Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesota Department of Transportation Mn/DOTs Gradual Shift from Profile Index to IRI.
Advertisements

Mn/DOT Combined Smoothness Specification Operator Certification Training Workshop July 12, 2010.
Ride Specification – IRI Update Prepared by Joe Thomas, P.E. 11/1/06 MAAPT 53 rd Annual Asphalt Conference December 6, 2006.
A Connected Vehicle-Based Application to Estimate Road Roughness Transportation agencies devote significant resources towards collection of highly detailed.
Section Cross Slope District 1 Your logo here.
IRI Smoothness Testing for Quality Assurance and Warranty Construction Alberta Transportation CUPGA November 15 th, 2009 Moncton, NB.
LLP HMA Pavements Inertial Profiler Prebid Meeting Solano A0104 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Peter Vacura Chief, Office of Asphalt Pavement.
KOREA AIRPORTS CORPORATION & ROADTECH Advanced Non-contact Profiler Improving the Quality of Pavement Profile Measurement 1.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 2 Surface Characteristics.
The Company ViaTech is a Norwegian Company with a comprehensive range of tailor-made products and services aimed at road, rail and airport authorities.
History Dynatest was founded in 1976 in Denmark by a group of engineers and technicians who combined  science  technology and  business into the development.
International Roughness Index (IRI) for Construction Acceptance Technical Standards Branch Knowledge Presentations to the CEA February 13 th, 2014 Jim.
Review and Rating Discharge Measurements David S. Mueller Office of Surface Water March 2010.
Cams Cam Basics.
Aircraft Dynamic Response
Module 2-4 Roughness and Surface Friction Testing.
Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES. n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of.
I. Advantages of Smooth Pavements: Longer Life Public Opinion Save Fuel Less Surface Maintenance II. Ways to Ensure Smooth Pavements Subgrade and Subbase.
Rotor Track and Balance
Lecture 6 Loading and Hauling
V. Rouillard  Introduction to measurement and statistical analysis ASSESSING EXPERIMENTAL DATA : ERRORS Remember: no measurement is perfect – errors.
Nondestructive Testing and Data Analysis Module 2-3.
Complete High Speed Data Collection System
Portorož, Slovenia ADVANCED ANALYSIS FOR SINGULAR LONGITUDINAL PROFILES Alejandro Amírola SanzAlejandro Amírola Sanz Equipment research and development.
Moving to International Roughness Index Measured By Inertial Profilers for Acceptance of New Asphalt Construction in Ontario By John A. Blair, Bituminous.
Rich Quinley California Department of Transportation.
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Probabilistic Robotics Probabilistic Motion Models.
Footer Text 3D TEXTURE MEASUREMENT Development and Field Evaluation of a Texture Measurement System Based on Continuous Profiles from a 3D Scanning Instrument.
Emmanuel Fernando, Texas A&M Transportation Institute and and Magdy Mikhail, Texas Department of Transportation Texas Department of Transportation Road.
On Low Speed Problem in Road Smoothness Profiling Vadim Peretroukhine Michael Nieminen September 28, 2011.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS
ECE Regulation No.79 Informal Document No. GRRF (61 st GRRF, 5-9 February 2007 agenda item 5.) Proposal for Amendments Presented by the Expert from.
Comparison of Inertial Profiler Measurements with Leveling and 3D Laser Scanning Abby Chin and Michael J. Olsen Oregon State University Road Profile Users.
User perceptions of highway roughness Kevan Shafizadeh and Fred Mannering.
Chapter 20 Measurement Systems. Objectives Define and describe measurement methods for both continuous and discrete data. Use various analytical methods.
Use of Probe Vehicles to Measure Road Ride Quality
Addressing Localized Roughness at the Project Level by Gary Higgins.
4/25/2017 9:25 AM Inertial Profiler Forum Intro to the Inertial Profiler Implementation September 28, 2015 © 2015 California Department of Transportation.
Caltrans Test Method METHOD OF TEST FOR OPERATION, CALIBRATION AND OPERATOR CERTIFICATION OF INERTIAL PROFILERS References: AASHTO R 56 – Certification.
Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B
Jeffrey L. Rapol Qiang Wang Jeffrey L. Rapol, Civil Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Airport Engineering Division, AAS Independence Ave,
MnDOT Pavement Surface Smoothness Specification 23 rd Annual RPUG Meeting September 29, 2011.
1 COMPARISON OF MPD VALUES FROM HIGH- SPEED LASER MEASUREMENTS WITH MPD FROM TWO STATIONARY DEVICES Rohan Perera, PhD, PE Soil and Materials Engineers,
By Terry Treutel Ride Quality Consultant Former WisDOT Ride Spec Coordinator.
User perceptions of highway roughness
SURFACE TEXTURE MESUREMENT. Surface Metrology  Surface metrology or surface topology refers to the geometry and texture of surfaces.  The Surface Texture.
How are Highway Designs Actually Represented in Surface Models for Automated Machine Guidance and How Should We Control Them? Alan Vonderohe Construction.
Chapter 25 Wheel Alignment. Objectives Define the term “wheel alignment” Inspect tires, steering, and suspension systems before alignment Check and adjust.
NCDOT – “Final Surface Testing” CAPA / NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop February 21-22, 2012 Raleigh, NC IRI Standard Specification Article
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
ROAD PROFILING-ROUGHNESS Presentation by Niranjan Santhirasegaram
Recommended Guide for Determining and Reporting Uncertainties for Balances and Scales Val Miller NIST Office of Weights and Measures.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Rotor Track and Balance
GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT HIGHWAYS RESEARCH STATION Training program for newly recruited Assistant Engineers.
Office of Materials and Road Research
Surface Finish Measurement
ALDOT Specification Updates
Speed Sensor Calibration
UIC 518.
INSTRUMENTING THE MODEL
S. Ghosh, M. Muste, M. Marquardt, F. Stern
Probabilistic Robotics
Patented Precision 8 August 2014 US Patent 6,775,914
Measurements & Error Analysis
Survey Networks Theory, Design and Testing
Presentation transcript:

Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation

CAIT Topics Description of Ride Quality International Roughness Index (IRI) Summary Equipment used to measure wheel track profiles Issues with measuring and analyzing pavement profiles Pay Adjustment Examples NJDOT Certification Facility

CAIT Components of Pavement Roughness Surface Tolerance – deviations for a flat surface Roughness – the summary of irregularly spaced variations in surface tolerance that induce vibrations in the vehicle defined over a length of the road Repeated Waves – regularly spaced unevenness that causes vibrations in the vehicle

CAIT Roughness and Smoothness Roughness: Deviations of a surface from a true planer surface with characteristic dimensions that affect ride quality Smoothness: Lack of roughness, free of bumps and dips that cause discomfort to traveling public

Roughness or Smoothness

CAIT Wheel Track Profile Longitudinal Slices of the Pavement Surface

CAIT Wheel Track Profile

Pavement Ride Quality Index International Roughness Index IRI in in/mile ProVAL 3.0 IRI is a summary of the vertical movement of a vehicle caused by the pavement profile over a given distance.

CAIT NJ IRI Guidelines

CAIT Profile Equipment- Measure Wheel Track Profile Standard Profiler - Rod and Level and Walking Profilers Slow Speed – Light Weight Profilers High Speed – Portable and Full Size Profilers “Gold Standard”

CAIT Measuring the “True” Profile Walking Profiler Standard pavement profiling devices Rod and Level Walking Profilers Calibration/Correlation

CAIT Lightweight Profilers

CAIT Portable Profilers Dynatest Portable Roadware Portable

CAIT High Speed Profiler - ICC Profiler

CAIT Measurement Issues All Profilers are NOT created equal DMI

CAIT Height Sensor Footprint 9.5 Inches 12 Inches Sampling Intervals Footprint Shapes

CAIT Height Sensor Footprint 6 Inches

CAIT Measurement Issues All Profilers are NOT created equal Different Sampling Intervals Different Accelerometers Different Distance Measuring Instruments Different Start Sensors Different Data Processing – “Black Box” How can we get equivalent Ride Quality values?

CAIT Filters Pavement profiles are made up of an infinite number of profiles of different wave lengths Filters help to remove the information that does not affect Ride Quality

CAIT Filters Types: Smoothing (low pass) Removes the short wave lengths – Rumble strips Anti-smoothing (high pass) Removes the long wave length – Rolling hills Filter Sets can be specified and developed that get rid of wave lengths at both ends to leave the wave lengths that influence the roughness that we feel when riding on the pavement

CAIT Filter Issues Some profilers process the collected profiles through their “black box” filters on board the vehicle. The filtering algorithms are proprietary. Other profilers allow output of unfiltered profile data for processing by third party software (RoadRuf or ProVal). There are numerous types of filters available to process the profiles. The calculation of the smoothness statistic (IRI) is dependent on the filter set(s) used.

CAIT Filters - Smoothing (low pass)

CAIT NJDOT Certification Facility Check Calibrations of Profiler Sub-Systems Correlate NJDOT and Contractor Profilers against NJDOT Standard Profiler on three levels of roughness Check the Operators ability to check equipment calibrations and operate the Profiler Certify the Operator and Profiler for Ride Quality Measurement and Analyses on NJDOT paving projects

CAIT NJDOT Certification Facility AASHTO MP 11Standard Equipment Specification for Inertial Profilers AASHTO PP 49Standard Practice for Certification of Inertial Profilers AASHTO PP 50Standard Practice for Operating Inertial Profilers and Evaluating Pavement Profiles AASHTO PP 51Standard Practice for a Pavement Ride Quality Specification when Measured Using Inertial Profiling Systems

CAIT NJDOT Certification Facility Pre-operational checks on profiler Operating speed Lead-in distance Lateral Positioning Longitudinal Positioning/Triggering Checks during data collection Post-operational checks Verification Sites

CAIT Pre-operational Checks Tire pressure Visual check of sensors Static sensor check Bounce test

CAIT Lead-in Distance Profiler needs a lead-in distance to bring it up to speed and to initialize filters used for profile computation Inadequate lead-in will cause errors in profile at start of section Lead In Distance Start of Section

CAIT Advantages of Automated Triggering Data collection can be initiated at exact start of the section Roughness features can be identified at correct location in the field based on profile data (using DMI and GPS) Repeatability of profile data and roughness indices can be evaluated

CAIT Inertial Profiler Certification Specification Procedure to evaluate repeatability of profile data and comparison of inertial profiler profile with reference profile Procedure to evaluate repeatability of ride statistics computed from profile data and comparison of ride statistics obtained from reference profile

CAIT Correlation of Data Measurement (from profiler) Measurement (from Standard Device) IRI Adjustment IRI STD = A * IRI P +B

CAIT Ensuring Smoothness With a Little Work And Patience We Can Get Through the Wrinkles Questions?