WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-061

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worldwide Harmonised Test Procedure for Light Duty Vehicles WLTP EVE 2nd Session 13 of September Per Öhlund Co-chair Subgroup EV.
Advertisements

WLTP Validation 2 Assessment Criteria WLTP-DTP
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 Serge Dubuc, WLTP GTR 15 Drafting Coordinator WLTP-09-26e.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-053 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi WLTP-DTC
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-11-19e) 1. Discussion points 2. Next Actions.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-066 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Audi AG EA-52 Draft Vers WLTP Validation 2 Evaluation Issues ACEA Guidance Document after Bern.
1 WLTP-DTP- E-LabProc-005 Test Procedure for Electrified Vehicles presented by Japan 24&25 November 2010.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-088 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
WLTP, result calculation, v6
12 V SoC – Monitoring - Assessment of Tolerances Audi AG WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-105.
National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory JAPAN NTSEL OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
1 Discussion paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2 Prepared by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group November 2011 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-108.
WLTP 6th DTP Meeting Geneva DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Parameter Setting for Validation 2 DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-034 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP Vehicle range and energy consumption EVE October 2014.
Status report and Discussion paper for Number of tests at WLTP Tokyo IWG in 2015 JAPAN WLTP-12-15e.
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
WLTP validation test results for BEV(i-MiEV) & OVC-HEV (Prius PHV)
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Combined Approach for electrified vehicles Due to its technical difficulty and time shortage, it was agreed to take care of applicability of “combined.
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
WLTP-14-15e Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-14-15e) 14th WLTP IWG 26 April 2016.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 11/11/2018.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-077
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-081
Open issues 3 bis12, 20, 25, 26 bis, 30, 31 and 33 O.I. 12 (EV) :
Current status of WLTP-DHC
ATCT - Family Validation
Annex8  ( ) CD-CS break-off criteria Proposal from Japan with ACEA Comments ( )
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
WLTP DTP Lab Process EV sub group
Submitted by the expert from OICA
ACEA Comments from ACEA still does not understand the reasoning for this proposal. This proposal increases the test burden disproportionally.
Interpolation family criteria OVC-HEV and NOVC-HEV (new proposal)
OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Fuel Cell Vehicles - Required corrections in xxx-2016
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
Mode selectable switch
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
ACEA Comments from ACEA welcomes the idea to develop a shortened range test procedure based on MCT However, ACEA does not support JP proposal.
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-11e
Proposed actions for gtr development
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Problem with Rcda and suggestions for them
Analysis for WLTP UF development
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-028
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
Presentation transcript:

WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-061 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi

Proposed actions for gtr development 2011 11 12 2012 1 3 6 9 12 2013 1 3 6 9 12 E-Lab action Validation 2 Confirmation Round Robin test sequence Parameter set Procedure for V2 Draft gtr1 Draft gtr2 Modify gtr WLTC completed reflection Short V1 Confirmation Validation 2 Round Robin [ Background ] 1. Draft gtr 1 is the portion exclude Validation phase 2. 2. Some of open issues need to be evaluated during the validation program. 3. Draft gtr 2 is reflected the result of Validation 2 .

Lab process-EV meeting in Brussels 26-28th of March at JAMA office in Brussels. Discussion for the gtr text based on ACEA proposal. Some open issues should be evaluated during validation phase 2. The draft gtr ver.1 should be submitted to drafting coordinator. This result will be referred to Validation test sequence by beginning of May.

2.2.2. Hybrid Electric Powertrain Open issues concerning gtr text 2.2.2. Hybrid Electric Powertrain Hybrid electric power train means a power train that, for the purpose of mechanical propulsion, draws energy from both of the following on-vehicle sources of stored energy/power: - Consumable fuel - RESS [1]) 1) Rechargeable energy storage system (RESS) means the rechargeable energy storage system that provides electric energy for electric propulsion (e.g.: battery, capacitor, flywheel / generator ...). <<ECE101 base modified >> RESS renamed REESS(REchargeable Energy Storage System. Refer to R100.

Communication of test results Open issues concerning gtr text 3.4. Measurement Units and Presentation of results Accuracy of measurement units and presentation results shall be as follows: Parameter Units Communication of test results AER AERcity EAER RCDA RCDC Electric energy co NEC NEC ratio Eac recharged E FC correction factor CO2 correction factor Utility Factor ... km Wh/km Wh Ah % Wh l/100km/Ah g/km/Ah Rounded to nearest whole number Rounded to the first decimal place Rounded to 4 significant figures (e.g. 0.xxxx or xx.xx) Rounded to 3 decimal places The significant figure for the range value (AER, AER city, EAER and so on) should be for calculation 0.1km, for report nearest whole number.

4.2.2. RESS[Battery] Preparation Open issues concerning gtr text 4.2.1. Vehicle Preparation 4.2.1.1. As a general principle for the tests, hybrid electric vehicles shall be tested according to the principles applied to vehicles powered by an internal combustion engine only (Annex Z), unless modified by this annex. 4.2.1.2. The vehicle must have undergone at least [300] km with those batteries that are installed in the test vehicle. [to be discussed later ] 4.2.2. RESS[Battery] Preparation 4.2.2.1. If the batteries are operated above the ambient temperature, the operator shall follow the procedure recommended by the car manufacturer in order to keep the temperature of the battery in the normal operating range. The manufacturer's agent shall be in a position to attest that the thermal management system of the battery is neither disabled nor reduced. 4.2.2.2. The vehicle must have undergone at least [300] km with those batteries that are installed in the test vehicle.

Open issues concerning gtr text 5.1.1.7.1.Charge Depleting test: Option 1: For testing vehicles with operator selectable driving modes, the CD test shall be performed by using the most electric energy consuming hybrid operation mode that best match the target curve. In case that the most electric energy consuming hybrid mode that best match the target curve is the default mode, the test can be performed in the default mode. Option 2: Option 3: For testing vehicles with the default mode position as operator selectable driving modes, the CD test shall be performed by using the default mode. In case that vehicle has not the default mode, manufacturer may recommend the most representative mode that best match the target curve and most customers will use on the road to the type approval authority, the test can be performed in the approved mode. 2012.03.27 During CD test , EV on /off switch should be deactivated. Manufacure is a free to run the additional test with activating the EV on/off switch .(temporary treatment) [to be validated during Validation phase 2]

Open issues concerning gtr text 5.1.3.3.The charge depleting test procedure shall consist of a number of consequtive WLTC (phase 1-3(4) without soak) each followed by a [10]+/-2 minutes soak period until charge sustaining operation is achieved. [To be validatedVP2]

Open issues concerning gtr text 5.1.3.3.2.The break off criteria for the charge depleting test is reached when the Net Energy Change (NEC), over cycle N+1 is less than x Wh. Option 1 5.1.3.3.3.The break off criteria for the charge depleting test is reached when the relative net energy change as shown in the formula below is less than x %. Option 2 Relative net energy change [%] = ____________NEC_____________         Cycle energy demand of the test vehicle CS mode CD mode

Interruption condition should be evaluated during Validation phase 2 Open issues concerning gtr text 5.1.5.1.5.To respect human needs, up to [three interruptions] are permitted between test sequences, of no more than 15 minutes in total. [to be validated VP2, ex. Long range vehicle ] Interruption condition should be evaluated during Validation phase 2 Especially the BEV which has long EV range.

(a) at gear changes for a duration less than 5 seconds, Open issues concerning gtr text 5.1.5.3.1. Driving curve deviations beyond this tolerance band are permitted as follows: (a) at gear changes for a duration less than 5 seconds, (b) and up to five times per hour at other times, for a duration less than ?x? seconds each.  [Jp and US has another criteria for end of test, to be considered] [(c) to respect to human needs up to 3 interruptions are permitted between test sequences of no more than 15 minutes in total.] to be deleted, This sentence already written.

Charging condition after the range test Open issues concerning gtr text 5.3.2.5.5.(d) Charging of the battery and Measuring of the electric energy consumption The vehicle shall be connected to the mains within [30 minutes] after the conclusion of the all-electric range AER determination. The vehicle shall be charged according to normal overnight charge procedure (see paragraph ????? to this annex). The energy measurement equipment, placed between the mains socket and the vehicle charger, measures the charge energy E delivered from the mains, as well as its duration. Charging is stopped when the fully charged battery is detected. [to be validated VP2] Charging condition after the range test

6.1.1.1.Charge Sustaining Mode Pollutant Emissions Open issues concerning gtr text 6.1.1.1.Charge Sustaining Mode Pollutant Emissions The exhaust emissions shall be calculated by a cold start CS test according the requirements for the conventional vehicle as described in annex XY. The charging balance correction calculation is not required for determination of pollutant emissions. [Additional pollutant should be considered to be corrected or not] Discharge(+) Charge(-) CO2/Fuel consumption/(Emission) ∆RCB (Ah) OIL No.25bis How to measure? Opt.1) Voltage [V] Opt.2) Current [Ah] Opt.3) CAN To be measured by current regulation

6.1.1.2.Weighted Pollutant Emissions Open issues concerning gtr text 6.1.1.2.Weighted Pollutant Emissions Calculate the weighted pollutant emissions from the CD mode and CS mode results using the formula below: [Jp will consider later]

6.1.2.NOVC-HEV with/ without driver selectable operating modes Open issues concerning gtr text 6.1.2.NOVC-HEV with/ without driver selectable operating modes The exhaust emissions shall be calculated in the same way as required for conventional vehicle as shown in Annex XX. The charging balance correction calculation is not required for determination of pollutant emissions.[to be considered initial SOC at testing ] [Additional pollutant should be considered to be corrected or not]

OIL No.27 RCB correction criteria Open issues concerning gtr text 6.2.1.2.5.Under the conditions below, it is allowed to take the uncorrected measured values C and M as the test results: 1) in case the manufacturer can prove that there is no relation between the energy balance and fuel consumption, 2) in case that ΔEbatt always corresponds to a RESS charging, 3) in case that ΔEbatt always corresponds to a RESS decharging and ΔEbatt is within [1??? per cent] of the energy content of the consumed fuel (consumed fuel meaning the total fuel consumption over 1 cycle). [to be discussed later ] ∆RCB (Ah) Cycle Start End EU) ECE101 Annex8 OIL No.27 RCB correction criteria ±x%of fuel energy? Start

Open issues concerning gtr text II.1.2.1.Separate fuel consumption correction coefficients shall be determined for the fuel consumption values measured over [each Part of the WLTC respectively]. To be validated VP2 II.1.3. Fuel consumption at zero battery energy balance (C0) II.1.3.1.The fuel consumption C0 at ΔEbatt = 0 is determined by the following equation: [Jp will propose fuel consumption formula with unit (km/l) in parallel] C0 = C – Kfuel · Q (l/100 km) where: C : fuel consumption measured during test (l/100 km) Q : electricity balance measured during test (Ah) II.2.2.1. Separate CO2-emission correction coefficients shall be determined for the fuel consumption values measured over WLTC.[ to be validated VP2]

Proposed actions for gtr development 2011 11 12 2012 1 3 6 9 12 2013 1 3 6 9 12 E-Lab action Validation 2 Confirmation Round Robin test sequence Parameter set 8th May Phone conf Procedure for V2 Draft gtr1 Draft gtr2 Modify gtr WLTC completed reflection Short V1 Confirmation Validation 2 Round Robin [ Background ] 1. Draft gtr 1 is the portion exclude Validation phase 2. 2. Some of open issues need to be evaluated during the validation program. 3. Draft gtr 2 is reflected the result of Validation 2 .

Appendix; Consideration items on E-Lab. Gr. CO2/FC calculation (PL8/10) Performance of Watt-hour meter, Am-meter (PL3) Multi mode gear box (PL11) Termination condition for EV range (PL6/7) Charging voltage 100 / 200V (PL12) End of charge criteria (PL1) Order of CD/CS (PL4) Interruption condition (PL5) RCB break off criteria (PL2/9) ◆Test flow (independent test for L/M/H/ExH) Charge sustaining (CS) mode test (cold) Charge depleting (CD) mode test Charge sustaining (CS) mode test (hot) Precondition (Drain & Fill) Soak 12~36 hr Plug OFF Discharge Confirm tire pressure within 1hr Battery condition [Ah} Prepare RCB measurement Drain & Fill ⊿E ⊿E Soak 12~36 hr Canister loading AER Soak 6hr EAER RCDR Pre-con cycle Full charge max. 12 hr WLTC×1 WLTC×n WLTC×1 Full charge Day 1 Day 2 (EV: Day 1) Day 3 (EV: Day 2) Confirm tire pressure Prepare RCB measurement *) RCB: RESS Charge Balance (=SOC) *) RESS: Rechargeable energy storage system *) AER: All Electric Range *) EAER: Equivalent All Electric Range *) RCDR: Charge Depleting Range *) NEC: Net Energy Change = RCB * nominal voltage of RESS

PL1. End of charge criteria Back ground: ACEA proposal: Starting within 1 hour from “plug-off” Japanese proposal: ”from charge completed” How to: Monitoring RCB fluctuation after charge complete CD test:2(max/minimum charging)×4 phase(L/M/H/ExH)×3 times Impact of battery type ? (Ni-MH /Lithium,,) Measurement parameter: RCB(Voltage/electric current & CAN) Test equipment : RCB measurement system Charge complete Plug off CD test start 1hr fluctuation CS test CD test WANTED! Participant! Laboratory ,manufacture

PL2/9. RCB break off criteria Back ground: RCB Break off Criteria (CD→CS) How to: Comparing 2 calculation result by each procedure CDtest:4phase(L/M/H/ExH)×3times Measurement parameter: RCB,Fuel Consumption, total Energy demand at wheels to perform the cycle based on the theoretical profile of the WLTC Test equipment: RCB measurement system CS mode CD mode To be analyzed : a relative NEC: 1) (RCB x Nominal Voltage of the battery) / (RCB x Nominal Voltage of the battery + Energy of the Fuel) 2) (RCB x Nominal Voltage of the battery) / (total Energy demand at wheels to perform the cycle based on the theoretical profile of the WLTC) or an absolute NEC : RCB x Nominal Voltage of the battery WANTED! Participant! Laboratory ,manufacture *) RCB: RESS Charge Balance (=SOC) *) RESS: Rechargeable energy storage system *) NEC: Net Energy Change = RCB * nominal voltage of RESS

PL4. Order of CD/CS test Back ground: Confirm impact the order of CD/CS test Soak -CS test –Charge or CD test –shifting CS mode-Charge For example the temperature impact around Battery How to: CD&CS test:4phase(L/M/H/ExH)×3times Measurement parameter: RCB(Voltage/Electric current & CAN& temperature Battery or any other electrical parts) Test equipment: RCB measurement system

PL6/7. Termination condition for EV range (EV) Back ground: Japan:the deviation occurs not more than once within 4 second US:more than 2 second Europe:Target more than 50km/h:Below 50km/h, Target Less than 50km/h:more than 5s 6times during 1 hour How to: Running until completely stop and calculate EV range by each procedure Compare each result EV range test:4Phase(L/M/H/ExH) Measurement parameter: RCB(Voltage/electric current & CAN),Distance Test equipment: RCB measurement system

PL6/7. Termination condition for EV range (OVC HEV) Back Ground: To compare PHEV and Range Extender How to: Confirmation test procedure for range extender Compare with PHEV CD& CS test:4phase(L/M/H/ExH)×3times Measurement parameter: RCB(Voltage/Electric current & CAN) Test equipment: RCB measurement system WANTED! Participant! Laboratory ,manufacture Especially Range extender manufacture

PL12. Charging voltage 100 / 200V Back ground: Charging voltage has impact for charging efficiency. There are several Voltage in all of the world. US:110-120V,Japan:100/200V.EU:220-240V(127V) How to : Measure Charging time,Fluctuation during Plug ON,impact for CS/CD test result,Electric Range. PHEV:CD test:each Voltage×4phase(L/M/H/ExH)×3times EV: Electric range :Each Voltage × 4phase(L/M/H/ExH) ×3times Measurement parameter: RCB(Voltage & CAN) Test equipment : RCB measurement system Japan conducted pre-validation 2 How do we treat the difference of Voltage of each region?

Appendix:Open issues Green color means “agreed or deleted” Red color means “to be discussed “. Blue color means” to be confirmed in Validation phase 2”. Under line means “changed from last DTP in Geneva”. These under lined issues will be reported today.

Open issues 11 open Issues are Color means state of each issue on Open issue list 11 open Issues are To be discussed 2 (UF, Battery charging time) =>To be discussed during V2 Depends on new cycle 1 ( AE city for Low speed EV) => To be discussed during V2 Depends on Validation results 5 (ex,EV range, CD /CS test,)=>TBD after V2 Follow ICE group 3 (R/L, multi gear box,) The Issues to be validated are listed on parameter setting list. The procedure for validation phase 2 are shown next.

Performance of Watt-hour meter, Am-meter Proposal Step 3 Charge Sustaining Mode Unknown SOC Cold start of ICE Performance of Watt-hour meter, Am-meter OIL No.15,16,17 Charging Condition Battery [Ah] operation switch initial discharge pre-conditioning Soak time Charge sustaining test Charging OIL No.8 Charging method EV n/a  n/a ConsumptiontestOILNo.2 Charging time: OIL No.9 Condition: OIL No.7 end of charge :OIL No.10,10bis OVC HEV without  OIL No.14  discharge condition MR  follow ICE follow ICE OIL No.26,27 RCB correction   Ex; correct emission?  With NOVC HEV Without follow ICE  with Validation test

Proposal Appendix: RCB Compensation Discharge(+) Charge(-) CO2/Fuel consumption/(Emission) ∆RCB (Ah) OIL No.25bis How to measure? Opt.1) Voltage [V] Opt.2) Current [Ah] Opt.3) CAN To be measured by current regulation ∆RCB (Ah) Cycle Start End EU) ECE101 Annex8 ±x%of fuel energy? OIL No.27 RCB correction criteria Operation switch Range test Pollutants (including AP/PN/PM) CO2/Fuel Consumption CD test CS test EV Without n/a OVC HEV With (incl. pure EV) OIL26/26bis/27 Applicable OIL No.27 To be discussed based on Validation result With (no pure EV) NOVC HEV RCB Correction for CO2 &FC

Proposal Step 3 Charge Sustaining Mode (bis) OIL.10bis 1hr End of charge criteria Charge complete Plug off Test start (OIL10) Validation test

What is Low power vehicle? Proposal Step4 Charge Depleting Mode Alternative 1h max from (in case of plug off Fully Charged CD test has charge and to be start of CD retested) : ICE Charge Depleting Range RCDA Spak precondition time+ battery ing at charge All Electric Range chronologica Equivalent All Electric Range Charging Condition [Ah] l separation from step 1 and 2 First start of ICE Test 1 Test 2 Test n Test n+1 Driving cycle [/] (transcient) (needed for CO RCDA calculated with k factor calculations) Recharge 2 Recharging 12h max 12h max CO 2 avg CD CO 2 Transcient CO 2 hot CS 36h soak max operation switch charging after CS test Charge depleting test/EV range test OILNo.11Interruption Condition Charging EV n/a  n/a Test termination Condition OIL No.12 Stop Condition OILNo.13 Same as Step3 OVC HEV without  refer to step3 RCB break off criteria: OIL No.25& 25bis Deceleration condition; OIL No.13bis  EAER determination OIL No.21 To be discussed based on validation result. with NOVC HEV OIL.No31 Low power vehicle What is Low power vehicle? How to validate? To be raised DTP level

Detailed calculation formula is developed Proposal Step5: Calculation Detailed calculation formula is developed based on validation test results. Pollutants : CO2/Fuel Consumption : Range : Operation switch Pollutants Fuel Consumption Electric Energy Range RCB(DC) Chaege Duration others AER EAER Rcda Rcdc AERcity EV n/a applicable Applicable OVC HEV Without With NOVC HEV

To be discussed later stage Proposal Appendix: Utility Factor 1.0 JPN (EU) US OIL No.1: WLTP UF SAE 1711 with Opt.1) based on reagional data Opt.2) based on worldwide data Utility Factor 0.5 US: SAE J1711 with US data JPN: SAE J1711 with JPN data         EU: CS weight is 25km (fixed) 25 OVC range (km) Operation switch Utility Factor EV Without n/a OVC HEV With (incl. pure EV) OIL. No.1  SAE method is acceptable. But to get the traffic data of all country is too difficult. Political issue what should be discussed in DTP meeting. With (no pure EV) NOVC HEV To be discussed later stage

Annex: Open issue list 1

Open issue list2

Open issue list3

Open issue list4

Open issue list5

Open issue list5