Permanency Roundtables -Texas Style! October 2012 Jenny Hinson, Division Administrator for Permanency Carol Self, Lead Permanency Program Specialist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subsidized Permanent Guardianship (SPG)
Advertisements

Care Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities
Permanency – Why Now? DCF Family Services Things.
1 Child Protective Services in Harris County Stakeholder Forum December 12, 2013.
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Educational Issues of our Foster Children Presented by Alma Alfaro CPS Education Specialist.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
  Shane’s Story.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Resource Family Approval Process Implementation
Permanency Values & Roundtable Orientation Florida PRT Initiative 1.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Child Welfare Practice Model
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
202: Truancy: Prevention and Intervention. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Discuss the.
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
Using An Organizational Assessment : A framework to Help Agencies Build on Strengths, Recognize Challenges, and Develop a Comprehensive Work Plan, CWDA.
1 Statewide Parent Collaboration Group and Local Parent Support Group May 23, 2012 Presented by: Kathryn Sibley, Family Based Safety Services Program Specialist.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
Our three year strategy >Our vision >Children and young people in families and communities where they can be safe, strong and thrive. >Our mission >Embed.
Welcome to the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) Top 10 Strategies for Ensuring a Successful Start November 3, 2008.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
1 Informed Consent and Monitoring of Psychotropic Medications in Texas Kathy Teutsch, RN, LMSW-MSSW: CPS Division Administrator for Medical Services SHARED.
The Prevention of Bullying Building an Alberta research agenda WELCOME.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
1 Future of CPS Audrey Deckinga, Assistant Commissioner of CPS June 4 th, 2013.
WELCOME TO FAMILY TEAM DECISION MAKING MEETINGS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TRAINING IS.... Explain how Family Team Decision-making Meetings (FTDMs) are part.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Overview of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) and Quality Service Review (QSR) Process.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Kentucky Permanency Roundtables Partnership with Casey Family Programs Presentation developed in partnership with: Barry Salovitz, MSW, Senior Director,
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Adoption Selection: Caseworker, Local or Central Committee Developed by Portland State University Center for Improvement of Child and Family Services Child.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Children’s Administration Region II Jonah Idczak, Father Engagement Specialist.
ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)
One Death Too Many Teresa Morrow. Executive Summary The statistics stop you short. Christian Nieto, 16 month old died of head injuries sustained from.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
NOVEMBER 19 TH, AM – 12PM Resource Family Approval Project Management Team Welcome.
Collaboration: A Different Approach Working with Aboriginal Families in Calgary Hazel Bergen, Program Director Mahmawi-atoskiwin Carmen Esch, Associate.
1 Child and Family Teaming Module 2 The Child and Family Team Meeting: Preparation, Facilitation, and Follow-up.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Foster Care Managed Care Program
209: Visitation: The Heart of Permanency Planning
3 in 30 Committee for Advancing Residential Practice January 11, 2018
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
RFA Jeopardy!.
Psychotropic Medication Use by Children in Texas Foster Care:
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Permanency Roundtables -Texas Style! October 2012 Jenny Hinson, Division Administrator for Permanency Carol Self, Lead Permanency Program Specialist

Permanency Roundtable a (PRT) is an internal case consultation process designed to facilitate a discussion about a child’s permanency plan to develop a child specific permanency action plans is a structured meeting facilitated by a permanency practitioner and attended by CPS subject matter experts who play a specific role in the meeting does NOT replace any permanency planning meeting

Permanency Roundtable Goals  Develop child specific permanency action plans with multiple permanency strategies  Establish lifelong connections to and/or supports for these children and youth  Stimulate thinking with agency staff and develop/model clinical practice as we seek pathways to permanency for these and other children  Identify ways to involve the youth in their permanency goals and play an active role in their outcomes  Identify and address barriers to permanency that might be eliminated through professional development, policy change, resource development and the engagement of system partners  Explore ways to improve collaboration with children, youth, families, external partners in the permanency planning process.

Impact and Benefits Build on existing good practices Identify barriers and solutions (child specific and systemic) Improved development around topic of permanency by creating staffing forum including tenured agency staff Model outline for case presentation that can be used in other venues Improved concurrent planning; case planning documentation; court report documentation

Process 6 phases –Welcome and Overview –Case presentation –Clarify and Explore –Brainstorm –Create Permanency Action Plan –Debrief Case Consultation Follow up by CPS Permanency Practitioner Each PRT generally takes 2 hours for one child and hours for a sibling group

Participants Permanency Practitioner (permanency expert/facilitator) Master Practitioner (policy/resource expert) Caseworker (expert on case) Supervisor (expert on case) Scribe Permanency Consultant (permanency expert) Other internal subject matter experts (as needed)

PRT Criteria PMC with and without TPR Children ages 6 and up Not intended to be permanent placement Sibling groups Length of time in care Race/ethnicity

Preparation for PRT Paperwork Case summary form Initial CPOS Most recent court report Family Tree Training Permanency Values Training and Orientation Skills training (before PRT—one time event)

Pre-PRT Case Mining Diligent Search Person Searches Consultation with: child/youth, caregivers, ad litem, CASA, family members Post-PRT Update Child Plan of Service Begin Action Items Discuss PRT recommendations with child/youth and others Monthly follow up on action items

Outcomes Georgia saw # of children in foster care decrease by approximately 50% 52% of children in care over 18 months exited to positive permanency Kentucky 30% of children staffed over a one year period achieved permanency

Texas PMC Data 29,951 children in DFPS Conservatorship 12,119 children in PMC 8871 PMC with TPR 3164 PMC w/out TPR

Current Status of Implementation Hired 11 Regional Permanency Practitioners Hired 1 State Office Permanency Practitioner Trained over 1000 staff and stakeholders in Permanency Values Conducted 250 PRTs Currently Monitoring action plans Improved permanency status for 18% Currently implementing PRTs in Regions 8 and 10 Implementing PRTs in Regions 4 and 5 in January, 2013 Complete statewide Implementation by November 2013

All Children Deserve a Lifelong Connection to a Family