NATIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PROGRAM: FROM PAPER TO THE INTERNET TO 3D Frank LaFone, West Virginia University Maneesh Sharma, West Virginia University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joe Chaisson April 21, Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants and Geologic Carbon Sequestration Joe Chaisson.
Advertisements

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
Coal to Liquids Plant Site Selection in WV Douglas G. Patchen October 25, 2007.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
Carbon Sequestration Red Balansay ESS 315. What Is It? Also known as “carbon capture” A geoengineering technique for the long-term storage of carbon dioxide.
C. Sequestration zones & relative costs. Lake Nyos, Cameroon CO 2 “burp” formed 400 yr ago in volcanic field formed 400 yr ago in volcanic field CO 2.
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
U.S. Primary Energy Flow by Source and Sector, 2009 (Quadrillion Btu) Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2009, Tables.
NATURAL GAS. What is it? Waste product produced by bacteria and enzymes that break down organic matter Mostly methane (CH 4 ) with a small amount of other.
Meeting the Goal: Progress Report Washington, DC June 30, x’25 National Summit 2010: Mission Achievable.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Resource and Energy.
Carbon Sequestration Anjani Kumar CPSP218L Dudash
Two environmental Problems Caused by Burning Fossil Fuels
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
NATURAL GAS. What is it? Waste product produced by bacteria and enzymes that break down organic matter Mostly methane (CH 4 ) with a small amount of other.
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
The importance of fossil fuels and the challenges facing their use
Do you know? Of the 7.2 billion people on this planet, Source:
Opportunities and Challenges for New Zealand's Energy Future Rosalind Archer Energy Research Theme Leader Faculty of Engineering University of Auckland.
A black rock What is in coal?  Comes from the remains of plants that have been compressed over millions of years in the Earth.  It is about 75% carbon.
An Introduction to the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in Ukraine Keith Whiriskey.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
Carbon capture and geological sequestration:. Some numbers 40 % carbon emissions from power plants 90 % emission reduction proven operationally Eg. Geological.
Emerging sustainable energy technologies. Ferrybridge Power Station (Eric De Mare)
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) in China.
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
NamPower’s perspectives on CCS
Carbon Capture & Storage(CCS)
© OECD/IEA 2010 Cecilia Tam International Energy Agency Martin Taylor Nuclear Energy Agency The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Energy Future Paris,
Geology of Fossil Fuels. Natural Resources Global uneven distribution of natural resources Global uneven distribution of natural resources Global uneven.
Natural Gas PRESENTED BY SARAH SHAQUOYA & NICK. Questions to Consider  Where are the nonrenewable sources of energy located?  How easy is it to gain.
The Science and Economics of Energy: Learning about Solar Energy.
APEC Demand and Supply Outlook 5 th Edition A Preliminary APERC View 5 March, 2012 APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur Ralph D. Samuelson Vice President Asia.
NONRENEWABLE RESOURCE DEPLETION. HOW ARE NONRENEWABLE RESOURCES OBTAINED?
Autumn Million Jen DePaoli
Fossil Fuels Chapter 11. Energy Consumption Per capita energy consumption.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
Chapter 18 Fossil Fuels and the Environment. Fossil Fuels Forms of stored solar energy created from incomplete biological decomposition of dead organic.
Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants: Economic and Environmental Impacts 15 June 2011 Professor Paul Fischbeck Carnegie Mellon University
GEOLOGICAL STORAGE OF CARBON DIOXIDE A.K. Bhandari Advisor TPPC, Ministry of Mines International Workshop on Power Generation with Carbon Capture and storage.
Opportunities and Challenges Joseph Naser Electric Power Research Institute IAEA Technical Working Group on Nuclear Power Plant Control and Instrumentation.
Carbon Capture and Storage - can it make coal clean? Dr. Shannon Page Department of Environmental Management Lincoln University.
Game Changers. Technology Game Changer Barriers Many technologies are capable of significant deployment as “Game Changers” (energy efficiency, CH&P, renewables,
Technology Response to the Science and Policy of Climate Change Carey R. Butler, PE, PMP Executive Director, Energy Programs KeyLogic Systems, Inc. With.
API Climate Challenge Program Bob Greco, API Natural Gas STAR Workshop June 19, 2003.
Overview of alternative energy sources Some definitions: 1)electric capacity vs. electric generation 2)“proven reserves” vs. “resources” 3)capacity factor.
Warm-Up Read the background information below and write one or two sentences to explain why we mine for coal. The past: The past: ► coal burned in small.
15 November 2011 Response to NCCRWP EKC 1 Response to the NATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE WHITE PAPER 2011 Presented to The Portfolio Committee on Water.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
The role of gas in developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
Climate Change: Past Legacies, Current Choices Lisa Dilling NCAR/ESIG.
Deploying Carbon Reduction Technologies In Time Daniel A. Lashof February 2007.
Smart Grid Schneider Electric Javier Orellana
M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
The Impact of CO 2 Emission Constraints on U.S. Electric Sector Water Use Colin Cameron 1, William Yelverton 2, Rebecca Dodder 2, Jason West 1 1 University.
Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.
Fossil fuels: Energy from fossilised organic materials.
Carbon Dioxide Fluxes in a Forest Soil in the Citronelle Oil Field of South Alabama Latasha Lyte and E.Z. Nyakatawa Department of Natural Resources and.
Reaching New Heights Tools and Data for air quality planning in the Intermountain West Intermountain West Data Warehouse Presenter: Agency: Contact Information:
Chapter 11 Fossil Fuels.
Overview of alternative energy sources
Chapter 11 Fossil Fuels.
Carbonscapes A National Look at Soil Carbon Landscapes
The role of gas in developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
CO2 Capture and Storage Potential for Reducing CO2 Emissions
Bioenergy System Synergies: The Case of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies Gal Hochman, Robert Kopp, Ken Miller, Saketh Aleti, Vijay Appasamy, William.
How to reduce atmospheric CO2?
The Human Impact on Earth’s Environment
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PROGRAM: FROM PAPER TO THE INTERNET TO 3D Frank LaFone, West Virginia University Maneesh Sharma, West Virginia University Tim Carr, West Virginia University

WHAT IS GEOLOGIC CCS? Geologic storage is defined as the placement of CO2 into a subsurface formation such that it will remain permanently stored. Formations of concern 1.Oil/Gas 2.Coal 3.Saline

WHY STUDY GEOLOGIC CCS? New power plants are being built worldwide all the time Power demand is increasing, not decreasing Power plants are major sources of CO2 pollution, particularly from coal sources Estimates suggest 40% of CO2 emissions in the US comes from power plants Geologic CCS provides an alternative to: Planting 62 million trees and waiting 10 years Shutting off power for over 300,000 homes It’s easier to monitor a few hundred stationary source points instead of millions of ever mobile consumption points

NAT IONAL CARB ON SEQUESTRATION PROGRAM “NATCARB organizes and enhances the critical information about CO 2 stationary sources and develops the technology needed to access, query and model, analyze, display, and distribute CO 2 storage resource data. Data are generated, maintained, and enhanced locally at each RCSP, or at specialized data warehouses and public”

METHODOLOGY Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships (RCSPs) were charged with providing a high-level, quantitative estimate of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) storage resource available in subsurface environments of their regions as well as estimating CO 2 emitting stationary sources

METHODOLOGY Estimates were done of 5 major geologic formations Oil & Gas reserves Unmineable coal areas Saline Shale Basalt Volumetric estimations for subsurface volumes based upon geologic properties and storage efficiency Generated using Monte Carlo simulations Designed to create a high level, regional/national scale estimation End up with 10K grid scales

WHERE CAN CO2 BE STORED GEOLOGICALLY IN NORTH AMERICA?

STORAGE BY FORMATION

SOURCES Agricultural Processing Cement Plant Ethanol Plant Fertilizer Industrial Mining Petroleum & Natural Gas Refineries/Chemical Electricity Generation Unclassified

VISUALIZATION GOALS 1.Provide a high level look at geologic carbon sequestration 2.Provide a method to explore carbon sequestration potential 3.Provide a method to explore stationary source CO2 emissions 4.Provide a method for the general public to explore this data 5.Provide a method for interested, non-experts to explore this data 6.Provide a scientific tool for experts

FIRST CHALLENGE - MIXED USER EXPERTISE

SECOND CHALLENGED – MIXED SCALES

THIRD CHALLENGE – MIXED PLATFORMS

ATLAS IV APPROACH - PAPER ATLAS

ATLAS IV APPROACH - ONLINE INTERACTIVE MAP

ATLAS IV APPROACH – DATA DOWNLOAD

DISCOVERIES AND ISSUES Paper Atlas serves the paper format well Interactive Map attempt to serve both the novice and the expert Neither served to the best of their ability “Experts” are not experts in everything – same with novices Experts knew the data and the science, struggled with the interfaces Novices addressed the interface easily, yet didn’t have the scientific background Cross platform development is hard Feature creep – expert tools started to show up in novice areas

APPROACHES FOR ATLAS V Understand different audiences require different approaches

NEW INTERACTIVE ATLAS

NEW SCIENTIFIC TOOLS FOR EXPERT NEEDS

QUESTIONS? COMMENTS?