ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulation No. 96 Proposal for 03 Series of Amendments GRPE, January 2011 Informal document No. GRPE (61st GRPE, January 2011, agenda item.
Advertisements

Simplification of Regulations Lighting and Light Signalling Regulations inclusive Regulation 48 analysis and way forward GRE IWG SLR Informal Working Group.
Principles of Revision of ECE Regulation No. 59 Submitted by CLEPA Informal document No. GRB-42-8 (42nd GRB, 5-7 September 2005, agenda item.
WLTP-10-11e 1 By H. Steven Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russian Federation October 2013 Deputy director of the Department of transport and special engineering industry V. Kaganov.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
ECE Regulation No.79 Informal Document No. GRRF (61 st GRRF, 5-9 February 2007 agenda item 5.) Proposal for Amendments Presented by the Expert from.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
UN/ECE GRB R41WG DEG conclusions 8 August General - 1 In February 2007, GRB agreed: In February 2007, GRB agreed: That ISO362-2 is practical and.
Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russian Federation June 2013 Deputy director of the Department of transport and special engineering industry V. Kaganov.
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
Current Status of Noise Regulation Review in Japan Ministry of the Environment, JAPAN Informal document GRB (55th GRB, 7-9 February 2012, agenda.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-45-3 (45th GRB, February.
Regulation 13-H Transitional Provisions Presentation in conjunction with ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2014/16 Prepared by the ad hoc group on Transitional Provisions.
Motorcycle Noise Emissions - The German Position – - ISO response - 4. GRB Informal Group Meeting 25./26. August 2005 Milwaukee.
Transmitted by the expert from FRANCE Amendments to Regulations Nos. 30, 54 and 117 Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, agenda.
Informal document No. GRPE (72nd GRPE, January 2016,
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
ASEP, items for clarification
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Japan
64th GRB EU Regulation on AVAS requirements
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Supplementary Document
European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation - ETRTO
43rd Session GRB 21 February 2006 Geneva, Switzerland
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
GRBP subjects Meeting 31st October, 2018 Brussels
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Supplementary Document
Informal document GRE-79-04
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Main subjects: priority 1, 2, 3
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Supplementary Document
International Whole Vehicle Type Approval
IMMA proposal for a test procedure towards real driving conditions
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
GRB informal group R51.03 Annex 10
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Presentation transcript:

ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal document No.GRB (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 2) Transmitted by the expert from IMMA

Actions since 9/R41WG DEG continued discussions; still some ASEP issues to check DEG documents have been sent to UN for uploading on ECE website; origin of motorcycles added to noise level database 01-R41WG-08 (draft amendment) has been updated (see Informal Document No) This presentation shows how the amendment is linked to past decisions of R41WG

Modular structure – “the package” New TA testASEP Stationary + drive-by test for roadside enforcement Anti- tampering / contructional requirements TA test Stationary test for roadside enforcement ECE R41.03 – 97/24/EC Chapter 9 ECE R41.04

TA test Problem – No required acceleration and potential perverse consequences (longer gearing in test = lower rpm = lower noise but also lower gears used in real life = higher rpm = higher noise) – No relationship between test conditions and actual use conditions, meaning reduced effectiveness of noise reduction measures in real life New TA test

TA test Proposed solution / benefits – Essentially same method as for cars but with higher target accelerations and without acceleration limit Prescribed target acceleration rate related to vehicle acceleration capability – level playing field Accurate simulation of noise source distribution (intake, exhaust, engine/gearbox, …) in relation to most relevant motorcycle operation – effective noise reduction measures Independent of vehicle design to allow future propulsion technologies to be tested – vehicle speed and acceleration instead of engine speed Remaining tasks – Limits Where in 01-R41WG-08 – Annex 3 section 1 (test method) + Annex 6 (limits) New TA test

ASEP Problem – Base TA test provides only “snapshot” of noise emission behaviour – Noise levels below and above TA test conditions may increase inappropriately ASEP

Proposed solution / benefits – Definition of operating range below and above TA test conditions within which noise emission should not deviate significantly from what one would expect from the base TA test results – control beyond TA “snapshot” – Manufacturer declaration of conformity with possibility for TA authority to perform checks – limited testing burden at time of TA Remaining tasks – Limits (slopes and tolerance) Where in 01-R41WG-08 – Paragraph 6 and Annex 7 ASEP

Roadside enforcement Problem – Stationary noise test with reference noise level by itself is only able to capture crude illegal systems and rough manipulations Proposed solution / benefits – Maximum WOT drive-by test result for lowest gear from TA test made available as additional reference data for roadside enforcement – better enforcement capability with drive-by noise test as additional tool next to stationary noise test Remaining tasks – Alignment with ISO 5130 (stationary noise test) Where in 01-R41WG-08 – Annex 3 section 3 Pass-by test for roadside enforcement

Anti-tampering Problem – No prescriptions related to easily modifiable and manually adjustable multi-mode mufflers Proposed solution – Legal language to prevent approval of mufflers designed for tampering – Performance requirements for multi-mode mufflers (test all modes) Remaining tasks – / Where in 01-R41WG-08 – Paragraph 6 Anti-tampering / contructional requirements

01-R41WG-08 structure 1.SCOPE DEFINITIONS, TERMS AND SYMBOLS APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL MARKINGS APPROVAL SPECIFICATIONS TA test ASEP Anti-tampering 7.MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF THE APPROVAL OF THE MOTORCYCLE TYPE OR OF THE TYPE OF EXHAUST OR SILENCING SYSTEM(S) CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION PENALTIES FOR NON-CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION PRODUCTION DEFINITELY DISCONTINUED NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF TECHNICAL SERVICES RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING APPROVAL TESTS, AND OF ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS ANNEXES Annex 1 - Approval communication Annex 2 - Arrangements of approval marks Annex 3 - Methods and instruments for measuring the noise made by motor cycles TA test Pass-by enforcement test Annex 4 - Test track specifications Annex 5 - Exhaust system (silencer) Annex 6 - Maximum limits of sound level (new motor cycles) TA test Annex 7 - Additional sound emission provisions (new motor cycles and new exhaust or silencing systems) ASEP

Proposed next steps Initial discussion at 10/R41WG Reporting to 47/GRB R41WG/GRB member comments to Italy by 31 May Consideration of comments by 11/R41WG on [2/3] July 12/R41WG on 1 September (PM) Discussion at 48/GRB (amended text and limit values)