Trends in Stormwater Permitting Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Advertisements

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Adopting a Local Program in Accordance with the Revised Stormwater Regulations Appomattox County February.
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
BEFORE AFTER. New Effluent Limitation Guidelines On November 28th, 2008, the EPA issued a proposed regulation which strengthened the existing National.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Stormwater Management for Highway Projects Regulatory Environment And Tools.
June 1, 2001 Public Workshop Orange County MS4 Permit, Urban Storm Water Runoff Management Program Order No (NPDES No. CAS ) Mark Smythe Chief,
June 19, 2014 CONTROL OF TRASH ENTERING WATERWAYS IN CALIFORNIA DRAFT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POLICY.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
SLIDE 1 Sustainable Stormwater Management May 6, 2015 Blue Highways: Transportation and Stormwater Management in Virginia Ginny Snead, PE Richmond Office.
12/2/2011WORKSHOPS & WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 ARRA 604B WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING GRANT Guam Environmental Protection Agency.
Draft Phase II Small MS4 General Permit Water Quality Monitoring & Assessment Jonathan Bishop Chief Deputy Director Director State Water Resources Control.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Design for Water Quality CE 365K Hydraulic Engineering Design Spring 2015 David R. Maidment.
6 th Edition CCCWP Management Committee February 15, 2012.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Chanhassen’s 2006 Surface Water Management Plan Carver County WENR Meeting March 27, 2007 Lori Haak Water Resources Coordinator
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Introduction to PA Act 167 Stormwater Management Planning Little Juniata River Watershed April 21, 2005.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Stormwater Management Initiative Update. ODOT’s Goal Develop a streamlined stormwater runoff treatment program to: Develop a streamlined stormwater runoff.
City of Puyallup Planning Commission Presentation February 8, 2012.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Interim Headwater Drainage Feature Guideline: Protecting HDFs through Urbanization Laura C.R. Del Giudice, B.Sc., M.F.C., Senior Planning Ecologist.
Construction Site Best Management Practices and the Project Design Process.
1 Stormwater Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and Act 167 Doug Brennan PA DEP September, 2002.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Coastal Stormwater Supplement Training.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Introduction to Storm Water Phase II Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Presented by Gary Lippner & Glenn Moeller 3 - Year Storm Water Monitoring Action Plan.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Storm Water: Federal Enforcement and Compliance for Phase II MS4.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Workshop on the draft General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water from Small MS4s Fresno August 6, 2002 Redding August 8, 2002 San Luis Obispo August.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow-Control Requirements in Phase I and Phase II Municipal NPDES Permits Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Regulatory Developments Affecting Southwest Washington Land Use in Southwestern Washington Law Seminars International Vancouver, WA February 11, 2008 Bill.
Stormwater and C.3 Overview Tom Dalziel, Assistant Manager Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Countywide Model SUSMP July 17, Topics SUSMP Timeline Goals Approach to Compliance NPDES Permit Requirements NPDES Permit Requirements Model SUSMP.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
Stakeholders Meeting November 15,  Review the development and identification of State’s preferred alternative  Provide updates on SCH Project.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Agenda  Review project scope and goals  Update project status  Review results of public surveys  Identification of capital projects  Draft capital.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
1 State Parks  Soil and Water Conservation  Natural Heritage Outdoor Recreation Planning  Land Conservation Dam Safety and Floodplain Management Chesapeake.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Illinois Green Infrastructure Grant Program (IGIG) ABC’s and 123’s of Illinois EPA’s newest grant program Jan Carpenter Illinois EPA
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
Noelle Patterson and Charlow Arzadon State Water Resources Control Board.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
CLEAN WATER ACT AND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CALIFORNIA STORMWATER WORKSHOP David W. Smith, Manager NPDES Permits Section EPA/Region 9.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
Draft Strategy To Optimize Resource Management of Storm Water
PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Stormwater Control Transfer Program Overview January 31, 2018
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

Trends in Stormwater Permitting Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters Road Ecology Meeting February 26, 2009

Overview  Caltrans NPDES Permitting History  Status of New Permit  Upcoming Trends in Permitting  Stormwater Quality Issues/Concerns  Our Anticipated Tasks

Brief History on Caltrans NPDES Permit  Originally 9 NPDES Permits  Consolidating Caltrans permitting with the State Board to insure statewide consistency.  Statewide Permit issued in 1999

Awaiting new NPDES Permit  Statewide NPDES permit term ended in 2004, administratively extended  Continue to operate under current permit  New Draft Permit expected ???  Public Comment Period ???  Workshops ???  Adoption??

Anticipated new NPDES Permit  Extensive Location-specific Requirements  Hydromodification (pre-post hydrologic balance)  Proposed New Construction Permit Requirements  TMDLs and 303d listings of Impaired waterbodies

303(d) Listed  1,780 pollutant/ waterbody combinations listed  Stakeholder in more than 40 TMDLs  Potential for up to 200+ TMDLs

Water Quality Issues / Activities  Floodplain encroachment – NPDES, Biology  Critical Habitat (ESA) - Biology  Water supply/Groundwater- Hydraulics  Discharges to land (WDRs) – NPDES, Construction, Maintenance  Stormwater - NPDES/Design/Construction/Maintenance  Hydromodification – NPDES, Design, Hydraulics  Dewatering (groundwater vs. stormwater) – NPDES, Hydraulics, Construction, Maintenance

401 and NPDES Permit 40  Section 401 water quality certification should be consistent with beneficial uses identified in the Basin Plan  Section 401 certification should contain reference to the beneficial uses to be protected, and link the conditions to restoring, or maintaining past, present, and/or probable beneficial uses.  Address early in the project to avoid delays  Part of NPDES permit water quality requirements – permit requires compliance with water quality standards

Current Compliance Tasks  Water Quality issues have created challenges for project delivery  Analysis at late stages of project delivery creates difficulties in modification of projects  HQ has been working with the State Water Board, Districts working with 9 Regional Boards on a project by project basis.  Major changes are on the horizon. Changes driven by Regional Board initiatives

Anticipated Compliance Requirements  Planning/Environmental review  Increased focus on watershed impacts and mitigation  New numeric limitations on pollutants and runoff volume  Increased right-of-way for treatment, flow controls: ponds, grass swales, and infiltration of runoff  More collaboration with locals  TMDLs for “impaired” waterways will require retrofit treatment controls  Design  Limit runoff – no increase in volume, duration  Low impact development (LID) – change from end-of-pipe treatment to “holistic” controls  Technology to meet specific numeric limits on pollutants  Controls during construction – can’t leave it to contractor

Anticipated Compliance Requirements  Construction  Approval process for sediment controls in addition to established BMP’s – possible delay  Controls during construction – can’t leave it to contractor  Treatment costs to control runoff turbidity for some sites with fine soils: chemical addition and filters  More public oversight – all site documents posted  Maintenance  Increased costs to manage all treatment controls  More institutional controls

Current – Anticipated Compliance Requirements  DEA (Division of Environmental Analysis)  More program effort – extensive tracking, reporting  Management  Government focus on costs – are all TMDLs doable?  Need support from other agencies – e.g., legislation to reduce copper from brake pads

Recent Modifications in Analysis  Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) – Statewide Interpretation  “NPDES permits issued for MS4 stormwater discharges require controls to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP)…  Water quality requirements in our statewide permit: stormwater discharges may not cause or contribute to exceedance of water quality standards.”  Design Staff: Modifications to Project Planning Design Guide (PPDG) December 2008  Interim Scoping Questionnaire for Water Quality Issues m  Projects that require a 401 certification should evaluate the feasibility of post construction BMPs, to insure that water quality standards are met.

New SER Language Proposal  WQ section will include a discussion of watersheds and receiving waters that are potentially affected by the project  A checklist to assess water quality impacts will be used until final guidelines for water quality assessment are adopted

Questions? Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters (916)