GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL 2008 Legal Department Spending and Staffing Benchmarks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B2B Go-To-Market Strategy
Advertisements

Office of Business and Financial Services Purchasing Division How to Develop Revenue Generating Activity Contracts.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Government Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
1 H2 Cost Driver Map and Analysi s Table of Contents Cost Driver Map and Analysis 1. Context 2. Cost Driver Map 3. Cost Driver Analysis Appendix A - Replica.
© 2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved. Market Research Executive Board 2008 Member Survey Resource and Organizational Benchmarks for the.
California | Illinois | Michigan | North Carolina | Texas | Washington, D.C. Exceptional service. Dykema delivers. 21 ST CENTURY LEGAL FEE.
Conflicts of Interest An Overview for Staff Prepared by MSM Compliance Services P/L.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Development Times for Instructor- Led Learning (ILT) A Chapman Alliance, Learning Brief November 2007 By Bryan Chapman, Chief Learning Strategist
Satisfacts Customer/Employee Evaluation Program Do you want to learn about what your clients, customers, members and employees are really thinking?
RUN YOUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT LIKE A BUSINESS UNIT – HOW TO MAKE A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION ROB THOMAS, VICE PRESIDENT, MARKET DEVELOPMENT GROUP THOMSON REUTERS.
ORC International Proprietary & Confidential Stress Awareness Month Survey Report April 7, 2015 EMBARGOED UNTIL 8:00 AM, April 13, 2015.
1 Report of the Financial Affairs Committee of the Faculty Senate Paul Bolster, CBA - Finance and Insurance Jackie Isaacs, COE - Mechanical and Industrial.
2014 Recruitment & Retention Plans The Office of Charter Schools and School Redesign.
2014 US IT Salary Survey Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Networking Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Security Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
TNS Proprietary: © Linking Employee Compensation to Survey Metrics High-Level Considerations and Best Practices January, 2006.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Executives Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
©2009 OCS, Inc Hospice and Palliative Care Association of Iowa QAPI Snapshot Program Presented by Becky Anthony Roger Herr.
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
Promotional Guidelines Key Findings from the WorldatWork Survey of Promotional Guidelines, 2010 © 2011 WorldatWork. All rights reserved.
Equality And Diversity Monitoring as at 31-March-2012 Report to the Board 1.
Copyright Medical Group Management Association. All rights reserved. Dos and Don’ts of Surveys Kristina Ziehler, MPH Meghan McMahon,
FY 2007 Chapter Survey Executive Summary. OVERVIEW 52 out of 68 (76%) active chapters completed at least one section of the survey. Chapter Size Categories:
/ 1 Benchmarking today’s results for tomorrow’s success Grant Corderoy Senior Partner.
July 6, 2014 This report is intended for the sole and exclusive use of IBS and is not to be copied or shared with other parties. International Biometric.
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2004.
Eastway Behavioral Healthcare 600 Wayne Avenue, Dayton, OH Summary Results Report ©2011WorkplaceDynamics, LLP.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
© 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008.
0 Overhead and the Truth about Efficiency Metrics.
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2004.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
Benchmarking Finance and Business Operations The Finance and Administration Roundtable May 24, 2006.
Copyright, © 2004, Theresa M. Welbourne, Ph.D. 1 HR Confidence June Leadership Pulse Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report June 16, 2004.
Value-Based Fee Structures: How Can They Help Us?.
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2004.
2006 – 2007 Budget Outline Keeping the promise by adjusting and aligning our budget.
PTGC Part Time General Counsel Prepared for:. The Concept Having a high caliber, senior level “legal insider” on location part-time, compared to the outside.
Chapter 25: Reporting and Evaluation McGraw-Hill © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
2005 Customer Satisfaction Study September 2005 NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information Systems.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Part 4 Compensation of Human Resources.
All rights reserved | Phone: | Website: © 2004 Accenture All Rights Reserved.
CHAPTER 12: COMPARATIVE DATA, FORECASTS, & BENCHMARKING Part V: Plan, Monitor and Control Financial Operations.
Customised Solutions Sample Reports 2009 Australia.
Financial Downturn for Churches in 2010 Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors October 2010.
A proposal to ACC Belgium by Towers Watson April 2015 Towers Watson Data Services Media Association of Communication Companies Club Compensation Survey.
Chapter 29 Conducting Market Research. Objectives  Explain the steps in designing and conducting market research  Compare primary and secondary data.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Company LOGO Customer Satisfaction 2013 Yuma County Internal Services Departments Survey Results.
2014 Internal Customer Satisfaction Survey Executive Summary o Surveys were completed from September through October o All County employees were.
Claims Leakage Control
Insider Connectivity Review & Savings Analysis
Highlights of the 2007 NRMCA Industry Data Survey
Building a government contractor for the 21st century
The High Cost of Low Morale
Pet Retail Performance Report: Identify Profit Opportunities
Human Resource & Workforce Analysis
Social Services Union County
HAVE YOUR SAY… UCL Staff Survey 31 October – 18 November 2011
Improvements in Legal Revenue
ASHHRA / PwC SaratogaTM HR Metrics Tool
Supply Chain Best Practices Executive Seminar
Account Management and New SIRI Dashboard
Benchmarking New for 2016.
Presentation transcript:

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL 2008 Legal Department Spending and Staffing Benchmarks Customized Report for ACME Co. Preliminary Report: May 24,

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Table of Contents ii

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Overview of GCR Benchmarking This report compares your company’s 2007 legal department spending and staffing metrics to those of peer companies. Metrics are shown in US$. GCR performs all survey aggregation and analysis, ensuring the security of the collected data. At your request, a representative from the GCR quantitative research team would be happy to discuss these findings with you and make recommendations for follow up. Please note that this report may contain instances in which certain data are not displayed. This is either because your company did not respond to that question or because the sample size is too small to make a meaningful comparison. To ensure statistical significance and anonymity of respondent data, this report does not display results where there are less than seven applicable company responses. About This Report iii Hand-Picked Comparisons – You may select a benchmark group of seven or more participating companies with which you would like to be compared for a customized data cut. Please reference the participant listing on page 27 of this report to select your comparison companies. Peer Referral Service – You may nominate other companies to which you would like to be compared. GCR will contact these companies on your behalf. Instant Online Resources – You have access to additional online budgeting and forecasting tools. See the benchmarking section of the GCR member Website, for more information. Related Services Lawyer and Paralegal Compensation Benchmarking See if your department’s compensation practices are in line with peers. Additional GCR Benchmarking Services Business Alignment Survey Identify gaps in Legal and client perceptions of legal department priorities and performance with this Web-based survey. Outside Counsel Management Benchmarking Compare your company’s outside counsel management practices with those of peers. Send an to com for any additional legal department benchmarking questions.

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Part 1: Executive Summary for ACME Co Reported Revenues: US$1,500,000,000 Reported Total Legal Expenses: $8,050,000 Reported Total Legal Expenses as a Percentage of Revenues: 0.537% Median Total Legal Expenses for Peer Companies : 0.503% What this means: Your reported Total Legal Expenses are roughly in line with the companies in your peer group. Your expenses are above the median and below the third quartile, which means that at least 25% of companies in the peer group have higher expenses. Reported Outside Legal Expenses: $4,080,000 Reported Outside Legal Expenses as a Percentage of Revenues: 0.272% Median Outside Legal Expenses for Peer Companies : 0.374% Reported Inside Legal Expenses: $3,975,000 Reported Inside Legal Expenses as a Percentage of Revenues: 0.255% Median Inside Legal Expenses for Peer Companies : 0.185% What this means: Your reported Outside Legal Expenses are slightly less then the median for your peer group. This means that more than half of the companies in your peer group have higher outside legal expenses. GCR has extensive resources to help identify opportunities to reduce Outside Counsel costs. Peer Group for this Executive Summary: Companies with Between US$ 1-3 Billion in Revenues Total Legal Expenses Inside Legal Expenses Outside Legal Expenses (Comparisons to other companies by industry and by department size appear later in this report.) Your reported Inside Legal Expenses are higher than the third quartile. This means that 75% of companies in your peer group have lower Inside Legal Expenses.

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Part 1: Executive Summary for ACME Co. (Continued) Reported Number of Lawyers: 18 Reported Number of Lawyers per US$ Billion in Revenues: Median Number of Lawyers per US$ Billion in Revenues for Peer Companies : 4.35 Reported Outside Counsel Hourly Cost: $200 Median Outside Counsel Hourly Cost for Peer Companies: $193 Reported Number of Legal Assistants: 4 Reported Number of Legal Assistants per Lawyer: 0.33 Median Legal Assts. per Lawyer for Peer Companies : 0.43 Outside Counsel Hourly Cost Legal Assistants per Lawyer Lawyers per US$B in Revenues What this means: Your number of lawyers per US$B in revenues are higher than the third quartile. This means that 75% of companies in your peer group have fewer lawyers per US$B in revenues. What this means: Your reported number of legal assistants is low. Fewer than 25% of companies have fewer legal assistants per lawyer. Increasing the ratio of legal assistants to lawyers would free up lawyer time and improve overall efficiency. What this means: Your reported Outside Counsel Hourly Costs are roughly in line with the companies in your peer group. Your average hourly costs are above the median and below the third quartile, which means that at least 25% of companies in the peer group pay a higher hourly cost.

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Total Legal Expenses (Percentage of Revenues), 2007 Total legal expenses are defined as all inside and outside legal expenses, excluding damages, settlements, fines, and penalties. ■ACME Co.’s value: 0.537% Part 2: Legal Department Spending 5

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Inside Legal Expenses (Percentage of Revenues), 2007 Inside legal expenses are defined as the subset of total legal expenses not paid to outside service providers such as law firms. Where participants have provided the necessary data, adjustments have been made to reflect differences in department cost allocation practices. ■ACME Co.’s value: 0.255% Part 2: Legal Department Spending 6

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Breakdown of Inside Legal Expenses The Roundtable defines Inside Expenses as the sum of Legal Salary, Bonus,and Benefits, Legal Overhead, and Legal Technology Expense. To accurately display the proportion of inside expenses that are allocated to each item, on average, companies that did not report on all three of these metrics were excluded from this chart. Part 2: Legal Department Spending 7

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Legal Department Size, 2007 Part 3: Legal Department Staffing 19 The legal department size metric is defined as the sum of lawyers, legal assistants/paralegals, and other staff that work in the legal department.

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Number of Lawyers, 2007 Part 3: Legal Department Staffing ■ ACME Co’s Value: 18 Lawyers

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Appendix B: Survey Respondent Demographics Industry Legal Department Size (Number of Lawyers) Revenue Band (in US$ Billions) Geography

GENERAL COUNSEL ROUNDTABLE ®  2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved CONFIDENTIAL Appendix C: Legal Department Structure (Continued) Senior Executives to Whom the Chief Legal Officer Reports Non-Legal Functions Falling Within the Chief Legal Officer's Set of Responsibilities N=139