage. H.5.5.3 Visual sweep widths are determined by choosing an uncorrected sweep width based on type of search object and SRU altitude and correcting it for environmental conditions, speed, and fatigue. For maritime SAR, Sweep width corrected (W) = sweep width uncorrected (Wu) x weather correction (fw) x fatigue correction (ff) x speed correction (fv-aircraft only). Emphasize the three correction factors – Weather, Fatigue, Speed

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Example Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Example Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 knots Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts Review the example specification.

Visual Sweep Widths Search Altitude (e) Search Altitude. For many objects, the available sweep width tables indicate that sweep width increases slightly with increasing altitude up to 3,000 feet under ideal conditions. However, these figures should not be given undue regard as the smaller increases indicated are generally within the estimation error of the methods used to create the tables.

Uncorrected Visual Sweep Width Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Uncorrected Visual Sweep Width Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts Start with uncorrected sweep width.

Uncorrected Visual Sweep Widths Tables H-11 thru H-19, Pages H46- H50

Uncorrected Visual Sweep Widths Note: If using a surface vessel, use Table H-19 pg H-50 NOTE – Difference between a vessel and a small boat. Cutter or Small boat?

Uncorrected Visual Sweep Width Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Uncorrected Visual Sweep Width Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts Wu = 6.3 Uncorrected sweep width is 6.2. Write it down. Stress the importance of organized work sheets so work can be checked by themselves or by others.

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Weather Correction Factor Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Weather Correction Factor Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts

Weather Correction Factor Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Weather Correction Factor Weather Correction Winds are 14 knots, that row would be selected. The seas are 4’, so that row would be selected. Then depending on what search object you are looking for, you select a column. Since the object we are looking for is 33’, the CG uses Other search Objects. If environmental conditions of more than one row apply, use the smaller of the weather correction factor.

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Weather Correction Factor Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Weather Correction Factor Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts The first correction factor for weather. Fw = 0.9

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Fatigue Correction Factor Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Fatigue Correction Factor Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts Correcting for Fatigue The second correction factor is for fatigue. Either “YES” or “NO” Coast Guard Addendum Paragraph H.5.5.4(c) If feedback from on scene SRUs indicates search crews were excessively fatigued, reduce sweep width values by 10 percent (multiply by 0.9). How do we know if excessive fatigue is present? An SRU does NOT have to be in fatigue status for this to apply. If the crew has been underway / airborne in heavy weather for a significant amount f time, go ahead and apply this factor. You are giving the search object the benefit.

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Fatigue Correction Factor Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Fatigue Correction Factor Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts In this example fatigue is excessive so the factor is 0.9. Next factor is velocity. Ff = 0.9

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Speed Correction Factor Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Speed Correction Factor Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts Speed correction factor applies to aircraft only.

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Speed Correction Factor Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Speed Correction Factor Note – fixed wing and helicopter speed correction factors.

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Speed Correction Factor Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Speed Correction Factor Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts In this example the velocity correction factor is .9 Fv = 0.9

W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Example Visual Sweep Widths W = Wu x fw x ff x fv Example Search Object 33 ft Power Boat SRU Type HH-65 Altitude 1000 ft Visibility 10 nm Wind 14 kts Seas 4 ft Crew fatigue Yes SRU Speed 120 kts Wu = 6.3 fw = 0.9 ff = 0.9 fv = 0.9 W = 4.59 Review the example specification. Make sure the class is with you.

Uncorrected Visual Sweep Width Visual Sweep Widths Uncorrected Visual Sweep Width Wu = 6.3 fw = 0.9 ff = 0.9 fv = 0.9 W = 4.59 SRU track Effect of correction. Uncorrected we had a sweep width of over six miles.

Uncorrected Visual Sweep Width Visual Sweep Widths Uncorrected Visual Sweep Width Wu = 6.3 fw = 0.9 ff = 0.9 fv = 0.9 W = 4.59 SRU track Corrected, it is less than five miles. THE PROCESS IS IMPORTANT!

Visual Distress Signaling Devices (VDSD) Orange smoke Red flare Star shell Dye markers Tracers Signal mirrors Sweep widths for VDSD are never corrected. Use them right out of the table. Active targets are designed to attract our attention. VDSD do not require correction, their Sweep Widths are used as listed. Of course, if the visibility is 4 miles in haze and the sweep width for a target is 10NM, make the correction as necessary. H.5.5.6 Visual Distress Signaling Devices (VDSDs). When estimating sweep widths for VDSDs, such as pyrotechnics, dye markers, tracer bullets, or signal mirrors, use either twice the range at which survivors can be expected to detect the SRU, or the value given in Tables H-20, H-21, H-22, H-23 or H-24, whichever is smaller.

Electronic Search Sensors EPIRB/ELT* Surface Radar FLAR SLAR FLIR NVG* EPIRB / ELT Sweep widths require minor corrections. Radar search sensors do not require correction either, their Sweep Widths are used as listed. NVG’s require very complex calculations, allow the SMC to utilize computer systems to calculate.

Coverage Factor (C) C = W/S Measure of search thoroughness or how well an area was searched. Entering argument when calculating Probability of Detection. C = W/S H.5.6 Coverage Factor (C) Coverage Factor (C) is a measure of search thoroughness or how well an area was searched. It is used as an entering argument when calculating POD. For search pattern that uses straight, equally spaced parallel tracks, coverage is computed as the ratio of the corrected sweep width to the track spacing (C = W/S). Coverage (C) = Corrected Sweep Width (W) / Track Spacing (S)

How to use the Bookmark W / / Demonstrate the use of the pyramid C S X

Track Spacing and Sweep Width are equal. C = 1.0 S = W (1: 1 Ratio) Sweep Width Track Spacing SRU track 3.4.2.1 Initial Response Search Area. When the search object is not located upon arrival on scene, the default initial response is to conduct a search with an average coverage of 1.0. In this search, SWEEP WIDTH equals TRACK SPACING. Which factor do you have control of? Track Spacing. Track Spacing and Sweep Width are equal.

Track Spacing is greater than the Sweep Width. W < S (1:2 Ratio) Sweep Width Track Spacing Coverage factor LESS THAN 1 leaves areas that are not searched or not searched well. TRACK SPACING is greater than SWEEP WIDTH. Ask students when might a search like this be used?? (perfect conditions, large target, large area to search, little time, few resources) Sweep Width Track Spacing is greater than the Sweep Width.

Track Spacing is less than the Sweep Width. W > S (3:2 Ratio) Sweep Width Coverage factor is GREATER THAN 1. TRACK SPACING is less than SWEEP WIDTH, which causes overlap. When might this search be used?? (small object (PIW), small area, many resources, good datum , lots of time) Track Spacing Sweep Width Track Spacing is less than the Sweep Width.

Review Distance between two adjacent search legs Width of a swath centered on an SRU’s track where probability of detecting object outside that swath is equal to missing the object inside the swath Measure of search thoroughness or how well an area was searched Track Spacing Sweep Width Coverage Factor

Review What are the factors for correcting a Visual Sweep Width? What is the correction factor for a VDSD? Sweep Width divided by Track Spacing = ?? Weather, fatigue, A/C Speed None Coverage

And that is all there is to it! LAB TIME