Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Roaming Date: 2015-January Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 2013 doc.: IEEE Nov 2013 Dense Apartment Complex Capacity Improvements with Channel selection and Dynamic Sensitivity Control Date:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Doc.: IEEE /1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color
Doc.: IEEE /0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes.
Doc.: IEEE /0543r0 Submission May 2015 TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide.
Doc.: IEEE Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Regime Evaluation Revisited March 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Doc.: IEEE /0319r1 Submission March 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Impact of TPC coupled to DSC for legacy unfairness issue Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1148r1 Consideration of asynchronous interference in OBSS environment Date: Authors: September 2014 Slide 1Koichi.
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1580r0 Submission December 2014 Perspectives on Spatial Reuse in 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE r1 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Regime Evaluation Revisited March 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1228r2 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, Yeungnam Univ./NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Jan 2014 E-Education Analysis HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission June 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Clarification on outdoor deployments Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Mar 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission September 2013 Matthew Fischer et al (Broadcom)Slide 1 CID 205 BSSID Color Bits Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1108r0 Technical Feasibility for LRLP September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, IntelSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r0 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Revisit May 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Doc.: IEEE /0863r0 Submission July 2012 David Halasz, Motorola MobilitySlide 1 Propagation delay and extended range IEEE Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0328r1 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Mar 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1110r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 September 2015 BSS-TXOP NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r4 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission Eduard Garcia-Villegas Drivers of the dynamic CCA adaptation Authors: Nov Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0779r2 Submission June 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Practical Usage Date: 2014-July Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / aa Submission Apr 2009 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Considerations for Statistical Multiplexing Support in OBSS Proposal.
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0294r1 Submission Dynamic Sensitivity Control Channel Selection and Legacy Sharing Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /0645 Submission May 2012 Open-Loop Link Margin Index for Fast Link Adaptation Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell,
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0889r3 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission May 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Implementation Date: 2014-May Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Simulation-based evaluation of DSC in enterprise scenario
TG ax DSC Summary Date: Authors: July 2015 April 2013
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
TG ax Indoor Enterprise Scenarios, Color, DSC and TPC
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
20/40MHz Channel Selection
Stray and Overlapping STAs
Stray and Overlapping STAs
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Roaming Date: 2015-January Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission 13/1012r4 Dynamic Sensitivity Control 13/1290r1 Dynamic Sensitivity Control 13/1487r2 Dense Apartment Complex DSC and CH Select 14/0045r2 E-Education 14/0058r1 Pico Cell 14/0294r2 DSC, Channel Selection and legacy sharing 14/0297r0 DSC Description (Initial proposed Text) 14/0328r2 Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations 14/0635r1 DSC Implementation 14/0779r0 DSC Practical Usage Previous DSC Presentations by Author Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission DSC basics –Shameless Publicity –What it is –Fixed CCA vs DSC –Setting the DSC Margin –Algorithm for setting RX sensitivity/CCA DSC and Roaming –7 cell frequency re-use –Roaming –‘Good’ roaming algorithm –DSC and roaming Prompted by 14/1416r1 “ Observed protocol violations caused by DSC with roaming STAs” which could be misread as it is based on fixed CCA thresholds and no frequency re-use. Contents Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Shameless Publicity DSC enables frequency re-use DSC can increase the area throughput by significant amounts –296% improvement for Single Apartment Complex –412% improvement for Double Apartment Complex –800% improvement for Cell Structure network DSC used in conjunction with channel selection can eliminate OBSS completely in dense apartment scenario DSC does not require any hardware changes and is simple to implement DSC can improve performance for all PHYs DSC does not degrade the range of a STA Dynamic Sensitivity Control - DSC Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission DSC Scheme where STA measures the RSSI of the AP Beacon (R dBm) Sets RX Sensitivity Threshold at (R – M) dBm, where M is the “Margin” –Example: STA receives Beacon at -50dBm, with Margin = 20dB STA sets RX Sensitivity Threshold to -70dBm. Also set an Upper Limit, L, to Beacon RSSI to cater for case when STA is very close to AP. –Need to ensure that all the STAs in the wanted area do see each other. Hence if one STA very close to AP, then it could set RX Sensitivity too high. –Example: STA receives Beacon at -15dBm, L = -30dBm, M = 20dBm STA sets RX Sensitivity Threshold at = -50dBm (NOT –35dBm) If the RX sensitivity threshold is higher than the CCA Threshold then CCA Threshold = RX Sensitivity Threshold Graham Smith, SR Technologies Jan 2015 Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission It is important to note the difference between DSC and simply setting the CCA Threshold or the RX sensitivity to a higher value The chance of hidden STAs in the home network is greatly reduced The DSC STA, maintains full range. The sensitivity will move towards lowest value as the STA moves away from the AP See next Slide DSC maintains full sensitivity Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Hidden STAs – Fixed CCA vs DSC Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 7 Jan 2015 DSC Note NO hidden STAs

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 8 The DSC Margin is set to be: 1.Large enough to provide adequate SNR –The Margin is the effective SNR for the DSC STA. Allows simultaneous transmission by another STA if received signal strength is less than –The Margin sets the effective minimum PHY Rate 2.Large enough to account for sudden changes in reception of Beacon signal –If STA goes behind obstruction, RSSI will drop. If the drop is higher than the Margin, then the AP Beacon is lost. Suggested Margin is in the order of 20dB to 25dB. Setting the DSC Margin

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 9 The Beacon RSSI will vary as the STA moves, for example. Therefore, the calculation of the CCA threshold or Receive Sensitivity is a continuous one. The algorithm outline is: 1.Start a timer T 2.Record RSSI of each Beacon Check is > Upper Limit, if so RSSI = Upper Limit 3.Calculate average RSSI Use a moving average such that last reading has higher influence 4.Check if T > Update period (e.g. 1 second) No, continue Yes, Convert the Averaged RSSI to CCA Threshold –CCA Threshold = Ave RSSI – Margin. In addition, check if a Beacon or consecutive Beacons are missed, and if so decrement the average RSSI by a set amount Algorithm for setting CCA/RX sensitivity

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 SubmissionGraham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 10 Jan 2015

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 SubmissionGraham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 11 Jan 2015 In 13/1290r1 it was shown that using DSC allows a 7 segment cell pattern. Hence, a 40MHz channel in each cell. Improvement of 7.58 in capacity with DSC We now look at roaming

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 SubmissionGraham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 12 Jan 2015

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 SubmissionGraham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 13 Jan 2015

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission A ‘Good’ Simple Roaming Algorithm looks like: A STA scans to look for APs and associated RSSIs (and load?) –Scan frequency is inversely related to RSSI of AP i.e. The weaker the beacon, the more frequent the scan A STA will attempt to roam based upon Existing RSSI and Difference in RSSIs If existing RSSI is good, less incentive to roam, but should roam if a large differential is present – i.e. much closer to another AP, so roam. If existing RSSI is low, then good incentive to roam and will roam for any positive differential. A ‘Bad’ Roaming Algorithm “application is working, why roam? – RSSI must be good enough” “oh-oh weak signal....where the heck is that other AP?.... too late!” Roaming - Basics Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 14

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Sensitivity, 20MHz 64-QAM -72 to -74dBm 16 QAM-79 to -82dBm QPSK-86 to -88dBm BPSK-90 to -91dBm Hence, a basic roam decision scheme may look like: RSSIClassScan Diff >-72dBm Good signal 10 sec > 10 (or 6 ) dB >-82dBm 6 (or 3) dB >-90dBm 3 (or 2) dB Notes: 10dB represents about half the distance. Hopefully, differential in practice is inverse of what is shown – gets larger as RSSI drops Scan time is related to the distance and drop in RSSI that may be covered in between scans. Data rate drops quickly with RSSI. RSSI is being constantly measured by DSC General Roaming Scheme Outline Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 15

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission RSSIs relatively high in the cell. Hence, scan time and RSSI difference decisions will be high. –In our example STA at edge is still at -50dBm. (Scan every 10 seconds, roam if RSSI > 10dB) At edge of cell, STA is half way between APs. As it moves into other cell, RSSI difference increases. Roaming between Cells Example Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 16 Cell edge 10dB AP1AP2AP1 AP2 If STA is using a ‘good’ roaming algorithm it should roam (Note: Walking, 10 seconds is 44 feet. Hence scan time 10secs is reasonable) 10dB

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Using a ‘good’ roaming algorithm, the STA should roam when distance to AP1 is about 2.5 x as far as distance to AP2. As STA wanders into the next cell, it may experience sharing with STAs in the closest part of the closest cell with same channel, but this is minimal Roaming Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 17 So roaming should not be a problem. BUT, needs AP to set DSC limit beyond the “10dB Differential” limit

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Roaming with DSC Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 18 The AP needs to set its threshold to equivalent to 1.5r to 2r distance. (UL –M) In our example -60dBm. DSC STA knows the UL and M and knows when approaching AP boundary. STA could use this in its roaming decision. STA should roam at or before RSSI = (UL-M-6) dBm (UL-M-10) dBm is outer limit of cell STA A should roam

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission DSC is a scheme that promotes good frequency re-use –Ideal is 7 cell re-use It can be used when optimum re-use is not used so as to reduce the interference on the DSC STA. Same criteria apply. –The AP must set its threshold to cover most of the next cell so as to allow the STA to roam. –Upper Limit must be set to provide same coverage for a STA close to AP. STA threshold = UL - M –Hence, (UL – M) is also the correct threshold setting for the AP 14/297r0 contains text for DSC and proposes DSC Parameter Set element, DSC STA therefore knows the AP threshold. Could add a “roam” field for flexibility. DSC and 1 or 3 cell re-use pattern Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 19 Element IDLengthDSC Margin DSC Upper Limit octets 1111

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission DSC is ‘dynamic’ only for the STA In a managed network, the AP advertises the Upper Limit and Margin –Sets Margin to dB –Sets Upper Limit such that (UL – M) is effective RSSI for 1.5 – 2 times radius of desired cell coverage DSC STAs assume that the AP threshold is UL – M STAs should roam when ~10dB differential for strong RSSI (which it is when using DSC) APs could tell a STA to roam (BSS Transition Management) when detected RSSI is outside desired cell radius (about UL – M + 6dBm) Conclusions Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 20

doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Used intelligently, DSC can aid the STA to roam and enable good cell structure topology. Conclusion Jan 2015 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 21