Evaluating Physical Data Objectives: n you should be able to: Locate the physical data on the data sheetLocate the physical data on the data sheet Describe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soils.
Advertisements

Objectives Be able to use basic volume weight equations
Aggregate Properties HMA
Characterizing Soil Horizons Physical Properties of Soils.
Rock Cycle & Soil Origins Magma –> Igneous Rocks Intrusive, Extrusive Transportation, Erosion, Weathering Sediments -> Sedimentary Rock Metamorphism Melting.
Physical Science Applications in Agriculture
Physical properties – Texture Texture – proportions of sand, silt, and clay Determines water holding capacity, water availability, nutrient supply capacity.
Quick Methods for Determining Plant Available Water
3. Grain Size Distribution (Das, Chapter 2) Sections: 2.5, 2.6, 2.7
Introduction to Soil Mechanics
NOAA-CREST GPR Study Eric Harmsen, Associate Researcher Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering.
Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity Laboratory #4.
Soil physics Magnus Persson.
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL
Ken Scheffe NSSC – Standards Branch. ◦ Describe the different kinds of data reports ◦ Locate data on the data report ◦ Obtain reports from web application.
 Necessary materials: PowerPoint Guide Teacher Information!
Physical Properties of Soils GES175, Science of Soils.
Soil Texture Presented by: Mr. Brian Oram, PG, PASEO Wilkes University GeoEnvironmental Sciences and Environmental Engineering Department Wilkes - Barre,
Chapter 4: Soil Architecture and Physical Properties
Soil Types and Textures
Physical Properties of Soil
Created by Dr. Michael Pidwirny, Department of Geography, Okanagan University College, BC, CA evaporation Soil and Water Ch 5 Continued.
Soil Water ContentSoil Moisture Content Water that may be evaporated from soil by heating at C to a constant weight Gravimetric moisture content.
Soil Physical Properties Used to Assess Soil Quality Field Exercise.
Ch. 4 continued Soil Properties.
Standard Soil Lab Data Reports Soil sampling strategies have evolved over the past 100 years since USDA first was charged with the mapping, sampling, and.
GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES (CE1203)
Unified Soil Classification System Training
Soil Testing Methods Chapter 8.
COMPACTION Topic COMPACTION Presented to Dr. Ayub Elahi Presented by Group leader. M.Zeeshan haider yousaf Zia. # 14 Haider ayub # 13 Bilal ansari #35.
7. Soil Compaction (Das, chapter 6)
Water in Soil. The basis of irrigation Soil Plant Evapotranspiration Plant requirements.
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
CHAPTER TWO SOIL COMPRESSION.
Lecture (3). Mechanical Analysis of Soil is the determination of the size range of soil particles, expressed as a percentage of total dry weight. The.
Lecture (4).
Growing Plants : The Soil Profile. What is Soil Made up of?
Growing Plants Hydroponically vs. In Soil:
Soil Water.
Lecture 7 b Soil Water – Part 2
Normal Aggregate DR. Khalid Alshafei.
Lab 9: Building a Soil Moisture Characteristic Curve or Moisture Release Curve A plot of water content, , vs. soil tension, or versus pressure, .
College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
Estimating Soil Moisture by Appearance and Feel
1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION. 2 According to their particle sizes, soils are divided into two: Coarse grained soils: Gravel » Sand Fine grained soils: Silt &
The diagnostic features used to differentiate soils in USDA Soil Taxonomy are primarily macromorphological Soils can also be studied at smaller scales.
Soil Water Movement and Retention. Medium for plant growth Regulator of water supplies Recycler of raw materials Habitat for soil organisms Engineering.
Water Movement Below Surface
Soil Water Tension Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Experiment # 1 Grain Size Analysis Sieve Analysis.
Characterization of Soil Moisture Status and the Movement of Water in Soils.
Ch. 4 continued Soil Properties.
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SOUNDING TO STUDY WATER CONTENT DISTRIBUTION IN HETEROGENEOUS SOILS 1 University of Maryland, College Park MD; 2 BA/ANRI/EMSL, USDA-ARS,
Homework I will be ed It is also posted on the website.
Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity
Moisture-Holding Capacity of Soil
Soil Chapter 2 Soil Physical Properties Pages 26 – 60.
WATER I: POROSITY Intraped micropores Macropores.
Lecture 7 b Soil Water – Part 2 Source: Dept of Agriculture Bulletin 462, 1960.
Soil Nature’s dirty little secret. Soil is… July 22, 2012Footer text here2 Detritus from rock or - sand, Or silt and clay particles along with decomposed.
Soils and Growing Media
Submitted By- Amandeep Singh Roll No
Horticulture Science Lesson 27 Understanding Moisture Holding Capacity.
Soil-Water-Plant Relationships A. Background 1. Holdridge Life Zones 1.
SMNO.jursntnhfpub.Sept2014
Soil, Plant and Water Relationships
Soil Physical Properties Used to Assess Soil Quality
Soil Texture and Textural Class
SEM 3 CIVIL.
Soil Texture.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Physical Data Objectives: n you should be able to: Locate the physical data on the data sheetLocate the physical data on the data sheet Describe common physical data methodsDescribe common physical data methods Give examples of how to apply physical dataGive examples of how to apply physical data Determine if the physical data is internally consistentDetermine if the physical data is internally consistent Calculate fundamental relationshipsCalculate fundamental relationships

Exercise - find physical data n Complete exercise n SSL information manual (SSIR 45) pp

Exercise - find physical data n Find and write the following (page 204): Soil Survey Number ______Soil Survey Number ______ Percent clay for C3 horizon _______Percent clay for C3 horizon _______ Percent fine silt for BS horizon ______Percent fine silt for BS horizon ______ 1/3 bar bulk density for Ap2 horizon ______1/3 bar bulk density for Ap2 horizon ______ 15 bar on moist soil for Ap1 horizon ______15 bar on moist soil for Ap1 horizon ______ Water dispersible clay for Ap1 horizon _____Water dispersible clay for Ap1 horizon _____ Which horizons have 15bar/clay greater than 0.6? ______Which horizons have 15bar/clay greater than 0.6? ______ What is the method code for WRD? _____What is the method code for WRD? _____

Exercise - find physical data n Find and write the following (page 204): Soil Survey Number - S88ME Soil Survey Number - S88ME Percent clay for C3 horizon Percent clay for C3 horizon Percent fine silt for BS horizon Percent fine silt for BS horizon /3 bar bulk density for Ap2 horizon /3 bar bulk density for Ap2 horizon bar on moist soil for Ap1 horizon bar on moist soil for Ap1 horizon Water dispersible clay for Ap1 horizon - 7.7Water dispersible clay for Ap1 horizon Which horizons have 15bar/clay greater than 0.6? Ap1, Ap2, BS, C1Which horizons have 15bar/clay greater than 0.6? Ap1, Ap2, BS, C1 What is the method code for WRD? 4C1What is the method code for WRD? 4C1

Physical Methods n Each data element has a method n Each method has a method code n The method is the standard operating procedurethe standard operating procedure part of the quality assurance program part of the quality assurance program n Lab methods are in SSIR 42: Laboratory Methods Manual n SSIR 42 was written for laboratory technicians n SSIR 51 – Field and Laboratory Methods

Internal Consistency n Consistency of data – does it follow expected trends -with other analyses -within pedons -with genetically and geographically associated pedons Laboratory consistency (repeatability) is monitored by use of standard samples for each batch.

Evaluating the consistency of physical data n Maximum, minimum, and representative values n Depth trends within a pedon : clay, Db … n Trends in physical, chemical and mineralogical data are compared. n Compare apples to apples. Know the methods used for the data you are comparing. Use the appropriate method.

n Inconsistency? n Rerun lab data? Representative site? Variability at sampling site? Sampling procedure. n Reevaluate your hypothesis

Physical Analytical Methods n Particle-Size n Bulk Density n Water Retention n COLE n Aggregate Stability

NASIS ‘Super 7’ n Coarse fragments n Sand n Silt n Clay n OM n Bulk density n Ksat

Particle-size analysis n Method 3A1 describes measuring sand, silt, and clay fractions with the pipette and sieves. n The sedimentation theory is based on Stokes’ Law. n Most applicable for soils with crystalline clays.

Particle-size analysis (pipette) n The method is precise within 1.5 percent, absolute. n Only method to obtain fine clay and CO 3 clay. n Method is time consuming and labor intensive.

Pipette PSDA analysis n Errors with pipette analysis are associated with sampling and measuring. n Uses pretreatments: OM, salts CO 3 … n Generally considered to be superior to other sedimentation methods, particularly at low clay contents where the hydrometer has low sensitivity.

Hydrometer PSDA analysis n Less equipment, quicker n Commonly does not remove OM and salts. (Dispersion can be a problem.)(Dispersion can be a problem.) n The major source of error is in the hydrometer reading. (Gee and Bauder, 1979) An error of +- 1 g/L in the hydrometer reading results in an error of about +- 2 wt % for clay size particles.

Evaluation and Interpretation of PSDA Data n Lab vs. field texture n Clay distribution with depth and morphology; (argillic? ). n Clay illuviation - fine clay distribution (Higher ratio of fine clay to total clay than overlying and underlying horizons.) n Distribution of silt and sand fractions (PM discontinuities)

Weighted average for control section 79CA093001Tangle control section: cm HrzTopBotThickClayProduct A A Bt Bt Bt Bt Clay Weighted Average31.9(sum/50)

Examples of Data Interpretation Typical calculations - PSDTypical calculations - PSD –Weighted average for control section SSIR 45 pp SSIR 45 pp –PSA on clay-free basis SSIR 45 pp SSIR 45 pp –Changing basis whole soilwhole soil <75 mm<75 mm with soil organic carbonwith soil organic carbon

PSA on clay-free basis clayfsiltcsiltvfsfsmscsvcs A Divide by 100-clay Use to determine PM, lithologic discontinuities

Changing Basis

PSDA – comparison of standard vs. ‘gypsic’ method SAMPLEHORIZONGYP % SAND %, STD METH. SAND %, GYPSIC METH. SILT %, STD METH. SILT %, GYPSIC METH. CLAY %, STD METH. CALC. CLAY %, GYPSIC METH. Series: Loki; Coarse-loamy, gypsic, thermic Typic Calcigypsid 06N04753A N04754 Bw N04755Bk N047562By N047572B/Cy N047582Cy N047592Cy N047602Cy

Bulk density n Moisture state when volume is measured should be specified. n 1/3 bar bulk density - oven-dry mass per unit bulk volume of soil equilibrated at 1/3 bar (<2 mm) tension. a. Clod method (primary method used by SSL), provides ancillary data: COLE, water content at 1/3 bar.a. Clod method (primary method used by SSL), provides ancillary data: COLE, water content at 1/3 bar. b. Reconstituted (plowed surface layer)b. Reconstituted (plowed surface layer)

Bulk density n Field moist bulk density – oven-dry mass per unit of bulk volume of soil at field moisture a. Compliant Cavity, frame, ring (excavation techniques)a. Compliant Cavity, frame, ring (excavation techniques) b. Known-volume can, field-moist coreb. Known-volume can, field-moist core (a. & b. <2mm / not natural fabric) (a. & b. <2mm / not natural fabric) Cores that are extracted without disturbing the natural fabric, and which remain in the core can be used for water retention.Cores that are extracted without disturbing the natural fabric, and which remain in the core can be used for water retention. 2. Oven-dry bulk density - oven-dry mass per unit bulk volume of soil at oven dryness (<2 mm)2. Oven-dry bulk density - oven-dry mass per unit bulk volume of soil at oven dryness (<2 mm)

Other bulk density measurements n Oven dry bulk density - oven dry mass per oven-dry volume unit of soil n Rewet bulk density - used to determine irreversible shrinkage.

Bulk density relationships n 1/3 bar bulk density is less than or equal to oven dry bulk density n There is less difference between clod and other methods in soils with less clay, more sand.

Bulk density relationships n Average Db at 1/3 bar Soils g/cc Organic Sandy Silty Clayey Soils g/cc Organic Sandy Silty Clayey n Lab range for 1/3 bar / Db: n 0.03 g/cc g/cc n (>2.0 is unusual)

Bulk density average db values clay_classdb_13b(N)db_13bdb_od(N) db_od very-fine fine coarse silty fine silty fine loamy sandy coarse loamy

Water Retention n Determined by desorption on pressure plate. n Determined on n 1)natural fabric clod /core or n 2) <2mm

Water Retention n 15-bar (1500 kPa) --ground soil <2 mm Approximate wilting pointApproximate wilting point n 2-bar (200 kPa)--ground soil <2 mm Approximate point at which plants begin to experience stressApproximate point at which plants begin to experience stress n 1/3 bar (33 kPa) --natural fabric Approximate field capacityApproximate field capacity n 1/10 bar (10kPa)--natural fabric Approximate field capacity in sandy soilsApproximate field capacity in sandy soils

Appropriate sample types for water retention n Low tension (1/3 bar, 1/10 bar, - 6, 10, 33, 100 kPa) water retention determinations require clods for textures finer than sandy loam. n Higher tension (2 bar /200 kPa, 15 bar / 1500 kPa) can be determined on <2mm sieved samples.

15 bar to clay ratio ( > 5-10 percent clay) n Provides an indication of dispersion n Rule of thumb-- percent clay equals 2.5 times 15-bar water content minus percent organic carbon. n This may be used to estimate clay content in hard-to-disperse soils.

15 bar : clay ratio n For a typical soil with well dispersed clays, the ratio is 0.4. (If you remember no more, remember point four.) n Higher ratios indicate poor dispersion of clays.

15 bar to clay ratios Other factors: n Low activity clays lower ratio to < 0.35 n High activity clays increase the ratio n Variable surface charge and amorphous clay minerals n Organic soils – higher 15bar : clay n Other soils with dispersion problems, salts, gypsum

n Low activity clays, iron oxides, clay- sized carbonates produce 15 bar / clay of <0.4. n Ratios of less than 0.3 are common in some soils that contain large amounts n of gypsum.

Isotic mineralogy criteria n The ratio of 1500 kPa water to measured clay is 0.6 or more. n (Also NaF pH > 8.4 and no carbonates.)

n 15 bar water =.12 n OC = 2% n % clay = ______?

n % clay = 2.5 x = 32%

n 15 bar water =.12 n clay =.50 n 15 bar water =.23 n clay =.27

n.12 /.50 =.24 gypsum? Salts? n.23 /.27 =.85 andic?

Water relationships n Water is held at higher tension by smaller particles. n High tension water is held mostly in micropores (in interstitial spaces between soil particles): <2mm samples vs. clods can be used for 15 bar WR. There is no significant water in macropores at 15 bars.

Water retention different (WRD) n The difference between the 15 bar water content and the 1/10 or 1/3 bar water content on a volume basis weight percent X bulk density = volumetric water contentweight percent X bulk density = volumetric water content

Soil Water Retention Curve n Silty Clay Loam

Available Water Capacity (AWC) n The difference between field capacity and wilting point (Wilting point varies with the kind of crop.)

Water Retention Curve

COLE n Coefficient of Linear Extensibility

COLE –Coefficient of Linear Extensibility n 1. When coarse fragments are absent (COLE,<2mm, 1/3bar-oven dry ): n COLE whole soil = (Db d<2mm /Db 33<2mm ) 1/3 – 1 n Units = cm / cm n 2. When coarse fragments are present (whole soil, 1/3bar-oven dry)

Coefficient of Linear Extensibility (COLE) n Determined using an undisturbed clod Measures change in volume from 1/3 bar to oven dry.

COLE – soil paste / soil rod n COLE rod = (L w – L d ) / L d n uses sieved < 2mm soil n the shrinkage of the soil paste was ~ twice that of the clod with a regression as follows: COLE std = COLE rod (r2 = 0.829). (Schafer and Singer, 1976)

Linear Extensibility n Linear extensibility of a layer = COLE x thickness of layer n Linear extensibility of a soil = sum of LE for all layers to 100 cm or root limiting layer n LE of 6.0 or more is a criterion for most vertic subgroups

Aggregate Stability n n measures the retention of air-dry aggregates (2 to 1 mm) on a 0.5-mm sieve after sample has been submerged in water overnight followed by agitation of sample. n n Reported as percentage of.5 to 2 mm aggregates retained after wet sieving. n n Potential soil quality indicator.

Interpreting IRIS tube data

n IRIS tubes can also be used to characterize reducing conditions for studies not specifically related to hydric soil determinations.

Exercise -- Hydrometer PSDA data spreadsheet

Cumulative Particle-Size Distribution Curve (<75-mm base)

Exercise: Construct Distribution Curve n Plot measured values from to 75 mm on semi-log paper n Sample number 88P3856 n Data on pages 204, 209 n Plot on chart obtained from National Soil Mechanics Lab n Show how to obtain intermediate values