Presented by Torky, H.A.; Soliman, M.K. *; El- Ashram, A.M.M. ** and El-Refaee, A. M. E ** STUDIES ON STREPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONS AMONG CULTURED FRESH WATER FISHES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS DIAGNOSIS BY POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION TEST
“ Introduction ” Fish is among the most important sources of protein to human consumption, thus the study of the signs and lesions, induced by fish diseases, helps the protection in our national economy. Infectious diseases of cultured fish are among the most notable constraints on the expansion of aquaculture and the realization of its full potential (Plumb, 1999; Woo and Bruno, 1999 and Klesius et al., 2000). Bacterial pathogens are the most serious disease problem in tilapia production causing 80% of fish mortalities (Plumb, 1999; Woo and Bruno, 1999; Clark et al., 2000 and Shoemaker et al., 2000). Historically, Streptococcus sp. are not serious pathogens of fish, but recently, these bacteria have become more prominent in wild and cultured fish (Baya et al., 1990). Now Streptococcus sp. has recently created a major disease problem in cultured tilapia and considered of high importance in recent years because of the increased reports of infections and the high economic losses caused by gram-positive bacteria in both wild and cultured fish (Eldar et al., 1995 and Domenech et al., 1996). Moreover, Weinstein et al., (1996) and Zlotkin et al., (2003) recorded that Streptococcus iniae was capable of causing disease in humans who had recently handled infected fish from aquaculture farms. In Egypt, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) population facing streptococcosis in several areas, notably in Lake El-Temsah in Ismailia governorate (Badran, 1994) recorded a serious mass mortality among fish due to streptococcal infection, in Kafr El-Sheikh governorate (Khalil, 2000) who recorded massive mortalities from streptococcosis and (Ebtesam, 2002) recorded streptococcosis in Lake El-Ibrahimia in Upper Egypt.
Saçilik et al., (2000) analyzed different gram positive cocci by SDS-PAGE in order to obtain better discrimination between different gram positive cocci and found a common 18 and 35 kD characteristics bands of Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis. Also Barnes et al., (2003) used it for characterization of Streptococcus iniae. Saçilik et al., (2000) analyzed different gram positive cocci by SDS-PAGE in order to obtain better discrimination between different gram positive cocci and found a common 18 and 35 kD characteristics bands of Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis. Also Barnes et al., (2003) used it for characterization of Streptococcus iniae. Enlightenment the previous argument the present study was conducted to fulfill the gap about Streptococcus species infection among cultured freshwater fish in Egypt. Also, availability of use of total bacterial proteins in SDS-PAGE for characterization of the isolated streptococcus. In addition to using of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as a rapid and sensitive method for identification of streptococcus with potential diagnostic value.
Fig : Streptococcus spp. spp. isolated from fish occurred as gram positive cocci arranged in chain.
Prevalence of Streptococcosis among the examined fish. % of the diseased fish from the same species Number of clinically diseased fish Number of examined fish Fish species Oreochromis niloticus Clarias gariepinus
Seasonal prevalence of Streptococcosis among Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) niloticus) and African catfish (C. (C. gariepinus). C. gariepinusO. niloticusSeason % from examined fish/season No. of infected fish/season No. of examined fish/season % from examined fish/season No. of infected fish/season No. of examined fish/season Spring Summer Autumn Winter
Seasonal prevalence of Streptococcosis among Nile tilapia (O. niloticus).
Seasonal prevalence of Streptococcosis among African catfish (C. (C. gariepinus).
Prevalence of Streptococcosis among O. niloticus niloticus and African catfish (C. gariepinus) gariepinus) in relation to locality and the total examined fish. Catfish (C. gariepinus)Tilapia (O. niloticus)Locality *% of infected No. of infected No. of examined *% of infected No. of infected No. of examined Domiata Sharkia Kafr El-Sheikh Total
Clinical signs
O. niloticus niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. showing skin ulceration and tail fin erosion.
C. gariepinus gariepinus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. showing haemorrhagic ulcers..
C. gariepinus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. showing skin ulceration and haemorrhages in the base of the fins..
C. gariepinus naturally infected by Streptococcus spp. showing haemorrhagic ulceration.
O. niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. Showing sever exophthalmia and congestion of the eyes.
O. niloticus niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. showing congestion of the eyes and corneal opacity.
O. niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. showing corneal opacity.
O. niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. showing different stages of corneal opacity until complete destruction of eye.
O. niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. showing haemorrhage at the base of dorsal fin.
O. niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. Showing inflammation and congestion of the anal opening.
O. niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. showing vertebral column deformities
O. niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. spp. showing pale liver and haemorrhage on the skin
O. niloticus niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. spp. showing pale liver and congestion of internal organs
O. niloticus niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. spp. showing corneal opacity, brownish liver and distended gall bladder.
O. niloticus niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. spp. showing bloody ascitis and inflammation of intestine.
O. niloticus niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. spp. showing enlarged spleen.
O. niloticus niloticus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. spp. showing enlarged and congested kidney..
C. gariepinus gariepinus naturally infected with Streptococcus spp. spp. showing empty intestine and enlarged kidney.
Number of dead Monosex tilapiaNumber of dead O. niloticus No. of injected Dose days Control2X10 8 2X10 7 5X10 6 5X10 5 5X10 4 Control5X10 8 5X10 7 5X10 6 5X10 5 5X %100% 80%60%30%0%100% 80%50%40% % of dead Experimental infection of fish with different concentrations of Streptococcus faecalis:
Number of dead Monosex tilapiaNumber of dead O. niloticus No. of injected Dose days Control5X10 8 5X10 7 5X10 6 5X10 5 5X10 4 Control5X10 8 5X10 7 5X10 6 5X10 5 5X %100%90%70%20%10%0%100% 60%30%10% % of dead Experimental injection of fish with different concentrations of Streptococcus faecium:
O. niloticus niloticus injected with Streptococcus faecalis faecalis showing slight exophthalmia.
O. niloticus niloticus injected with Streptococcus faecalis faecalis showing congestion of the internal organs.
Sensitivity testes for isolated Streptococcus spp. RRRRR Optochin SSSSS Nalidexic acid SSSSS Vancomycin SSSRS Trimethoprim +Sulfamethoxazole SRSSI Streptomycin SRSSS Penicillin SRSSR Tetracycline RRSIR Kanamycin SSSSR Erythromycin SISSR Ciprofloxacin SSRSS Chloramephenicol SRIRR Ampicillin SRIIS Amoxicillin S. sp 3.S. sp 2.S. sp 1.S. faeciumS. faecalis Antimicrobial agent
M: Marker. 1: Standard Streptococcus faecalis 2: Streptococcus faecalis 3: Streptococcus faecium 4: Streptococcus sp1 5: Streptococcus sp2 6: Streptococcus sp3 SDS-PAGE of bacterial cell protein.
S. sp ,7918S. sp ,7918S. sp S. faecium S. faecalis Standard Number of common bands Molecular weight of diagnostic bands/KD Number of diagnostic bands Highest molecular weight/KD Total number of bands Species The number of protein bands and highest molecular weight, number of diagnostic bands and its molecular weight:
S. sp3S. sp2S. sp1S. faeciumS. faecalisStandardM. W. KDRelative FrontBand Number Table (16): Densitometeric analysis of bacterial cell protein
S. sp 2.S. sp 1.S. faeciumS. faecalisStandard Strain 0.83S. faecalis S. faecium S. sp S. sp S. sp 3. Similarity coefficient among species by protein electrophoresis Dendrogram among species by protein electrophoresis.
The polymorphic bands, shared and total bands in related to the type of primer used for Streptococcus identification: Total No. of bands.No. of shared bands No. of polymorphic bands Primer code No.Serial number 918 OP.A OP.A OP.A OP.Z OP.B OP.C OP.C OP.C OP.A OP.O Total
M: Marker. 1: Standard Streptococcus faecalis 2: Streptococcus faecalis 3: Streptococcus faecium 4: Streptococcus sp1 5: Streptococcus sp2 6: Streptococcus sp3
Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified RAPD-PCR products with primers Z1, B2. M: Marker. 1: Standard Streptococcus faecalis 2: Streptococcus faecalis 3: Streptococcus faecium 4: Streptococcus sp1 5: Streptococcus sp2 6: Streptococcus sp3
Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified RAPD-PCR products with primers C1, C4, C6. M: Marker. 1: Standard Streptococcus faecalis 2: Streptococcus faecalis 3: Streptococcus faecium 4: Streptococcus sp1 5: Streptococcus sp2 6: Streptococcus sp3
Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified RAPD-PCR products with primers A11, O20. M: Marker. 1: Standard Streptococcus faecalis 2: Streptococcus faecalis 3: Streptococcus faecium 4: Streptococcus sp1 5: Streptococcus sp2 6: Streptococcus sp3
Similarity coefficient among Streptococcus species with total of primer: S. sp 2.S. sp 1.S. faeciumS. faecalisStandard Strain 0.96S. faecalis S. faecium S. sp S. sp S. sp 3. Dendrogram using average linkage from total of primers data among Streptococcus species.
Similarity coefficient between Streptococcus species with total of data (primers and protein). S. sp 2.S. sp 1.S. faeciumS. faecalisStandard Strain 0.94S. faecalis S. faecium S. sp S. sp S. sp 3. Dendrogram using average linkage from total of data (primers and protein) among Streptococcus species.
Conclusion It could be concluded that streptococcosis was detected in high prevalence among cultured fresh water fish in Egypt, especially during summer season. The most common signs of streptococcosis in fish was septicaemia, ulcer formation, uni- or bilateral exophthalmia, haemorrhage of the eye, in some cases change cloudy and destruct of eye (pop-eye) and haemorrhages on the skin especially in the base of fins and tail.
Using of molecular diagnostic technology in diagnosis of bacterial fish pathogens, considered as good tool due to: 1.Highly specific, quick and sensitive. 2.Give accurate diagnosis and accurate treatment. 3.Help in detection of non culturable bacteria. Results of SDS-PAGE and RAPD PCR considered first record in Egypt and can be used for rapid diagnosis of Streptococcus species.