Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part 1) Rachel Melton and Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tara Capobianco Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2012.
Advertisements

Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2014.
Air Toxics Monitoring Results in the Houston-Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Modeling the New 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Alan Dresser Research Scientist I October 14, 2011.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
EUROPEAN UNION INITIATIVES AND REQUIREMENTS : AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY MECHANISM Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part 1) Rachel Melton and Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.
Adam N. Pasch 1, Ashley R. Russell 1, Leo Tidd 2, Douglas S. Eisinger 1, Daniel M. Alrick 1, Hilary R. Hafner 1, and Song Bai 1 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc.,
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Colorado May 2013.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Air Dispersion Modeling City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department Air Quality Program Director: Mary Lou Leonard.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Icfi.com April 30, 2009 icfi.com © 2006 ICF International. All rights reserved. AIR TOXICS IN MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA: A MONITORING AND MODELING STUDY WEBINAR:
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Alabama May 2013.
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
PARTICULATE MATTER: REGULATORY RESPONSE Presented by: Karl Loos.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
NACAA Permitting Workshop, Chicago June 14, 2011
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part 1) Rachel Melton and Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2014

Agenda Representative Background Monitor: – Selecting/Justifying a Representative Monitor – Calculating the Design Value 1-hr NO 2 NAAQS: – Treatment of Intermittent Emissions – Tier 3 Options for NO x -to-NO 2 Conversion

Purpose of a Representative Monitor The purpose of a representative monitor is to estimate existing ambient air quality at the project site and in areas which may be affected by emissions from the project.

What Is a Representative Monitor? A monitor that can capture nearby sources not explicitly modeled in an air dispersion modeling analysis – Nearby sources may include: mobile sources & non-stationary sources natural sources & unidentified sources

Selecting a Representative Monitor Factors to consider: – proximity of the monitor to the project site; – similarity of topography, meteorology, and land-use for the project and monitor site; – stationary source types and amount of emissions around the monitor compared to the project site; – emissions from mobile or other non-stationary source activities; and – meets completeness criteria

Resources for Selecting a Representative Monitor EPA AirData EPA Design Values Texas Air Monitoring Information System (TAMIS) Yearly Summary Reports

Justifying a Representative Monitor The applicant must justify why the monitoring data selected are representative of the existing air quality in the area of the project site – Qualitative assessment – Quantitative assessment

Qualitative Assessment: Monitor site relative to project site Proximity, topography, and land-use: – aerial photography Meteorology: – prevailing winds / influential sources

Quantitative Assessment: Monitor site relative to project site Population Harris County Jefferson County County wide comparison: – population – emissions: » similar source categories » mobile & other non-stationary source Houston Deer Park #2 monitor, highlighted RNs within 10kms Nearby emissions (10 km) comparison: Nearby emissions (10 km) comparison: – quantify emissions for RNs near the project site and monitor site

Example Project site Site located near Port Arthur in Jefferson County adjacent to various industrial sites; 786 TPY of reported PM 2.5 emissions near the site.

Example PM 2.5 monitor for use as a background The background monitor located in Harris County near Galveston Bay in a residential area with only a few industrial sites nearby; 282 TPY of reported PM 2.5 emissions near the monitor.

Example PM 2.5 monitor for use in justifying the SIL The monitor for SIL justification located in Harris County near industrial sites; 2765 TPY of PM 2.5 near the monitor.

Determine the Monitored Design Value EPA Completeness Criteria The representative background concentration should be in the form of the standard: Exceedance-based: – Example 1-hr CO:  H2H from most recent year Statistically-based: – Example 1-hr NO 2 :  3-year average of the 98 th percentile of the annual distribution of maximum daily 1-hr concentrations

Contact Information Rachel Melton – Air Dispersion Modeling Team – (512) – Matthew Kovar – Air Dispersion Modeling Team – (512) – Air Permits Division (512) Rachel Melton Air Permits Division (512) Matthew Kovar