KIDS compared to PanSTARRS: specs and status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selecting Supernovae for Cosmology
Advertisements

P.Tisserand Rencontres du Vietnam Final results on galactic dark matter from the EROS-2 microlensing survey ~ images processed - 55 million.
Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
KIDS: mapping the universe with weak lensing Konrad Kuijken, Leiden.
Cosmology Zhaoming Ma July 25, The standard model - not the one you’re thinking  Smooth, expanding universe (big bang).  General relativity controls.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Measuring the local Universe with peculiar velocities of Type Ia Supernovae MPI, August 2006 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical I: Big Apertures Geoff Bower.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009.
Relating Mass and Light in the COSMOS Field J.E. Taylor, R.J. Massey ( California Institute of Technology), J. Rhodes ( Jet Propulsion Laboratory) & the.
Synergies with multi-wavelength surveys Matt Jarvis University of Hertfordshire.
Type Ia Supernovae on a glass: The bread and butter of peculiar velocities Lunch meeting Aarhus, March 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute.
X-ray Optical microwave Cosmology at KIPAC. The Survey 5000 square degrees (overlap with SPT and VISTA) Five-band (grizY) + VISTA (JHK) photometry to.
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing What did we learn? What can we learn? Henk Hoekstra.
30/6/09 Unity of the Universe 1. Michael Drinkwater for the team Australia: Blake, Brough, Colless, Couch, Croom, Davis, Glazebrook, Jelliffe, Jurek,
Weak Lensing 3 Tom Kitching. Introduction Scope of the lecture Power Spectra of weak lensing Statistics.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni Martin Kilbinger Andisheh Mahdavi.
Cosmic shear results from CFHTLS Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni.
Robust cosmological constraints from SDSS-III/BOSS galaxy clustering Chia-Hsun Chuang (Albert) IFT- CSIC/UAM, Spain.
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
Cosmic Structures: Challenges for Astro-Statistics Ofer Lahav Department of Physics and Astronomy University College London * Data compression – e.g. P(k)
A Short Talk on… Gravitational Lensing Presented by: Anthony L, James J, and Vince V.
Lecture Outlines Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 25.
Pan-STARRS The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System Stefanie Phleps (MPE Garching, Decrypting the Universe, Edinburgh,
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
Introduction to the modern observational cosmology Introduction/Overview.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Constraining Cosmology with Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Cosmo 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics & Astronomy,
How Standard are Cosmological Standard Candles? Mathew Smith and Collaborators (UCT, ICG, Munich, LCOGT and SDSS-II) SKA Bursary Conference 02/12/2010.
Yanchuan Cai ( 蔡彦川 ) Shaun Cole, Adrian Jenkins, Carlos Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University May 31, 2008, NDHU, Taiwan ISW Cross-Correlation.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
G. Miknaitis SC2006, Tampa, FL Observational Cosmology at Fermilab: Sloan Digital Sky Survey Dark Energy Survey SNAP Gajus Miknaitis EAG, Fermilab.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
1 Imaging Surveys: Goals/Challenges May 12, 2005 Luiz da Costa European Southern Observatory.
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
VST ATLAS: Requirements, Operations and Products Tom Shanks, Nigel Metcalfe, Jamie McMillan (Durham Univ.) +CASU.
23 Sep The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun Peking Univ./ CPPM.
6dF Workshop April Sydney Cosmological Parameters from 6dF and 2MRS Anaïs Rassat (University College London) 6dF workshop, AAO/Sydney,
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
J. Jasche, Bayesian LSS Inference Jens Jasche La Thuile, 11 March 2012 Bayesian Large Scale Structure inference.
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Emission Line Galaxy Targeting for BigBOSS Nick Mostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BigBOSS Science Meeting Novemenber 19, 2009.
Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Effects Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Prospects of Measuring Dark Energy Equation of State with LAMOST Xuelei Chen ( 陳學雷 ) National Astronomical Observatory of.
Luminous Red Galaxies in the SDSS Daniel Eisenstein ( University of Arizona) with Blanton, Hogg, Nichol, Tegmark, Wake, Zehavi, Zheng, and the rest of.
Dept. of Astronmy Wide Field Surveys and Astronomical Discovery Space A. Lawrence / Astro-ph: Byeon Jae Gyu.
Goals for HETDEX Determine equation of state of Universe and evolutionary history for dark energy from 0
Gravitational Lensing
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
Surveys with OmegaCAM / VST KIDS Koen Kuijken, Leiden.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
Probing dark matter halos at redshifts z=[1,3] with lensing magnification L. Van Waerbeke With H. Hildebrandt (Leiden) J. Ford (UBC) M. Milkeraitis (UBC)
Chapter 25 Galaxies and Dark Matter. 25.1Dark Matter in the Universe 25.2Galaxy Collisions 25.3Galaxy Formation and Evolution 25.4Black Holes in Galaxies.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Inh Jee University of Texas at Austin Eiichiro Komatsu & Karl Gebhardt
Astronomy toolkits and data structures Andrew Jenkins Durham University.
Lightcones for Munich Galaxies Bruno Henriques. Outline 1. Model to data - stellar populations and photometry 2. Model to data - from snapshots to lightcones.
Some issues in cluster cosmology
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

KIDS compared to PanSTARRS: specs and status R.P.Saglia, MPE The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System Background and project history Hardware Software Science Projects Status and perspective Leiden, 31.3.2008

General information: Where, who, why, what? Pan-STARRS is developed by the University of Hawaii, partially funded by the US Airforce One day Pan-STARRS will be a system of four 1.8m telescopes that will survey the entire visible sky (3p) in five filters every five nights New technology wide-field camera, FOV is 7 sqdeg with 0.3” pixels, tip-tilt correction on the chip!

Possible telescope design

Pan-STARRS1: The prototype One 1.8m telescope Built on Haleakala (on Maui, Hawaii) PS1 will allow us to test all the technology that is being developed for Pan- STARRS, including the telescope design, the cameras and the data reduction software. PS1 will be used to make a full-sky survey

Panoramic Survey Telescope & Rapid Response System

The camera Consists of an array of 64x64 CCDs Each CCD has 600x600 pixels A total of 1.4 Gigapixels spread over 40x40 centimeters Orthogonal transfer allows for a shift of the image during the observation -> tip-tilt correction on the chip Expected data flow: 50Tbytes/month

The camera

The camera First light on 22nd of August 2007!

The famous Bonn-Shutter

The filter system: grizy Pan-STARRS will be a very red survey Good photometric redshifts only for red galaxies (LRGS -> similar to SLOAN) For studies of galaxy properties have to combine with other surveys

The PS Pipeline Completely automatized data reduction pipeline on the mountain Satellite tracks detected and deleted from raw data: only censored data will be given to the astronomical community Photometrically and astrometrically calibrated single frames Evolving coadded frames, difference images Static and time-dependent object catalogues, secondary catalogues (photometric redshifts, spectral classification, light-curve fitting, etc.) accessible through a centralized database Galaxy photometry performed „a‘ la SLOAN“: PSF-convolved model fitting

Our further plans Copy reduced frames to our PanSTARRs Beowulf cluster (through the net or cassettes) Ingest frames in AstroWise Perform PSF equalization across colors Reassess object detection, photometry and photometric redshifts Perform difference imaging and light curve analysis for microlensing search in M31 and transit planet light curves

The PS1 Surveys 3p steradian Survey Medium Deep Survey Solar System Sweet Spot Survey Stellar Transit Survey Deep Survey of M31

The 3p Survey Survey the entire visible sky (from Hawaii) Earth-bound all-sky survey In five filters 56% of total observing time Every field will be visited 4 times in each band pass every year, 3.5 years long Median redshift: z~0.7

The 3p survey Starting end 2008 to mid of 2012 Planet Medium deep Transits Medium deep fields

Limiting magnitudes Medium deep survey, 84 sq. deg.: Lensing!

The Medium Deep Survey 10 GPC1 footprints distributed uniformly across the sky (optimized for SnIa studies) Nightly depth chosen to detect SnIa at z=0.8 Stacks constitute 84 square degrees Facilitates detection of L* galaxies at z=1.8

Key science projects Populations of objects in the Inner Solar System Populations of objects in the Outer Solar System (Beyond Jupiter) Populations in the Local Solar Neighborhood, the Low Mass IMF, and Young Stellar Objects Search for Exo-Planets by dedicated Stellar Transit Surveys Structure of the Milky Way and the Local Group A dedicated deep survey of M31 Massive Stars and Supernovae Progenitors Transients Galaxies and galaxy evolution in the local universe Active Galactic Nuclei and High Redshift Quasars Cosmological lensing Large Scale Structure

Status and Perspectives Optical alignment of the primary+secondary+camera lens system optimized using a novel technique, image quality improving steadily Problems with mirror support under investigation Electronics performances improving as the tele- and radio- transmission towers are moved away from the telescope Overall optical transmission efficiency under assessment Pipeline well developed, still work to be done on satellite tracks elimination (outsourced to Boeing...) Aimed start of science operations: Fall 2008

M31

Key science projects Populations of objects in the Inner Solar System Populations of objects in the Outer Solar System (Beyond Jupiter) Populations in the Local Solar Neighborhood, the Low Mass IMF, and Young Stellar Objects Search for Exo-Planets by dedicated Stellar Transit Surveys Structure of the Milky Way and the Local Group A dedicated deep survey of M31 Massive Stars and Supernovae Progenitors Transients Galaxies and galaxy evolution in the local universe Active Galactic Nuclei and High Redshift Quasars Cosmological lensing Large Scale Structure

Key project 12: Large Scale Structure (PIs: S. Cole and S. Phleps) Input: Redshift catalogues realistic Pan-STARRS mocks Science projects: BAOs and cosmological parameters Clustering as a function of X Higher Order Statistics Galaxy Clusters CMB foregrounds

Redshift catalogues (Coordinated by R. Saglia and D. Wilman) Accurate multiband seeing-matched photometry Photometric redshifts (goal: sz<3% for LRGs) Supplementing Pan-STARRS grizy with other wavelength information (where available) Calibrate photometric redshifts with spectroscopic redshifts (over full range of Galactic extinction) Surface photometry Completeness maps (depth and coverage as function of coordinates) Bulge to total light ratios Saglia, Wilman, Bender, Meneux, Drory, Lerchster, Seitz, Szalay, Metcalfe, ….

Realistic mocks (Coordinated by F. van den Bosch and C. Frenk) Different mock catalogues: A 7 square degree PS1 footprint synthetic sky Redshifts, apparent magnitudes, structure parameters, but no clustering Timeslize galaxy catalogues (realistic clustering at fixed redshifts) Galaxy lightcones (with evolution of clustering along the line of sight)

LSS and BAOs (Coordinated by S. Cole, S. Phleps and A. Szalay) Use the acoustic oscillations in the galaxy distribution as a standard ruler to measure the equation of state of dark energy with Projected correlation functions Angular correlation functions in z slizes Power spectra (spherical harmonics decomposition) Compare with models/theoretical predictions and infer w

LSS and BAOs (Coordinated by S. Cole, S. Phleps and A. Szalay) Use the acoustic oscillations in the galaxy distribution as a standard ruler to measure the equation of state of dark energy with Projected correlation functions Angular correlation functions in z slizes Power spectra (spherical harmonics decomposition) Compare with models/theoretical predictions and infer w

LSS and BAOs (Coordinated by S. Cole, S. Phleps and A. Szalay) Use the acoustic oscillations in the galaxy distribution as a standard ruler to measure the equation of state of dark energy with Projected correlation functions Angular correlation functions in z slizes Power spectra (spherical harmonics decomposition) Compare with models/theoretical predictions and infer w

LSS and BAOs (Coordinated by S. Cole, S. Phleps and A. Szalay) Use the acoustic oscillations in the galaxy distribution as a standard ruler to measure the equation of state of dark energy with Projected correlation functions Angular correlation functions in z slizes Power spectra (spherical harmonics decomposition) Compare with models/theoretical predictions and infer w

Requirements (from the ESA/ESO Cosmology Report) 1% error in distance gives 5% error in w For a spectroscopic survey minimum volume is 5 h-3 Gpc3 Typical number of galaxies: N = 2*106 Blake and Bridle 2005: for photometric redshifts need a factor of 10 more (to make up for redshift smearing) Area wins over depth

Measuring the acoustic peak in Pan-STARRS We have area! -> 3p =30000 sq.deg In order to calculate clustering statistics we need good redshifts (sz/(1+z)<0.03) -> select luminous red galaxies (LRGs) Expect to find about 10000000 LRGs with I<23, 0.2<z<1 We will be able to measure w to 3-5%

Potential difficulties 10000000 LRGs is a huge number of galaxies -> computationally challenging run the codes in parallel on the Beowulf cluster additionally use a tree code or adaptive grid Have to understand systematics: Influence of redshift errors and varying depth across the sky on measurements nonlinear biasing on large scales shift of acoustic peak (see Smith et al. 2007, astro- ph/0703620 very large angles -> distant observer approximation not valid any more

Clustering as a function of X (Coordinated by F. van den Bosch, S Clustering as a function of X (Coordinated by F. van den Bosch, S. Phleps) Analyse clustering statistics as a function of Luminosity Colour Stellar mass Star formation rate Compare with models based on Halo occupation distribution Conditional luminosity function Semi-analytics

Clustering as a function of X (Coordinated by F. van den Bosch, S Clustering as a function of X (Coordinated by F. van den Bosch, S. Phleps) And learn something about How galaxies trace the underlying dark matter density field (biasing) How the environment (the local overdensity) influences the galaxies’ properties

Higher order statistics (Coordinated by I. Szapudi) Complementary information from Three-point correlation function Bi-spectrum Scaling indices Minkowsky functionals Count-in-cells Void probability function Put constraints on non-Gaussianity of distribution and initial conditions as well as (non- linear) biasing and Put constraints on cosmological parameters (e.g. s8)

CMB foregrounds (Coordinated by J. Peacock and C. Frenk) Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect Rees-Sciama Sunyaev-Zeldovich Lensing

Galaxy clusters (Coordinated by R. Bower and H. Böhringer) Cluster catalogue (using a matched filter technique) Measurement of LSS and constraints on cosmological parameters Constraints on galaxy formation theories and role of environment on galaxy properties Probe thermodynamics and metal enrichment history of intracluster/group medium Lensing: provide a source list of gravitational telescopes for constraining cosmological distance scale and properties of background objects

Summary Pan-STARRS 1 will survey 3p of the sky in five filters for 3.5 years Expect about 107 LRGs up to z=1 with redshift accuracy of ~3% Huge number of science applications Particularly interesting for cosmology: LSS and BAOs: will be able to measure w with 3% accuracy

The acoustic peak: a first simulation 3 Nparticles ~ 3 Million, 45 degrees x 45 degrees