Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 1/15WW Winter School 2013 Quasi-stationary WAVEWATCH III André van der Westhuysen The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Is the shape below a function? Explain. Find the domain and range.

Advertisements

5 th NOAA Testbeds and Proving Grounds Workshop, April 16-18, 2014 André van der Westhuysen, Joannes Westerink, Juan Gonzalez, Jane Smith, Jamie Rhome,

A Prediction-Correction Approach for Stable SPH Fluid Simulation from Liquid to Rigid François Dagenais Jonathan Gagnon Eric Paquette.

Version 1.5, Feb. 2013Compile 1/27WW Winter School 2013 Compilation of WAVEWATCH III code André van der Westhuysen The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends Marine.

Level set based Image Segmentation Hang Xiao Jan12, 2013.

Running the model, single grid version

Version 1.2, Feb Regression testing 1/15WW Winter School 2013 Regression testing W. Erick Rogers Oceanography Division Naval Research Laboratory.

National Weather Service Portland Near Shore Wave Forecasting William R. Schneider Science and Operations Officer Ron Beitel Information Technology Officer.

Version 1.1, Jan. 2013Obstructions 1/26WW Winter School 2013 Developing Obstruction grids Arun Chawla The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends Marine Modeling.

Tolman and friends, Feb. 6, 2008Coastal Altimetry 1/23 Altimeter wave data Deep ocean and coastal use and issues Hendrik L. Tolman NOAA / NWS / NCEP /

1.Real-time rainfall observations: Addition of USGS and NC State Climate Office precipitation stations so EMs can get real- time observations of how much.

Günther Zängl, DWD1 Improvements for idealized simulations with the COSMO model Günther Zängl Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany.

GFDL’s unified regional-global weather and climate modeling system is designed for all temporal-spatial scales Examples: Regional cloud-resolving Radiative-Convective.

Version 1.2, Feb Action Balance 1/35WW Winter School 2013 Overview of action balance and source terms Jose-Henrique Alves / Hendrik Tolman The WAVEWATCH.

Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.

An Optimal Nearly-Analytic Discrete Method for 2D Acoustic and Elastic Wave Equations Dinghui Yang Depart. of Math., Tsinghua University Joint with Dr.

Some Innovative Applications and Approaches Using Nudging Four Dimensional Data Assimilation: Lili Lei and David R. Stauffer Dept. of Meteorology, Penn.

Structure and Phase Transition Phenomena in the VTC Problem C. P. Gomes, H. Kautz, B. Selman R. Bejar, and I. Vetsikas IISI Cornell University University.

1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.

Review of the NCEP production Suite: Recent Changes and Plans

Model Simulation Studies of Hurricane Isabel in Chesapeake Bay Jian Shen Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences College of William and Mary.

Version 1.3, Feb. 2013Parallel implementation 1/28WW Winter School 2013 Parallel implementation Hendrik Tolman The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends Marine.

Basic Concepts of Numerical Weather Prediction 6 September 2012.

MAT 1236 Calculus III Section 14.5 The Chain Rule

MAT 1236 Calculus III Section 14.5 The Chain Rule

UMAC data callpage 1 of 28Operational wave modeling suite EMC Operational Models NCEP WAVE MODELING SUITES Arun Chawla and Jose-Henrique Alves NCEP Wave.

Version 1.2, Jan. 2013Grid generation 1/32WW Winter School 2013 Automated Grid Generation for WAVEWATCH III Arun Chawla The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends.

Version 1.3, Feb. 2013Time stepping 1/20WW Winter School 2013 Time stepping Hendrik Tolman The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends Marine Modeling and Analysis.

Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Robert DeMaria 2, Andrea.

RDFS Rapid Deployment Forecast System Visit at: Registration required.

Using Partnerships to Meet NOAA’s Needs for its Next Generation Storm Surge System NOS/OCS/CSDL J. Feyen F. Aikman M. Erickson NWS/NCEP/EMC H. Tolman NWS/OST/MDL.

Oceanic and Atmospheric Modeling of the Big Bend Region Steven L. Morey, Dmitry S. Dukhovksoy, Donald Van Dyke, and Eric P. Chassignet Center for Ocean.

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Modular structure 1/22WW Winter School 2013 Modular structure of WAVEWATCH III and general features Arun Chawla The WAVEWATCH III.

Space and Time Multiscale Analysis System A sequential variational approach Yuanfu Xie, Steven Koch Steve Albers and Huiling Yuan Global Systems Division.

Version 1.4, Jan. 2013Triangles 1/27WW Winter School 2013 Running WWATCH on triangular meshes Fabrice Ardhuin The friends of WAVEWATCH III Team Marine.

Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA

2012 NARCCAP Meeting, NCAR, Boulder Ana Nunes 1 and John Roads 2* 1 IGEO, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2 ECPC,SIO, UCSD, California, USA (*) Deceased (*)

Efficient Integration of Large Stiff Systems of ODEs Using Exponential Integrators M. Tokman, M. Tokman, University of California, Merced 2 hrs 1.5 hrs.

SURA Super-Regional Testbed on Coastal Inundation – Extra-tropical Storm Harry V. Wang, Yi-cheng Teng, Yanqiu Meng and Derek Loftis Virginia Institute.

Chawla et al., Dec NCEP production suite review, 1/18 Review of the NCEP production Suite: Recent Changes and Plans Marine Modeling and Analysis.

USF FVCOM Tropical Cyclone Inundation Testbed Progress by Robert H. Weisberg, Lianyuan Zheng and Yong Huang College of Marine Science University of South.

Model Task 0A: Programming the 1D upstream scheme ATM 562 Fall 2015 Fovell 1.

Space-Time Mesoscale Analysis System A sequential 3DVAR approach Yuanfu Xie, Steve Koch John McGinley and Steve Albers Global Systems Division Earth System.

Tolman, Sept. 16, 2009MMAB Branch Meeting, 1/19 MMAB plans for FY2010 Hendrik L. Tolman Chief, Marine Modeling and Analysis Branch NOAA / NWS / NCEP /

UMAC data callpage 1 of 16Nearshore Wave Prediction System (NWPS) EMC Operational Models Nearshore Wave Prediction System (NWPS) André van der Westhuysen.

Richard Rotunno NCAR *Based on:

STMAS runs FAA: surface analysis, CONUS runs: MIT and backup; 5-minute ASOS runs: w-asos/n-asos (OSE); CWB: CWB surface reanalysis; CWB real time full.

Tolman et al, Feb. 19, 2010NFRA telecon, 1/28 Review of the NCEP production Suite: Recent Changes and Plans The short version Hendrik L. Tolman Chief,

Version 1.3, Feb. 2013Welcome 1/4WW Winter School 2013 Welcome and Introduction Hendrik L. Tolman The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends Marine Modeling and.

A baroclinic instability test case for dynamical cores of GCMs Christiane Jablonowski (University of Michigan / GFDL) David L. Williamson (NCAR) AMWG Meeting,

1 Future NCEP Guidance Support for Surface Transportation Stephen Lord Director, NCEP Environmental Modeling Center 26 July 2007.

Implementation and Testing of 3DEnVAR and 4DEnVAR Algorithms within the ARPS Data Assimilation Framework Chengsi Liu, Ming Xue, and Rong Kong Center for.

Extreme Waves at the Great Lakes: Performance of NCEP’s Operational Wave Models Jose-Henrique Alves Research Scientist 1.

NOAA Global Modeling Workshop January 2006NOAA/ESRL FIM Contribution toward future NOAA global modeling system Developed at ESRL, collaboration so.

Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The use of an intensity-scale technique for assessing operational mesoscale precipitation forecasts Marion Mittermaier and.

August 6, 2001Presented to MIT/LL The LAPS “hot start” Initializing mesoscale forecast models with active cloud and precipitation processes Paul Schultz.

Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,

Exploratory Spatial Optimization in Site Search: A Neighborhood Operator Approach Thomas J. Cova Department of Geography University of Utah and Richard.

The Developmental Testbed Center: Historical Perspective and Benefits to NOAA Steve Koch DTC Deputy Director Director, NOAA/ESRL/Global Systems Division.

Milton Garces, Claus Hetzer, and Mark Willis University of Hawaii, Manoa Source modeling of microbarom signals generated by nonlinear ocean surface wave.

The effect of tides on the hydrophysical fields in the NEMO-shelf Arctic Ocean model. Maria Luneva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool 2011 AOMIP meeting.

Marine Modeling and Analysis Branch Ocean Waves.

Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.

Sensitivity of Orbit Predictions to Density Variability

Development of nonhydrostatic models at the JMA

Grid Point Models Surface Data.

Velocity Estimation from noisy Measurements

Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences College of William and Mary

Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde, Germany

Rebecca Cosgrove NCEP/NCO/Production Management Branch April 11, 2011

Presentation transcript:

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 1/15WW Winter School 2013 Quasi-stationary WAVEWATCH III André van der Westhuysen The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends Marine Modeling and Analysis Branch NOAA / NWS / NCEP / EMC

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 2/15WW Winter School 2013 Outline  Covered in this lecture: Action balance equation and solution methods Quasi-stationary operation of WWIII Alternative QS approaches Field case: Hurricane Gustav

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 3/15WW Winter School 2013 Action balance equation Required physics for nearshore application already present Eulerian approach on rectangular, curvilinear or unstructured grids Explicit vs. Implicit implementations CFL constraints and nearshore application

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 4/15WW Winter School 2013 Current WWIII model grid mosaic Max. coastal resolution = 4 arc min (7.5 km) Desired nearshore application Nearshore resolution: < 100 m Resolving coastal scales

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 5/15WW Winter School 2013 Performance comparison: Explicit vs. Implicit WFO MFL Alpha testing site 1 arc-min grid 96 h forecast, dt – 600 s

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 6/15WW Winter School 2013 Quasi-stationary operation of WWIII Residence time Global input/output interval Quasi-stationary conditions where: Time stepping can be accelerated: where, with  a constant = 1.2

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 7/15WW Winter School 2013 Test case: Idealized wave propagation f p = 0.33 Hz, Std dev. = 0.01 Hz Dir = 270 o N, monochromatic, long-crested

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 8/15WW Winter School 2013 Approach 1: Discontinuous time stepping, discontinuous stationary BC

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 9/15WW Winter School 2013 Approach 2: Discontinuous time stepping, discontinuous nonstationary, phase-shifted BC

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 10/15WW Winter School 2013 Data: Chen et al. (2010) Field case: Hurricane Gustav (Aug-Sept 2008)

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 11/15WW Winter School 2013 Results: H Gustav (Nonstationary WWIII) Grid 1Grid 2Grid 3 Grid 4Grid 5 Grid 5:  t n = 5 s Run time = 67 min (512 cores on IBM Power6 Cluster)

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 12/15WW Winter School 2013 Results: Hurricane Gustav, QS WWIII

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 13/15WW Winter School 2013 Results: Hurricane Gustav, QS WWIII Wave-field dependent t s Constant t s = 1800 s

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 14/15WW Winter School 2013 Conclusions If the residence time t s in nearshore domains is shorter than the input/output interval, quasi-stationary conditions develop, and a saving in computational time of the explicit model is possible. Quasi-stationary approach is proposed with (i) discontinuous time stepping, and (ii) nonstationary, discontinuous, phase-shifted BCs. With variable t s computed from wave field: Local computational time savings of up to 50% ( depending on domain and wave condition), with errors below 1% and no spurious phase lag. With constant t s : Greater constant savings in computational time (50% total), but with greater error (H m0 < 5%; T m01 < 2%). Run time is about 20 times longer than an equivalent nonstationary SWAN run (with  t = 10 min, no. iter = 3), but CFL condition is adhered to, and error can be controlled. Future: QS implementation for WWIII Multigrid.

Version 1.2, Feb. 2013Quasi-stationary WW3 15/15WW Winter School 2013 The end End of lecture