E+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

MERIT Pump/Probe Data Analysis Outline  The pump/probe program  Particle detector response correction  Pump/probe analysis results NFMCC Collaboration.
Electron cloud tune shift measurements for long trains Tune Shift versus current: Measured the tune shift for 45 and 115 bunch positron trains with 14ns.
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
Recent observations of collective effects at KEKB H. Fukuma, J. W. Flanagan, S. Hiramatsu, T. Ieiri, H. Ikeda, T. Kawamoto, T. Mitsuhashi, M. Tobiyama,
“AC” Dispersion Measurement David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
Turn by turn horizontal and vertical positions at consecutive horizontally focusing quads 8W and 10W. Horizontal motion excited by horizontal shaker.
CESR Beam-Beam Effects at CESR Mark A. Palmer Cornell University July 14, 2001.
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
Low Emittance Program David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education CesrTA.
Henrik Loos High Level 17 June 2008 High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning Henrik Loos.
Alignment and Beam Stability
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner Hector Garcia Morales 25 th of January.
Feedback for CESR TA Michael Billing May 17, 2007.
Witness Bunch Experimental Studies at CESR-TA Robert Holtzapple Alfred University/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
E- Cloud Machine Studies-Systematic Study of Single Bunch Tunes I. Pinger timing effect on single bunch tunes II. Vertical/horizontal pinger high voltage.
Recent electron cloud studies at CESR David Rice Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Elias Métral, APC meeting, 02/02/2006 1/35 E. Métral, G. Arduini and G. Rumolo u Observations of fast instabilities in the SPS (1988 and 2002/3) and PS.
Proposal for Low frequency damping system in Tevatron Why do we need it? Maybe not? Can our current correctors handle the job? How should the system look?
#3191, 14 Oct 2012 Cabling installed to allow fast BPM electronics on injector BPMs System is flexible enough to allow different INJ-BPMs to be used (not.
January 19, 2006PEP TFB R.Akre PEP II Transverse Feedback System Ron Akre William Colocho Anatoly Krasnykh Vojtech Pacak Dmitry Teytelman Uli Wienands.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
3243 Fri 23 Nov Summary INJ-BPM-01: took 1 shot of data, just a reference to compare with previous recent shifts – Did not see a strong dominant 100 kHz.
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
BPMs period General BPM Tasks/Projects New single bunch BPM electronics on ALICE AR1 + ST2 They had been tested already last year by Alex and Ian.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
4 th Order Resonance at the PS R. WASEF, S. Gilardoni, S. Machida Acknowledgements: A. Huschauer, G. Sterbini SC meeting, 05/03/15.
02/04/2009 AS-TAGL Mtg Global Design Effort 1 CesrTA Update Mark Palmer CLASSE.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Simulation of Spin Interference and Echo Effect Abstract Successively jumping across a depolarization resonance twice produces interesting spin dynamics.
MDO4000C Series vs. Regular Scope FFTs Competitive Fact Sheet Benefits: ~20dB better dynamic range than a scope FFT RF support.
LCWA09 – October 1 st S. De Santis Measurements of the Electron Cloud Density by TE wave propagation in Cesr-TA M. Billing, J. Calvey, B. Carlson, S. De.
Analyze of Synchrotron Sidebands with ICA Honghuan Liu Indiana University March 15 th 2012.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Coherent Space Charge Tune Shift.
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Coupled-bunch oscillation feedback studies 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 20 February 2013 Many thanks to R. Garoby, S. Gilardoni, S. Hancock,
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
BPM and BSM Tune Measurements August 2, 2007 B. Cerio, R. Holtzapple.
Three examples of application of Sussix 1)Data from simulations  sensitivity 2)Data from measurements  frequency resolution.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
SPM Users Basic Training August 2010 Lecture VIII – AC Imaging Modes: ACAFM and MAC Imaging methods using oscillating cantilevers.
Low-Emittance Tuning at CesrTA Jim Shanks Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.
Bunch by bunch feedback systems for KEKB Makoto Tobiyama KEK Accelerator Laboratory.
Weiming Guo Accelerator Physics Group / ASD Advanced Photon Source
e- Cloud Machine Studies-Tune Shift Studies
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Fast losses at collimators during 16L2 dumps
e-/e+ Vertical beam size with 6 Wigglers Low and Off
The Effect of Poisson Data Weighting on Streak Camera Diagnostics
e+/e- Vertical Beam Dynamics during CHESS Operation-Part II
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Electron cloud studies at CESR
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
e-/e+ Vertical Beam Dynamics with 6 and 12Wigglers On
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
G. Codner, E. Tanke, M. Palmer Cornell University
e- Cloud Studies-Tune Studies with 45 Bunch Trains
Observation of Transverse Mode Coupling Instability at the PS and SPS
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
M. Forster, G. Codner, R. Holtzapple, J. Kern, and E.Tanke
Presentation transcript:

e+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure single bunch tunes of 4-ns spaced CesrTA bunches. These results are from measurements during the August-September 2009 CesrTA run by M. Billing, M. Palmer, M. Rendina, N. Rider, C. Strohman, G. Dugan, M. Forster, L. Fabrizio, M. Randazzo, and R. Holtzapple.

Data analysis software for 4-ns spaced bunches Part of the commissioning the digital BPM system was to measure the tunes of 4-ns spaced bunches. To process the BPM data a Matlab software package was written to analyze the data files. The software package has the following features: Data files can contain data from multiple BPM’s and can process multiple data files. User specifies the number of bunches and number of turns in the BPM data file. Plots either the full FFT power spectrum or the power spectrum near the expected tune. Peak in the spectrum can be determined by fitting it to a parabola and the result is saved in a text file. The position, power spectrum, 3D power spectrum, tune vs. bunch can be plotted and saved with specified fixed axis. Matlab GUI for BPM Data Analysis Software

Movies 1. Motion detection without excitation Horizontal Motion along a 4-ns spaced 45 bunch e+ train without exciation I~0.25mA/bunch. Large jumps in the orbit are observed. Took data with 1024, 2048, 4096, and 8192 turns. The BPM signal when turns>2048 has large oscillations and an increased offset between even and odd bunches. Small horizontal tune signal is observed (expect Q x ~233kHz). FFT of horizontal position

Movies Vertical Motion along a 4-ns spaced 45 bunch e+ train without pinging I~0.25mA/bunch. Large jumps in the orbit are observed. Small vertical tune signal is observed (expect Q y ~249kHz). FFT of vertical position

2. Motion detection with excitation-Vertical/Horizontal Pingers Horizontal Motion with a 4-ns spaced 45 bunch e+ train when the bunches are horizontally/vertically pinged. I~0.3mA/bunch. Increased the horizontal pinger amplitude in four steps (22, 35, 135, and 268cu). FFT peak signal is visible but easily determined at the lower pinger amplitudes. Movies pinger amplitude pinger amplitude

pinger amplitude pinger amplitude Vertical Motion with a 4-ns spaced 45 bunch e+ train when the bunches are horizontally/vertically pinged. I~0.3mA/bunch. Increased the vertical pinger amplitude in two steps (11 and 27cu). FFT peak signal is hard to detect with the pinger at 11cu. Acceptable pinger amplitudes are 27cu (vertical) and 268cu (horizontal). Movies

Single shot vertical tune shift Average vertical tune shift The pingers causes the whole train of bunches to oscillate coherently which gives a different tune shift than is a single bunch is oscillating (especially in the horizontal plane). The Dimtel feedback system has the capability to excite a single bunch so we can measure the tune of singe bunches along the train.

3. Motion detection with excitation from Dimtel feedback system Vertical Motion with 4-ns spaced 37 bunch e+ train when all 37 bunches are vertically excited using the Dimtel feedback system. I~1mA/bunch. Excited the train at center freq. of 220kHz, with a sweep span of 10kHz, and period of 2ms at two different drive amplitudes (0.5 and 1). Took 2048 turns of data (>2 periods). Several excitations are evident over the 5.25ms orbit sample. The excitation amplitude decreases over the train. Bunch 8, Amp=0.5 Bunch 8, Amp=1 Bunch 37, Amp=0.5 Bunch 37, Amp=1

Movies of position and beam spectrum with an amplitude of 0.5 and 1. Amp=0.5 Amp=1 Noticed that the beam lifetime did not change while driving the beam. Three BPM’s took data (8AW, 47AE, and 12W3). Only one BPM (12W3) was working properly. A strong signal was detected in the vertical spectrum that certainly changed with amplitude. The signal is strong for bunches at the front of the train and dies out along the train. In addition, a strong signal is also detected in the horizontal plane most likely due to coupling (not shown).

Single shot vertical tune shift along the train. A vertically tune shift of ~5kHz along the train with I~1mA/bunch.

Vertical excited front/back of a 4-ns spaced 37 bunch e+ train using the Dimtel feedback system. I~0.5mA/bunch. Excited front/back of train at center freq. of 220kHz, with a sweep span of 10kHz, and period of 2ms at two different drive amplitudes (0.5 and 1). Took 2048 turns of data (>2 periods). When bunches are excited (Dimtel bunches 73:83 in the 2-ns world) vertically only bunches are excited (bunch 38 has a much higher amplitude than bunch 37). A strong horizontal oscillation is detected near the front of the train when this data was taken. When only bunches 1 and 5 are excited vertically (Dimtel bunches 1:9) it is evident that bunches 1, 5-6 are driven and subsequent bunches are self excited. A large horizontal oscillation amplitude is also evident at the front of the train. Amp=1, excite bunches 1,5-6. Amp=1, excite bunches Movies

Comparing the tune at the front of the train (Q y =220.1kHz-file #294) and the end of the train (Q y =221.5kHz-file #293) gives a vertical tune shift of ~1.4kHz with I~0.5mA/bunch. The tune shift across the train is also be determined to be 1.4kHz from the data when the front of the bunch is shaken.

Horizontally excited front/back of 4-ns spaced 37 bunch e+ train using the Dimtel feedback system. I~0.5mA/bunch. Excited front/back of train at center freq. of 225kHz, with a sweep span of 10kHz, and period of 2ms at two different drive amplitudes (0.5 and 1). Took 2048 turns of data (>2 periods). The horizontal spectrum displays the excitation at the front and tail of the train. Comparing the horizontal tune at the front of the train (Qx=222.2) and the end of the train (Qx=224.0kHz) which gives a horizontal tune shift of ~1.8kHz (looks promising compared to pinged method) Amp=1, excite bunches 1,5-6. Amp=1, excite bunches Movies

Summary The 4-ns BPM data analysis software is operational. Single bunch orbit data taking using the digital BPM system for 4-ns spaced bunches is working. The following upgrades/fixes will help taking tune data in the future: - When taking BPM data for more than 2048 turns, large oscillations and large offset between even and odd bunches is present. - Determine if the jumps in the orbit are real. - BPM system limits data files to 135 bunches at one time. -Update the BPM data acquisition to make consecutive measurements (up to 10). The vertical tune shift along the train can be determined by exciting the 4-ns bunches with the pinger and FFT the vertical orbit. The horizontal tune cannot be determined due to the coherently oscillation of the train. Preliminary studies using the Dimtel feedback system to excite single bunches in the train to determine their single bunch tune looks promising and should be pursued in the future. Further studies of this method should include: -Comparing the vertical tune shift measurements with pinger and Dimtel for consistency check. -Do a detailed measurement of the horizontal tune by single bunch excitation and compare with simulation. -Automate the bunch selection for the Dimtel so it steps through the train while taking BPM data (concerned about amount of data and acquisition time).