1 23-10-2013 The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Brian Elliott Senior Project Officer for Environmental Protection European Policy Update. ESA Workshop 25th January 2010.
Advertisements

Katrien Delbeke, ECI, Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe On behalf of the Eurometaux Water Project Team Accounting for bioavailability.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management Current situation and challenges Oslo, September 25 th 2012 Erik Ranheim Senior Manager Research.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Sustainable Energy Systems Int’l H 2 Safety Conf, Pisa, Italy, 8-10 Sep IPHE projects focus on pre-competitive collaborative research, development.
EGGG 167 CEE Lecture 2 Environmental Engineering and Risk Analysis.
Ecological Risk Asssessment Part I – The Basics. Introduction Subject normally taught at end of course, after exposure to background material Subject.
Polar Rules and AMSA : A Glimpse into the Future of Arctic Shipping V.M. Santos-Pedro, P.Eng. Transport Canada Marine Safety.
Green Ship Technology Conference Rotterdam March th 2008 Water Ballast Tank regulations IMO BWMS Convention IMO PSPC SOLAS regulations Some challenges.
Leading the way; making a difference North American Panel March 17, 2014 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
1 IPCC IAC Review meeting R.K. Pachauri Chairman, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Amsterdam, May 14, 2010 WMO UNEP.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Thanks to Fiji Government Risk Assessment for BWMS Jan Linders, RIVM-SEC, Bilthoven GESAMP37,
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
1 OECD Work on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials Environment, Health and Safety Division Environment Directorate OECD.
Leading the way; making a difference Latin American Panel November 6, 2013 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
UNEP POPs Negotiations Background Mandate Status Report Relevance to Great Lakes.
Characterizing Chemical in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals December 12, 2006 L. Twerdok, Ph.D, DABT NPPTAC Member Report.
1 Overview of Activities of GESAMP-BWWG (WG34) Jan Linders GESAMP39, New York (USA) April 17, 2012 Overview of Activities of GESAMP-BWWG (WG34)| April.
What does the Administration need? ESA user consultation meeting Dr. Kai Trümpler
Nanomaterials Issue Paper Standard 61 Joint Committee Meeting December, 2013.
1 International/OECD Nanotechnology Activities EPA/DoD Meeting on Nanotechnology March 9, 2007 Jim Willis, EPA/OPPT.
Science - the basis of CODEX work. The Role of Science in Codex Decision-Making Key principles Risk analysis guide Codex stds from development to implementation.
Development and application of guidance documents – industry view Dr Martin Schaefer ECCA-ECPA Conference March 2014.
“Science is the knowledge of consequences, and dependence of one fact upon another. “ Thomas Hobbes ( )
EDSP’s Approach to Test Protocol Validation Office of Science Coordination and Policy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
Nanomaterials classification and labelling – status of work undertaken in GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals)
Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET) By: Adelaida B. Roman Programme Officer Secretariat for EANET UNEP RRCAP.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
PSPC and the BW Convention Tokyo Tripartite Meeting, 2010.
Ballast Water Management DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR
PPSD in specific sectors in Bulgaria - Regional Plans for Development National Programme for Ports Development (2006 – 2015) Vania Grigorova, Jacquelina.
The Future of Yacht Recycling “overview on regulatory compliance” Albert Willemsen ICOMIA Environment Consultant.
Leading the way; making a difference GREEN4SEA Athens Forum April 9, 2014 UPDATE ON BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Leading the way; making a difference Lunchtime Seminar October 10, 2012 Ballast Water Management JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
WP2: Cumulative dietary exposure and hazard assessment Bernadette Ossendorp en Polly Boon.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
Coatings Issues Tripartite Nov08. Key Developments IMO Guideline for Maintenance & Repair of Coatings SOLAS amendment for coating of cargo oil tanks of.
GESAMP (IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection) February 7-8, 2002,
BUG SURVEYS : An Initiation of Transboundary Co- operation Małgorzata Landsberg-Uczciwek Voivodeship Inspectorate of Environmental Protection in Szczecin.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs Hong Kong, 26 November 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Senior Manager - Environment.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs October 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Busan, 21 October.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
Abstract A step-wise or ‘tiered’ approach has been used as a rational procedure to conduct environmental risk assessments in many disciplines. The Technical.
BWS for CME under the BWM Convention
Transboundary movement of used batteries of used lead batteries, in draft Guidelines for environmentally sound management of used lead batteries Jaromír.
REPORT OF THE ELECTRONIC WORKING GROUP UNEP(DEC)/CAR WG.29/INF.12
European Policy Update.
An update on ballast water management
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
CHEMICAL ACCIDENTS Programme
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
MSFD list of criteria elements
Nickel Risk Assessment
Study on non-compliance of ozone target values and potential air quality improvements in relation to ozone.
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
MSFD list of criteria elements
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG E on Priority Substances
Presentation to IPC RoHS Meeting
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
HELCOM Meeting May 2019 OSPAR’s monitoring and assessment in reducing discharges of radioactive substances to the North-East Atlantic Kinson Leonard (Vice.
Some concepts for quantifying emissions of Priority Substances
Presentation transcript:

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship Jan Linders, GESAMP-BWWG chair R&D Forum, Busan, Republic of Korea 23 October 2013

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Contents GESAMP GESAMP-BWWG Stock taking workshop #5 Phase 2 database CHERABS Conclusions and Recommendations

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders GESAMP The Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine environmental Protection an inter-agency advisory body of the United Nations system

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders UN-Organizations IMO FAO UNESCO-IOC WMO IAEA UN-DOALOS UNEP UNIDO UNDP Member Institutions of GESAMP

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders UN SPONSORS FAO IAEA IMO UN-DOALOS UNDP UNEP UNESCO-IOC UNIDO WMO POOL OF EXPERTS NOMINATION OF EXPERTS SPONSORSHIP Executive Committee GESAMP Working group 39 Working group 38 Working group 37 Working group 34 Working group 1 PARTNERS Governments IGO’s Regional organisations Industry Scientific bodies NGO’s Organizational structure

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders = WG34 (Standing, since 2006): Scientific evaluation of the active substances and relevant chemicals in BWMS proposals on the potential for unreasonable risk to the environment, human health, property (i.e. ship) or resources in support of the Ballast Water Convention (IMO; Jan Linders, The Netherlands, chair) Members from different countries: Portugal, Sweden, UK, Japan, Republic of Korea, USA, Canada, Nigeria, selected on the basis of relevant expertise from the GESAMP pool of experts and supported by 1 or 2 consultants GESAMP- BWWG

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Approval Process Active Substance Basic Approval Land based type approval Whole effluent test Shipboard type approval Final approval Final Product YesNo Guideline G8 Procedure G9 Applicant / Administration GESAMP/ MEPC

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Risk Assessment Data evaluation Data set Exposure estimation Emission rates Environmental distribution Exposure levels, con- centrations, intakes Hazard identification Dose-response assessment Toxicity data single species Extrapolation No-effect levels Riskcharacterisation (P)EC/PNEC,MOS, TER

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Environment: Determination of PEC, PNEC and ratio PEC/PNEC –Relevant substances and treated BW –Water and sediment, –Fish, Daphnia and algae –Marine organisms –PBT (incl. CMR) Humans, treated BW –Workers Crew and port state control Unit operations, ventilation, storage, temperature –General public Swimming (oral, dermal and inhalatory route) Consumption of seafood Ship –Corrosion Evaluation of BWMS

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Literature data –From scientific papers –From evaluation by recognized bodies (EPA, EU, OECD, WHO, etc.) Acute and chronic tests –According to internationally accepted guidelines (OECD, EPA, etc.) –For fresh water and marine water environments Evaluation leading to a PNEC –For the active substance(s) –For relevant chemicals, like DBPs –According to accepted Methodology Laboratory toxicity tests with treated BW at Basic Approval Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) tests at Final Approval Information on Effects

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders WET tests 1For the Basic Approval process, the discharge testing should be performed in a laboratory using techniques and equipment to simulate Ballast Water Discharge following treatment by the Active Substance or Preparation 2For Final Approval, the discharge testing should be performed as part of the land ‑ based type approval process using the treated ballast water discharge

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Stock Taking Workshop #5 Structure ERA TRO measurements Temperature effects Corrosion Higher tier testing

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Structure ERA, BA Risk assessment tier 1 PEC/PNEC, incl. near sea PEC/PNEC Using modeling and literature data Risk assessment tier 2 Effects in lab tests- Risk assessment tier 3 Tiers 1 and 2 in agreement? Yes/No ProposalPreference Risk Assessment 1

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Structure ERA, FA Risk assessment tier 1 PEC/PNEC, incl. near sea PEC/PNEC Using modeling and literature data Risk assessment tier 2 Effects in WET tests - Risk assessment tier 3 Tiers 1 and 2 in agreement? Yes/No ProposalPreference Risk Assessment 2

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Approach Apply the quality validity criteria for ecotoxicity tests strictly, if appropriate, relying on expert judgment Literature data are preferred over laboratory- scale ecotoxicity testing at BA WET test results at FA are preferred over literature data Near sea scenario as defined

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders TRO measurements Under current circumstances, the Group recommends TRO monitoring by the DPD colorimetric method as a preferred measuring method for the TRO The Group anticipated that monitoring technologies of TRO by the amperometric method are likely to be developed further by the industry Position may be changed in future

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Temperature effects

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Corrosion Left over from last MEPC Agreement reached between GESAMP- BWWG and NACE International and IPPIC Results: –For systems using TRO as Active Substance no corrosion testing is needed if TRO < 10 mg/L as Cl 2 –Use of artificial seawater is preferred but natural seawater is acceptable –Final text for Methodology of BWWG is agreed

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Higher tier testing Several tests under discussion at BWWG: –Tests on CMR properties –Two algal species at BA and at FA –Inclusion of non-diatom algal test –Preferred algal species is Skeletonema costatum –Organism to remove is Phaeodactylum tricornutum –Introduction of TIE and/or micronucleus test However, not feasible until BWM Convention has entered into force

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Phase II CHERABS 1,2-dichloroethane dibromomethane acetaldehyde formaldehyde bromochloroacetonitrile tetrachloromethane chloral hydrate dalapon dichloroacetonitrile dichloromethane trichloroacetonitrile chloropicrin 1,1-dichloroethane monobromoacetonitrile 1,2-dichloropropane 2,4,6-tribromophenol bromate ion dibromochloroacetic acid dichlorobromoacetic acid 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane 1,1,2-trichloroethane trichloroethene monochloroacetonitrile 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1,1-dibromoethane

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders CHERABS

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Conclusions STWs show useful, yearly maybe too often Clear structure in Environmental Risk Assessment strategy Preferred method for TRO measurements Agreement on corrosion with NACE and IPPIC Phase II of GESAMP-BWWG database operational in 2014 Database available at MEPC66

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Recommendations Applicants to make use of the database at submissions for BA and FA Application of near sea scenario Additional testing proposed if BWM Convention enters into force

The Methodology to Evaluate BWMS for Risks to the Environment, Humans and Ship | Jan Linders Thank you for your kind attention