ROLE OF COMPOSITES IN CROSSBREEDING Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The American Brahman: Crossbreedings Common Denominator 17 th World Brahman Congress Joe C. Paschal Professor and Livestock Specialist Texas A&M AgriLife.
Advertisements

First must come the blinding realization that no one breed excels in all areas that lead to profitability.
Heterosis: Defined and Research Experience
Selection For Carcass Marbling and Muscling-- Benefits and Pitfalls Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Animal Breeding Systems
Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Rick.
Genes Located on chromosomes Thousands found in each animal
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Mongastric Production Swine Section Breeding and Selection of Swine.
Natural Selection Four factors:
Can You Breed a “Good Breeder” Kristi M. Cammack Department of Animal Science University of Wyoming.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
The Future is Here Jim Gosey University of Nebraska “Show Me The Future” National Angus Conference & Tour, Sept.28, 2005 Kansas City, Mo.
Genetics in the Animal Industry A.Describe 2 types of selection B.Compare Phenotype and Genotype C.Define Common Terms used in genetics D.Describe the.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum Unit 4 – Reproduction and Genetics Lesson 15 – Mating Systems.
Selecting the Right Genetics (Matching Cows to your Environment) David W. Schafer Arizona Beef Day July 29, 2009.
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection
ROLE OF COMPOSITES IN FUTURE BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS Harlan Ritchie Michigan State University East Lansing, MI
Genetics.
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection Composite Populations Larry V. Cundiff ARS-USDA-U.S. Meat Animal Research Center 2008 Beef Cattle Production.
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
By Payton Fehringer. Why Red Angus Genetics?  Superior maternal traits  Crossbreeding advantages  Promotional tools  Red Angus Association.
Developing Cattle Breeding Program Setting of goals is of major importance and includes goals for:
The Beef Industry. The average size beef herd is around 100 head.
Heterosis – The Forgotten Tool? Dr. Tom Field Colorado State University Dr. Andy Herring Texas A&M University Cattlemen’s College 2005 NCBA Meeting, San.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
Lecture 7: Inbreeding and Crossbreeding. Inbreeding Inbreeding = mating of related individuals Often results in a change in the mean of a trait Inbreeding.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Dr. Gordon F. Jones Professor of Animal Science / Retired Western Kentucky University.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Tools of the Trade Tom Field, PhD Andy Herring, PhD.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
Designing Genetics and Selection for Seedstock Breeders, Commercial Cattlemen and Show Ring Enthusiasts ASA Fall Focus 2015: Confidence Builds Success.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
 Mating animals to produce certain characteristics  Low Birthweight  Heavier Weaning Weight  Color  Horned or Polled  Temperment.
Chapters 13 & 14. Objectives Understanding of the concept of genetic variation Knowledge of quantitative vs. qualitative traits Appreciation for genetic.
Heterosis-Ignored or Forgotten? (or did we ever believe in it to start with?) D. A. Daley California State University, Chico.
Livestock Breeding & Marketing Systems. Breeding Systems Different systems exist due to the various types of livestock operations Factors to determine.
Genetics.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
The Science of Animal Agriculture Ch. 4 The Science of Genetics.
Identifying Genetic Antagonisms Megan Rolf Oklahoma State University.
ACROSS BREED EPD TABLES FOR THE YEAR 2006 ADJUSTED TO THE BIRTH YEAR OF 2004 L. Dale Van Vleck and Larry V. Cundiff MARC-ARS-USDA Lincoln and Clay Center,
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Growth and development Part two: Genetic factors: breeds Animal sex and hormones Climate Revision.
Animal Reproduction Animal Science
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
BEEF CATTLE OPERTATIONS. Objectives  Students should be able to :  Plan a feeding program for a cow calf herd  List and describe approved practices.
THE ANIMAL INDUSTRY PROCESS The Animal Agriculture Process The process for producing and caring for animals varies greatly depending on the type.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
David L. Thomas Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison Basics of Sheep Breeding for Commercial Flocks.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Genetics Original Power Point Created by Casey Osksa
Joe C. Paschal Livestock Specialist Texas AgriLife Extension
Genetic 3 Mating Systems
Breeding Systems
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
Genetics.
Cross-Breeding What is X-Breeding?.
Animal Reproduction Animal Science
Animal Reproduction Animal Science
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Unit 4: Genetic Selection & Mating
Presentation transcript:

ROLE OF COMPOSITES IN CROSSBREEDING Jim Gosey University of Nebraska

CROSSBRED ADVANTAGE Heterosis + Breed Differences

HETEROSIS (hybrid vigor) GREATEST IN LOWLY HERITABLE TRAITS DUE TO DOMINANCE GENE EFFECTS RECOVERY OF ACCUMULATED INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN BREEDS

LINECROSS HETEROSIS ? LINES WITHIN BREEDS LACK SUFFICIENT SEPARATION TO PRODUCE MEASURABLE HETEROSIS

BREED DIFFERENCES (complementarity) COMPOSITION OF GAIN GROWTH & SIZE CALVING DIFFICULTY MILK AGE AT PUBERTY

CROSSBRED ADVANTAGE Crossbred Cows Have…… 25% GREATER Lifetime Productivity

QUESTION : Why isn’t crossbreeding more widely used ?

PROBLEM: Three generations of Angus bulls used on F1 Angus cows results in: 3/4 Angus 7/8 Angus 15/16 Angus and a loss of 87% of Hybrid Vigor !

HOW MUCH CROSSBRED ADVANTAGE CAN I GIVE UP ? % Total Per Calf Lost W.Wt/Cow $$$ Deficit Zero 525 $ Half 472 $ $ 51 3/4 446 $ $ 78 ALL 420 $ $102

QUESTION: Why isn’t crossbreeding more widely used ?

TRADITIONAL CROSSBREEDING SYSTEM % HETEROSIS 2-Breed Rotation 67 3-Breed Rotation 87 Rotation Terminal 2X= X=87+100

TRADITIONAL CROSSBREEDING SYSTEM %ADVANTAGE 2-Breed Rotation 16 3-Breed Rotation 20 Rotation Terminal 24

TRADITIONAL CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS FAIL “MANAGEMENT EASE”TEST Too many breeds / pastures Difficult in small herds Sire ID replacements Swings in breed composition Hard to market uniform load lots

BREED COMPOSITION IN 3-BREED ROTATION %BREED COMPOSITION GEN. SIRE A B C 1 A B C AV. %

Swings in breed composition have led to perception of greater variation in crossbred cattle.

SIMPLIFIED / ONE PASTURE CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS

ONE PASTURE CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS SYSTEM %ADVANTAGE Sire Breed Rotation…….15 Multiple Sire Breeds..… Composite……………….15-18

Composites

COMPOSITE BREEDS CLOSED COMPOSITE …………... Closed at Foundation, Need 25 Sires Per Generation to Avoid Inbreeding OPEN COMPOSITE……………….. Open to New Sires, Reduces Inbreeding in Small Herds

HETEROSIS RETAINED Heterosis in Composites is Equal to (n-1/n), where n is the Number of Breeds Used Example: 4 Breed Composite (4-1) / 4 = 3/4 = 75%

COMPOSITE HETEROSIS BY MATING TYPE Breeds Found. % Heterosis %Advant. 2 1/2:1/ /8:3/ /4:1/ /2:1/4:1/ /8:3/8:1/ /4:1/4:1/4:1/

SLIDE OF BLACK BULL 281 GOES HERE

OPTIMUM HETEROSIS Some heterosis is very important but Maximum heterosis is not necessary

MARC RESEARCH ON COMPOSITE BREEDS Heterosis is Retained From F1 to F2, F3 & F4 Variation in Composites was NOT Greater than Parental Purebreds

COEFFICIENTS OF VARIATION Trait Purebreds Composites Birth Wt Wean Wt Retail Prod. % Marbling.27.29

CONFORMANCE OF BREED TYPES TO CARCASS TARGETS BREED TYPE ITEM BRITISH CONT. M1 M2 M3 % Y 1& % CH

MARC RESEARCH ON COMPOSITE BREEDS Composite Breeds May be the Best Solution for the Antagonism Between Marbling and Retail Product %

Calves sired by Univ. of Neb. Composite bulls Date # Wt. Fat REA %Y1:2 %Ch 6/ / / / / / AV

SUMMARY: 1. Crossbreeding Works 2. Composites Retain Heterosis 3. Composites Utilize Breed Effect 4. Composites Require Planning to Build, Easy to Use 5. Composites Not More Variable

Jim Gosey 204 Animal Science University of Nebraska Lincoln, Ne