Understanding and Leveraging MU Stage 2 Optional Transports (SOAP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XDM / XDR Point-to-Point Transmission of Documents
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.
Stage 1 Meaningful Use & Reportable Lab Results
2014 Edition Release 2 EHR Certification Criteria Final Rule.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session esMD Requirements, Priorities and Potential Workgroups – 2:00pm.
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Understanding Patient Engagement in Stage 2 MU: Direct, HIPAA, VDT, and Patient Engagement.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Direct Implementation Perspective 0 Mark Bamberg, Vice President Research & Development MEDfx.
Slide 1 Regional Care Collaborative March 26, 2015.
Supporting Meaningful Use Stage 2 Transition of Care Requirements
NHIN Specifications Richard Kernan, NHIN Specification Lead (Contractor), Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Karen Witting, Contractor to.
Electronic Health Records – Meaningful Use, Certification, and the Regulatory Rulemaking Process June 18, 2015 Lori Mihalich-Levin,JD
Temporary Certification Program: Overview Educational Session August 18, 2010 Carol Bean, PhD Director, Certification Division Office of the National Coordinator.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Discussion of 2015 Ed. NPRM Certification/Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 2, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Deployment Models A. client (no S/MIME) »NHIN-Direct developed security agent »off-the-shelf S/MIME proxy B. client using Native S/MIME »Internet.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group May 17, 2013.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
EsMD Background Phase I of esMD was implemented in September of It enabled Providers to send Medical Documentation electronically Review Contractor.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session Charter Discussion – 9:30am – 10:00am October 18, 2011.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Direct Exchange An Introduction for Providers Engaged in Stage 2 Meaningful Use David.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
Cross Vendor Exchange Testing and Certification Plans April 18, 2013 Meaningful Use Stage 2 Exchange Summit Avinash Shanbhag, ONC.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.
Exchange: The Central Feature of Meaningful Use Stage Meaningful Use and Health Care Innovation Conference Craig Brammer Office of the National.
An XMPP (Extensible Message and Presence Protocol) based implementation for NHIN Direct 1.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
What Did I Work on in Washington? John Glaser April 16, 2010.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
Page 0 10/19/201510/19/2015 Meaningful Use of Health IT: Laboratory Data Capturing and Reporting Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA CDC, PHITPO.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Mandatory Payload = MU2 Consolidated CDA. Qualifier: "leniency" (allowance for null or alternative codes) should be allowed in the following areas of structured.
Submit Quality Measures Sender Onboarding 1 Michigan Health Information Network Shared Services Marty Woodruff – Director, Production and Operations Megan.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Identity Proofing, Signatures, & Encryption in Direct esMD Author of Record Workgroup John Hall Coordinator, Direct Project June 13, 2012.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Presenters Scanned Documents.
HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup Standards and Certification Requirements for Certified EHR Modules Dixie Baker, Chair Walter Suarez,
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments July 22, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
Dynamic/Deferred Document Sharing (D3S) Profile for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting February 1, 2010.
The NC Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Presented by: Rachael Williams, Program Manager Layne Roberts, Data Specialist.
Brief Profile Proposal for 2009/10 presented to the IT Infrastructure Planning Committee.
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
360Exchange (360X) Project 12/06/12. Reminders / announcements 360X Update CEHRT 2014 / MU2 Transition of Care Requirements 1 Agenda.
Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
By: Rebecca Cameron Amie Dennis Amy Everson Debborah Stokes.
Assumptions The base use case is a referral initiated by the PCP, and a response sent back by a specialist The minimal payload requirement is a CCDA structured.
Dynamic/Deferred Document Sharing (D3S) Profile for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting February 1, 2010.
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
ELECTRONIC MAIL SECURITY
ELECTRONIC MAIL SECURITY
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

Understanding and Leveraging MU Stage 2 Optional Transports (SOAP)

2 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 2 SOAP Deep Dive - Agenda Agenda MU2 Overview and Context Applicable Transport Standards for Certification Importance of Optional Standards (SOAP & XDR/XDM for Direct) XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging RTM 1.0 Discussion and Q/A

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule (MU2) Overview and Context Meaningful Use MU2 objectives are the measurable benchmarks that EPs and EHs/CAHs must meet in adopting and using electronic health record (EHR) technology to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments Clinical Care Coordination Privacy & Security Public Health Utilization CQMs Patient Engagement MU2 sets measurable objectives for Eligible Professionals (EPs) or Eligible Hospitals (EHs) / Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) to obtain CMS incentives (CMS 495.6) MU2 objectives are categorized to reflect Health Outcomes Policy Priorities Pursuit of certain objectives within Care Coordination category involve using Certified EHR Technology that implements Transport standards Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 3

2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria: Transitions of Care Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 4 Summary from CMS Final Rule: As part of the Core Set of Measures, EPs, eligible hospitals and CAHs need to “electronically transmit” summary of care record during care transitions. These are further detailed for EPs at §495.6(j)(14)(ii)(A) and eligible hospitals and CAHs at §495.6(l)(11)(ii)(A). These objectives discuss the transport standards that are applicable and the corresponding certification criteria from the ONC S&CC 2014 edition.

2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria: Transitions of Care Cont’d Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 5 Summary from ONC S&CC 2014 edition: § (b)(1) (Transitions of care – receive, display, and incorporate transition of care/referral summaries) § (b)(2) (Transitions of care – create and transmit transition of care/referral summaries) Transport Standards (Base Minimum) Direct Project Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport (Optional Standards – 1) Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport specification and the XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging specification. (Optional Standards – 2) Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP)-Based Secure Transport Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) version 1.0 standard and the XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging specification.

6 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (b)(1) and (b)(2) – Transitions of Care Transport Standards (Base Minimum) Direct Project Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport (Optional Standards – 1) Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport specification and the XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging specification. (Optional Standards – 2) Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP)- Based Secure Transport Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) version 1.0 standard and the XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging specification Edition EHR Certification Criteria: Transitions of Care Cont’d

7 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 7 XDR and XDM for Direct as a Bridge capability Systems (HIE’s, HISP’s, EHR’s) Supporting SOAP endpoints SOAP Endpoint 1 SOAP Endpoint 2 Incoming SMTP + S/MIME Direct Messages Outgoing SMTP + S/MIME Direct Messages Information Exchange requiring conversion from SMTP + S/MIME to SOAP Information Exchange requiring conversion from SOAP to SMTP + S/MIME XDR + XDM for Direct Specification used for conversions

8 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 8 XDR and XDM for Direct as a Bridge capability Cont’d Systems (HIE’s, HISP’s, EHR’s) Supporting Direct endpoints Direct Endpoint 1 Direct Endpoint 2 Incoming SOAP Messages Outgoing SOAP Messages Information Exchange requiring conversion from SOAP to SMTP + S/MIME Information Exchange requiring conversion from SMTP + S/MIME to SOAP XDR + XDM for Direct Specification used for conversions

9 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 9 Importance of the Optional Transport Standards Implementation of the Direct capability will require at a minimum Technical Implementation that consists of conformance to the Direct Applicability statement (STA Implementation) CA and RA Services to manage identities and certificates of Direct end points Policies and processes that facilitate the operational aspects of the overall implementation Vendors providing CEHRT may not always provide CA and RA services Organizations may procure different services from different vendors

10 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 10 Importance of the Optional Transport Standards Cont’d SMTP + S/MIME Messages CEHRT SMTP + S/MIME Messages SOAP + XDR Messages CEHRT with XDR + XDM SOAP + XDR Messages SMTP + S/MIME Messages CEHRT with XDR + XDM Implementing the optional transport standards enables CEHRT To participate in different HIE/HISP eco-systems in an agnostic manner Provides multiple deployment options for organizations Support multiple edge protocol options for organizations

11 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 11 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging Overview XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging specifies Transport Conversion requirements to convert between SMTP and SOAP Packaging Conversions requirements to convert from SMTP + S/MIME packages to XDR/XDM packages How the XD* Metadata should be used for Direct Messaging

12 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 12 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging Overview Cont’d Receivers Senders RFC5322+MIMERFC5322+XDMSOAP+XDR RFC5322+MIME No conversion Receiver expected to be able to handle MIME packages Transport Conversion Metadata created RFC5322+XDM No conversion Receiver expected to be able to handle XDM packages No conversion Transport Conversion Metadata simply transformed SOAP + XDR Transport Conversion Metadata simply transformed Package delivered as XDM Transport Conversion Metadata simply transformed Package delivered as XDM No conversion

13 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 13 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Transport Conversion In order to support Direct Addressing requirements locating the receivers and senders without opening the contents of the message Addressing Headers have been added to the SOAP envelope Example

14 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 14 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Transport Conversion Cont’d SMTP to SOAP ElementSMTP Source FieldsSOAP Destination Fields Addressing ListsSMTP TO command SMTP RCPT FROM command Each TO address is mapped to a corresponding WS Address (Stored in intendedRecipient field), Optionally added to the (direct:to element in SOAP Header) Message ID populate the Message Id WS-Addressing Header elements. Date Populate the submissionTime XD* metadata element of the SubmissionSet

15 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 15 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Transport Conversion Cont’d SOAP to SMTP ElementSOAP Source FieldsSMTP Destination Fields Addressing ListsSOAP Header values (direct:from and direct:to elements) if available. Always available in the XD* Metadata elements SubmissionSet.author SubmissionSet.intendedRecipient SMTP TO command populated from the intendedRecipient field SMTP RCPT FROM command populated from the author field. Message IDMessage ID WS-Addressing headerMessage ID field DateSubmissionTime XD* metadata element from the Submission Set Date field

16 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 16 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Packaging Conversion RFC5322 to XDR Each part of the RFC5322 message converted to a Document Entry Text Part of the should be mapped to classCode Metadata of from LOINC indicating Healthcare communication Base 64 encoded documents should be decoded prior to packaging them with SOAP Create a Single Submission Set with association to each Document Entry

17 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 17 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Packaging Conversion Cont’d Conversions from XDM to XDR Construct a single XDR transaction for each XDM directory containing a metadata file Read and interpret the Metadata.xml file of XDM package Locate all document entries and correlate the URI property of the Document Entry to the corresponding source document Reconstruct the Mime multipart documents using the source Package the source documents as an XDR transaction

18 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 18 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Packaging Conversion Cont’d Conversions from XDR to XDM Extract the documents and SubmitObjectsRequest XML element Construct INDEX.HTM and README.TXT following XDM guidelines Create the IHE_XDM directory with a valid subdirectory containing all the XDR transaction contents Each source file is placed in the directories with a unique file name and package multi-part documents as folders Setup the URI property for each file to point to the appropriate file Serialize the SubmitObjectsRequest XML element as METADATA.xml file Finally package the structure as a zip file

19 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 19 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Using XD* Metadata Metadata is used within XDR transactions to describe the content of the message to enable integration into workflows of CEHRT Metadata conformance Levels Full XDS Metadata as described by the IHE specifications Minimal metadata Conversion process should indicate the level of conformance using the SOAP header element minimal or XDS

20 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 20 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Document Entry Metadata

21 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 21 XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging – Submission Set Metadata

22 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 22 RTM Overview Requirements Traceability Matrix Architecture and Design Documents Reference Implementation and Source Code Demo bundles Test Cases and Test Scripts RTM only specifies Transport, Messaging and Security requirements (TLS, SAML, SOAP Envelope etc) RTM does not specify any content requirements RTM does not require any additional profiles

23 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 23 Discussion and Q/A