Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Bill Eggertson Executive General Manager Canadian Wood Pallet & Container Association Association canadienne des manufacturiers de palettes et contenants
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment
Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint Good Choice Environment
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint Good Choice Environment Relevant stakeholders to understand and accept our view
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint Good Choice Environment Relevant stakeholders to understand and accept our view Matrices
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint Good Choice Environment Relevant stakeholders to understand and accept our view Matrices Good current activities
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint Good Choice Environment Relevant stakeholders to understand and accept our view Matrices Good current activities Potential other activities
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint Good Choice Environment Relevant stakeholders to understand and accept our view Matrices Good current activities Potential other activities Emotion
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint Good Choice Environment Relevant stakeholders to understand and accept our view Matrices Good current activities Potential other activities Emotion Not a “good choice for the environment”
Wood Packaging: a good choice for the environment Meet demand for sustainability, low carbon, soft footprint Good Choice Environment Relevant stakeholders to understand and accept our view Matrices Good current activities Potential other activities Emotion Not a “good choice for the environment” the ONLY choice for the environment
ISPM#15: CA-US bilateral exemption
Exempt since 2006; to terminate in 2013
ISPM#15: CA-US bilateral exemption Exempt since 2006; to terminate in 2013 Concerns / Suggestions:
ISPM#15: CA-US bilateral exemption Exempt since 2006; to terminate in 2013 Concerns / Suggestions: border passport / non-certified / informed compliance WMP & Dun consistent / HT supply / documentation plastic competitive / $ support
ISPM#15: CA-US bilateral exemption Exempt since 2006; to terminate in 2013 Concerns / Suggestions: border passport / non-certified / informed compliance WMP & Dun consistent / HT supply / documentation plastic competitive / $ support USDA perspective
ISPM#15: CA-US bilateral exemption Exempt since 2006; to terminate in 2013 Concerns / Suggestions: border passport / non-certified / informed compliance WMP & Dun consistent / HT supply / documentation plastic competitive / $ support USDA perspective Implications for HT of all forest products
ISPM#15: CA-US bilateral exemption Exempt since 2006; to terminate in 2013 Concerns / Suggestions: border passport / non-certified / informed compliance WMP & Dun consistent / HT supply / documentation plastic competitive / $ support USDA perspective Implications for HT of all forest products NB: US does ship north / 0.27% = $330m = who pays?
ISPM#15: CA-US bilateral exemption Exempt since 2006; to terminate in 2013 Concerns / Suggestions: border passport / non-certified / informed compliance WMP & Dun consistent / HT supply / documentation plastic competitive / $ support USDA perspective Implications for HT of all forest products NB: US does ship north / 0.27% = $330m = who pays? 31 Jan deadline for USDA-APHIS