January 24, 2013. SA12-PE-04 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this self assessment is to conduct a multi-discipline team review (deep dive) of the Feedwater.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cycle of Performance Getting Back on the Path to Excellence Warning Flags/Precursors Palo Verde: A Case Study Frederic Lake Corrective Action Program.
Advertisements

Bruce Power OPEX Program
CIP Cyber Security – Security Management Controls
INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
1 Component Design Basis Inspection (CDBI) Graydon Strong 6/17/14.
A A A N C N U I N F O R M A T I O N T E C H N O L O G Y : IT OPERATIONS 1 Problem Management Jim Heronime, Manager, ITSM Program Tanya Friehauf-Dungca,
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
Water | Slide 1 of 16 January 2006 Water for Pharmaceutical Use Part 4: Commissioning, Qualification and validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good.
Top Tactics for Maximizing GMP Compliance in Blue Mountain RAM Jake Jacanin, Regional Sales Manager September 18, 2013.
HACCP Training Guide
Industry Nuclear Safety Culture* Process Thomas C. Houghton Director, Safety Focused Regulation Nuclear Energy Institute March 12, 2009 *Nuclear Safety.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Org Name Org Site CMM Assessment Kick-off Meeting Dates of assessment.
Questions/Comments: Ed Smith VVSG and Requirements Management Ed Smith January 13, 2011.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
1 CMBG 2009 PSEG Nuclear Vendor Technical Document Program Deficiencies, Successes, and Cost Savings Presented By: Paul Davis PSEG Nuclear, Engineering.
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
Guidance Notes on the Investigation of Marine Incidents
IRSN STRATEGY TO ASSESS A NEW MAINTENANCE POLICY / Nesebar, Bulgaria Presented by Naoëlle MATAHRI, IRSN.
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
Physical Building Audit Physical Building Audit By; Engr.Dr.Attaullah Shah PhD ( Civil) Engg, MSc Engg ( Strs), BSc Engg ( Gold Medalist),), MBA, MA (
Performance Improvement Metrics JFO-TRNC-METRICJFO-TRNC-METRIC.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
How to prepare for an Authorized Agent Compliance Review Ronald Hebert Water Section Manager Region 10/ Beaumont (409)
How To Build a Testing Project 1 Onyx Gabriel Rodriguez.
Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.
Harris Plant - Heater Drain System Transients INPO ICES # HNP Root Cause Evaluation
ISM at the Savannah River Site Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop Facility Evaluation Board Steve Johnson, Manager Operations Evaluation Department.
1 CDBI Inspection Insights for 2008 Kelly Clayton Senior Reactor Inspector Engineering Branch 1 Region IV.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
© Michael Crosby and Charles Sacker, 2001 Systematic Software Reviews Software reviews are a “quality improvement process for written material”.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program Workshop Information.
Evaluating Configuration Management
Mahindra Satyam Confidential Quality Management System Software Defect Prevention.
2006 CMBG Conference BREAKOUT 1: Component Design Basis Inspection Facilitators: Bill Kline/FENOC Sonya Myers/NMC June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
Pertemuan 14 Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Maintenance Rule Program Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
Standard Design Process Overview
Computer Security: Principles and Practice First Edition by William Stallings and Lawrie Brown Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown Chapter 17 – IT Security.
Certified Software Tester How To Build a Testing Project, Part 1.
NERC Published Lessons Learned Summary
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
NIEP Evaluation PO&A “How-to” Guide and Issue Classification
Lessons Learned in Vendor Oversight
ISO 14001: 2004 Environmental Management Review Presentation
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Technology that lets you Trust your batteries!
TA-V eB Performance Improvement Overview
2012 Operating Experience for Feedwater and Related Systems
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
NRC CM Pilot Inspections Methodology and Results
Using CM to Maintain the Design Basis
Engineering Processes
State of Configuration Management
INPO Configuration Management Activities
ENTERGY FLEET FEEDWATER SYSTEM VULNERABILITY REVIEW
Results of Design Reviews
Facilitated By: John Meyer Rick Harris
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
EQUIPMENT RELIABILITY AT KOEBERG
Jim Powers - Director, Fleet Engineering
Big Data for Nuclear Power Plants Shawn St. Germain – INL
Bioprocess Engineer NOS Functional Map v4
Engineering Processes
Vendor Technical Information
Final Design Authorization
CR-GR-HSE-302 Management of change
Presentation transcript:

January 24, 2013

SA12-PE-04 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this self assessment is to conduct a multi-discipline team review (deep dive) of the Feedwater System following Recommendation #8 from INPO IER Level , Scram Analysis. This evaluation will be performed to validate the effectiveness of station processes to identify, track, and resolve off-normal or low margin conditions in the Feedwater System using the attributes listed below.

INPO Event Report, Level 2, Scram Analysis Recommendation #8 Conduct a multidiscipline team review (deep dive) of at least two systems or components that have been identified as significant contributors to plant scrams in this scram analysis or by station- specific analyses. Attachment 5, Technical Data Analysis, provides a list of scram-significant systems for each NSSS type to assist in determining scram-risk-significant systems. These evaluations will be performed to validate the effectiveness of station processes to identify, track, and resolve off-normal or low margin conditions.

SA12-PE-04 Team Host Manager: Kirk Weir Team Leader: Tod Welsh Team Members: James Alston, STP FW System Engineer, External Peer John Waters, Engineering Specialist III, PSE

Performance Objective 1 Determine whether or not the Feedwater system is or is not being operated as designed. Include current configurations, operator workarounds and burdens, disabled annunciators/alarms, and controls being operated in manual (vs. automatic).

Performance Objective 2 Determine if deficiencies exist in the Feedwater equipment, to include corrective and deficient critical and noncritical backlogs, which lower system reliability.

Performance Objective 3 Verify relevant internal and industry OE and vendor recommendations are reviewed for applicability for the FW system.

Performance Objective 4 Verify FW design changes applicable to off-normal or low margin conditions are addressed.

Performance Objective 5 Verify preventive maintenance work not excessively deferred for FW.

Performance Objective 6 Verify previous corrective actions to resolve Feedwater system and component vulnerabilities to scrams and transients have been effective.

Performance Objective 7 Verify that identified Feedwater issues are appropriately captured in system and component health reports and in the corrective action program

Questions?

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.